through INSPIRE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Innovation and the Zone of Proximal Development in Engineering EducationAbstractRecent scholarship has emphasized incorporating innovation experiences into engineeringcurricula. These experiences are often positive, especially when students have the opportunity tosolve novel but challenging problems, navigate their own processes, critically reflect on theirexperiences, and receive appropriate levels of support and scaffolding. This study furtherexplores the role of scaffolding on innovation and non-innovative projects through the lens ofVygotsky’s theory of proximal development. Ten engineering seniors participated in
of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the two grants entitled ”Project to Integrate Technical Communication Skills” and ”Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engi- neering students by utilizing integrated online modules and experiential learning opportunities.” Through these grants technical communication and entrepreneurial thinking skills are being integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs.Dr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito-Gobel, Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of New Haven, received her Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She has been
Associate Professor at the Department of Textile Engi- neering since 2005. Degree in Textile Engineering by the University of Minho. Professor at the University of Minho since 1984. PhD in Engineering –Technology and Textile Chemistry by the University of Minho in 1993. Rieter Award, 1993. Responsible for several curricular units in the integrated study cycles in Textitle Engineering and Engi- neering and Industrial Management, in the 1st cycle course of Design and Fashion Marketing, and also in the 2nd cycle courses of Fashion Design and Communication, Textile Chemistry, Advanced Textiles and Design and Marketing. Head research and research member of several R&D projects, has presented as main author or co
Paper ID #16484Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset through a Sophomore-Level, Multi-Disciplinary, Engineering Design Studio ExperienceDr. Cristi L Bell-Huff, Lawrence Technological University Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is the Director of the Studio for Entrepreneurial Engineering Design (SEED) at Lawrence Technological University where she teaches courses on fundamentals of engineering design projects and entrepreneurial engineering design. In addition to her PhD in Chemical Engineering, she also has an MA in Educational Studies and is a certified teacher in Michigan. She has industrial experience in pharmaceutical product
multiplepedagogical innovations emerged (e.g., collaborative and active learning, project and problembased learning, and more technology in the classroom) and great amount of information wasexchanged among participants. However, the diffusion and adoption of these innovations wererare within participant institutions and those who did not participate.2 From there, a large seriesof studies tried to understand the main challenges associated to processes of change inengineering schools.Clark, Froyd, Merton, and Richardson (2004) focus on the perspective of those leading thechanges promoted by the Foundation Coalition.3 At an initial stage of the program, leaders’ andauthorities’ approaches to curricular innovation followed a product development process.3
Project courses for all majors. The importance of understanding risk andliability, of continuous professional development including licensure, and of ethics inengineering practice, all of which are relevant concepts for an entrepreneurial approach toengineering, have been stressed. Historically, senior projects that have led to longer-termstudent-private sector collaborations or even student-initiated business have been rare.Recently, entrepreneurship at Pitt-Johnstown has experienced a revitalization. A renewed pushto create an Entrepreneurial Studies program came from Pitt-Johnstown President Jem Spectar in2011. This led first to an agreement with Johnstown Area Regional Industries (JARI) to supportentrepreneurial internships for Pitt-Johnstown
Paper ID #15994Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Innovation for Engineering and Busi-ness Student TeamsDavid G. Alexander Ph.D., California State University - Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The evolution of a course on Creativity and New Product DevelopmentAbstractCreativity and New Product Development is a two semester senior design course for MechanicalEngineering students at the University of Virginia. Design thinking is fundamental to all stagesof this course. It emphasizes creative thinking and stimulates the students to generate diversesolutions to problems. Students are required to work in teams developing new product ideas.Each team carries their idea through to a working prototype, and manufacturing and businessplans. They also submit a proposal for funding and a draft patent application. In its current form,the class project is usually the basis for the senior
first year engineering experience, authentic projects and assessments, and P-12 engineering.Heather Sapp, Ohio Northern University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Curiosity, Connection, Creating Value: Improving Service Learning by Applying the Entrepreneurial MindsetIntroductionProviding students with meaningful learning experiences can be challenging. One approach is touse authentic learning, where knowledge is applied in real world contexts. Through contentanalysis of relevant journal articles from different disciplines, Rule outlined four characteristicsof authentic learning.1 First, the problem at hand is rooted in the
projects. In the field of international development, her primary interests are in safe water supply access, environmental conservation and sustainable livelihoods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Igniting creativity and innovation in engineering students: the case for technology and society courses in engineering curriculaAbstract: Engineering educators have long struggled with coaxing creativity from their students,given the massive amount of prescriptive material that must be covered in their curricula. Ifstudents want to graduate in four years, they have very limited time to explore unique interestsoutside of their specific engineering discipline. A technology and society
