Engineering Technology Colleges, 2008 Edition, American Society forEngineering Education, Washington DC (2009)[3] U.S. News & World Report Ultimate College Guide, 2011 Edition, Sourcebooks, Naperville IL (2010)[4] Menand, L. The Marketplace of Ideas W. W. Norton and Company, New York (2010)[5] Grayson, J.O., The Making of an Engineer, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993)[6] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. and Sullivan, W.M. Educating Engineers Jossey Bass SanFrancisco (2009)[7] Graff, G. Professing Literature: An Institutional History, 20th anniversary edition, University of ChicagoPress, Chicago (2007)[8] Donoghue, F. The Last Professors, Fordham University Press, (2009)[9] Damrosch, D. We Scholars
. Muqri, M., Shakib, J., A Taste of Java-Discrete and Fast Fourier Transforms, American Society for Engineering Education, AC 2011-451.2. Shakib, J., Muqri, M., Leveraging the Power of Java in the Enterprise, American Society for Engineering Education, AC 2010-1701.3. Learning Objective-C: A Primer, iOS Developer Library, http://developer.apple.com/devcenter/ios/gettingstarted/docs/objectivecprimer.action4. The Objective- C Programming Language, February 2003, http://pj.freefaculty.org/ps905/ObjC.pdf5. Altenberg, B., Clarke, A., Mougin, P., Become an Xcoder : Start Programming the Mac Using Objective-C, CocoaLab, 2008, http://www.e-booksdirectory.com/details.php?ebook=38326. Kochan, S. G., Programming in
Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.4. Fledderman, C. (2008). Engineering Ethics. 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall. New York, NY.5. Freyne, S. and Hale, M. (2008). “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide.” Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, TX.6. Freeman, R., Johnson, P., and Leitch, K. (2007). “Improved Pedagogy for Ethics Instruction.” Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI.7. Holdhusen, M. (2009) “Comparison of Engineering Graphics Courses Delivered via Face-to-Face, Online, Synchronous Distance Education, and Hybrid Formats.” Proceedings of the 2009 Annual
around the stationary pylon. The motion characteristics of theairplane are governed by the non-dimensional aerodynamic coefficients. Analytical expressionsare available to relate these coefficients to the geometry and mass distribution of the airplane.Table 2 Airplane Equations of MotionA model validation example is illustrated in Figure 5. This example represents the type ofanalysis results that are expected as part of the student technical reports. The airplane is trimmedat an airspeed of approximately 8 m/s. The pilot applies a full deflection, Trailing-Edge-Up(TEU) elevator input and then returns the control to the trim position. The pilot control input iscaptured by the on-board data logger and is shown as the orange line in Figure
: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23490.x12. Giroux, R. P. “Relevance of Roebling,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 23 no. 2 (2009): 2-4.13. Portrait of Emily Warren Roebling, Brooklyn Museum.14. Eagleton, Mary. “When Old is New: Diana Athill and Literary Value. Contemporary Women's Writing,” 5 no. 3 (2011): 172-187. doi: 10.1093/cww/vpr00115. Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley. Selected Letters. Isobel Grundy, ed. London, England: Penguin Classics, 1997.16. Bear, Risa S., transcriber. Selected Prose and Poetry of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. accessed January 9, 2012, http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/Renascence_Editions/montagu.html17. Prose and Poetry of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu. Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library
be to use aBASIC Stamp for the servo control. All it needs to do is receive the direction command on twoinput ports and then enable the appropriate servo(s).IV. Firmware DesignThe transmitter firmware, written in combination of the free version Hi-Tech C and MPASMassembler, demonstrates some of the capabilities if the rfPIC12F675 by transmitting the status ofthe two buttons GP3 and GP4 on the transmitter4 5. A 0x23h is transmitted if the left button ispressed and a 0x43 is transmitted if the right button is pressed. The Xmit function used totransmit the data uses a simplified KeeLoq protocol based on the assembler code provided withthe PICkit 1 and has been adapted to interface to the Hi-Tech C compiler. The Xmit functions
