Paper ID #12025A Robotics-Focused Instructional Framework for Design-Based Research inMiddle School ClassroomsMr. Matthew Moorhead, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Matthew Moorhead received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, where he is a teaching fellow in their GK-12 program. Matthew also conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory with an interest in robotics and controls.Dr. Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School of
Paper ID #12024Using Robotics as the Technological Foundation for the TPACK Frameworkin K-12 ClassroomsAnthony Steven Brill, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Anthony Brill received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently a M.S. student at the NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering, studying Me- chanical Engineering. He is also a fellow in their GK-12 program, promoting STEM education. He conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory, where his interests include controls and multi-robot systems.Dr. Jennifer B Listman, NYU Polytechnic School
16%Housing 16% Materials 6%Materials 14% Admin Materials 1% Admin Materials 6%Misc. Expenses 20% Misc. Expenses 24%To give a framework for how the camps are organized, sample weekly agendas are shown inFigure 1. The agenda is designed to be fast-paced, while giving adequate time for each activityto meet its goals. For example, activities during the beginning of the week need to concentrateon teaching how to use the design process and on the Engineering Habits of Mind of optimism—sticking with it until success is achieved—or teamwork. Later in the week, activities may bemore designed to teach a particular scientific concept; however, each activity is
in mathematics education and has worked as an engineer, a pastor, and a high school math teacher.Mr. James Holly Jr., INSPIRE Institute, Purdue University James Holly Jr. is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received a B.S. from Tuskegee University and a M.S. from Michigan State University, both in Mechanical Engineering. His research interest is exploring formal and informal K-12 engineering education learning contexts. Specif- ically, he is interested in how the engineering design process can be used to emphasize the humanistic side of engineering and investigating how engineering habits of mind can enhance pre-college students’ learning abilities.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue
Education 22 (4): 777-791.11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press12. Cardella, M., Svarovsky, G., and B.L. Dorie (2013). Gender Research on Adult-child Discussions within Informal Engineering Environments (GRADIENT): Early Findings. Conference Proceedings: American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA June 2013.13. Dorie, B.L., Cardella, M.E., and G. Svarovsky (2014). Capturing the design behaviors of a young children working with a parent. Conference Proceedings: American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, Indianapolis, IN June 2014
Page 26.961.10learners and agents in mind as we consider pre-college engineering education. We can learn fromboth the processes that homeschool families have used to access the resources, as well as theresources themselves. This will help us to elucidate the many different options that are availablefor today’s families in supporting the development of their children’s engineering knowledge andskills in out-of-school settings.The preliminary findings from this study raise interesting questions for future exploration. In thecurrent study, we did not explicitly ask the parents about their goals for what their childrenwould learn about engineering. We also did not ask them to provide specific details about thewebsites, museums, and other informal
engineering to participate.Likewise, for students from grades 4-8 who attended the 1-day mechanical engineeringoutreach also showed an increase in interest in considering engineering as a career asreported by Fleischer, Wemhoff, O’Brien, Ural & LeRoy9. Ultimately, Deckard andQuarfoot10 summed it up in their paper:“single-day event can be effective in reshaping attitudes, exposing young minds to theworld of engineering.”The above studies demonstrate the short-term effect (immediately after the completion ofthe outreach program) of engineering outreach to both middle and high school students.However, very few studies have followed the same group of participants to determine thelong-term impact of early outreach program on the students’ decision to
Paper ID #12630From Pretending to Engineering: An examination of students’ dynamic en-gagements in Novel Engineering design activities (Fundamental)Mary McCormick, Tufts UniversityDr. Jessica Watkins, Tufts University Page 26.804.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Pretending and Engineering: An examination of students’ dynamic engagements in Novel Engineering design activities (Strand: Fundamental)IntroductionRecent reports, frameworks, and assessment criteria1-3 have
Paper ID #13813Crafting a Successful High School Engineering ProgramMs. Marie Anne Aloia, Bayonne High School Marie is an alternate route teacher with an educational background in math, physics, chemical engineering and computer science. As the first girl in her family to go to college, and maybe to prove the point, she earned two bachelor’s degrees, one from Montclair State University by day, and 8 years later, one from New Jersey Institute of Technology, by night, while working full time by day at Exxon Research and Engineering. While a traditional female career, like teaching, was the last thing on her mind, she was
science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 564-582.10 National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education:Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.11 Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.12 Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Handbook of engineering educationresearch (pp. 267-282). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.13 Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education, Journal ofEngineering Education, 99, 5-22.14 Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives
, with the capacity to function effectively in a globally connected, innovation driven economy. Within the Center it is appreciated that the field of neural engineering will be most innovative and transformative when people from a wide range of backgrounds contribute. With this in mind the Center places a special emphasis on recruiting females, students from historically underrepresented groups, and people with disabilities into our education Page 26.894.3 programs.2As one of many Center education interventions developed to support the K-to-career pathways,the design of the YSP is aligned to concepts of
patterns looking for specific evidence ofthese behaviors and saw that there were nuances to each of these levels. The students wehighlight below represent this range and some of the nuances we saw in the data. In thefollowing section, we suggest the implications that our observations can have for supportingteachers as they teach engineering, identify how to promote expert behaviors, and fosterengineering habits of mind. We also believe that our data emphasizes the need for a deeperevaluation of student’s approaches to solving authentic and realistic engineering problems. Page 26.593.4Beginning designer patterns in understanding the challenge and
habits of mind can enhance pre-college students’ learning abilities. Page 26.177.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Assessment Tool to Evaluate Student Learning of Engineering (Fundamental) Strand: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best practices in curriculum designWhile STEM subjects have traditionally been taught separately in K-12 schools the newinitiatives share a focus on integrated approaches to teaching STEM. For example, the recentlyreleased Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)1 addressed the need for explicit integrationof
anincrease in their understanding of the engineering design process, engineering concepts,engineering habits of mind, and the connections between engineering and other subject-areaconcepts and practices. Understanding of the engineering design process shifted from between Figure 3: Understanding of Engineering Design Process Figure 4: Understanding of Engineering Concepts 25 25 Pre-program Pre-program Post-program
take risks in their design until a desired outcome was achieved.Constructivism and Social ConstructivismAs identified in Mendoza Diaz and Cox constructivism was the most prevalent theoreticalframework found in their review of the P-12 engineering education literature; seven publicationsused constructivism. Engineering design as a student-centered, active-learning pedagogy fits wellwithin the constructivism framework. Constructivism in an educational context which recognizesthat knowledge is constructed in the mind of the learner by the learner[16]. As described byJonassen,[17] “Constructivist learning environments: 1. Provide multiple representations of reality; 2. Represent the natural complexity of the real world through these multiple
component, has further encouraged theintegration of engineering principles into the K-12 curriculum. Some would argue thatindividuals that have earned an engineering degree are in the strongest position to accuratelyintroduce K-12 students to engineering and encourage them to enter the field12. Students that areable to successfully complete an engineering degree from an accredited engineering programpossess the content knowledge to teach STEM subjects at the K-12 level and can help to removethe misconceptions in the minds of K-12 students about what engineers actually do. However,what these students typically lack is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), a concept thatencompasses not only knowledge of one’s subject matter, but also knowledge of ways
.” Page 26.911.15 One concept that was wrapped into any course that it worked with was that of the engineeringdesign process. There were even several posters of The Works museum’s version of theengineering design process in many of the classrooms. Here we see that the class worked toincorporate not only varying topics of STEM and engineering but also the overarching hope thatthe girls would take away habits of mind that lead to successful engineers.Selected “What I want to know [about engineering and engineering design process]"responses: “I want to know why my LED bracelet didn’t light up. I sewed everything on correctly. I think it might be the way the
been collaborativelyimplemented over five years in middle grades classrooms by math and science teachers. TheEYE Modules aim to improve student Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(STEM) performance, including engineering habits of mind, as well as students’ beliefs aboutand interest in STEM. The EYE Modules support NGSS standards in engineering as well asCommon Core State Standards for Mathematics. The partnership to implement these moduleshas positively impacted teachers and students, leading to district level STEM reform. As part ofa National Science Foundation award, a longitudinal comparison study of the impact of the EYEModules has been completed. There is evidence that EYE Module participation has a positiveimpact on
within my college.Of course, I expect to encounter worldviews very different from my own and don’t assume thatmine are more valid. But I am wondering whether the story the administrator is telling alsoallows for other versions of becoming an engineer. The story doesn’t demand outright that Iconform but there is a tacit hostility in the way other points of view are unacknowledged andexcluded, like the feeling of dismissal when somebody doesn’t take the trouble to learn yourname.After telling us about our importance to the economy, the administrator then tells us how exactlywe are important: “The role of technology, and the infusion of technology in our society, has just become limitless, right?”To my mind, these comments even seem to
xEngFac 15 x xMST 2 xMST 3MST 5 x xMST 9 xEdFac = College of education faculty member, EngFac = College of engineering faculty memberMST = Middle school teacher, *element is linked to MS-ETS-3 in the NGSSPracticality and clarity. With a typical middle school science course in mind, the PACED-LRwas applied. The researchers found that use of the PACED-LR instrument was very valuable indiscerning lessons for their feasibility and replicability in a middle school classroom. In a fewcases
