Paper ID #17132Civil Engineering at Purdue University. In that role, Dr. Lawley worked directly with Industry to placestudents in internship/co-op positions, recruited students to Civil Engineering, and managed marketingand communication efforts for the School. Dr. Lawley has taught courses in Technical Communicationsfor Engineers and Law and Ethics at Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Enriching the Diversity of the Engineering Workforce: Addressing Missed Opportunities to Support Student Transition from a Two- to a Four-Year InstitutionI. IntroductionEducators across the State of Texas and nation are engaged in efforts to answer calls including:(a
in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate
, Human Factors, Ergonomics and Safety. Category 10 has the most relevanceto an ergonomics course, although as discussed earlier, some IE programs may combine topicsfrom Categories 10 and 11 in one course. There are 8-12 exam questions drawn from Category10 (7-11% of the FE Exam). The relationship between this list of topics and IE curricular contentwill be further discussed in the next section of this paper. 1. Mathematics: 6–9 questions 2. Engineering Sciences: 5–8 questions 3. Ethics and Professional Practice: 5–8 questions 4. Engineering Economics: 10–15 questions 5. Probability and Statistics: 10–15 questions 6. Modeling and Computations: 8–12 questions 7. Industrial Management: 8–12 questions
the instructional scaffolds usedin the treatment condition. Participants were recruited from 13 classes over 4 consecutivesemesters. During the first two semesters data was collected under the control condition for allthe courses, while the last two semesters data was collected under the treatment condition. Theundergraduate courses included Project Management, Engineering Ethics, Introduction toEngineering Management and the graduate course included Project Management and SystemsAnalysis. All courses have a team project that accounts for at least 45% of the total course grade.The students in the treatment condition received an in-class 30-minute training module on theuse of the tool and they were also given access to a training video
strategies advanced in the engineeringeducation literature produce higher levels of student engagement [19]. Students also read fourshort classroom scenarios that described examples of interactive engagement. These scenarioswere aligned with the following ABET student outcomes: c) an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solveengineering problems; k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice. Students were then asked
-long learning, at the highest of ethical behavior and social responsibility. The emergingclean-energy smart grid environment in the electric power sector has necessitated that relatededucational programs, course or laboratory development and implementation evolve to meet theneeds of students, faculty, and employers alike. In order to prepare the future power engineeringprofessionals to meet the challenges ahead in the power industry, a new curriculum must bedeveloped that includes core power engineering principals coupled with emerging aspects ofsmart grid technologies, green electricity generation, or clean energy integration. SG initiativenot only requires power engineers to have a better understanding of auxiliary fields like
requirements include:1. A process based on the needs of the program's various constituencies in which the objectivesare determined and periodically evaluated (Criterion #2);2. The students in the program must attain “an ability to design a system, component, or processto meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” (Criterion #3); and3. The overall competence of the faculty may be judged by such factors as education, diversity ofbackgrounds, engineering experience, teaching experience, ability to communicate, enthusiasmfor developing more effective programs, level of scholarship, participation in professionalsocieties, and licensure
RMU. Applicable ABET Criterion 3 Learning Conceptual and procedural knowledge Outcomes for Software V&V course at taxonomy based on revised Bloom’s RMU taxonomy for STEM Disciplines 17, 19 b. An ability to design and conduct I & III experiments, and analyze and interpret data e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve II, IV & V engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and V & VII ethical responsibilities g. An ability to communicate effectively III, IV & V h. Broad education necessary to understand VI the
and, as a result,bibliometrics methods have been adopted by research evaluation process. However, there aremany controversies around the topics of research assessment’ need, its methodology, and ethics,and whether the bibliometric methods could indeed produce a valid measurement for researchevaluation. Since bibliometrics has been an important field of research in library and informationscience and part of libraries professional practice for a long time, it seemed a natural transitionfor libraries to start offering bibliometrics services.Bibliometrics services as part of research evaluation process are more common in libraries fromcountries with national research assessment frameworks that are mostly specific to Europe. InU.S., these services
% HSOL 20% 10% 0% Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Figure 2: Comparison of IET course enrollments by delivery type.18There are two courses that were not converted from traditional to hybrid. The first is a one credithour safety and ethics course. This course only meets 50 minutes per week, so there was littlebenefit in creating a hybrid. The other is the senior project. In this course, teams of studentsmeet with a faculty mentor at times arranged for each team. Although they were not
ethical practice grounded in science and engineering methods andstandards. The process involves face-to-face meetings and discussions with entrepreneurs of thecity, from the presentation of the problem until the delivery of the plans. Once engineers are partof society it is important that they have a stronger interaction with the wider public. So the goal ofincluding this course in the program is to provide students the opportunity to work closely withthe real local entrepreneurship environment. Apart from this, engineers need to develop broadfundamental understanding of their professional responsibilities, as well as the need to beentrepreneurial in order to understand and contribute in the context of market and businesspressures. If engineers
observable, an anonymous survey was administered andstudents were asked to self-report on their awareness of their higher-order cognitive thinking.While such self-reporting surveys have limitations, the results of this initial work in progresssuggest that under this model, students are more aware of their learning, they spend more timereviewing and evaluating their solutions, and they report that self-grading and self-correctingleads to an improved understanding of the material. Future work will expand this initial casestudy into a longitudinal study designed to test the impact of this model on student learning whencompared to a control group.References [1] R. Kelley and B. Dooley, “The technology of cheating,” in IEEE Intl. Symp. on Ethics in
engineering design projects for a servicelearning project. The research questions to be studied were as follows: What influence does theuse of Design Heuristic Cards have on freshmen engineering students’ design strategies? Whataspects blocked creative processes during engineering students’ design strategies? The researchexposed to two undergraduate students to the principles of qualitative research, the concept ofcoding for inter-reliability of interpreted information, the importance of Institutional ReviewBoard considerations and ethical handling of information, and ensured that the REU studentswere communicating and cross-talking ideas and concepts during emergent themes.Assessment of Students’ ExperiencesAn independent evaluator assessed students
Expectations Initial Ideas Incomplete, little effort. Good effort, mostly complete. Highly motivated, detailed. 5 Presentation Prototype Setup Absent, not participating. Present, participating. Fully engaged. 5 Final Pitch Incomplete, little effort. Good effort, mostly complete. Highly motivated, detailed. 5 Presentation Management/ Very little effort put into the Highly motivated. Good Good work ethic, team-effort
of its commitment to the scientific and experimental nature of engineering by rejecting the special place accorded to testing by TF-3. A new focus on engineering judgment and professional judgment; a restored emphasis on professional responsibility, including the graduate’s ability to make informed, ethical decisions based on the global, economic, environmental, and societal impact of engineering. The reintroduction of lifelong learning, but as operationalized to facilitate reliable assessment. Also, the reintroduction of a more robust set of constraints on the engineering design process, but as handled as definitions placed in an expanded introduction. Likewise, the introduction of a
communicating cross-culturally or identifying problems within their team. The same holds true for visual literacy:Students rated their mechanistic skills like image editing or labeling higher than theirstrategic/critical ones. We assume that most of the students have edited or labeled photos beforeentering college because of their use of social media, so they are familiar with those activities. Incomparison, at each university students reported they were not confident in legal restrictions onuses of visual media. A discussion of these restrictions and proper citations for images can easilybe included either in professional communication courses or in the wide range of ethics coursesthat are already embedded in engineering programs.DiscussionThese
process to meet desired needs.needs within realistic constraints such (c.2.) - An ability to apply realistic constraints withinas economic, environmental, social, a system, component, or process design.political, ethical, health and safety, (c.3.) - An ability to identify and use appropriatemanufacturability, and sustainability technical literatureEAC (e) An ability to identify, (e.1.) - An ability to identify engineering problems.formulate, and solve engineering (e.2.) - An ability to formulate engineering problems.problems (e.3.) - An ability to solve engineering problems. Table 3. Capstone Team Assessment Results
% 16% Financial management skills 4% 3% Time management 65% 39% Integrity and ethics 18% 11% Safety 34% 26% Community service and outreach 1% 0% Communication 59% 39% Teamwork 85% 63%It is worth noting that the both groups agree on skills in design, time management, andteamwork as the most impacted.Degree of ConfidenceRQ3: What is the level of self-confidence and motivation of students who use the facilityin the skills that the facility was developed to
Quarter SMCCBecause the ME capstone course was the largest capstone course of the 3 participatingdepartments, we chose to assess the merit of the college of engineering’s multidisciplinarySMCC approach by comparing it to single team ME capstone projects. All data collected wasfrom the first quarter of a three quarter long project. Table 3 shows the three instruments used toassess our SMCC approach. This study involved research conducted in an established,commonly accepted educational setting specifically for understanding the effectiveness ofinstructional techniques, and thus was not subjected to an ethics board for approval as per theuniversity exemption policy.Instrument 1 consisted of two close ended questions added to the end-of-quarter
project, ”A Characterization of Enolase: A Glycolytic Enzyme in Plasmodium Yoelii”, was chosen to be presented at the International Science and Engineering Fair. Furthering her interest, Savannah designed a dehydration detector, ”Detecting Dehydration through Skin Conductivity”, that won first place in poster competitions of both the Society of Women Engineers and the Drexel Fresh- man IEEE. This inspired her to join IEEE, where she served as the outreach chair for one year followed by being elected President of the Student Branch. Savannah earned the IEEE Section Leader Scholarship, third place in the IEEE Undergraduate Paper Contest, and first place in the SAC Ethics Competition. She co-founded and organized the