with the system demonstration (15 minutes teampresentation).Design Team: The project is executed by two member teams. A formal Project Report (consistingof Abstract, introduction, Design Description consisting of Schematic(s) and Software Code andBibliography) will be prepared by each member of the group.Duration: Week 13, 14 and 15Project Grading: Five points for the design features, 10 points for successful execution anddemonstration, 5 points for code quality and organization, total 20 points, which is the 20% of the Page 25.515.5total class grade. IV. STUDENT AND FACULTY FEEDBACKThis class is offered in every
laboratory-driven Electrical Engineering 2-year curriculum for distance and at-home learning”, http://www.ee.washington.edu/faculty/soma/fipse/. 13. UC Berkeley, “Online curricula for monitored, closed-lab first-year CS courses”, http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~clancy/ucwise/ccliemd04_narrative.pdf. 14. Velankaris, Y., Brophy, S., Okutsu, M., Delaurentis, D., “TEAM-BASED NEGOTIATION OF IDEAS ON DESIGN DECISION MAKING PERFORMANCE”, AC 2010-1902, in Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June 20-23, 2010. Page 25.275.9
follows: 1. Analyze a client’s objectives and formulate an engineering problem statement. 2. Develop multiple solutions to an engineering problem and determine the merits and deficiencies of each solution. 3. Recommend the most appropriate solution based on client and engineer developed criteria. 4. Develop a design for the most appropriate solution(s) to meet a client’s objectives. 5. Explain and document the solution in oral and written formats. 6. Work effectively in an engineering team by utilizing individual strengths and communication.Each team is made of 4 or 5 students and is assigned to a different project for an external clientwith a real need. On the first day of class students individually rank
tests, pre and post-affectsurveys, will also be administered to the students to gauge the effectiveness of challenge-basedlearning in MECE 3320.References1. Pandy, M., Petrosino, A, Austin, B. and Barr, R. “Assessing Adaptive Expertise in UndergraduateBiomechanics,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, 2004, pp. 211–222.2. Barr, R.E., Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Roselli, R.J., Brophy, S., and Freeman, R.A., “Challenge-BasedInstruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules”, Advances in Engineering Education, Vol. 1, No. 1,Fall 2007, pp. 1 – 30.3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R., “How People Learn : Brain, Mind, Experience, and School”(Expanded Edition), National Academic Press, (2000).4. Giorgio, T.D. and
, January 7, 2012.5. Meyer, K. and S. Ressler, “Let’s Get Down to Business: Preparation for ABET Under the New CE ProgramCriteria,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX,June 2009.6. ABET Self Study Questionnaire, Engineering Accreditation Commission, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD., accessed Page 25.313.8at http://www.abet.org/download-self-study-templates/, January 11, 2012.7. Program Evaluator Worksheet, 2011-2012 Accreditation Cycle, ABET Inc., Baltimore, MD., accessed athttp://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Program_Evaluators/Training_Process/eac-instructions-for-completing-pev
Education. Honolulu, HI, 2007.4. M. Haungs, J. Clements, and D. Janzen, “Improving engineering education through creativity, collaboration, and context in a first year course,” ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.5. Council on Competitiveness, Innovate America, 2005.6. K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, “Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 129, pp. 761-768, July 2007.7. N. Genco, N., K. Hölttä-Otto and C. C. Seepersad, “An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of engineering students,” ASEE Annual Meeting, Louisville, KY, 2010.8. B. Cooperrider, “The importance of divergent thinking in engineering
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography 1. Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, Greg Pearson and A. Thomas Young, editors, National Academies Press, (2002). 2. E. D. Hirsch and James S. Trefil, Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, Random House, (1987). 3. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving the Public Understanding of Engineering, Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, National Academies Press, (2008). 4. Heywood, J., “Engineering Literacy: A Component of Liberal Education” Proceeding of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2009
," in Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, 2006.[2] T. Kaiser, A. Lingley, M. Leone, and B. Pierson, "MEMS Fabrication as a Multidisciplinary Laboratory," in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, 2007.[3] T. Hsu, MEMS & Microsystems Design and Manufacture. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2002.[4] W. Park, J. Mallon, A. Rastegar, B. Pruitt A. Barlian, "Review: Semiconductor Piezoresistance for Microsystems," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 513-52, 2009.[5] S. Bouwstra, R. Spiering V. Spiering, "On chip decoupling zone for package-stress reduction," Sensors and Actuators, vol. A.39, pp. 149-56, 1993.[6] K. Petersen, "Silicon as a Mechanical Material," Proceedings of the
) 480-488.9. S. Ersoy and H. Kucuk, ―The effect of a new teaching methodology on learning performances of automotive – mechatronics students,‖ Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 310-316.10. F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnston Jr, J.T. DeWolf, and D.F. Mazurek, Statics and Mechanics of Materials, McGraw-Hill, NY (2011). Page 25.395.14
-536, July 2002.8. Taylor, K. and Dalton, B., “Internet Robotics: A New Robotics Niche,” IEEE Robotics and Automation,Vol.7, No.1, pp.27-34, March 2000.9. "Bailey, S. A., Cham J., G., Cutkosky, M. R., Full, R. J., "Biomimetic Robotic Mechanisms via ShapeDeposition Manufacturing," Robotics Research: the Ninth International Symposium, John Hollerbach andDan Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000. Page 25.396.12
Cognitive Learning Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development Lev S. Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory of Psychological Development Albert Bandura’s Social-Cognitive Learning Bernard Weiner’s Attribution Theory Table 5 Instructional Development Models7 Type of Model Name of Model Classroom Oriented Models Gerlach and Ely Heinich, Molenda, Russell and Smalindo Newby, Stepich, Lehman
/sketching, orthographic Page 25.437.4projection, and etc. So far, students have done the first phase of the project. Someinteresting topics they have selected include: portable podium design, design of a bottleopener that can work for twisting off caps and popping off caps, improving design ofvegetable slicer, and redesign school bus seats.Peer reviewing will be used to evaluate their projects. Each presentation will be evaluatedby both instructor and peer groups. By the end of the semester, each student will submit aself-evaluation and s/he will also be evaluated her/his teammates.Evaluation Plan: The evaluation plan, designed to address progress
to identify, analyze, and solve broadly-defined engineering technology problems.In addition, the student outcomes for the FPGA curriculum will also meet the followingoutcomes required by the Program Criteria for an EET baccalaureate degree program6: the application of circuit analysis and design, computer programming, associated software, analog and digital electronics, and microcomputers to the building, testing, operation, and maintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems; a. the ability to analyze, design, and implement control systems, instrumentation systems, communications systems, computer systems, or power systems.It can be seen from Table 4 that the student outcomes involve the final project. Thus, theassessment
. IEEE Std. 738-1993, IEEE Standard for Calculating the Current- Temperature Relationship of Bare Overhead Conductors, 1993.9. S. Northrup, “A Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project: Redesigned to Increase Interdisciplinary Interaction,” the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011.10. S.M. Batill, “Teaching Engineering Decision Making Using a Multidisciplinary Design Paradigm,” the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, June 2000. Page 25.454.8
, Release 2.5.2, 21st February, 2008, Python Software Foundation.11. B. Chatterjee, D. Dey, and S. Chakravorti, "A Modular Approach for Teaching Partial Discharge Phenomenon Through Experiment", IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 3, august 2011, pp. 410-415. Page 25.455.9
/matlabcentral/linkexchange/links/2202-bse-4004-instrumentation-measurement-and-control-in-biological-systems).Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., and Bransford, J.D. 1999. “Toward the development of flexiblyadaptive instructional designs”. In Instructional Design Theories and Models, Vol. II, edited by C. M.Reigelut. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., and Johnson, D.W. 2005. “Pedagogies of Engagement- Classroom-BasedPractices”. Journal of Engineering Education 94:87–101.Wellman, J.V., Desrochers, D.M., and Lenihan, C.M. 2009. Trends in College Spending. The DeltaFoundation. http://www.deltacostproject.org/resources/pdf/trends_in_spending-report.pdf
