AC 2012-4805: ASME VISION 2030’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ME-CHANICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Allan T. Kirkpatrick P.E., Colorado State UniversityDr. Scott Danielson P.E., Arizona State University, Polytechnic Scott Danielson is the Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Technology and Innova- tion at Arizona State University. Before assuming that role, he had been the Interim Chair of Engineering Department and the Chair of the Engineering Technology Department. He has been active in ASEE in the Mechanics Division and the Engineering Technology Division. He has also been active in ASME, being awarded the 2009 Ben C. Sparks Medal for excellence in mechanical engineering technology education, serving as a
AC 2012-4360: IMPROVING UPON BEST PRACTICES: FCAR 2.0Dr. John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is a professor of computer engineering and computer science at Ohio Northern Univer- sity. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, first-year engineering instruction, and the pedagog- ical aspects of writing computer games. Estell is an ABET Program Evaluator, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon.Dr. John-David S. Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder received all of his degrees (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) in mechanical
AC 2012-3015: ROBOTIC FOOTBALL: AN INTER-UNIVERSITY DESIGNCOMPETITION EXPERIMENTDr. John-David S. Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder received all of his degrees (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. He is professor and Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Ohio Northern University, Ada, Ohio. He has previously served as Proposal Engineer and Proposal Engineer- ing Supervisor at Grob System, Inc., and Software Engineer at Shaum Manufacturing, Inc. He has held a number of leadership and advisory positions in various entrepreneurial ventures. He is currently a KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network) Fellow, and has served as a Faculty Fellow
assist with this goal, students were encouraged, early in the term, to discover reallife examples of mechanisms with an aim to promote curiosity and foster interest in learning.Throughout the term, a design project was introduced which required students not only to applyfundamentals of kinematics and dynamics, but also to exercise skills in teamwork, collaborativelearning and communication. A student survey was conducted at the end of the course and theefficacy of the approach was assessed.IntroductionThe University of British Columbia‟s Okanagan campus was established in 2005 in Kelowna,British Columbia. The School of Engineering offers three undergraduate programs: CivilEngineering, Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. In 2010
⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠0 = m& (hi − he ) or hi = he Page 25.228.7 • • • ∑T Qj + m(si − se) ) + σ cvdScv = dt j j• • •m(si − s e ) + σ cv = 0 or s e = si + σ cv • mWe have noticed that many students write the equation for the first law of
, Page 25.100.2students need to have an advisor from their respective program. The elements emphasized andadopted to promote project evaluation practices include periodic review of journal/log bookentries, presentations, periodic milestone reports, at least weekly meetings with the advisor(s),and the final design report.IntroductionDue to its culminating nature, the senior design project course is probably the most significantexperience of the undergraduate engineering students (1). In the process the students apply whatthey have learned in their undergraduate course work; develop their communication,interpersonal, project management, and design skills; and learn about the product developmentprocess. Students also get an understanding of the
in appropriate subsequent analyses. From the Y2 data, we observed no significantdifferences at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) between any student sections’cumulative pre-test score, and thus, we include this data in the appropriate analyses in Section 4. When looking atindividual parts of the pre-test, however, we did find a significant difference between section 1 andsection 4 on the Lab 5 portion of the pre-test (p-value = 0.04), with section 4 having a significantlylower average on this portion of the material. Because of this, student section 4’s data was omittedin the Lab 5 analyses for Y2. 4 Results 4.1 Educational Benefit from Course The first question we sought to answer was whether or not the students learned and
be written in vector form as ∇ ∙ u ൌ 0, (1) ଵ ሺu ∙ ∇ሻu ൌ − ∇ + ߥ∇ଶ ܝ. (2) ఘIn Eqs. (1) and (2), commonly known as continuity and Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations, u ൌሺݑ, ݒ, ݓሻ is the three-dimensional Cartesian velocity vector of components ݑ, ݒ,andݓ, in thedirections ݔ, ݕ,andݖ, respectively; is the pressure, ߩ is the fluid density, and ߥ is the kinematicviscosity. The solution of these equations is complex and difficult because (a) the momentumequation has
