assessment data areincluded so that interested groups can begin their own programs.1.0 IntroductionSmall universities with primary undergraduate programs have historically been teaching-focusedwith research being a secondary priority or even non-existent. In recent years, there has been ashift toward involving undergraduate students in mentored research activities.1 The benefits andrewards for the students, faculty mentors, the institution, and the greater scientific andengineering community have been recognized. However, there are many challenges toimplementing a successful teaching research program at the undergraduate level. Within theengineering education community, the topic of undergraduate research, and in particular theissues facing
learning.Educational Philosophy of Experiential LearningIn his seminal work, Kolb draws upon the work of Dewey, Lewin, and Piaget to discuss thecharacteristics associated with the process of experiential learning; key among thesecharacteristics, given the context of the research presented in this paper, are the propositions that“learning is a continuous process grounded in experience,” and that “learning involves Page 26.1280.2transactions between the person and the environment.”1 Experiential learning places an emphasison the emergent process where thoughts and ideas are not fixed but are formed and reformedthrough experiences instead of specific outcomes
workforce can expect to participate in virtual teamswhose members collaborate through a variety of powerful Information Technology (IT) tools.Lipnack and Stamps call virtual teams “the peopleware for the 21st century”(1, p. 2). In response toglobalization and the need to be flexible and competitive, industry increasingly relies on virtualteams to bring together resources and expertise that are geographically distributed(2). It isestimated that 30 million US workers were engaged in virtual teams in 2000(3); today the numberis even higher. A 2012 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management indicated that 46percent of organizations use virtual teams(4). This significant professional trend provided thecontext for experimenting with virtual
females [1]. The Women’sEngineering Institute will provide academic, career, social and extracurricular activities, plusresearch and professional development opportunities for women in engineering. The center willnot only focus on recruitment and retention, but also on providing excellent financial andprofessional development opportunities to all female engineering students at Embry-Riddle. Anumber of other universities have already established similar centers of excellence that havegreatly benefitted their female students and faculties, e.g., the WiSE program at the University ofWashington [2] and University of Iowa [3], the Advance initiative at Lehigh University [4].Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University has already made considerable strides in
questions: (1) What is thenature of the progress of a small group of invested faculty focused on interactive pedagogy? (2)How do faculty experienced in interactive pedagogy analyze student learning? The first questionbecame the core of what we investigated over the life of the project. The second questionevolved into understanding how faculty implemented teaching strategies that provided moreformative assessment data and information about students’ learning in an ongoing fashion.MethodologyIn year one, a pilot group was formed. This group consisted of four faculty members, all fromdifferent institutions. These faculty members would become group leaders in the second phaseof the project, but in the first year they met monthly (via phone conference
inthis context, three dominant research faculty roles are identified and described in this paper: (1)entrepreneur, (2) inventor, and (3) consultant.A comprehensive role-based model will be useful for researchers and practitioners to clearlydiscern the types of relationships that are relevant to the work they conduct in university-industryresearch partnerships. A key factor in improving university-industry research partnershipexperiences is advancing our understanding of the nature of the roles and relationships amongparticipants. Finally, clarifying these roles will be helpful for moving forward with a morefocused research agenda for university-industry research partnerships.Introduction There is increasing national interest in the U.S
additiveprocess to create a desired shape by incremental addition of material in a layer-by-layerfashion[1]. These early machines are relatively expensive, difficult to operate and require longbuild time. With the advent of self-replicating rapid prototype (RepRap) movement that startedin early 2005[2], more affordable desktop 3D printers started to appear in the market[3] starting in2009. These 3D printers deposit melted plastics layer-by-layer in microns until the part iscompleted. The build times depends on the size and fill options, typically several hours. Thisenabled designers to evaluate different design options and finalized the part in matter of days.Uses of 3D printers have evolved into mainstream manufacturing. 3D printing has fashiondesigners
