Engineering Education, 2015 Opportunity Thinktank: Laying a foundation for the entrepreneurially minded engineerIntroductionDesign projects have become a principal element of the undergraduate engineering curriculum.Recently, using the KEEN philosophy, there is momentum to push engineering education furtherby fostering an entrepreneurial mindset among students. Providing a basic set of engineeringskills in specific specialty areas of study is no longer sufficient. Engineers design solutions formarketplace problems. As such it is imperative that they approach the marketplace in search ofopportunities for which they can design break-through solutions. This is the mindset of theentrepreneur. The need for entrepreneurial thinking is pervasive among
within acommunity that acknowledges their expertise in a particular craft or discipline and shareinformation competently with those who are not experts."The Kern Family Foundation is helping engineering schools change their pedagogy to developthe entrepreneurial mindset in undergraduate engineers [12]. The Kern EntrepreneurshipEngineering Network (KEEN) consists primarily of small private engineering schools to promotethis change. Attributes of the KEEN entrepreneurially minded engineer are integrity, tenacity, Page 26.1507.5ethics, creativity, intuition, a deep knowledge of engineering fundamentals, the ability toengineer products for
Paper ID #13559Assessment of Innovative Skill Development in Weekend ChallengesMs. Magdalini Z Lagoudas, Texas A&M University Magda Lagoudas, Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships, Dwight Look College of Engineering, Texas A&M University. Mrs. Lagoudas holds a BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering. She worked for the State of New York and industry before joining Texas A&M University in 1992. Since then, she developed and taught courses in the Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Technology. In 2001, she joined the Spacecraft Technology Center as an Assistant Director
-rans.Companies able to leverage the power of many minds working in conjunction to understand theiruser’s story have a vast advantage over those that are unable to do so. Nowhere in the world isthis more evident than in the hotbed of ideas that is Silicon Valley2.One group of students at a Silicon Valley university understands particularly well what goes intofostering effective storytelling. Their course, “Tales to Design Cars By” is offered in the Collegeof Engineering’s mechanical engineering design program. Students and faculty both are carenthusiasts and non-car enthusiasts. The class features a generative storytelling experience withstudents defining and examining their personal car experiences, and using their findings toinform new design. These
teamwork are defined as importantfactors in developing and assessing entrepreneurial skills in engineers10,11 and in general.12,13Additionally, communication, teamwork and problem solving are essential components ofABET’s a-k outcomes.14 The development of programs for 15, 16 and assessments of17. 18 theseskills continues to be a focus on engineering education publications.MethodsMultiple methods were used to assess the Leadership Academy. An overview of all of thesemethods is shown on Table 1. Two surveys were given to students who participated in theacademy before and after the completion of academy activities. The first was a survey with itemstailored to each of the most recent KEEN outcomes called the Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML
entrepreneurial activities? 3. For engineering alumni who have been entrepreneurs in the past, what activities led them to either become more entrepreneurially-minded or divert to a non- entrepreneurial career path?The participants in this study were 484 alumni who received their undergraduate engineeringdegrees in 2007 from four different universities in the United States. Our research aims to helpengineering educators understand the factors that promote and contribute to entrepreneurialpursuits among engineering alumni. In addition, by identifying what factors or circumstancesinfluence entrepreneurial activities, engineering schools may design programs and identifypotential opportunities for intervention.1
(KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network) philosophy there is momentum to push engineeringeducation further by fostering an entrepreneurial mindset in young engineers. At Western NewEngland University the first year engineering program has been revamped using a combinationof elements including entrepreneurially minded learning (EML), Problem Based Learning (PBL),Active Collaborative Learning (ACL) and a design framework based on the "living with the lab"program developed at Louisiana Tech University.The First Year Engineering program at Western New England University spans four commoncourses for all engineering majors. This work focuses on two courses, the Introduction toEngineering course, a four credit course offered in the first semester and the Data
curricula are most effective in generating an impact on retention in UG- engineering students by non-traditional groups? • How do we classify students studying entrepreneurship into archetypes based on their expression of how, why, and when it fits into their career trajectory? • Are active student entrepreneurs a distinct population from entrepreneurially-minded students or pre- entrepreneurs?Students’ Career Beyond
Paper ID #11487Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by UtilizingIntegrated Online ModulesDr. Ronald S Harichandran P.E., University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and a Leadership Cohort. Through this grant entrepreneurial thinking will be integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel
and spray physics. Page 26.69.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Module to Introduce the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Thermodynamics - a Core Mechanical Engineering CourseAbstractThe work proposed here consists of an educational module designed for thermodynamics (a coreMechanical Engineering course) that promotes entrepreneurially-minded problem-solving bylinking the application of theory with economic and environmental costs. It was designedspecifically to provide students with a hands-on approach to learning, while giving themexposure to integrating
