industrialpartners through setting up an industrial advisory board1, 2. However, in order to sustain theinteraction and truly take advantage of the participation of industry leaders, many programs havedeveloped various models suitable for their specific needs3. Most programs involve their Page 26.538.2councils beyond a simple advisory role such as curriculum, extracurricular activities, research,and faculty development4, 5, some programs make use of industry-sponsored projects6, whileothers suggested integrate practice-oriented education of engineers by working with industrypartners7.In this paper, we present our experience in working with our industrial
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at
interventions.Mr. Muhammad Faiz Shams, Museum of Science Muhammad Shams is a Research Associate who has been with the Museum of Science, Engineering is Elementary team for almost 2 years. He graduated from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth with a Bachelors of Science in Mathematics. Prior to his time with EiE, Muhammad worked as an undergrad- uate researcher in the field of applied numerical analysis. Muhammad assists the team with quantitative analysis, paper writing, and database management.Jonathan D Hertel, EiE/Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort
engineering or technology. A National Association for Researchand Teaching article provides an overview of engineering education to date, and the stepsnecessary for successful integration of engineering in the new NGSS. 2 They suggest a need formore training and new instructional resources to provide opportunities to engage students inSTEM learning; however they caution that “effective, equitable, and accessible teaching andlearning” require “careful planning and implementation”.There have been several nation-wide engineering curriculum program (Engineering isElementary (EiE), Project Lead the Way (PLTW), Lego Engineering, etc.) as well as university-led initiatives in local schools3,4,5 which have brought engineering to K-12 students
curriculum showed that energyconcepts are indeed fragmented into disciplinary silos (Chen, Scheff, Fields, Pelletier, &Faux, 2014). This means that students cover the same energy concepts in differentclasses, but learning does not necessarily build on prior knowledge and it is notconnected to other content areas. Because current curricula do not do a sufficient job ofintegrating energy across the K12 science disciplines, additional work needs to be done todevelop curriculum that covers multiple science disciplines, including biology, earthscience, physical science, and chemistry. An ideal bioenergy curriculum would teachstudents core concepts of the field from the various disciplinary perspectives, as well aspresent the material in a learning
hardware design engineer, from 1997- 2002, and by vLogix as chief hardware design engineer, from 2002-2004. In 2009, Alaraje was awarded the Golden Jubilee by the College of Engi- neering at Assiut University, in Egypt. He has served as an ABET/IEEE-TAC evaluator for electrical engineering technology and computer engineering technology programs. Dr. Alaraje is a 2013-2014 Fulbright scholarship recipient at Qatar University, where he taught courses on Embedded Systems. Ad- ditionally, Dr. Alaraje is recipient of an NSF award for a digital logic design curriculum revision in collaboration with College of Lake County in Illinois, and NSF award in collaboration with University of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College
culturally-contextualized theory of learning and curriculum modules that will be piloted in several schools over 4 years in the Navajo Nation. These modules will be embedded into an existing engineering design program 3) Create and pilot tools to evaluate Navajo students’ experience of engineering design in the context of Navajo cultureResearch DesignThis research is guided by the following research questions and research design. Ourconstructivist grounded theory research questions are:RQ1. What are the ways in which Navajo students and Navajo professionals experience, understand, and apply engineering design in the context of their culture, community, and society?RQ2. How do culturally-contextualized
logisticsand transportation education.The term "Best Practice" has been used to describe "what works" best in a particular situation orenvironment. Best practices are an inherent part of education that exemplifies the connection andrelevance identified in educational research. They interject rigor into the curriculum bydeveloping thinking and problem-solving skills through integration and active learning. Bestpractices are applicable to all degree levels and provide the building blocks for instruction. Bestpractices motivate, engage and prompt students to learn and achieve. Students who receive abalanced curriculum and possess the knowledge, skills and abilities to transfer and connect ideasand concepts across disciplines are most likely succeed in
engineering is an up-to-date issue and is a topic of internationaldiscussions. US, European and Asian researches suggested many innovative ideas that allowfor better international engineering interaction and students’ readiness for the open world [1],[3], [6], [8], [9]. For example corporate education presented by Herman Schneider more thana hundred years ago was successfully implemented as the option for students to gain secondlanguage proficiency and international job experience [3]. Page 26.425.2 Leading Russian universities also take part in the global integration process. Thenumber of international students is increasing from year to year
CollegeAbstractThe purpose of this project is the bridging between California State Polytechnic University,Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) Civil Engineering students and Pasadena City College (PCC)science students to enhance the curriculum at both institutions. While enhancing the curriculum,the project seeks to improve the retention of both Cal Poly Pomona and PCC students, and tofacilitate the transfer of PCC students to Cal Poly Pomona. Indirectly, the project promotesgraduate school opportunities and lifelong learning in an inter-institutional disciplinaryenvironment.One of the main ideas behind this project is the development of teams composed of both PCCstudents and Cal Poly Pomona students. These student teams work on the design of naturaltreatment systems
6mentioned6. The other is in the area marked “T-shaped Education” in Figure 4. This will be thefocus of the remainder of this paper, and will be used as an example to convey the final of step ofthe intrapreneurship study process, which is to build intrapreneurship competency throughengineering educational opportunities. Potential challenges and obstacles to achieve this areidentifying what new and differentiated educational opportunities should be provided, how bestto integrate these into the engineering education experience without adversely affecting otherparts of the curriculum, and how to assess their effectiveness in developing the competenciesneeded for intrapreneurship. The ultimate measure of how effective this approach is will be inthe
opportunities for improvement. Recommendations regarding humanitiesand social sciences for BOK3 are presented based on the findings of this student. Therecommendations are grounded in previously established curriculum guidance including ABETprior to ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000, EAC/ABET 3(a) through 3(k), BOK and BOK2.Integration of Humanities and Social Sciences into BOK, ABET and other CriteriaThere is a large body of literature, going back in time, which provides support for humanities andsocial science (H/SS) in the education and the practice of engineering.1-6 There is a commonagreement that an engineering education must be supported with a fundamental education inmathematics, natural sciences, humanities and social sciences. The graphic
Paper ID #11190Ethics for BeginnersDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was named an
responsibility forassessment of certain Student Outcomes each time that the course is taught andthis data is integrated into a program level evaluation of the curriculum. Likeother programs, embedded indictors include tests, laboratories, papers,presentations, and projects. What follows are some unique ideas for assessing thestudent outcomes. Each of these is a graded event in the NE Capstone Course,NE495/496. They include (1) Student Outcome Essays to assess studentperspectives on their attainment of ABET Student Outcomes a-k, (2) CapstoneProject Elevator Pitch to convey a broad perspective of the engineeringenvironment ABET Student Outcomes h, (3) an Oral Examination to assessstudent dedication to continued learning Student Outcomes i, and (4) a
question,estimating the scope of the project, writing an acceptable statement of work, completing theproject, and delivering results that could be readily disseminated.The undergraduate engineering curriculum at our institution has built-in project-basedcornerstone, sophomore, and senior capstone design courses. The master of engineering is a 30credit course-only program. By leveraging these two curricula, we developed a successfulmultidisciplinary modeling course where key learning outcomes strengthen student readiness toperform research. This paper describes the evolution of our overall strategy to overcomechallenges and put solutions in place. An overview of the course is presented in the context ofhow the pedagogy of student research has
, fostered students' academic integration at levels similar to that of the other more selective and somewhat more coordinated, LC models.Recent work on LLCs has also raised a number of interesting questions regarding whether self-selection into an LLC influences the impact of the LLC on the student 4,6 and how individualpersonality might impact the influence of an LLC on an individual student.5Within the present manuscript, attention is focused on students involved in what Stassen3 wouldlikely term a modest model of an LLC. Three specific questions are explored relative to thisLLC. First, do students applying for the LLC prior to arriving on campus as freshmen havedifferent characteristics than their classmates in terms of: self-confidence and
Challenges was one of the first decisionswe made in revising this course. The Grand Challenges Scholars Program at FGCU had beenrecently approved, and an additional opportunity to further integrate the Grand Challenges intothe Engineering curriculum and promote the opportunity to encourage students to participate inthe scholars program was seen to be a positive. Furthermore, the Grand Challenges offered aplatform onto which almost any faculty across the College could integrate their areas of expertiseto the class. However, because we wanted the projects to remain student-driven, we didn’t wantto immediately present the Grand Challenges to the students and force their research into aspecific area. We wanted to regain the active learning component
: A New Curricular Model for Engineering EducationIntroductionTraditional physics undergraduate education has used a “spiral curriculum” method1: mechanics,waves, statistical and thermal physics, electromagnetics, and quantum physics are introduced in afreshman-level survey course; each of these subjects is covered again at a higher level insophomore and junior level courses; and selected topics are revisited in senior-level “specialtopic” or advanced study courses. This model allows for deepening understanding of each topicand the application of more sophisticated mathematical methods – such as complex analysis,differential equations, integral transforms, matrix methods, and linear algebra – as the students’mathematics preparation progresses
courses were first offered on an experimental basis in the Fall 2014 semester. We foundthe students to be very interested and engaged and all expressed positive impressions of theirlearning experience. Additionally, we gained insight into what the students were taking awayfrom their introductory coursework.We envision these courses as emerging as part of an on-going incremental development in ourembedded computing curriculum. For example, one of the outcomes of the “Design Your OwnEmbedded Experiment” is a new sequence of experiments that will be merged into our existingcourse enabling us to broaden our options for this course and perhaps develop new courseworkthat may be more focused for students from other majors such as Computer Science
themthroughout the curriculum, Ohio State formed a new program called the Integrated Business andEngineering (IBE) program as described in more detail below.The IBE ProgramBased on the authors' research, interpretation of the "voice of the customer" (i.e. industry), andyears of personal industrial and academic experience, the following interpretation of a T-shapedengineer is offered: 1. Sound technical expertise in one discipline Page 26.1507.8 2. A solid business acumen including the issues associated with product commercialization 3. An entrepreneurial mindset supplemented with design thinking 4. Ability to function effectively on