Paper ID #14053Developing Industry Partnerships for Student Engagement in ChinaProf. Scott I. Segalewitz, University of Dayton Scott Segalewitz, P.E. is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton (UD). His areas of interest include using technology to enhance the learning environment, devel- oping global technical professionals, distance and asynchronous learning, and technical communication. He served for 2-1/2 years as Director of Industrial and Technical Relations for the University of Dayton China Institute in Suzhou, China where he established corporate partnerships and training
each year and a total of 1177students. The previous freshmen year was somewhat traditional in approach and consisted ofseveral classes on design communication, a broad introductory course including a lecture thatprovided an overview of various Mechanical Engineering subjects (e.g. mechanics,thermodynamics, mechatronics, and design) and supported those with a three hour/ week hands-on laboratory. There was a strong feeling among the faculty that the freshmen year could beredesigned to better support the overall program goals. One often cited goal of the redesign offreshmen engineering programs is to increase retention through discipline-specific designactivities.1-3 At Cal Poly, the one-year retention rate of Mechanical Engineering students
problem: rescue vehicles need to beable to cover a variety of different terrains to get to stranded victims during natural disasters suchas floods or severe storms. In this unit, students are tasked with designing a vehicle that canspeed up, slow down, and turn on smooth and rough surfaces as well as in water. As theydevelop background knowledge necessary for this task they learn about forces and friction.Unit SummaryLesson ObjectivesLesson 1: Friction Students learn about friction as they measure the force required to drag aSleds sled across different surfaces. They then investigate the effect of changing the mass of the sled has on friction. Once done, they use their data to
condition details influence the demands on the connectionsand the overall structure.Test Specimen:An 8½ feet tall, three-dimensional two-story steel moment frame served as an ideal structure forstudents to experiment with and model. The frame is composed of W6x9 columns and beams. Figure. Two-story Steel Frame, Beam/Column Connection and Column Base ConnectionThe 18” thick concrete floor diaphragms are sized to result in realistic natural frequencies for the Page 26.959.3first few modes of the frame. The columns are connected to the laboratory concrete floorthrough 1” thick steel base plates and four 5/8” diameter bolts spaced at 5.25” from the
) which is mostly used to address inimproving educational policies for increased educational and technology development 1. Mills &Treagust in their paper on application of problem-based and project-based learning inengineering education identify critical issues to be addressed in the philosophy and delivery ofengineering education. The identified issues are 2: Curricula being too focused on engineering science rather than providing integrated topics related to industrial practice. Providing insufficient design experience to students Lack of teamwork and design experience to students Outdated culture of learning strategies and a need towards identifying more
Education faculty and doctoralstudents from Purdue University. Each year, the IGERT-MNM pedagogy module is led by theEngineering Education collaborators from Purdue. The main objective of the module is to helpthe IGERT Trainees and associate trainees develop pedagogical expertise in order to integratepedagogy within their disciplinary areas. To accomplish these objectives trainees were expectedto: 1. Understand pedagogical techniques and apply them to science and engineering activity and curriculum design 2. Identify best practices in methods of communicating scientific content to learners 3. Be able to implement backward design principles 22 to complete a deliverable for use in a classroom setting 4. Gain experience with
research with over 80 papers published in refereed journals and conferences. He has been the principal investigator on several major research projects on industrial applications of sensing and Control with focus on Energy Efficiency. He is a senior member of IEEE, ISA, and a member of ASEE. Page 26.1156.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Minority-focused Engagement through Research and Innovative Teaching (MERIT) 1. Introduction:This paper will present the implement of MERIT, a Department of Education funded project toengage, mentor and
tightly integratingnetwork. As shown in Fig. 1, traditionally theelectricity is first generated in power plant and thentransmitted in high voltage over long distances tosubstations, where it is transformed into loweredvoltage and then distributed to consumers. Currently63% electricity in America is generated from fossilfuel like coal, gas and oil, 20% from nuclear, and6% from hydro. For those obsolete power plantsestablished several decades ago, they are runningwith a very low efficiency. After deducting thelosses in generation, transmission and distribution,only 30% energy stored in coal is finally deliveredto the customer as electricity1. Fig. 1. Traditional Power Grid4 In order to