-thinking skills that come from studying inSTEM environments.[8] STEM learning environments provide opportunities for students to focuson discovery and the ability to solidify educational concepts in their minds by understanding aconcept in a variety of contexts. A true STEM environment has students engaged in all aspects ofa topic, incorporating knowledge and approaches from all the core K-12 subjects, not just scienceand math. Unfortunately, current methods of educating K-12 students about engineering andengineering careers have shown little impact on improving the number of students pursuing anengineering related degree.[9]Students must have a positive impression of engineering before they will consider it for theirprofession, as behavior will
Universityresearchers and students to promote the “engineering habits of mind” and provide students withopportunities to practice engineering problem solving in a college engineering laboratory as theybuild their STEM identity.IntroductionDuke University’s High School Bioscience and Engineering camps have employed our modelduring four 2-week sessions over the summers of 2013 and 2014. Each session had between 26and 40 high school-aged students that were either over-night or day campers. Currently,enrollment is open to all applicants with no conditions, though the activities and model designmay be adapted towards experiences with targeted enrollments (i.e. gender, ethnicity, etc). Thecurrent cost of this particular camp is around $200/day for residential
Paper ID #12617Transformation of STEM to STEAM – How a traditionally run STEM campsuccessfully incorporated the ARTS into its framework resulting in a success-ful STEAM Camp (Work in Progress)Dr. Arthur D. Kney, Lafayette College Arthur D. Kney received his doctorate of philosophy (Ph.D.) in Environmental Engineering from Lehigh University in 1999 and his professional engineering license in 2007. He is currently serving as an As- sociate Professor and Department Head in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Throughout Kney’s career he has been active in the community, at the local, state
opportunities of the futurerequires that they learn to engage in analytical thinking, argumentation, and collaborativeteamwork and that they see such practices as central to design processes. Engaging middleschool learners in collaborative engineering design projects can provide them with opportunitiesto develop communicative competencies related to speaking like an engineer by participating intalk about designed products, design processes, and metacommunicative talk about designcommunication itself.9-11The K-12 engineering education community also recognizes collaborative interaction as a keyengineering practice. The National Research Council identified communication as a vitalengineering “habit of mind.”12 Additionally, the Next Generation Science
University at Qatar has been recognized as one of the leading institutions offering engineering degrees in the region. The campus has attracted over 85 full-‐time faculty members representing some of the best minds in engineering education and scholarship. STEM Education The State of Qatar has long acknowledged the intrinsic value of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) for empowering upcoming Qatari talent and to transform this fast-‐growing country into a world-‐class research and discovery icon in the region. Further, Qatar’s efforts to nationalize its energy workforce and reduce dependence on foreign workers creates an
Paper ID #13537Introduction to STEAM through Music Technology (Evaluation)Mr. Jeff Gregorio, Drexel University Jeff Gregorio is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Drexel University. He received his BSEE from Temple University in 2011, and MSEE from Drexel in 2013. In 2012, he received the NSF-funded GK-12 Fellowship, for which he designed activities for Philadelphia high school students illustrating the connection between the arts and the sciences, to catalyze interest in STEM/STEAM. Jeff currently studies under Dr. Youngmoo Kim in Drexel’s Music Entertainment Technology lab, pursuing
demonstrated a small, but not yet significant, increase in interest aftercamp compared to camp surveys without social integration. When comparing theBioengineering track to other GAMES tracks, BIOE campers reported an 8% increase in interestin engineering and confidence in engineering careers. Students also provided open-endedresponses to the survey and comments were positive about the experience (Figure 4). “I was really surprised how the environment has influence over us” “I really liked how [we] talked about some ‘taboo’ topics for our age like race and gender roles” “Small groups really helped with difficult conversations” “It was neat to see how our mind, body, and social network
communities in under- graduate physics departments, and an elected member of the Physics Education Research Leadership and Organizing Council (PERLOC).Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video data both from a micro- genetic learning analysis methodology (drawing on knowledge in pieces) as well as interaction analysis methodology. He has been working on how learners’ emotions are coupled with their conceptual and
communication of learninggoals5 – the knowledge they are expected to know, the skills they are expected to do, and thehabits they are expected to possess.6 In engineering, learning goals can be categorized into fourbroad areas: factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, skills (communication andprocedural), and habits-of-mind.7To foster engagement, schools are turning to active learning methods that stress dynamic studentinvolvement in classroom lessons and activities. Research supportive of active learning points toincreased levels of higher-order thinking, long-term information retention, and intrinsicmotivation.8,9 Strengths of the interactive model are attributed to the hands-on application ofnewly-attained information, more likely to be
Paper ID #11777Designing a Multimedia Learning Environment that Engages Children ThroughNarrativeDr. Glenn W Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is a Professor of Engineering at Smith College who teaches courses in engineering science and methods for teaching science and engineering. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Operations Research from Princeton Univer- sity. The winner of numerous teaching and research awards, Dr. Ellis received the 2007 U.S. Professor of the Year Award for Baccalaureate Colleges from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement