Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada. Page 26.629.11 [4] Meyers, K. L., Ohland, M. W., Pawley, A. L., Silliman, S. E., Smith, K. A. (2012). Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14, 119-131.[5] Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273.[6] Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). Quebrando Fronteras: Among Latino and Latina undergraduate engineers. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 134-146.[7] Pew Research Center: U.S
projects in the future? 6 3 5 4 2 x = 4.86 x = 3.88 3 s = 0.38 s = 1.13 2 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 1
26.646.3described in a recent report titled Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education, fundedby the National Science Foundation (NSF) and published by the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE). 6Problem StatementExpanding on the issues described in the introduction, the problems faced by science andengineering (S&E) employers, whether in industry or governmental agencies, are multifacetedand combinatorial. The supply and demand of graduates currently is not in an equilibrium stage,and despite the efforts to expand STEM opportunities, the number of college students pursuingscience and engineering is stagnating. 7 Stagnation continues when unemployment is at recordlows for S&E graduates, this dynamic defies the “invisible hand
field constitute legitimate exceptions to stricturesagainst text recycling.A problematic area involves translations: while some may view translating an article from onelanguage to another as intellectually suspect and perhaps a case of duplicate publication, Wenand Gao offer a compelling argument that this practice actually “maximize[s] the effectivenessof academic communication and equalize[s] the rights of creating, distributing and accessingknowledge.”12 Furthermore, they note, that moving from one language to another involves morethan simply translating the words. It may include adding extra background information,completely revising the scope of the literature review, and, in general “reposition[ing] theresearch in an international context
) Semester Outline Week Lecture Topic(s) Laboratory Topics 1 Site & Project Design Loading Overview Criteria -Structural Subsurface Loading Exploration Program -Wind Pressure Layout -Snow Loads Page 26.1019.5 -Building Codes (Mass, IBC) 2 RISA-2D Lecture Site Geology & Truss Analysis using and Examples Soil
, etc.), (2)their opinion on how the project helped them learn the subject content (e.g., controls conceptsand methods), and (3) their opinion on how the project helped them learn the computer tools(e.g., MATLAB and SIMULINK functions). The complete survey questionnaire is included inAppendix II. TABLE II compiles the survey results.TABLE II. Student Self-Evaluation with End-of-Project Survey Mean Mode(s) Standard Deviation Student General Perception 1. Interesting and motivating 3.6 3 0.99 2. Sense of accomplishment 3.5 3, 4 0.87 3
. Thepresentation should focus less on note taking strategies and more on ways to transforminformation, with supplemental readings attached. The addition of the “supplement” part of theStudy Cycle appeared to be extremely valuable as students self-reported use of campusresources, peers, TA’s, and professors as a result of this section and could use more time.References1. Freedman, M. The passage through college. J. Soc. Issues 12, 13–28 (1956).2. Schreiner, L. A. & Pattengale, J. Visible Solutions for Invisible Students: Helping Sophomores Succeed. (2000).3. Tobolowsky, B. F. & Cox, B. E. Shedding light on sophomores: an exploration of the second college year. (2007).4. Hunter, M. S. et al. Helping sophomores succeed
Variable Mean StDev N P os t-Ex am 86.44 11.69 9 0.030 P re-Ex am 73.22 13.20 9 0.025 De n s i t y 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Grades Figure 3- Fitting the Pre & Post Exam Grades into Normal DistributionsTo verify and validate these findings, a thorough
concept(s)? In what ways did students not understand the concept(s)? How can the alignment between students’ understanding of learning expectations, your expectations, and assessment be clearer?8. Refine course materials and simulation. Instructors can use the information collected and discovered through evaluation and reflection to identify what areas of the curriculum and computational simulation could be enhanced or modified.Figure 1 shows our Framework for Integration of Computational Simulation in the classroom.Red X’s represent difficult concepts that are identified by analyzing student responses andlooking for common student misconceptions and aspects that seem difficult. Green circlesrepresent the one or two larger learning goals
perception of increased time to graduation as a deterrent from participating. Ourresults have implications for students, employers, institutions, educators, and program Page 26.140.11administrators. By providing stakeholders with valuable insights, co-op research reaches beyondacademia, making industry and classrooms more inclusive and effective.References[1] Grayson, L. P., The making of an engineer : An illustrated history of engineering education in the united states and canada, New York: Wiley, 1993.[2] Wankat, P. C., Felder, R. M., Smith, K. A., and Oreovicz, F. S., "The scholarship of teaching and learning in engineering
. Page 26.1658.12ReferencesAnthony, S., Johnson, M. W., Sinfield, J., & Altman, E. (2008). The innovator’s guide to growth: Putting disruptive innovation to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Bilen, S. G., Kisenwether, E., Rzasa, S. E., & Wise, J. C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 233–243.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K & S Ranch.Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Duval-Couetil, N., Gotch, C. M., & Yi, S. (2014). The