presenter are TBPsmooth and effectiveUse of Presentation Media - Effectiveness of use of media (e.g., graphics, MEDCAD models, handouts, video clips, prototype, physical mockups) andtheir formats (e.g., font, color, units)Questions and Answers - Questions are answered accurately and concisely QAif the presenter(s) knows the answer, or handled appropriately if thepresenter(s) doesn’t know the answer, or taken as opportunity to delvedeeper into the topicAdherence to Time Limit - Presentation delivered within the allowed time TLlimitProblem Definition - A clearly stated design problem definition is PDEFpresented (e.g. what need(s) does this design meet, what are
Progress. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Page 25.442.14 Exhibition & Conference held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 1-4 November 2010.4. Ng, J.M.K., Gitlin, I., Stroock, A.D. & Whitesides, G.M. Components for integrated poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic systems. Electrophoresis 23, 3461-3473 (2002).5. Xia, Y.N. & Whitesides, G.M. Soft lithography. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 37, 551-575 (1998).6. Whitesides, G.M., Ostuni, E., Takayama, S., Jiang, X.Y. & Ingber, D.E. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 3
. Page 25.119.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Versatile Platform for Teaching MechatronicsAbstract Mechatronics courses typically include a project which allows the students to integrateand apply their knowledge in the design, construction and testing of a real mechatronic system.At one extreme, these projects can be free-form. The students think of an original device andthen deal with all aspects of engineering development from parts procurement to final testing ofthe full-up system. At the other end of the spectrum students are given prebuilt systems andmust program them to perform certain task(s). These often take the form of small mobile robotsthat are run in a
a strain gage based scale called SqueezoMeter designed to measure theapplied squeezing or pushing force. It is made of an S-shaped sensing element equipped with 4-strain gages, and two rectangular aluminum plates to apply the force.The second experiment, HuggoMeter, consists of two parallel ¼ inch aluminum beams mountedon two 8.5 x 16 x 1 in hard boards that are 1.25 inches apart. Mounted on the constant bendingportion of these beams are 4 strain gages forming a 4-active arm Wheatstone bridge. Studentscan hug the HuggoMeter and apply forces to it. The induced strains are measured through a dinrail mounted signal conditioner and A/D module, converted to the applied force and displayed onthe PC screen.These experiments, while entertaining and
tool.5 ConclusionsIn this paper, the use of impromptu design exercises in an introductory mechanical engineeringcourse was presented. These exercises were used to introduce three design ideas: 1) the designprocess, 2) brainstorming and decision making, and 3) optimization. The developed exerciseswere presented along with details pertaining to implementation and preliminary evaluationresults. Evaluation results showed that the impromptu design exercises had an impact (at least inthe student’s perception) on their engineering design education.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Villanova Institute for Teaching and Learning (VITAL)for supporting this project.References[1] C. Reidsema, S. Wilson, and C. Netherton. “Impromptu
. After the system properties are set correctly, thesimulation is run and the links are set into motion. The system can then be analyzed using thecharting functions available in Working Model. The top graph shows the angle of rotation of linkAB with respect to time and the bottom graph displays the velocity of point C with respect totime. When link AB is exactly vertical (360° in this simulation) the velocity of point B is 5 ft/s inthe negative i-direction. The students can then look on the velocity chart to determine thevelocity of point C at the instant in time that AB is exactly vertical. This laboratory gave thestudents an interesting example of how to solve a real world problem using simple motionsoftware. The students had to develop a
, its relevance in engineering and engineeringeducation cannot be underestimated, especially when having today´s energy andenvironmental concerns in mind.Despite the importance of the subject, it has been considered as “dry and abstract” bystudents 1. One reason might be that the subject has become more and more difficult to relateto its applications –the fundamentals principles are the same as for 150 years ago, but theapplications become more and more refined due to technological developments andinnovations. If so, it is altogether not surprising that students find engineeringthermodynamics abstract, being separated from its applications – this might be devastating forthe students’ interest and possibility to learn.An increase in student
