Paper ID #11367Enhancing Spatial Visualization Skills in Engineering Drawing CourseDr. Tumkor Serdar, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Serdar Tumkor is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at University of Pitts- burgh at Johnstown. Dr. Tumkor has 20 years of experience in academia, having taught at Stevens Institute of Technology and Istanbul Technical University. His 25 years engineering experience includes design, manufacturing, and product development. He has been lecturing Manufacturing Processes, Machine De- sign, Engineering Design, and Computer Aided Technical Drawing courses.Prof. Roelof
visualization approach used in linear algebra instructions. World Applied Science Journal 2009, 1046-1052.24. McGrath, M. B.; Brown, J. R. Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2005, 56-63.25. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 1999.26. Frankel, F. Translating Science into Pictures: A Powerful Learning Tool. In Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education; AAAS Press, 2005; pp 155-158.27. Smith, J. M.; Van Ness, H. C.; Abbott, M. M. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 7th ed
Validation Development Action Plan Figure 1: Approach Page 26.1022.3ScopeEgoless behavior is a mindset. The earlier this mindset is developed, the better it is. Younger minds aremore malleable and have full careers ahead of them. Carver, et al. argue that before running an empiricalstudy at a software company, it is useful to carry out a pilot study with students in an academic setting17.Therefore, we defined our scope of research to a batch of 86 junior software engineering students of
Paper ID #13547Spanglish Software Engineering: A Curious International Learning Experi-enceProf. Barbara Victoria Bernal, Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus (formerly Southern PolytechnicState U.) Barbara Victoria Bernal is a Emeritus Professor of Software Engineering at Kennesaw State U. (formerly Southern Polytechnic State U. (SPSU)), where she has worked since 1984, serving as undergraduate co- ordinator for software engineering (2002-2005); undergraduate coordinator for information technology (2004-2005); and chair of software engineering (2005-6). She was awarded the SPSU Outstanding Fac- ulty Award in 1995
Paper ID #12572Engineering, Society and the Environment in the Teaching Goals and Prac-tices of Engineering InstructorsMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Senior Lecturer, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engi- neering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and imple- mentation of various teaching and learning initiatives. Lisa is cross-appointed with the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE/UT, and
Paper ID #13813Crafting a Successful High School Engineering ProgramMs. Marie Anne Aloia, Bayonne High School Marie is an alternate route teacher with an educational background in math, physics, chemical engineering and computer science. As the first girl in her family to go to college, and maybe to prove the point, she earned two bachelor’s degrees, one from Montclair State University by day, and 8 years later, one from New Jersey Institute of Technology, by night, while working full time by day at Exxon Research and Engineering. While a traditional female career, like teaching, was the last thing on her mind, she was
thesesurveys are quite low, about 40 %.The bachelor course got an overall grade of 3.8 in the standard course survey, which isconsidered good having in mind that it was the first time it was held. The bachelor project aswell as the profile as a whole was also carried out by a questionnaire distributed by the author ofthis paper to the students first enrolled, at the end of their bachelor project. The response rate washigh, about 70 %. The overall grade of the course shows that most students were very satisfiedwith the bachelor project. Aspects particularly emphasized as positive were the multifacetedengineering approach and the opportunity to freely work on a large project. The project was alsoconsidered very relevant for the energy engineering
Paper ID #13957Practicing care in global engineering with underserved communitiesDr. Bhavna Hariharan, Stanford University Bhavna Hariharan is a Social Science Research Associate at the Kozmetsky Global Collaboratory in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University. Her field of inquiry is Engineering Education Research (EER) with a focus on engineering design for and with underserved communities around the world. For the last nine years, she has worked on designing, implementing and managing environments for interdisciplinary, geographically distributed, collaborative research projects among scholars, and
Paper ID #12430Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical Engineer-ingDr. Mariajose Castellanos, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Page 26.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical EngineeringAbstractA high-level goal of all disciplines is for students to develop the capacity for lifelong learning. Todevelop the capacity of lifelong
Paper ID #11182A Mastery Learning Approach to Engineering Homework AssignmentsDr. Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto Jacob Moore is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State Mont Alto.Dr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Dr. Joseph Ranalli has taught since 2012 as an Assistant Professor at Penn State Hazleton in the Alterna- tive Energy and Power Generation Engineering program. He previously earned a BS from Penn State and a PhD from Virginia Tech, both in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to his current appointment, he served as a postdoctoral
Paper ID #12226Defining and Assessing Global Engineering Competency: Methodological Re-flectionsProf. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan
Paper ID #11650Diversity in Chemical Engineering Education: Status and PerspectivesDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the
): 𝑋 → 𝑌̂or 𝐹̂ (𝑥, 𝐼, 𝐴) = 𝑦̂where 𝑥 is a solution vector and 𝑦̂ is the engineer’s approximation of 𝑦.Because 𝑦̂ is a representation of the engineer’s approximation about the performance of thedesign, we can think of 𝑦̂ as a vector of probabilities. That is, the engineer is not certain of thevalue of 𝑦 for a solution, 𝑥, and as a result, has some possible values in mind as to what 𝑦 couldbe. Thus, we can think of 𝑦̂ as a vector of 𝑦̂ = [𝜉1 , 𝜉2 , … , 𝜉𝑜 ]where each 𝜉𝑗 is a random variable whose distribution represents the predicted values for 𝑦𝑗 andtheir likelihoods based on available information 𝐼, assumptions 𝐴. In other words
Briggs Personality Type Inventory. While these two tools provide students with useful insights about their personalities, behaviours and habits of mind, our findings suggest that engineering educators who use these tools with their students would be well advised to discuss them as temporally-contextualized orientations rather than immutable categories. If they can critically examine these two typologies and expose students to multiple ways of influencing, supporting and relating to their colleagues, the next generation of engineers will learn the value and practice of flexibility while opening themselves to qualitatively diverse forms of professional development. 2) If it proves to be the case that female
Scholarship Program continues to support the scholars financially andprovide critical support for their success. With this in mind, three scholars who were in theirthird year had their scholarships extended until graduation, and this was based on their academicperformance and funds available as a result only six of the ten new scholarships were awarded in2012-2013.The engineering majors represented by this cohort were chemical, civil, electrical, mechanicaland petroleum, and they entered LSU as transfer students in the fall 2010 or spring 2011semester. The scholars’ academic performance at selection (i.e. at the end of the spring 2011semester) was on average well above the scholarship criteria, and demographics indicate that theprogram attracted
Paper ID #12534Building a STEM Pathway with Engineering by Design andMs. Laura E. LeMire, The Community College of Baltimore County Upon graduation from the University of Maryland at College Park with her masters in geotechnical en- gineering, Laura went to work for Baltimore Gas and Electric where during her career there she was responsible for substation and transmission line construction projects, relocation and installation of BGE facilities for Oriole Park at Camden Yards and for the Light Rail, and for improving service reliability. After obtaining her MBA, Laura became the Director of Corporate Purchasing and was a
Paper ID #13554Integrating Affective Engagement into Systems Engineering EducationDr. Timothy L.J. Ferris, School of Engineering, University of South Australia Timothy Ferris holds the degrees B.E.Hons, B.Th., B.Litt.Hons. Grad.Cert.Ed., and PhD from University of Adelaide, Flinders University, Deakin University, Queensland University of Technology and University of South Australia, all in Australia, respectively. He is a member of the School of Engineering at the University of South Australia. He teaches courses in systems engineering and research methods and supervises several PhD students in systems engineering. He was a
Paper ID #11895Leading Large-Scale Change in an Engineering ProgramDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin
or herown mind by constantly making and changing connections between with is new and what isalready known. Further, as it is just not possible for teachers to transfer knowledge into learners’brains, the students need to do the work required to learn. Thus, course innovations can bedesigned not only to help students develop metacognitive skills (e.g., previewing, summarizing,paraphrasing, note-taking), empowering them as active partners in their learning, but also toprovide students with the opportunity to do the work required to learn.12In response, recent innovations to the course not only increase the emphasis on active studentlearning but also provide students with opportunities that encourage them to think of themselvesas engineers by
intentions with the technology they are building. If someone takes their technology and uses it, you know, in a bad way that’s more on the person who used it. That’s my personal opinion (shrugs shoulders) anyways.Asked if in his future job he personally will have to grapple with the social impact of his designs,he says that he would like to be involved in that discussion. But says that engineers might belimited by their mindset: Engineers can be closed minded. We are very technically oriented. We don’t really think a lot about our impacts...I think it’s just how our brain works...Because I don’t come from an engineering [familial] background, I think about it. I would like to have some say in how [my
science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 564-582.10 National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education:Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.11 Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.12 Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Handbook of engineering educationresearch (pp. 267-282). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.13 Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education, Journal ofEngineering Education, 99, 5-22.14 Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives
, with the capacity to function effectively in a globally connected, innovation driven economy. Within the Center it is appreciated that the field of neural engineering will be most innovative and transformative when people from a wide range of backgrounds contribute. With this in mind the Center places a special emphasis on recruiting females, students from historically underrepresented groups, and people with disabilities into our education Page 26.894.3 programs.2As one of many Center education interventions developed to support the K-to-career pathways,the design of the YSP is aligned to concepts of
students in their academic programs. International students experience a variety of adjustment issues that affect the teaching andlearning processes that take place in the classrooms. The primary issues are associated withcultural differences, communication, psychological states of mind and academic challenges 6–8.For example, students from Asia who come from very structured and hierarchical societies areused to a passive-learning, instructor-led approach to education. Those students must adapt to themore active, student-driven education style, found in U.S. institutions 9. Developing teamwork skills is essential for any engineering professional since engineering isby nature a collaborative discipline 10. The importance of this skill is
senior-level counterparts, without sacrificing feasibility from a manufacturing and design perspective.” This occurred even though the seniors were more advanced in technical and drafting knowledge and skills. As might be expected, the authors recommended more studies. For example, they suggested determining the types of classes and pedagogical techniques that enhance creativity/innovation and considering changing curricula to more effectively promote students’ creative/innovative abilities throughout their undergraduate education. Engineering professor Richard McCuen19 addresses our creative-innovative mind set, or lack thereof, by offering this thought: “The attitude that creative thinking
teamwork are defined as importantfactors in developing and assessing entrepreneurial skills in engineers10,11 and in general.12,13Additionally, communication, teamwork and problem solving are essential components ofABET’s a-k outcomes.14 The development of programs for 15, 16 and assessments of17. 18 theseskills continues to be a focus on engineering education publications.MethodsMultiple methods were used to assess the Leadership Academy. An overview of all of thesemethods is shown on Table 1. Two surveys were given to students who participated in theacademy before and after the completion of academy activities. The first was a survey with itemstailored to each of the most recent KEEN outcomes called the Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML
sustainabilitystrategies and participating in a network of like-minded sustainability peers. A sustainable futuredemands a leader not just immersed in the sustainability issues but also be able to articulate a Page 26.826.3new paradigm that addresses sustainability not in silos but as systems based and have interrelatedfocus.Putting it all together using Learning LabsOne learning structure to help integrate sustainability, leadership and engineering in onecohesive student experience is the use of Learning Labs. Learning Labs are a two part hands oncollaborative learning experience designed for students to apply theories, models and processesinto practice and
and evaluated every year.The choice of courses for course-embedded assessment is guidedby two principles: (1) each Student Outcome is assessed withstudent work in a benchmark course, and (2) only required courses,not elective courses, in the curriculum are selected as benchmarkcourses.Assessment of a benchmark course is conducted with the followingin mind: (1) assessment of student work measures the extent towhich SOs are being attained, (2) it is not necessary to use all ofthe student work to assess an outcome, and (3) outcomesassessment is based upon student work and is guided by thegrading of that work.The implementation of our course-embedded assessment methodto a benchmark course, namely Engineering Economics, ispresented in this paper
Paper ID #11927Development of a Programmable Integrated Switch Matrix (PrISM) throughUniversity-Industry CollaborationDr. Baha Jassemnejad, Federal Aviation Administration-CNI Airway Syatems Engineering Organization Baha Jassemnejad was a Professor of Engineering and Physics and is a senior IEEE member as well as an ABET PEV. He is working as an Electronics Engineer VI for the FAA-Chickasaw Nation Industries, a contractor for National Airway Systems Engineering Organization.Mr. Igor IlikjJonathan Ryan Adams Full time electrical engineering student, currently working on masters degree.Mr. Neil Peery, CNI Aviation Technical
Paper ID #12107History and Heritage as a Vehicle for Contemporary IssuesDr. Douglas G Schmucker, University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 15 years experience focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models. A full-time teaching professional, he focuses on practice, project, and problem- based teaching methodologies.Dr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Page 26.847.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 History and Heritage as a Vehicle
patterns looking for specific evidence ofthese behaviors and saw that there were nuances to each of these levels. The students wehighlight below represent this range and some of the nuances we saw in the data. In thefollowing section, we suggest the implications that our observations can have for supportingteachers as they teach engineering, identify how to promote expert behaviors, and fosterengineering habits of mind. We also believe that our data emphasizes the need for a deeperevaluation of student’s approaches to solving authentic and realistic engineering problems. Page 26.593.4Beginning designer patterns in understanding the challenge and