) published by McGraw-Hill. Since 1995 he has taught in Rose- Hulman’s innovative, integrated Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, and his textbook, Basic Engineer- ing Science–A Systems, Accounting, and Modeling Approach, is used in this curriculum. In addition to teaching, he also served two years as the Director of the Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education at Rose-Hulman.Dr. Michael A. Collura, University of New Haven Michael A. Collura, professor of chemical engineering at the University of New Haven, received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lafayette College and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in chemical engineering from Lehigh University. After several years in industry, he moved to the academic world
University. Page 26.1580.9Bibliography1. McKenna, A., McMartin, F. and Agogino, A., 2000, "What Students Say About Learning Physics, Math and Engineering," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 1, T1F-9.2. Sathianathan, D., Tavener, S., Voss, K. Armentrout, S. Yaeger, P. and Marra, R., 1999, "Using Applied Engineering Problems in Calculus Classes to Promote Learning in Context and Teamwork," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 12d5-14.3. Barrow, D.L. and Fulling, S.A., 1998, "Using an Integrated Engineering Curriculum to Improve Freshman Calculus," Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Conference
assessment, development of computer-aided environ- mental analysis and management tools, environmental performance measurement, international project management and education, and sustainable development. She has published peer-reviewed journal and conference papers on the life-cycle environmental implications and LCA of construction methods and materials, extended producer responsibility in the construction industry, environmental decision support tools, and integrating service-learning and sustainability in coursework. She has developed construction management curriculum for Egyptian, Palestinian, Tunisian, and US university students. Her research in- tegrates concepts in economics, engineering, management
traditional theoretical and experimental components of the course(s). In a previous paper we proposed an approach to introducing computational physics in the undergraduate curriculum by blending computation and experimentation in the Modern Physics course and laboratory with materials that discuss contemporary physics subjects (quantum dots, LASERs, superconductivity, etc). In this paper we report on the homework problems and laboratories that have been developed as part of this project and the successes and challenges in implementing these materials, and we point to future work to be done in this area.In 2011, the American Association of Physics Teachers approved a “Statement
. This course has been developed and is taught by faculty from bothdepartments. The course includes the use of discrete components and FieldProgrammable Gate Arrays (FPGA). A set of custom hardware components have beendeveloped that can be interfaced to an FPGA and a microcontroller. Instructional videoshelp students prepare for laboratory exercises and the course concludes with a finaldesign-build project.The overall goal of this project is to teach students how to work in multi-disciplinaryteams and to make it easier for students to switch between AS and AAS programs. ACapstone Design course is being developed where small teams comprised of PrecisionMachining, Engineering Science, and Computer Technology students will solve asemester long
Outcome FrequencyIntroductionFirst-year programs nationwide typically feature an introductory curriculum featuring a semesteror yearlong “Introduction to Engineering” course or sequence. Examining a number of thesecourses shows that the content can vary significantly. For example, one course could focus onMATLAB programming while another course could emphasize technical communication. Mostcourses are a combination of these topics to varying degrees; therefore, an NSF-sponsoredproject to classify these courses was conducted which resulted in the First-Year Introduction toEngineering Course Classification Scheme.1 This taxonomy allows programs or instructors toquantify the content of their course(s) using the scheme. As a result, the scheme has
both be considered along with the inevitable other ideas that will begenerated.Fitting Creativity/Innovation into an Already-Full Curriculum: A Strategy andSome TacticsAssume, for discussion purposes, that creativity/innovation became an integral part of theCEBOK. That would motivate some faculty members to consider ways to integrate thatKSA set into their programs. Even without that incentive, some faculty have and willcontinue to incorporate creativity/innovation on its merits as suggested, in part, by themini-survey, published articles, and my observations. Page 26.421.11How can we fit creativity and innovation into an already full academic program
bachelor level in public universities does not have an external advisory council, so thispractice is highly recommended for programs that envision an international accreditation. Page 26.574.4The Program Committee is integrated by the program coordinator, the head of the MaterialsEngineering Division and three full time faculty members of the program, this collegiate bodywork as a team and plans and monitors all the academic aspects of the program, this team isresponsible for the outcomes and competencies assessment processes and collect and analyze allthe necessary materials. The Program Advisory Council was created, among other reasons, inorder to
educationprogramsStudents understood the importance of being technically competent as an engineering leader,however they had a lower confidence in their own technical leadership abilities. This gap Page 26.1424.10emphasized the importance of integrated learning within the engineering curriculum.Providing students with integrated engineering leadership experiences directly within thetechnical curriculum would allow the necessary leadership skills to be gained concurrentlywith an understanding how these skills will apply to an engineering career.Future DirectionsThe methods and results used in this pilot study will be applied to a variety of
graph and positiongraph. In a conventional curriculum those relations refer to the positive (negative) sign, andincreasing (decreasing) behavior of derivative function, corresponding to the increasing(decreasing) and concave upward (downward) behavior of the function. Software brings thescenario for learning those facts analyzing the real context of linear motion. As part of the study,an assessment instrument was designed in order to appreciate the students’ appropriation of thoserelations. The instrument’ items are classified by corresponding to the linear motion context, orcorresponding to different real contexts (no motion), or without including any real context. Theyalso consider the posing information of the item and of the answer, being