learning modules based on the “Quantified Self” social movementAbstractTraditional engineering curriculum and coursework lacks entrepreneurial experiences for students.While most entrepreneurship program models utilize curriculum that is delivered in a businessschool collaboration, more recently engineering colleges have started promoting the idea thatEntrepreneurial-Minded Learning (EML) can be formalized within engineering education.Development of an entrepreneurial mindset is difficult while students are actively working on theirsenior projects, so additional experiential learning during the earlier levels of undergraduateeducation is needed. In this project, we set out to include EML in courses across engineeringprograms and
Quote “Since we had worked with each other before (in other challenges), we knew how to function better as a group, and we communicated better. We were able to carry out our ideas faster” “This challenge made me realize that communication and understanding the consumer is key; so, as engineers, when we are designing our products we should always keep that in the back of our mind” “This is a great lesson to take away from the challenge. […] When I am an engineer and I think I have a great idea that is worth pursuing, I need to convey that message. With a good pitch, that grabs the attention of my boss, I can display why it is worth it for him to
multiple international academic and industrial forums. Page 26.89.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A program to develop resiliency, self-confidence, intrinsic motivation, and a sense of purpose in young adultsAbstractThe goal of this work is to develop and implement an early development undergraduateprogram that will help increase resiliency, self-confidence and intrinsic motivation, anddevelop a sense of purpose in young adults. The program is divided in two parts. In the firstpart students go through experiential training that uses techniques adopted from
Business Venturing, 21(5), 704–725.Mann, L., Alba, G. D., & Radcliffe, D. (2007). Using Phenomenography to Investigate Different Ways of Experiencing Sustainable Design. In Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu, HI.Marshall, S. P. (2009). Re-Imagining Specialized STEM Academies: Igniting and Nurturing Decidedly Different Page 26.504.26 Minds , by Design. Roeper Review, 32(1), 48–60.McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research / Susan E. McKenney, Thomas C. Reeves. New York : Routledge, 2012.Miemis, V. (2012
to experience. Since this time educators have been trying to create educational curricula at various levels that incorporate baseline knowledge with experience (Kolb, 1984; Savery and Duffy, 1995; Bonwell and Eison, 1991; Kolodner, 1993; Boud and Feletti, 1998). Historically, universities have followed traditionalist methods of instilling a broad range of information into the minds of their students. Within technically minded universities and colleges, however, there has been even more focus on providing the technical knowledge base. Today, the field is realizing the importance of developing engineering students who are technically proficient, but who are also inherently curious, who can infer and develop connections between ideas, and
Internet Marketing and Advertising, 2012.21. Karanian B.“Entrepreneurial Leadership: A Balancing Act in Engineering and Science,” ASEE Global Colloquia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007.22. Karanian, B. et al., “Open Process Team Collaboration: Story Parallels from an Academic Team to theStudied Start-Up,” ASEE, San Antonio, TX, 2012.23. Kelley D. and Kelley T. “Creative Confidence,” Crown Publishing Group, 2013.24. Kolmos A. "Future Engineering Skills, Knowledge, and Identity,” Engineering Science, Skills, andBuilding, 165-185, 2006.25. Langer E. J. “Mindfulness,” Merloyd-Lawrence, 1990.26. Leifer L. J. and Steinert M. “Dancing with Ambiguity: Causality Behavior, Design Thinking, and Triple-Loop-Learning,” Information Knowledge Systems Management, 10
using the skillstaught at all of the different schools.” In summary, a summer camp approach allows a student tosupplement their packed standard curriculum, allows for concentrated focus on the topic, andallows for a multi-institution/discipline experience.With this in mind, the program was open to any students within a multi-institutionalcollaboration known as the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) composed of≈19 engineering colleges spanning the U.S. dedicated to instilling an action-orientedentrepreneurial mindset in engineering, science, and technical undergraduates. Over threesummers, the camp engaged students from twelve institutions and from at least sevenengineering disciplines. While this summer enrichment program was
Paper ID #11986Effect of Comfort Zone on Entrepreneurship Potential, Innovation Culture,and Career SatisfactionDr. Ikhlaq Sidhu, University of California, Berkeley Ikhlaq Sidhu is the Chief Scientist and Founding Director of UC Berkeley’s Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology. Prof. Sidhu also developed and founded the Fung Institute for Engineering Leadership. He received the IEOR Emerging Area Professor Award from his department at Berkeley. He has been granted over 60 US Patents in networking technology, IP telephony, and mobile computing. He was awarded 3Com Corporation’s ”Inventor of the Year” in 1999. Dr. Sidhu
Paper ID #11095An Undergraduate Course in Intellectual Property LawDr. David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso David G. Novick, Mike Loya Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Professor of Computer Science, earned his J.D.at Harvard University in 1977 and his Ph.D. in Computer and Information Science at the University of Oregon in 1988. Before coming to UTEP he was on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the Oregon Graduate Institute and then Director of Research at the European Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Engineering. At UTEP he has served in a number of positions