(Analytical thinking, complex reasoning) 70.4% 27.8% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% Initiative (Self-starter, productive) 64.2% 34.0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% Prioritizing/Planning/Organizing 51.9% 37.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% Professionalism (Responsible, accountable, dependable) 73.6% 24.5% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% Integrity (Honesty, ethics, fairness) 87.0% 13.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Attitude/Cooperation 90.7% 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Communications (Verbal, written, collaborative, teamwork) 75.9% 20.4
of students enrolling in STEM degrees at Louisiana TechUniversity from high schools which participate has been seen 6.Since STEM issues cut across all aspects of our lives, our educational efforts have taken aholistic view in integrating science, mathematics, and engineering with business, humanities andliberal arts, including political science, history, ethics, social sciences, and psychology. Fromprofessional development of high school teachers to research and development, we have fostereda truly collaborative environment that is providing an avenue for the recruitment of students intoSTEM-related fields of study. STEM-Discovery focuses on research in STEM learning as wellas developing and fostering competitive, knowledgeable, and
Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He
coverage of fundamentals; teach more about “real-world” engineeringdesign, development, and operations; cover more material in frontier areas of engineering andengineering technologists; offer better instruction in both oral and written communication skillsand teamwork skills; provide training in critical and creative thinking skills and problem-solving methods; produce graduates who are conversant with engineering ethics and theconnections between technology and society so that the average student can complete theundergraduate degree in four years (ABET.org).In view of the broadening and rapidly shifting scope of the profession and ABET criteria, it isimperative to shift the focus of E and ET curricula from transmission of content to the
, software useskills, graphical analysis, data analysis, and oral and written communication skills. Theoverarching goals of this course include: Providing the student with an overview of the profession of civil engineering and a basic understanding of the subfields in the discipline; Providing the student with a basic understanding of the role and responsibility of engineers with an emphasis on ethical, safety, and licensing issues; Introducing the student to the global implications of civil engineering; Exposing the student to current civil engineering projects and their societal implications; Introducing the student to state-of-the-art technologies that are used in civil engineering practice
the realworld, confronts makers with design constraints that they must think around. The “(c) ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability,” that ABET calls for in engineers is just an extension of the practical ingenuitythat Makers apply to their personal projects. These characteristics are all in harmony withengineering standards, and are necessary to create successful engineers.Verbal communication and teamwork is something that many Young Makers are familiar with,and is something that many engineering student struggle. The mindset that is an intrinsic part ofmaking is
students6-9 but there arediscussions whether it should stop at introducing the theoretical rules and use7 or should italso include the development process.10The most effective way to introduce standards to engineering students was determined to beby inclusion into engineering curricula or use of standards in the classroom.8-11 However,although recognized as efficient, standards inclusion into curriculum is still not commonpractice due to a variety of reasons. One of the main reasons is that engineering curriculumis highly intensive in technical subjects which, in turn, leaves little room for auxiliarycourses on other topics of interest to engineers (i.e. project management, standards, ethics,etc.). Other reasons for the lack of curricula adoption
material, component, orsystem.Learn from Failure - Recognize unsuccessful outcomes due to faulty 52.6%equipment, parts, code, construction, process, or design, and then re-engineer effective solutions.Ethics in the Lab - Behave with highest ethical standards, including 44.7%reporting information objectively and interacting with integrity.Models - Identify the strengths and limitations of theoretical models as 36.8%predictors of real world behaviors. This may include evaluating whethera theory adequately describes a physical event and establishing orvalidating a relationship between measured data and underlyingphysical principles.Psychomotor - Demonstrate competence in selection, modification, and
ethically responsible ways. Students are involved more, and teachers control less. 3. Content is used to build a knowledge base, to develop learning skills, and to foster student self-awareness of their abilities. Teaching approaches accounts for students’ learning strategies and prior knowledge. 4. Together, students and teachers create motivating learning environments that encourage students to accept responsibility for their learning. 5. Assessments are implemented to promote learning and to develop self and peer assessment skills, not to evaluate performance primarily.In a meta-analysis of 119 studies, across grades K-20, Cornelius-White found that learner-centered variables such as incorporation of higher-order
school and high school girls topromote computer science and robotics. 11 His Arts and bots is a combination of crafting andcommon robotics programming that promotes collaborative “expression-focused robots”rather than competition based robotics.12In our work, co-robots are introduced as pedagogical tools to utilize engineering design as amotivator to teach Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics through practicalhands-on activities to students. Engineering education assists development of engineering“habits of mind” including systems thinking, creativity, optimism, collaboration, effectivecommunication, and ethical considerations.13 This paper reports on the first year of a multi-year project to engage middle and high school students