., Goddard, N. L. & Libchaber, A. Exponential DNA replication by laminar convection. Physical Review Letters 91, 158103 (2003).4 Chen, Z., Qian, S., Abrams, W. R., Malamud, D. & Bau, H. Thermosiphon-based PCR reactor: experiment and modeling. Analytical Chemistry 76, 3707-3715 (2004).5 Wheeler, E. K. et al. Convectively driven polymerase chain reaction thermal cycler. Analytical Chemistry 76, 4011-4016 (2004).6 Krishnan, M., Agrawal, N., Burns, M. A. & Ugaz, V. M. Reactions and fluidics in miniaturized natural convection systems. Analytical Chemistry 76, 6254-6265 (2004).7 Ugaz, V. M. & Krishnan, M. Novel convective flow based approaches for high-throughput PCR thermocycling. Journal of the
, 2009, pp. 819-827. 2. Caldwell, J.E., “Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips,” Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 2007, pp. 9-20. 3. Fies, C. and J. Marshall, “Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 2006, pp. 101-109. 4. Patterson, B., J. Kilpatrick, and E. Woebkenberg, “Evidence for Teaching Practice: The Impact of Clickers in a Large Classroom Environment,” Nurse Education Today, 30(7), 2010, pp. 603-607. 5. Karaman, S., “Effects of Audience Response Systems on Student Achievement and Long-Term Retention,” Social Behavior and Personality, 39(10), 2011 pp. 1431-1440. 6. Black
”, Page 25.489.10 J. Physiol. 197, (1968), 551-566. 6. Demirkaya, O., Asyali, M., H., Sahoo, P.K., Image Processing with MATLAB-Applications in Medicine and Biology, CRC Press, Florida, (2009). 7. Gonzalez, R.C., &Wintz, P., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., MA. (1987). 8. Jain, A., K., Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, NJ, (1989) 9. Kalanad, A. and Rao, B., N., Detection of Crack location and size in structures using improved damaged finite elements, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 10, (2010), 1-10. 10. Lim, J., S., Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing, Prentice Hall, NJ, (1990). 11. Mannan, M.,A
.; Martin-Vega, L.A.; Stenger, H.G.; , "Integrating design into freshman engineering: aLehigh experience ," Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. 27th Annual Conference. 'Teaching and Learning inan Era of Change'. Proceedings. , vol.2, no., pp.1115-1119 vol.2, 5-8 Nov 19977. Sheppard, S., and R. Jenison, “Freshmen Engineering Design Experiences and Organizational Framework,” Page 25.501.9International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 1997, pp. 190–197.8. Woods D.R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M., Hoffman, T.W., Wright, J.D., Taylor,P.A., Woodhouse, K.A., Bouchard, C.G.K., Developingproblem
. Student and Faculty Perception of Engagement in Engineering. Heller, Rachelle S., Beil, Cheryl and Dam, Kim. 3, s.l. : Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, Vol. 99, pp. 253-261.3. Embedding Laboratory Experiences in Lectures. Morgan, James R., Barroso, Luciana R. and Simpson, Nancy. 4, s.l. : Advances in Engineering Education, 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 1-31.4. The State of Water in Living Systems: From the Liquid to the Jellyfish. Henry, M. 2005, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Vol. 51, pp. 677-702.5. The Debate on Evolution Won't be Won in the JAVMA. Lugten, Peter. s.l. : Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2001, Vol. 216, pp. 857-858.6. Entropy Based Assessment of Written Albanian Language. Borici, Saif al Zahir &
, Steel, Inc., Atlanta Demolition, PaulLee and by the volunteer efforts of many students, faculty, and community partners. Thanks toall the faculty members who have encouraged students for participating in this project. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Southern Polytechnic State University orother project sponsors. Page 25.52.12Bibliography 1. Nations, U. (2010). Haiti Earthquake: Situation Updates. Retrieved 12 30, 2011, from UN News Centre: http://www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/haiti/haiti_quake_update.shtml 2
”,Information Systems Education Journal, Vol. 4, No. 50, pp 1-7, August 8, 2006.4. Auer, M. E., Pester, A. 2007. Toolkit for Distributed Online-Lab Grids. In: Advances on remote laboratories ande-learning experiences, 2007, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.5. V. J. Harward, J. A. del Alamo, S. R. Lerman P. H. Bailey, J. Carpenter, et. al., "The iLab Shared Architecture: AWeb Services Infrastructure to Build Communities of Internet Accessible Laboratories," Proceedings of the IEEE ,vol.96, no.6, pp.931-950, June 2008.6. Felknor, C., DeLong, K. 2006. iLabs Service Broker Complete Machine Build, 2006, MIT iCampus, CambridgeMA, USA