; and sponsoring companiesindirectly benefit from their engineers’ increased skills, networks, and engagement.IntroductionEducation is fundamental to developing and sustaining healthy, productive, and innovativesocieties and economies. In a rapidly changing, globalized economy, the skills that every studentneeds to be successful in the 21st century include problem solving, creativity, critical thinking,and analytical reasoning—skills that are increasingly important for jobs that require academicdegrees in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), as well as those that do notnecessarily require STEM degrees.1 Furthermore, the rate of job and industry growth in STEMsubjects is outpacing other sectors.2,3 In the United States, however
EM211-core students and 86 EM211-like students. The academic characteristics of the EM211-Core, EM211A and EM211-Like studentswere compared and are shown in Table 1. The table shows the mean data for the five academiccharacteristics considered in the logistic analysis as well as the statistical significance of thedifferences observed between the values of the at-risk groups (Sig). The data clearly show thepronounced difference between the entry and performance characteristics of the core not-at-riskgroup and the at-risk groups. Also importantly, the data show that the two at-risk groups(shaded) are significantly similar (Sig > 0.05) in 4 of the 5 categories. The characteristic with asignificant difference, SATM, is not surprising
CanvasThe idea of product archaeology has been explored elsewhere 26,27,28,29,30,31 , but this is the firstintroduction of the canvas. Product Archaeology Canvas Broader Impacts Marketing Customers/Stakeholders Sales and Distribution Legal and Regulatory Value Proposition Technical Design Finance Operating Resources "#$%&'(!)*(+&, ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !-.(&,! Figure 1: The graphical representation of the Product Archaeology
WeaknessIntroductionMedical imaging education is popular in undergraduate engineering curricula. Medical imagingrelated courses, such as physics of medical imaging, medical imaging signals and systems, imagereconstruction principles, etc., are usually offered by electrical engineering, computerengineering, and particularly biomedical engineering programs. Biomedical engineering (BME)education, a part of STEM, has developed as an interdisciplinary engineering training area in thelast 30 years. Based on the current ASEE College Profiles3, BME undergraduate enrollment hasbecome one of the most rapidly growing engineering majors (Fig. 1 below).Fig. 1 Undergraduate enrollment in Biomedical Engineering has increased more than four timesfrom year 2000 to year 2013. It is
Pro/Engineer CATIA Autodesk InventorAmong all the above mentioned tools, SolidWorks is the most widely used software in industryand also it is taught to students in most of the educational institutions. Hence it is selected to beused as training tool in this paper.SolidWorks is a 3D parameterized design tool, focusing on Para-solid inclined solid modellingenvironment.1 Drawings in SolidWorks can be worked out from previous assemblies or assemblyportions. View generations are automatic and acquired from the solid model itself. Tolerances,notes and dimensional feedbacks, as per the requirement, can be added later on. Modules can beprepared on all standard orientations and layouts like ANSI, ISO, JIS.SolidWorks can
assessment process as described by Colella2 and diagramed in Figure1. The assessment process shown in Figure 1 illustrates the key elements of the assessmentprocess which include (a) department review, (b) program review and (c) end of course review(EOCR). Note this process involves the stakeholders such as students, alumni, graduatingseniors, and faculty and addresses the appropriate ABET criteria. Note that this process is not Page 26.1420.2confined to a single program, but when appropriate reaches out to assist other programs anddepartments for mutual benefits. Particularly noteworthy is when the outcomes of one courseimpact another. A similar
many of our natural resources are buried under the ground and need to be dug up. Onesuch resource is coal, which is a nonrenewable resource used to produce energy. Miningengineers need to think about how to remove resources safely and effectively. Miningoperations, however, can have a devastating impact on the environment and the land must berestored to a usable purpose (a process called reclamation).Activity: 1. Tell students are starting their own coal mining company that they will ‘mine’ chocolate chips out of a cookie. Students will use a worksheet to keep track of costs and profits. This will incorporate math topics such as addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Higher levels can work with prices that contain