thisevent came, in part, from Suffolk’s partners in the power industry who are in need of recentgraduates to replace their aging workforce, and from the knowledge that new and renewablesources of electric power are becoming more important, and that the current aging system ofpower generation and delivery needs to be overhauled. This event is part of an NSF S-STEMgrant awarded on January 1st 2014 to Suffolk’s EE program to encourage students from BostonPublic High Schools, who are predominantly from underrepresented groups, to study EE and tobe exposed to the power industry. The event was held the day after spring semester finalexaminations, allowing Suffolk EE students to present demos of renewable electricitygeneration, to lead high school
Davis & Elkins College in Elkins, WV where Dr. Floyd Wiseman mentored and sparked an interest for him in conducting chemistry research. He attended a chemistry REU program at Boise State University with Dr. Eric Brown. There they conducted research of the bioinorganic synthesis of compounds replicating the mechanism by which carbonic anhydrase processes greenhouse gasses. Most recently, Curtis has worked with Dr. Dave Estrada and Dr. Kevin Ausman conducting research of 2D nanoparticles as part of a materials science REU at Boise State. He is currently continuing that research while working towards an undergraduate degree in chemistry at Boise State.Dr. Louis Nadelson, Utah State University Louis S. Nadelson is an
innovators work within the time constraints of themodern school classroom to provide solutions that are easily implementable and support otherimportant subjects. Integrating engineering into other subjects such as science or literacy couldimprove adoption and retention rates of engineering curricula.14 Our Novel Engineering projectseeks to provide an easy entry point to teaching engineering by using classroom literature as acontext for engineering problems and found materials to build solutions. 13,15Bibliography 1) Achieve. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next- generation-science-standards 2) Purzer, S., Moore, T., Baker, D., & Berland, L. (2014). Supporting the implementation of
related to thedemonstration/learning objectives (listed in Table 1) and the expected outcome(s). Eachgroup spent approximately 10 minutes at each of the six demonstration stations.Table 1: Demonstrations offered during Engineers Week Activities Demonstrations Learning Objectives DepartmentHands-on: Hovercraft Design and relate to pressure Mechanical Can Crusher Design and relate to force Mechanical and simple machine Robotics Design of robots Electrical and ComputingHands-off: Compressive Crush/ Forces and structures Civil and Concrete blocks
and collaborative innovation.AcknowledmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1329224. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References [1] W. Clough, “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century”. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2004[2] G. Hofstede, “Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival,” London: Profile, 2003.[3] G. Hofstede, “Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney,” in Human Relations, vol. 55(11), 2002
advisor (provide guidance in a non-typical technical topic). However,this project clearly showed the wide applicability of the engineering education that students havereceived during their coursework, and opened their eyes to a wider spectrum of possibilities.BackgroundCapstone Projects. Whenever the terms senior design project and capstone project are used, theclassical understanding will be for a project that is closely related to the field of study for the Page 26.710.2student(s), with the characteristic that the project will be as well closely related to the materialscovered in the main courses in the program. This understanding has been
technology, vol. 135, pp. 142-149, 2013.[2] N. Wei, J. Quarterman, and Y.-S. Jin, "Marine macroalgae: an untapped resource for producing fuels and chemicals," Trends in biotechnology, vol. 31, pp. 70-77, 2013.[3] K. A. Jung, S.-R. Lim, Y. Kim, and J. M. Park, "Potentials of macroalgae as feedstocks for biorefinery," Bioresource technology, vol. 135, pp. 182-190, 2013.[4] A. Singh, P. S. Nigam, and J. D. Murphy, "Mechanism and challenges in commercialisation of algal biofuels," Bioresource technology, vol. 102, pp. 26-34, 2011.[5] M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, and G. Barberio, "Utilization of macro-algae for enhanced CO2 fixation and energy production," Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem, vol. 49, p. 348, 2004.[6] S. A. Razzak, M
technology (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association. (Original work published 2000)3. Raney, C., & Jacoby, R. (2010, Winter). Decisions by design: Stop deciding, start designing. Rotman Magazine, 34-39.4. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Retrieved from: http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2014-2015/5. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797.6. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the
Paper ID #127225th Year Master’s Degree Program for Engineers: Preparing the Next Gener-ation of K-12 Technology, Engineering and Design Education Teachers (Workin Progress)Dr. Tameshia S. Ballard, North Carolina State University Dr. Tameshia Ballard is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of STEM Education within the College of Education and Director of Engineering Education within the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. She earned a B.S. in Biological Engineering from North Carolina State Uni- versity and a M.S. and Ph.D. in Biological Systems Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic
exposed to basic concepts ofcomputation and computer programming, without having to go beyond the user friendly blocksbased interface. Figure 6 shows an arena for the maze-based educational game. Page 26.17.7 Figure 6: Maze-based Educational Game.Note that our proposed “gamification” of robot-programming satisfies several rules of goodgame design for learning. First, it provides the student an opportunity for active learning,wherein s/he learns the concepts of programming while trying to score points in the game. Evenas the student is engrossed in the game to score points, s/he is involuntarily learning andpracticing
