in P-12 career and technical educa- tion for the Illinois State Board of Higher Education/Illinois State University; research and evaluation for the Illinois Assessment and Accountability Project (Illinois State Board of Higher Education/University of Illinois); and the Entrepreneurial Leadership in STEM Teaching and Learning (Project EnLiST - Na- tional Science Foundation/University of Illinois). Her research focus and area of expertise is personal development, sustainable transformative learning environments, and curricular change. She has worked with curriculum/programs in a variety of areas, including teaching centers, engineering, business, honors, national scholarship advising, animal sciences, human
University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s AD- VANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the web- site http://feministengineering.org/. She is interested in creating new models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was awarded a CAREER grant in 2010 for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using
Society of Civil Engineers for curriculum redesign supporting the civil engineering body of knowledge. He is actively engaged in developing strategies for enhancing the STEM education pipeline in Texas and nationally and has testified before the Texas Senate Higher Education Committee in that regard. He served on a committee of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to develop a statewide articulation compact for mechanical engineering and currently chairs the council for developing articulation compacts in other engineering disciplines. He also served on the Texas State Board of Education committee preparing the standards for career and technical education.Dr. Mary Eileen Smith, Texas Higher Education Coordinating
for future research.1. IntroductionGraduate students attending large, research-intensive institutions of higher education are oftenprovided departmental funding as teaching assistants (TAs). This is especially true in the case ofhigh enrollment and service courses such as English, mathematics, foreign languages andintroductory courses in disciplines such as psychology and sociology. Although the specificresponsibilities of TAs vary among institutions and even between departments within the sameinstitution, many graduate students serving in these positions are asked to deliver content andeven serve as primary instructors1. These teaching responsibilities are important to graduatestudent development as individuals who intend to pursue careers
, employers and managers are unable to give completefeedback that satisfies employees need to understand their current successes and shortcomings.7In the STEM research community, fellow researchers must give feedback on most papers prior topublication, which means the STEM community could not disseminate research withouteffective feedback.8 Ensuring that our STEM educators, professionals, and researchers arecapable of effective feedback is crucial for the continuing success of the STEM community.Due to the need for informal and formal feedback in STEM careers, it is vital to teach futureSTEM professionals how to develop and give effective feedback during their undergraduateeducation. Teaching peer feedback enables students to do more than just give
Virginia Tech Engineering Communication Center. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, commu- nication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foun- dation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design, writing across the curriculum in statics courses, and a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is
educators convince the need forincorporating CFD course in the curriculum of undergraduate engineering education. Thus,number of universities that develops and implements a CFD course for undergraduate andgraduate engineering students is growing every year, especially for mechanical, civil,biomedical, energy, and aerospace engineering disciplines 2, 3, 4, 5. Incorporating a CFD into thefluid curriculum will not only benefit to have better understanding and visualization offundamental fluid dynamics and prepare them for higher studies and research but also support toachieve their short and long term career goals. Furthermore, it is felt that an early introduction toCFD may inspire the students to take advanced fluid mechanics courses or go to
students for engineering practice, the importance of writing isoften emphasized. The need for improved writing skills is a regular finding in surveys ofemployers and graduates.1,2,3 Practicing engineers note the importance of communication skills,including writing, for advancing their careers.4 Accreditation criteria since 2000 have alsoreflected the importance of writing.Within civil engineering practice, writing takes on an even more important role than in manybranches of engineering. There is a vast array of writing behind any civil engineering project –qualifications proposals, cost proposals, scoping notes, technical memos, design reports, site visitreports, reports for regulatory agencies, e-mails among the team, plan sheet notes and
about the alumni’s career paths (for example, full-time employment orgraduate school), the importance of certain skills and abilities in their current jobs, how wellprepared they perceive themselves to be in these skills and abilities, and how satisfied they werewith their engineering education3. Page 25.1062.3This study is part of a larger, multi-year study that seeks to understand the undergraduateengineering experience and how the University’s College of Engineering is preparingundergraduates for their future careers. To do this, quantitative and qualitative methods will beused to study both alumni’s and current undergraduates’ experiences
and courses in the areas of renewable energy and power system. This is becausethere is and will be demand of power engineers knowledgeable in renewable energy and conversiontechnologies. Aside from the field of power engineering, energy industries are also looking for engineerswith renewable energy background because of the predicted high growth in the renewable electric energyand the public interest in cleaner energy. Most engineering students start their professional career rightafter they finish the undergraduate degree, and by providing a background in renewable energy will helpthem to research alternative energy options in their perspective professional career. Engineeringprograms around the world are trying to satisfy this need by
Society for Engineering Education, 2009.[6] Ernest T. Smerdon, “An Action Agenda for Engineering Curriculum Innovation,” presented at the 11th IEEE-USA Biennial Careers Conference, Nov. 2000, San Jose, CA, pp. 1-10.[7] Earl Dowell, Eleanor Baum, John McTague, “The Green Report - Engineering Education for a ChangingWorld,” American Society for Engineering Education, 1994.[8] Review of Engineering, et al., Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future, Institution ofEngineers, Australia, 1996.[9] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the NewCentury, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.[10] Barry Johnson, Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable
AC 2012-3670: ENGINEERING FUTURE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS: IN-CORPORATION OF PROCESS INTENSIFICATION CONCEPTS INTOTHE UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of chemical engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan. 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She re- ceived her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Tech- nological University in 1998. Minerick’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER Award and the
AC 2012-3498: ETHICAL AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF BIOMET-RIC TECHNOLOGIES: IMPLEMENTATION IN ENGINEERING CUR-RICULUMDr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Rigoberto Chinchilla, PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University, is an Associate Professor of Ap- plied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality design, Biometric and Computer Security and Ethics, Clean Technolo- gies and Automation. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright Scholar and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and university committees at EIU and has been awarded several research grants in his career. Dr. Chinchilla Publications in
course addresses the Mechanical Engineering Program Objective to prepare some of ourgraduates to enter graduate programs and succeed in obtaining graduate degrees at the Mastersand/or PhD level. The MS degree program in mechanical engineering is focused on enabling aresearch-oriented career path for those of our students who are so inclined. Some non-dualdegree MEng students wishing to change their status to MS also take the course to help them puttogether a successful proposal.Students enrolled in this course are expected to perform work independently, with minimalguidance, and with utmost attention to professional standards and conduct. Students taking thiscourse will be expected to perform at the level of a practicing BS mechanical engineer
emphasis on stimulating interest in STEM disciplinestowards increasing the number of underrepresented minorities and women in theses areas. Thespecific goals of the INSTRUCT program are to:1. Increase and stimulate the participation of underrepresented students in STEM disciplines2. Retain underrepresented students in STEM disciplines3. Foster the integration of NASA content into undergraduate education and training4. Promote the career preparedness of undergraduates by integrating NASA content based learning techniques throughout the STEM curricula5. Increase the number of students going to graduate school in NASA relevant technology areas6. Increase student and faculty exposure to NASA research and technologies and their relevance to
. To instill an interest for the engineering profession as a O7 42% 26% career objective. Reflect on practical and theoretical engineering exercises that cross disciplines to capture my imaginations regarding future academic and professional O8 26% 26% engineering activities. Gain an introduction to engineering design as a team activity and as a major element within the engineering O9 26% 32% profession
Page 25.624.6are attached. All players are primarily remote controlled, though some advanced programmingenables multiple actions through a single button press. Figure 4: Scenes from Robotic Football competition.13 At right, the passing robot is discussed.Through this event, Notre Dame aims to “introduce a new intercollegiate competition that will befun for all spectators and demonstrate the challenges and excitement of engineering.”14 Oneproject organizer notes that the “participants will use the skills they acquired during the projectduring their careers … to develop, among other things, intelligent prostheses, biomedicaldevices, and electromechanical systems in general.”15Students from ONU observed the game in 2010 and were first
AC 2012-4538: FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATION USING CELLULARAUTOMATADr. Gunter Bischof, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria Throughout his career, Gnter Bischof has combined his interest in science, engineering and education. He studied physics at the University of Vienna, Austria, and acquired industry experience as development engineer at Siemens Corporation. Currently, he teaches Engineering Mathematics and Fluid Mechan- ics at Joanneum University of Applied Sciences. His research interests focus on vehicle aerodynamics, materials physics, and engineering education.Mr. Christian Steinmann, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria Christian Steinmann has an engineer degree in mathematics
tunnel test model.They then learned the process to physically countermeasure that model to further reduce aerodrag inside of a wind tunnel. At that point we were able to discuss feasibility issues andconstraints that currently influence automobile design and aero countermeasures. We felt it wasa great real world learning experience for these university students and demonstrated twodifferent paths they could choose for a future career. Their overall design and individual ideaswere unique and the results were above the expectation of our company. They worked as a teamin design, construction and problem solving.”The student team felt that this project was a great experience not only as a capstone design-buildproject but in gaining an appreciation
early in his career, Caponigro was the founding director of the Robinson Community Learning Center, a 10-year-old educational partnership between the university and the northeast neighborhood of South Bend. In that capacity, he was the PI on community-based projects through the Department of Justice, the Small Business Administration, and HUD’s Office of University Partnerships, where he also served as a reviewer. Caponigro has co-authored articles in Christian Higher Education and the Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. Page 25.707.1 c American Society for
Department of Education (ED) Grant 9031C080057-09. Any opinions, findings andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of NSF and/or Department of Education.Bibliography [1] Cisco Academy, (2009), “Master a Language that Increases Your Career Potential”, Cisco Academy Report,[2] Council of University Presidents: New Mexico Universities, (2011), “Performance Effectiveness Report”, NewMexico, USA. [3] Fleming, L., Engerman, K., and Williams, D., (2006), “Why Students Leave Engineering: The unexpectedbond”, Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition,Chicago, IL.[4] Fujinoki, H., Christensen, K.J., and Rundus, D