AC 2012-4238: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH: DOES IT PROMOTEGRADUATE EDUCATION? CREATING FUTURE GRADUATE STUDENTSIN ENGINEERINGDr. Timothy M. Hodges P.E., Virginia Military Institute Timothy M. Hodges is a professor of mechanical engineering and Charles S. Luck, Jr., ’20, Institute Professor.Dr. Elizabeth White Baker, Wake Forest University Page 25.1391.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Undergraduate Research: Does it promote graduate education? Creatingfuture graduate students in engineering.AbstractThe Undergrad Only Colleges Mechanical Engineering Department would like to
modeling is used to highlight the hidden game inclassroom problems relating to the first law. Also, students collaborate with each other to assistin understanding of first law problems. Finally, the students are given specific feedback from theinstructor and classmates to help students understand how to make judgments about heat transfer,work, and energy in first law problems. Page 25.115.13Figure 9: Alignment of content, assessment, and pedagogyReferencesAnderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Longman Pub
injection water drained from thecylinder tended to overflow the FWT and that the temperature in the FWT of one of Smeaton’sengine was 134oF.methodologyThe general model that applies to a heat engine operating a pump is shown in Fig. 6. Figure 6 - Pumping Engine Efficiency Relationships Page 25.1357.8The notation convention used herein is that “dotted” terms indicate the time rate of the extensivevariable. The fuel energy rate ( E ) is the product of the mass flow rate of the fuel ( m ) and itsheating value (HV). The thermal power ( Q s ) supplied to the cylinder is the product of the massflow rate of the steam ( m stm
that are present in a number of core educationtheories. The observations of student gaps and repair/remediation issues are the everyday, reallife exemplars of what happens when there is a mismatch between principles of theory andpractice. The learning cycles approach, first articulated in the late 1950’s and 1960’s by RobertKarplus and J. Myron Atkin (physics/elementary science education) and independently Page 25.1160.3developed by Chester Lawson (biology education) (Lawson, 1989), is one of these corephilosophies which informs this research. Karplus and Atkin based their Learning Cyclesapproach on observation and Piaget’s work on
program: Strategies and experiences,” Huffman, S., Albritton, S., Wilmes, B. (editors). Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. She maintains research and publishing tracks in nascent interdisciplinary trust concepts, eLearning, and innovative teaching, learning in fields of statistics and research methods, engineering, medical fields, and assessment methods.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech C. T. Amelink is currently serving as the Research Analyst and Assessment Specialist for the Dean’s Office, College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. Previously, she worked on assessment initiatives with the Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning, Division of Student Affairs, and the Center for Excellence in Undergraduate
the importance of validation, however they can be improved to help thestudents learn self-teaching of engineering software. For this reason, the exercises will beupdated for continued use in future courses. The solutions to the five exercises may also act astutorials for the other faculty in the department. Page 25.604.8V. Bibliography 1. Garrett, S. L. (1996) The Polk County Courthouse: a $47 Million Iaq Disaster. Presented at 1996 ASEE National Conference. 2. Schlager, N. Breakdown: Deadly Technological Disasters (Visible Ink Press, 1995). 3. Petroski, H. Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in
both of these problems (i.e., numerical methods in two-dimensional heat conduction and transient heat conduction through semi-infinite mediums) have traditionally been challenging for students and an objective of the FE learning modules is to provide an alternative insight for students that will ideally make these topics easier to understand. The problems for each learning module are summarized in Figs. 1 and 2. The steady-state problem (Fig. 1) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Two-Dimensional, Steady-State Conduction”) of Incropera et al.’s textbook6, while the transient, semi-infinite medium problem (Fig. 2) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Transient Heat Conduction
of the wind tunnel is 25m/s (Sub-Sonic Flow).• The flow quality allows for basic observation of fluid flow phenomena.• Lab experiments that aid aerodynamics or fluid mechanics courses are designed and developed. These labs may include fluid flow development, boundary layer visualization, laminar/ turbulent flow visualization, flow around a cylinder, sphere or a wing of infinite length, and etc.The design constraints are as follows:• The design fits in the existing lab space; the length is not to exceed 3 meters.• Cost to manufacture a prototype of the successful design is one-tenth in comparison to a commercially available device roughly priced $30,000.• Flow Quality Standards enforced in the working section: o
: Learning Anywhere, Anytime,’ Journal of Engineering Education, pp 131-146. (2.) Mulligan. B, Coll, B, and Corcoran, G, 2007, ‘A Lean Approach to Engineering Education Online,’ International Symposium for Engineering education, Dublin City University, Ireland. [Online]. Available: http://doras.dcu.ie/447/1/Mulligan-corsoran_ISEE07.pdf (3.) Weaver, W. , Anderson, C. , Naber, J. , Keith, J. , Worm, J., Beard, J. , Chen, B. , and Hackney, S., 2011, ‘An interdisciplinary program for education and outreach in hybrid & electric drive vehicle engineering at Michigan Technological University,’ 7th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, (4.) Watson, J.L., Bibel, G., Ebeling, K., Erjavec, J., Salehfar, H., and
subject of on-goingefforts.Bibliographic Information1. McDonald, D., “Data Acquisition in a Vehicle Instrumentation Course,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.2. Zhang, Y., S. Cui, Y. Wang, and C. Akujuobi, “Taking Action: Enhancing Engineering Technology Laboratories with LabVIEW-Based Graphical Development Tools,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.3. Lohani, V., P. Delgoshaei, and C. Green, “Integrating LabVIEW and Real-Time Monitoring into Engineering Instruction,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.4. Delgoshaei, P., V. Lohani, and C. Green, “Introducing Dataflow Programming in a
and Compression," The Physics Teacher, pp. 54-55, 2002.[6] David Rosengrant, "Impulse-Momentum Diagrams," The Physics Teacher, pp. 36-39, 2011.[7] James E. Court, "Free-Body Diagrams Revisited – II," The Physics Teacher, pp. 490-495, 1999.[8] James E. Court, "Free-Body Diagrams Revisited — I," The Physics Teacher, pp. 427-433, 1999.[9] A. Collins, J. Brown, and S. Newman, "Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics," Hillsdale, NJ, 1987. Page 25.1464.9
., “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s So Darn Hard).” New York Times, 6 November 2011. Available at http://nytimes.com/2011/11/06/education/edlife/why-science-majors-change-their- mind-its-just-so-darn-hard.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&hp. Page 25.595.13 4. Lowman, J. 1995 Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. Jossey-Bass Publishing, pp. 232-236.5. Waters, C., Taher, A., Messiha, S., Oneyear, S. 2006. “Preparation, Attendance and Note-taking, How to Promote Student Buy-In.” Proceedings of The American Society of Engineering Education, Chicago, Illinois, 18-21 June.6. Daniel, J. W., “Survival
students inattendance.The approach used in this case varied over a three-term period, providing insight into whichaspects of the peer-tutoring process led to different observable effects on the students’performance. Additionally, the professor(s) teaching the same class each term varied, allowingfor insight into how the professor may influence the structure and content of the tutoringsessions.During the first term, a single peer tutor was employed by the university’s SARC to providelearning assistance to engineering students taking MECH-320: Thermodynamics. The tutor’sschedule was posted, however the professor made no commitment to the process, not even goingout of the way to mention in class that a peer tutor was available for consultation. As
Material Density Thermal Heat Thermal 3 (g/cm ) Conductivity Capacity Diffusivity (W/m-K) (J/g-K) (m2/s) Maple 0.6 0.14 1.3 1.8x10-7 Stainless Steel 304 8.0 16.2 0.5 4.05x10-6 Zinc 7.14 116 0.39 4.17x10-5 Tin 7.365 67 0.21 4.33x10-5 Aluminum 6061-T6 2.7 167 0.896 6.9x10-5 Graphite 1.76 120 0.71 9.6x10-5 Copper
Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Saad, M., Abu-Lebdeh, T., Pai, D., Waters, C., 2007, “Recitation in core engineering mechanics courses: Implications for retention and student performance”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.5. Rais-Rohani, M., Walters, A., Vizzini, A. 2010, “ Emporium based redesign of statics: An innovative approach to enhance learning and reduce costs”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.6. Mackey, K., Freyberg, D., 2010, “The effect of social presence on affective and cognitive learning in an international engineering course taught via distance learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, v 99, n 1, pp 23-34.7. Sorby, S. A., Vilmann, C., 2011, “Going