. It is generally accepted thatattending classes is an important aspect of college experience.10Studies reveal that there is a relationship between absenteeism and student performance incourses9. The hypothesis that there is a strong relationship between class attendance and studentlearning has been investigated empirically in journals of higher education. It is not surprising thatmost studies have found an inverse relationship between being absent from the class and courseperformance10,11,12,13.Studies have been conducted on the inverse relationship between absenteeism and studentperformance in different courses at college level. As long back as in the 1970’s, Jenne14 found thatattendance played a major role in a health science course
blocks. One terminal blockcontains the connections (E, B, C) for a BJT. A second terminal block has connections (S, G, D)for a MOSFET. The third terminal block makes available ±15VDC that may be used assubstrate bias voltages when tracing the IV characteristics of MOSFETs that are part of transistorarrays (e.g., CD4007).Two switches determine the functional mode of the curve tracer (MOSFET vs BJT, andNPN/NMOS vs PNP/PMOS).Fig. 1. Curve tracer front-panel connections. The unit is presently configured to measure the I-Vcharacteristics of a PMOS device.Figure 2 is a block diagram of the curve tracer. We have a complete schematic diagram of thedevice, but it is not included here. The schematic was drawn in landscape mode on an 11”×17”sheet, and
faced.Capstone ExperienceThe objectives of the Capstone Experience, as given to the students, were 1. Choose a “real-life” leadership opportunity in an organization that you have the greatest personal interest (passion) in addressing 2. Describe the leadership opportunity (including aspects the organizational structure) 3. Describe the problem(s) that you will or must address in this role 4. Envision the organization in your ideal outcome(s) and describe 5. Explain your vision for solving the problem(s) by developing specific objectives 6. Create a strategic plan for achieving your vision including a. Communication strategy b. Delegation and empowerment of your followers c. Timeline for completion of your
professional engineers. The prevalence of unethical behaviors, such asplagiarism, among college students has increased significantly in the past 30 years10. Researchsuggests that science and technology students have the highest levels of cheating includingplagiarism10. University educators often debate whether plagiarism is committed willfully orunintentionally out of ignorance and research investigating this area appears equivocal.Therefore, we sought to investigate first-semester freshmen engineering students’ understandingof plagiarism at a science and technology university.Nearly 1,100 first year engineering students at a Missouri University of Science and Technology(Missouri S&T) completed an online survey and corresponding quiz designed to
subsetsdescribed in the Data and Design section. The results are presented in Table 3. Last Group MI Full Cohort Only Engineers Engineering Whole Space I(T;S) 0.111103 0.083926 0.087116 I(G;S) 0.031648 0.031923 0.031516 Did Not Graduate I(T;S) 0.14089 0.113506 0.102177 I(G;S) 0.031166 0.035844 0.035115 Graduated I(T;S) 0.028349 0.03692
. Additionalresearch of this novel finding should be performed, particularly with regard to the relationshipsbetween SES, first generation students, and self-efficacy. One recommendation for futureresearch is to modify the demographic portion of the survey instrument to include additionalquestions pertaining to respondent SES. More information will only help to clarify and possiblysupport this unique finding.Future studies should be conducted to confirm these findings as well as to identify additionallinks between personal characteristics and self-efficacy of community college engineeringstudents. One avenue for future research includes extending the study into a longitudinal studyto collect data over time. This study and Whannell et al.’s study had similar
applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78 (2), 184-192. 4. Correll, J. S. (2001, May). Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assesments. American Journal of Sociology, 1691-1730. 5. Martin, P. J., Simmons, R. D., & Yu, L. S. (2013). The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 102 (2), 227-243. 6. Shehab, R. L., Murphy, T. J., Davidson, J., Foor, C. E., Reed-Rhoads, T., Trytten, D. A. & Walden, S. E. Page 26.1170.9 Academic Struggles and Strategies: How
the process of scoring resubmissions. Time savings can also be achieved by allowing students to continue from the point in a problem where their mistake occurred.Mastery grading on the whole can improve student learning, and if done correctly it can be aneasy way for new engineering educators to establish a fair system that encourages studentgrowth. It is hoped that the guidelines provided above can help new engineering educatorsseamlessly integrate this innovate method into their classrooms.References[1] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey or Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, Jul. 2010.[2] D
objectives “How often is there tension in your team caused byfor each of our roles.” member(s) not performing as well as expected?”“Team members seek solutions that will be good “I can rely on those with whom I work in this group.”for all of us.”Adapt Educate“Our team will re-establish coordination when “We work to improve and refine our existing knowledgethings go wrong.” and expertise.”“We regularly monitor how well we are meeting “We evaluate diverse options regarding the course ofour team goals.” the project.”“We seek to understand each other’s strengths “We use our opposing views as a learning