fall semester.The remaining sections of the paper are organized as follows. In section II, we briefly describethe course and its objective. Section III presents course design and detail schedule of activitiesduring the residency week. In section IV, we present a case study on an animal healthcaredistribution company from a recent class. Section V describes the key findings of the project. Insection VI, we conclude the paper with some remarks from students’ survey.II. Course DescriptionThis is a project-based course designed to enhance students’ experience in quantitative researchand analysis. The main objective of this course is to provide students with sufficient exposureand training to perform applied research in their post graduation career
AC 2012-4066: INTEGRATING INFORMATION LITERACY IN ENGI-NEERING: LIBRARIANS/FACULTYMs. Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University Mary L. Strife is Director of the Evansdale Library at West Virginia University and Senior Engineering Librarian since 2002. Her career covers almost 30 years as a Science or Engineering Librarian at Cornell, University of Rochester, and SUNY, Utica/Rome. She is a member of ALA, ACRL, and SLA.Robin A. M. Hensel Ed.D., West Virginia University Robin Hensel is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the West Virginia University Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources. She holds a B.S. in mathematics from Wheaton College IL, an M.A. in mathematics from SUNY
real-world problems that are interdisciplinary in nature typicallyhave limited exposure, at an early undergraduate level, to tools and methods that are available forrigorously and systematically examining these challenges. The development of analytical skillsfor addressing such problems has been primarily offered in graduation education. However,undergraduate engineering students are increasingly interested in working on contemporarychallenges earlier in their careers. Students entering engineering programs today are more awareand better equipped for conducting sophisticated analysis due to their access to information,knowledge and tools that previously were not available to prior generations. It is thereforeimportant – both for retaining
successes as well as pitfallsencountered in the implementation process. Concepts that distracted students from the capstoneexperience were removed, and new concepts are being added where appropriate, such as the riskmanagement module discussed above. The authors hope that the lessons learned will benefitother engineering programs that leverage SE principles as they seek an appropriate level of SEeducation in their disciplines.Bibliography1. McGrath, Elisabeth, Susan Lowes, Chris Jurado, and Alice Squires. "SE Capstone: A Pilot Study of 14 Universities to Explore SE Learning and Career Interest through DoD Problems." Vancouver, BC: ASEE, 2011. 725.2. Defense Acquisition University. Systems Engineering Fundamentals. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense
keeping them from doing more to ensurethat this happens at their institutions.Intentions for the futureSurvey participants articulated their intentions to ensure learners are exposed to understandingand applying leadership principles and practices. Here are some of their intentional statements: o Would like to co-create a leadership course for undergraduates o Motivation, awareness, pro-active career planning o Ensure that students are fully engaged with the resources and services available to them o Training, experiential learning and personal development are intertwined. o Give them opportunities integrated within existing curriculum without having a stand-along course o Multiple sessions of seminars and service learning o
strategic planning, international cooperation, cross-directorate coordination, architecture analysis, and exploration control boards. Guerra also spent three years at the Goddard Space Flight Center as Program Integration Manager for future high-energy astrophysics missions, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope. She began her career at the Johnson Space Center working for Eagle Engineering and SAIC, focused on con- ceptual design of advanced spacecraft for human missions to the moon and Mars. Guerra earned a B.S in aerospace engineering and a B.A. in English from the University of Notre Dame. She received a master’s of science degree in aerospace engineering from the University of Texas, Austin
cleaned up but is far better than the previous ones. • Improve the isolation design. • Add one more +‐5V power supply. What is the most you would pay for a system like this if it were used in several classes over the course of your academic career? ___ $0 ___ $50 ___$100 ___$200 ___$300 ___$400 ___$500 (check one) Average response: ~$205 Page 25.892.14How would you prefer to pay that amount? ___lump sum ___payments across semesters LS: 4; PAS: 7 Would you prefer to pay a lesser amount as ‘lab fees’ each semester to fund the purchase and upkeep of a set of RASCL units that would be available for check
, because all he wants to do isdesign earthquake-proof buildings. Despite a few students who fail to see the relevance, themajority seem to accept that this course is needed. When asked to respond to the statement "Thiscourse is relevant to my career", 85% of respondents chose "agree" or "strongly agree" (choices4 and 5 on a 5 point scale) in fall 2010, up from 75% in fall 2009.Many of the students in engineering have a dislike for chemistry, in some cases a very strongdislike. Generally such students are not attracted to chemical engineering, but we see many suchstudents in other majors. In response to this, the scope of coverage of some mass balance topicshas been selected to focus on situations which are of broader interest. For example
student’sgenerational culture. The millennium generation is stigmatized as a self-centered, indulgent,arrogant population. Ironically, recent research reveals that their concerns and goals mirror thoseof the baby boomer generation.7By understanding the key drivers of our student‘s behavior, we can more effectively deliverleadership and safety tools for their implementation. The ultimate goal: training future industryleaders who take Montana out of this safety slump. Along their career path each student willhave the opportunity to influence others and improve the safety culture of Montana.We begin by addressing the current millennial student, born between 1979 and 1994.7 Thielfoldt& Scheef advise that millennials are primarily team-oriented and prefer to