due to the instructor’s personal interest in the topic,but it was also due to a perceived need that innovative capabilities should be fostered amongEngineering Technology students. This perception was bolstered by published expressions ofthe same sentiment, for example as put forth by Duderstadt3 and by the Council onCompetitiveness4.Students were assigned a multi-phased project in which they developed design concepts, guidedby requirements provided to them in a given scenario, completing activities in parallel with thecourse’s progression. The course topic and the structure of its term project offered anopportunity to include some lesson units about innovation, and to incorporate related activitieswithin the project. The goal was to help
Paper ID #17396Chair of the Department of Economics and Management in Nizhnekamsk Chemical Engineering Institutein 2002-2012. She supervised several projects for Tatarstan chemical and petrochemical companies inthe years 2002-2007 and headed the Department of Macroeconomic Research in Advanced EconomicResearch Center in the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan in the years 2007-2010. Hercontribution to the projects was the supervision of their economic sections (including setting of researchobjectives, project supervision, economic assessment, report writing, presentations, and publishing of re-search discoveries). She was personally involved in the strategic planning of economic development at aregional level. All these research
question with a small but vocal minority indicating a desire for less businesscontent.1- IntroductionThe pedagogical goals, academic motivation and models of freshman engineering designexperiences are many. A survey paper1 lists eight models: reverse engineering; creatingsomething useful from a preset number of objects; full scale project; small scale projects; casestudies; competitions; non-profit project; and, redesign of a local project. The reader is invited toread Reference 1 for details.The last decade has witnessed a newfound emphasis on entrepreneurial engineering education,exemplified by efforts to develop engineering graduates with an entrepreneurial mindset2. Twoof the preeminent organizations advocating for changing the education
and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent the last 10 years evaluating projects supporting young adults moving through the STEM pipeline and workforce development projects. Rebecca’s work often involves evaluations of innovative approaches to STEM education, typically at community colleges and graduate school programs. Rebecca received her MBA in non-profit management at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management and her M.Ed. from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group Alan Peterfreund is Executive Director of SageFox Consulting Group, an education research, evaluation located in Amherst Massachusetts. Alan has a Ph.D. in Geology from
Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspec- tive of Human Constructivism. She has authored several publications and given numerous presentations on the generation of analogies, misconceptions, and facilitating learning in science and engineering educa- tion. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Nathan P. Siegel P.E., Bucknell UniversityDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering and an associate dean of engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in
Biomechanics Laboratory (EBL) at LTU with the goal of advanc- ing experimental biomechanics understanding. Dr. Meyer teaches Introduction to Biomechanics, Tissue Mechanics, Engineering Applications in Orthopedics, and Foundations of Medical Imaging. He has been an active member of the engineering faculty committee that has redesigned the Foundations of Engi- neering Design Projects course that is required for all freshmen in the College of Engineering at LTU. This committee is currently designing a new sophomore-level Engineering Entrepreneurship Studio that will also be required for all students as a continuation of the ”Foundations Studio.” He has published 33 peer-reviewed journal and conference proceeding articles. At
, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation into Problem-based Learning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid MechanicsAbstractA variety of pedagogies have become well-established and widely used in engineering educationincluding problem-based learning (PBL), project-based learning, case-based learning, andinquiry-based learning. All of these classroom techniques certainly emphasize skill-basedlearning outcomes (e.g., determine the size of a pump), but they do not always emphasizemindset-based learning outcomes (e.g., identify an unexpected opportunity). Incorporatingelements of the entrepreneurial mindset into these pedagogies, sometimes referred to asentrepreneurially minded learning (EML), can
campus and propose action plans, and estimate the economic impact of theirsolution. As a result of this project, students learn how to create value and communicate anengineering solution in terms of economic benefits. Students provide a report for each modulewhich is graded based on designed rubrics. All these modules are performed in teams which inturn improves students’ team work and collaboration skills. This paper elaborates the details ofeach module and learning outcomes, and presents the student evaluation results, and at the enddiscusses the lessons learned.1. IntroductionIn the past few years the attitude that considers engineers as sole reactive specialists has evolvedto team player entrepreneurs. This fact is critical while designing
the December workshop to learn more about the subject.They then create modules in one of their courses that demonstrate some aspect of theentrepreneurial mindset. Once they complete the project they create documents to show othershow these modules can be used. Once this is done they receive a small stipend. By emphasizingmodules, rather than entire courses, our faculty create things that other faculty (both here and atother schools) can insert into existing courses. So far we have had 15 faculty members (about40% of our total engineering faculty) create modules. Another six professors are in the processof creating modules. The degree of this involvement is helping to change the culture within ourcollege concerning the important of helping our
, there is a wave of energy focused onlearning-by-doing and human-centered design. From the business and engineering domains,students are being introduced to the concepts of Lean and Agile to inspire new ways ofaccomplishing collaborative, team oriented projects that require rapid iteration towards solutionsfor open-ended problems. A significant portion of STEM Faculty spends a great deal of timeand energy incorporating these concepts into effective pedagogy applied to undergraduateengineering education. Often, these same faculty members are eagerly engaged in advancing theentrepreneurial learning ecosystem in their institutions. In engineering and other STEMprograms, we apply innovation and entrepreneurship as the catalysts used to help guide
Paper ID #14951Inclusion of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML) Modules in 2nd-Year Core Engineering CoursesDr. Jennifer A. Mallory, Western New England University Dr. Mallory joined Western New England University after earning her Ph.D. from Purdue University in August 2012. Dr. Mallory’s current teaching interests include integrating problem- and project-based learning into core mechanical engineering courses to enhance student learning and motivation. She is currently the primary instructor for the Thermodynamics I and II courses in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests are in engineering education and spray
ofinnovation where problem solving is addressed by group interaction, as opposed to just oneindividual effort3. Negotiation techniques are needed in order to recombine past experiences ofdifferent individuals, and lead to new insights. Nonetheless, engineering schools often dismissteaching negotiation techniques that might be relevant for developing high performance teams2. Techniques for achieving temporary settlements are relevant to engineering students’ training.Innovation driven projects usually have to work with ambiguity4. Teams that manage multiplepoints of view are more prepared to face that challenge because they allow the existence ofhealthy conflict. Although the interest in Project Based Learning (PBL) courses has increased,the
participants of the Jam referred to creating a web-portal andmobile app that will support social-media type of communication between Industry andAcademia. Suggested platform will allow businesses to deploy information about ongoingresearch projects, calls for participation for academia and in its turn could identifyopportunities to join industry projects, position its areas of expertise and get better involvedin understanding trends for educating future of workforce.The framework describes herebelow the main steps towards stable, successful, long-termacademia-industry cooperation. The framework is industry-oriented, meaning that the processis initiated by the enterprise partner.IntroductionToday the interaction process between business and academia is
responsible for the structural and thermal analysis of payloads. She served as Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing the teaching the Engineering Projects in Community Service course, and developing
Mechanical Engineering. The NAE Grand Challenges are broad, important concepts forengineers to accomplish in this century for the betterment of humankind, and provide ourstudents with a large number of topics to consider for their project. We provide the students witha broad goal shown in Table 1 and allow them to brainstorm ideas to pursue. Our students breakinto groups to make initial prototypes (column 3 of table 1) of a product they would like topursue for the summer. The students then assess the various prototypes as a group advocatingfor both their design and another groups’ design. This competitive process ends with the classvoting as a whole on which project will go forward. We then assign a project lead from amongthe students to carry the
Service, where she wrote reports and advised members of Congress on science and technology policy issues. From 1989-2007, she was at the National Academies – the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine – where she was associate director of the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; director of the National Academies Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellowship Program; and director of the Office of Special Projects. While at the National Academies, she was study director of the landmark National Academies report entitled Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future which proposed the
DisciplinesIntroductionInnovation Sandbox is a physical and programmatic environment where students of allacademic levels and majors across the California Polytechnic State University at San LuisObispo (Cal Poly) campus can come together to explore and develop their early-stageideas. The goal is to stimulate creative play outside the traditional academic environmentthrough a mix of formal and informal engagement. This space allows innovations fromquick drop-in low resolution prototypes, to projects that are allowed to progress beyondthe duration of a single classroom project or exercise. Decoupling innovation from aparticular course or department into a true separated space increases student’s ownershipand accountability for the projects and is intended to facilitate
pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and outside the classroom, researching new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that
Paper ID #14992Dr. Nasser Alaeddine, Carnegie Mellon University - Qatar Nasser I. Alaeddine is the Director of Educational and Media Technologies at Carnegie Mellon University Qatar. He previously worked as the Director of Enterprise Applications and Educational Technology at Texas A&M University at Qatar. Dr. Alaeddine also taught courses as an adjunct faculty at University of Phoenix and University of Maryland University College. He has more than 18 years of experience in managing, developing, and leading enterprise IT projects. Dr. Alaeddine has published a number of papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
, blogs, and homepages ofconsultants list numerous reasons. These lists capture two main lines of arguments. One groupprimarily considers the market and the customer: entering the market too late or too early,requiring customers to change established habits and routines or not recognizing the true needs ofcustomers. The other group focuses on internal processes in enterprises: a lack of innovativeculture, decisions rejecting the promising projects, groupthink or sticking to established ideas, toname just a few. In the following paragraphs the discussion focuses on the second group ofarguments addressing the relationship between enterprises and their customers.“You can observe a lot by just watching!” is a famous Yogi-ism. Especially this Yogi-ism