, New York NY, 1998.5. Canham, M. S., Wiley, J. and Mayer, R. E. (2012), When Diversity in Training Improves Dyadic Problem Solving. Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 26: 421–4306. Wiley, J., et al. "The power of three: Why the third person matters." Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA. 2009.7. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141- 158.8. Cummings, Marx, Thornton, & Kuhl, Evaluating innovation in studio physics. Am. J. Phys. Supp. 1999. Page 26.117.7
students were electrical engineers and twowere mechanical engineers. No students participated both in an interview and a focus group.Demographics by major and population for each interview and focus group are summarized inTable 1.Table 1: Demographics of Student Participants in Interviews and Focus GroupsParticipant Pool Major(s) N Ethnicity Gender Applied Math (1)Focus Group Asian (3) Male (5) BioEngineering (1) 6Sensor Systems Caucasian (3) Female (1) Electrical Engineering (4)Focus Group
responsecurves for the circulating bath, jacket, and reactor and the integral absolute error (IAE) providinga measure of the deviation of the process temperature from the set point. ∞ 𝐼𝐴𝐸 = ∫0 |𝐸(𝑡)|𝑑𝑡 (2)A typical response curve is shown in Figure 3. T (K) Time (s)Figure 3. Temperature (K) in the reactor (blue), bath (green) and hose (magenta) as a function oftime in seconds. Set point temperature is in red. Page 26.130.4Student ExperienceSome students may have encountered
the grades that studentswho have resubmitted work that contributes to the recalculation of their final grade in thecourse, including the resit of the final exam.Once the Resit Boards have met, the progression rules are applied to determine which studentshave made adequate academic progress and will be allowed to enrol in the courses for the nextyear of the programme. These students may include some who failed to achieve satisfactorygrades, i.e., a grade of less than a D3 (D-), in one or more courses. In such a case, the student isrequired to resit some or all assessed components of the course(s) in which he or she has receivedfailing grades before the completion of the next academic year. Failure to pass the course(s) afterthe second resit
further actions. Reflection on experience was framed as an intentional and dialectical thinking process where a student revisited features of an experience and used one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that guided future action.28 From this standpoint, reflection the students had before, during, and after the international experience were analyzed. Reflection that occurred during the interview itself did not qualify as ‘Reflection’, as the nature of the interview was to engage the students to reflect on their experiences. Thus coding this way would have been unnecessary and uninformative. 6. Inductive – refers to codes that emerged from out of the interview data, not included in the
M., 2006. Characteristics of a highly efficient propeller type small wind turbine with diffuser. Renewable Energy; 31: 1343-13549. Yuji O., Takashi K, Akira S., Ken-ichi A. & Masahiro I., 2008. Development of a shrouded wind turbine with a flanged diffuser. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics; 96: 524-53910. Wunderground, (2015). Weather history channel. www.wunderground.com Page 26.447.8
strategic plan2 was developed to guide UDCI ’s direction and growth, with amission encompassing areas of research, facilities and programs for UD students to study inChina, developing partnerships with industry, continuing and professional developmentopportunities for industry, providing R&D expertise to companies through sponsored research,contracts, and student projects, and recruiting, both bringing students to UD, and assistingcompanies to cultivate talent for employment.The Memorandum of UnderstandingThe Memorandum of Understanding3 (MOU) between UDCI and its industry partnersestablishes a foundation from which relationships can grow. This non-binding agreementindicates the roles and responsibility of each entity. The details and
order to leave this option, anopen ended and template-oriented design had to be kept in mind when designing the algorithm.To achieve this functionality, there were some key points that needed to be accomplished for the Page 26.525.12success of the project: Configuration file(s) for different system parameters Program templates for future functionalities expansion Niceties for industry end userHaving a configuration file is important for the robustness of the algorithm. In designing a largeswitch matrix tailored for the specific needs of the end user, there are many parameters that needto be accounted for. A configuration file
trend, with design students in the minority. Futurework will focus on the suitability of this class for non-design majors and mixed groups. Thiscourse is certainly a work in progress, now offered for its third semester. As WIT continues towork toward interdisciplinary, project-based curricula, Conceptual Physics will undergo its ownprocess of testing and refinement to better meet the needs of our students.References[1] Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, Elliot Soloway, Ronald W. Marx, Joseph S. Krajcik, Mark Guzdial,and Annemarie Palincsar, “Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing,Supporting the Learning” Educational Phycologist, 26, 369-398[2] David R. Sokoloff, Ronald K. Thornton and Priscilla W. Laws, “RealTime Physics: ActiveLearning
Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.7. Orr, M. K., Ohland, M. W., Long, R. A., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., and Layton, R. A. (2012). Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models. Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.8. McLoughlin, L. A. (2009). Success, Recruitment, and Retention of Academically Elite Women Students without STEM Backgrounds in US Undergraduate Engineering. Engineering Studies 1, no. 2: 151-168.9. Valian, V. (1999). Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press10. Slaton, A. E. (2010). Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line
Agriculture’s 1890 CapacityBuilding Program awards # 2010-38821-21461 and # 2012-38821-20016. Opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the USDA NIFA.References[1] http://www.techopedia.com/definition/25651/wireless-sensor-network-wsn[2] D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, and S. Kumar, B Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks, inProc. 5thAnnu. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw., 1999, pp. 263–270[3] http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/sosus.htm[4] http://www.ni.com/[5] https://www.google.com/maps
toward the task(Pintrich and Schunk, 2002).” (Carberry A. H.-S., 2010)The implication of this research for engineering educators is that as students develop theircompetence for an engineering task, they are better able to perform that task . . . leading tohigher confidence/self-efficacy . . . leading to willingness to take on more complex, challengingtasks . . . leading to intrinsic motivation and learning of competence . . . and onward in a spiralupward of parallel increases in confidence and competence, leading to engineering mastery(Figure 1). Page 26.970.5
Page 26.978.2 student centered teachingThe most commonly prevailing model in engineering education, being practiced from 1950’s, isthe large student in-class lecture delivery system. This norm particularly involves a lecturer’sdiscretion on how a class is organized along with how the student interactions in a class takeplace. The interactions here are defined by a debate, student to student discussion, student tolecturer discussion and so forth 3. Such interactions play an important role in quantifying &analyzing if the goal of improving a student’s knowledge is achieved. Over the past few years,current trends are being observed in stimulating various interaction patterns among students andlecturers in an educational setting
are often regarded as only being observable through long-term evidence and not amenable to assessment during the program of study [28].This idea of the place and nature of the affective domain in education programs has a longhistory. Schmidt [29] refers to the idea in the mid 1970’s but only as an author making use anexisting idea. In addition, this perspective, that affective domain development in relation to thecognitive material which is learned, that we are pursuing in systems engineering is a perspectivewhich has a long tradition in both theological education and military academies, where theobjective is to develop people who will behave rightly, not just people who know how to behaverightly. Research about education aimed to
://www.fastcompany.com/3016031/leadership-now/are-you-an-introvert-or-an-extrovert-and-what-it-means-for-your-career2 Brothete, Antonie. (2011, September) chrome- http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199828340/obo-9780199828340-0120.xml3 Clark, S., Whittall, A. (2003, August 17). Performance management develops productivity. Winnipeg Sun.Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document4 Craston, David (2014) http://www.projectinsight.net/project-management-basics/basic-project-management-phases5 Jhonson, Brandon (2012) Scholarly Pub, Inc.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S02724944009018896 Prelude Consulting (2014) http://www.preludecharacteranalysis.com/extravert-vs-introvert
draw a scatter diagram and determine the sinusoidal function of best fit. Finally, studentsuse their model to answer various questions concerning the length of the day at a particular timeof the year.These projects progress were presented on the weekly meeting by each group. The final projectresults were presented and evaluated on the end-of-project conference. Each group alsosubmitted a project report. The first place team was recognized on the ceremony and awarded$500 scholarship to each team member if s/he retain or transfer to TAMU-K engineeringprogram. The scholarship was provided by the TAMU-K engineering student success center.Activity objective 4: Track and monitor progress of faculty and students who participatedin SRP.Pre and Post
, June 2010.3. Grenville, R. K. & A.W. Nienow, “Mixing of Miscible Fluids”, In NAMF Handbook of Industrial Mixing, (E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng and S. A. Kresta eds.), Wiley, NY, 2004. Page 26.1158.7Figure 1: Vessel, baffles, motor and speed controllerFigure 2a: Narrow blade hydrofoil Figure 2b: Wide blade hydrofoilFigure 2c: Pitched blade turbine Figure 2d: Rushton turbine Page 26.1158.8Figure 3: Conductivity versus time for blend time measurement
workThis paper demonstrates that it is possible for a public PUI to develop and deliver a successfulMOOC for relatively low cost using local resources. For this plan to be replicated at other publicPUIs, the instructor(s) must be willing to be only partially compensated for their time; theSummer 2012 workshop stipend and six units of release time received by the lead authorrepresents a fraction of the total time put into the creation of the hybrid course and MOOC. AMOOC developed using the model discussed in this paper would have to be a “labor of love.”While this may turn off many faculty members from creating their own MOOC, the lead authorexperienced a tremendous amount of personal satisfaction from helping hundreds of peoplearound the world
, pp. 52-64, Mar 2010.7. Kroposki, B.; Lasseter, R.; et al, "Making Microgrids Work", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp. 41-53, May/Jun 2008.8. Ipakchi, A.; and Albuyeh, F., "Grid of the Future", IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, pp.52-62, Mar/Apr 2009.9. Liserre, M.; Sauter, T.; et al, "Future Energy Systems", IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, pp. 18-37, Mar 2010.10. Bouhafs, F.; Mackay, M.; and Merabti, M., "Links to the Future", pp. 24-32, Jan/Feb 2012.11. Reder, W.; Bose, A.; et al, "Engineering the Future", pp. 27-35, Jul/Aug 2010.12. Venkata, S.S.; Brahma, S.; et al, "Continue Your Learning", pp. 37-43, Jul/Aug 2010.13. "Workforce Trends in the Electric Utility Industry", DOE Report to Congress, Aug
, 2013.8 L. Barba, "This CFD class is flippin’," Boston University , 1 February 2012. [Online]. Available: http://people.bu.edu/labarba/Lorena_Barba/Blog/Entries/2012/2/1_This_CFD_class_is_flippin.html. [Accessed 21 May 2012].9 S. Char, C. Collier, “Chalk and Talk Versus Classroom Flipping: Results of a Case Study,” in IOSR Journal of Resarch & Method in Education, Vol 5, Issue 1, pages 24-28, 2015.10 L. Deslauriers, E. Schelew and C. Wieman, "Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class," Science, vol. 332, pp. 862-864, 2011.11 A. Saterbak, M. Embree and M. Oden, "Client-based projects in freshman design," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, June 2012.12 A. Saterbak, M
thesubject. By using a probabilistic uncertainty measurement with 58 degrees of freedom and aninety five percent confidence level, the uncertainty of the average can be obtained throughEquation 1 𝑷 = 𝒕𝒗,𝒑 𝒔𝒙 Equation 1where tv,p is the t-value with “v,” degrees of freedom, and “p,” percentage of confidence and s x isthe sample standard deviation using the sample size, “n.” Page 26.1526.5 4. Results Students involved in the course were tested specifically on their knowledge of entropy.This subject was chosen due to the abstractness of the subject. It is a
Paper ID #12042Two Phase Flow Water Gas Separation in Biomass Energy ProductionProf. Yeong Ryu, State University of New York, Farmingdale YEONG S. RYU graduated from Columbia University with a Ph.D. and Master of Philosophy in Mechan- ical Engineering in 1994. He has served as an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Farmingdale State College (SUNY) since 2006. In addition, he has conducted various research projects at Xerox Corporation (1994-1995), Hyundai Motor Corporation (1995-1997), and New Jersey Institute of Technology (2001-2003). He has been teaching and conducting research in a broad range
feedback about specific elements of the LLC program. Wehave found that our first two cohorts of female engineering students, currently in their secondand third years, express significantly higher levels of career expectations, self-efficacy, feelingsof inclusion and coping towards engineering than when they first entered. !IntroductionEngineering remains an academic area where women obtain a small fraction of bachelor degrees,and this trend does not seem to be changing in the near future. A recent report by the NationalStudent Clearinghouse found that although more students are pursuing S&E degrees, women’sshare of these majors has failed to increase over the last ten years.1 Researchers’ assumptions thatas women claimed more of the
Page 26.1277.8 Learning in Engineering. Int J Eng Educ. 2010;26(5):1097-1110.7. Beichner R, Saul J, Abbot D, et al. Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project. In: Redish E, Cooney P, eds. Research-Based Reform of University Physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.8. Jonassen DH. Learning to Solve Problems. San Fransisco, CA: Pfeiffer; 2004.9. Pearson Higher Education. http://www.pearsonmylabandmastering.com/northamerica/myengineeringlab/.10. Grigg S, VanDyken J, Morkos B, Benson L. Process Analysis as a Feedback Tool for Development of Engineering Problem Solving Skills. In: ASEE Annual Conference. Atlanta, Ga; 2013
Paper ID #12279Student Outcome Assessment and Course Continuity for Programs With Mod-erate Faculty TurnoverDr. Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He received his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Poly- technic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include
Baltimore County Shawnisha S. Hester is an Evaluation and Assessment Coordinator. She earned both her BA in Psychol- ogy and MA in Applied Sociology from University of Maryland, Baltimore County. She went on to complete her MSW from University of Maryland School of Social Work. Her research interests focus on using qualitative research methods that measure various phenomena and making connections via an interdisciplinary approach, qualitative evaluation and assessment measurements, increasing the number of minorities in STEM fields, and program development at the graduate level. She has had the oppor- Page
times a week. It now uses a 2+2 format: two days of lecture per week,with each lecture day followed by laboratory time to facilitate material understanding by hands-on practice. Approximately 120 students attend a one-hour lecture in an auditorium. Thefollowing day, students attend a small lab session, usually 26 students, to allow more contactwith each student while s/he practices. There has been concern voiced regarding large lectureswith respect to attendance rates, effectiveness of large lecture instruction, and connectivitybetween the instructor and students15. To provide a more flexible learning environment and improve student learningoutcomes16-18, a blended learning approach was adopted in 2010 by approximately half of theEGR115