paper has focused on the pedagogical implications of us-ing the PAC to teach engineers to think like intrepreneurs. The short-term value of teaching withthe PAC is to highlight how decisions are made in the complex and rapidly changing environmentwithin a company. The long-term value is to develop habits of mind and action that will enablethem to make impactful contributions throughout their careers.8 AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the members of the Bucknell Biomedical Engineering Department,The Small Business Development Center at Bucknell University, Chris Sullivan, Charles Kim andSteve Shooter for their helpful conversations and comments.References [1] Henry Petroski, Henry Petroski, and Henry Petroski. To engineer is
. L. A. Zampetakis, L. Tsironis, and V. Moustakis, "Creativity development in engineering education: The case of mind mapping," Journal of Management Develop., vol. 26, no. 4, 2007.8. D. Tougaw. and J. Will, “An Innovative Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Course Sequence,” ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.9. D. Tougaw, E. Johnson, and M. Budnik, "Entrepreneurship Throughout an Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum," ASEE Annual Conference, Austin, TX, June, 2009.10. P. Mustar, "Technology management education: Innovation and entrepreneurship at MINES ParisTech, a leading French engineering school," Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 418–425, 2009.11
education of future engineers, in ways that they valued.Key Competency and Focus Areas for EducationFigure 3 is a bar graph of the key competency areas identified from the company visits. Theprocess to establish these has been previously described1, and involved asking the over 100corporate leaders involved, “what behaviors and competencies do you want in your newengineers that would make them more effective innovators and intrapreneurs in your company?”The responses essentially said1:“We want engineers who are confident, competent, open minded engineers who work effectivelyon teams that employ experimentation, analysis and innovation to create and “sell” productsthat are truly responsive to customers around the globe”Actually, no one leader said
. Page 26.1658.12ReferencesAnthony, S., Johnson, M. W., Sinfield, J., & Altman, E. (2008). The innovator’s guide to growth: Putting disruptive innovation to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Bilen, S. G., Kisenwether, E., Rzasa, S. E., & Wise, J. C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 233–243.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K & S Ranch.Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Duval-Couetil, N., Gotch, C. M., & Yi, S. (2014). The
Paper ID #11287Broadening Participation through Engagement in the Maker Space Move-mentDr. Edward Pines, New Mexico State University Edward Pines is Department Head and Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at New Mexico State University. He is a co-team leader of NMSU’s Pathways to Innovation team and is serves on the Faculty Advisory Board for NMSU Engineering’s Aggie Innovation Space.Dr. Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University Patricia A. Sullivan serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Public Service and is Director of the En- gineering New Mexico Resource Network in the College of Engineering at
Paper ID #12600Starter or Joiner, Market or Socially-Oriented: Predicting Career Choiceamong Undergraduate Engineering and Business StudentsMr. Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University Florian is studying Environmental Planning and Ecological Engineering at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). His majors are Sustainable City Development, Renewable Energy, International Land Use Planning and Environmental Economics. He is also participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which
Paper ID #14059Stimulating and Supporting Change in Entrepreneurship Education: Lessonsfrom Institutions on the Front LinesElizabeth Nilsen, VentureWell Liz Nilsen is a Senior Program Officer at VentureWell, a national higher education network that culti- vates inventions and technical innovations to improve life for people and the planet. At VentureWell, Liz provides leadership to the Epicenter Pathways to Innovation initiative, an effort to engage with a cohort of colleges and universities to fully embed innovation and entrepreneurship in undergraduate engineering education. She also works on the development of new
at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), where he has been involved in educational research on massive open online courses. His research interests lie at the intersection of psychology, sociology, business, and law. He will soon begin a joint degree program at UIUC, pursuing both a Master of Business Administration and a Master of Human Resources and Industrial Relations.Dr. Lalit Patil, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Patil is the principal researcher on the Educate to Innovate Project. Previously, he was the principal re- searcher on the Lifelong Learning Imperative project. He is a postdoctoral research fellow with Mechan- ical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at
Paper ID #11727Innovative Confidence: what engineering educators can do and say to gradu-ate more effective innovators and intrapreneursDr. Leo E. Hanifin, University of Detroit Mercy After engineering positions in the computer, aerospace and automotive industries, Dr. Hanifin led a re- search center focused on manufacturing technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for eleven years. He then served as Dean of the College of Engineering and Science at the University of Detroit Mercy for twenty-one years. He is now retired from full-time academic responsibilities, but continues to consult in higher education, study