described here was designed to eliminateoutdated or overly canned experiments, while choosing robust equipment that the students couldinteract with in a much more open-ended way.Measurement and Analysis is a required course for junior level mechanical engineers. Theoverall purpose of the course is to teach students how to design experiments, how to measurecommon engineering variables, and how to use and select sensors. The experiment in question isdesigned to teach students how to measure strain. Students are asked to investigate the effect ofdifferent numbers of strain gauges on the output of a Wheatstone bridge circuit, and observe therelationship between physical location on the object and location in the circuit. The specificgoals are: 1. To
engineering student motivation factors that are relevant to problem solving skilldevelopment. This assessment would allow educators to document outcomes of innovativeapproaches that present students with open-ended problems like those they will encounter in thefuture. The third and final phase of the study comprises a longitudinal study of changes instudent motivation and problem solving practices over time.IntroductionStudent motivation is a major factor in the development of metacognitive and problem solvingskills. A key factor in student motivation is their perceptions of their future possible selves,which are also linked to cognition and perceptions of themselves in the present.1-2 Understandingfactors that contribute to students’ Future Time
). An Instructional Model for Integrating Content Area Instruction with CognitiveStrategy Instruction, Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 10(1), 63-90 Page 26.434.4
offered in the first university areBiomedical, Civil, Computer, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering. The undergraduate degreesoffered at UTA are Aerospace, Biomedical, Civil, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, Mechanical, andSoftware Engineering. The majority of engineering programs in these two institutions are accreditedby ABET, except three programs which are so new that BS degrees have not yet been awarded inthose disciplines. Plans are underway for requesting ABET accreditation visits as soon as the firstdegrees are awarded in those three programs. It is expected that the new programs will receive theirABET accreditation within one or two years. The student enrollment and degrees awarded in eachprogram are summarized in Table 1.Table 1
acquiring the data from the universities hasbeen problematic to date. I continue to pursue this data for inclusion in future papers.Camosun College was formed in 1972 and has kept electronic student grades since that time.Although early data is sparse due to small start-up class sizes and the small number of programsoffered, the current student population as of 2014 is more than 10,000 full time equivalentstudents. This provides a good number for trending correlations.Interestingly, 46% of students at Camosun who have high school physics credits are female. Yetwomen comprise less than 5% of engineering students. The table in Figure 1 depicts thecorrelations between the percentage of women with high school physics credits and thecorresponding
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Development and use of an active learning classroom for a course on Dynamic Systems1 IntroductionLarge-scale reviews in physics and STEM education research have consistently found thatstudent active learning methods increase student learning outcomes and decrease drop-out rates[1, 2]. Our motivation for testing active learning methods in a technology-rich environment wasthe student association’s request for more active learning methods at our institution, and studentfeedback on course evaluations from fall 2013. The student feedback on a course in DynamicSystems in 2013 was that it was good, but that it required "solid knowledge and skills inmathematics
learns, understands, makes a decision, or thinks through a problem, two types ofcognitive processes or systems are involved:System 1 – implicit, unconscious, automatic, and works fast but is learned slowlySystem 2 – explicit, conscious, effortful, controlled, and works slow but is learned quickly(Kahneman, 2011; Rydell, McConnell, Mackie & Strain, 2006).In learning, these dual processes work for two different types of information. While conceptualinformation is obtained by fast-learning (System 2) processes, subliminal information is obtainedby slow-learning (System 1) processes (Rydell et al., 2006; Nosek, 2007). System 2 learning isdirect and declarative, while System 1 learning is mostly indirect and non-declarative. Studentsmight learn
Academic Integrity into Engineering CoursesAbstractThis study examined how a professional development workshop affected faculty members’perspectives about incorporating academic integrity into their engineering courses. Embedded inthe context of a new initiative at a large Mid-Atlantic University that aims to enhanceengineering students’ understanding of academic integrity and professional ethics, the workshopfeatured three aspects: 1) enhancing faculty members’ self-efficacy in teaching academicintegrity and professional ethics; 2) facilitating their development of instructional strategies forteaching integrity and ethics; and 3) supporting their classroom implementation of instructionalplans. Seven faculty participants were interviewed after