effort was lost, due in part to unintentionallack of institutional support.Fifteen years later, facing the challenges of financial shifts, changing perspectives aboutuniversities, new competition from for-profit and online universities, and changes in student andparent expectations, Mines organized committees and began a formal strategic planning process.Through this process the faculty and staff agreed that there was a need for greater emphasis onteaching and learning. The plan identified four goals for the university. Explicit within three ofthe four goals was a call for a center to provide the leadership and support to innovate instructionsystemically.Faculty were asked to submit proposals to begin efforts to meet the goals set forth in the
and student-driven curricula. The paper provides an overview and describesthe development of the first and fourth component of the curriculum, i.e. the role of technologyand the content for the course planned until the publication of this paper, and it serves primarilyto document the design and initial development phases of the ongoing project.IntroductionOne of the most pressing topics in educational development has been the need for educationalaccess and equity for diverse students and the potential role of technology to achieve thisinclusion. To achieve this objective, the educational context needs consideration, in particularwith respect to available resources and existing social, political, and cultural structures. Todesign an enriching
from 2010 to 2013; 95% advanced one grade level in mathematics,science, or engineering, while 79% of the participants completed the college level mathematicscourses and 85% completed the college level science courses11,12,14.The ANSEP Summer Bridge component is a ten-week summer experience for recently graduatedhigh school students who are planning to pursue STEM degrees14. Summer Bridge studentscomplete a college level mathematics course and a paid internship within an external engineeringor science organization14. Summer Bridge components vary in size from 20 to 30 participants.Between 1998 and 2013, there have been 250 participants of which 95% have continued on toengineering or science 4-year degree programs after participation in the
. Then faculty were asked todevelop changes that the fictionalized faculty could implement into their classroom—one thatwould be easy to implement and one that would be more significant. The final step of thisactivity was to have faculty identify specific changes that they could make to their own teachingto improve student learning. The end of the workshop concluded with a discussion of the largerRED project and plans for future NEXUS workshops. Faculty notes taken during the activitywere collected to capture the barriers and catalysts that faculty identified and ways that theywould like to make changes to their classrooms.!!In addition to the ASU-based NEXUS activities, two team members also delivered a three-hourworkshop at the University of
individuals different from the faculty memberswho actually taught those courses to be evaluated. The intent is to give unbiased evaluations ofthe evidence collected. Furthermore, a set of rubrics is used for each PI so that the raters employconsistent criteria when an article from the same student is being evaluated. Action itemsgenerated from different raters are then summarized as a report and feedback to the programdirector or chair to take corrective actions for improvement. The program director or chair maythen choose to disseminate or generate sub-action items for faculty to act on or to change thecurriculum as a result. This multi-rater methodology is adopted by BlackBoard® [16].Augmented with the above is the assessment plan. The assessment
introductory understanding of electrical powerand energy systems for marine platforms including ships and submarines. The course covers ACand DC marine systems, power distribution design, power generation, energy storage, electricpropulsion, power management, system protection, condition monitoring, electrical systemmaintenance and class rules.Course is offered for first time in Spring 2016 and will be offered in the future in the Fall semester.Lecture 3 hours; 3 credits. Pre-requisites: Fundamentals of Electrical Technology, Introduction toElectrical Power, Electrical Power and Machinery, or equivalent.Required Course Textbook: Shipboard Electrical Power Systems by Mukund Patel [7].Software / Labs: MATLAB, will incorporate labs from planned Marine
traditional view of providing superior products or services. Companiescannot attain competitive advantage unless their logistics and transportation professionals,irrespective of their functional orientation and current job responsibilities, fundamentallyunderstand the dynamics of how products move from one place to another. A well designedgraduate program in this area can produce graduates who can handle the job. The issue is that thenumber of graduates in this field is not meeting the current industry demand. Many U.S.Universities have recently developed and are planning to develop graduate degree programs inthis area. This research (funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation) analyzed the need andidentified best practices in logistics and
screen shots illustrating thermodynamic concepts and chargetransport concepts from the Fuel Cell Science module.Software evaluation/assessmentEvaluation status and approachSo far there have been two evaluations conducted to test the effectiveness of the software in liveundergraduate engineering classrooms at a large university in the south-east of the United Stateswith sample size of 144 and 135 during Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 respectively. In addition,there is one evaluation planned for Spring 2016 at the home university and another evaluation tobe conducted in Summer 2016 at a different university. The sample size for these futureevaluations are expected to exceed 200 students each. To assess the software’s effectiveness it isimportant to
: “Students are self-regulated to the degree theyare metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally participants in their ownlearning”15. A key to SRL is that the “learner displays personal initiative, perseverance,and adaptive skill” when pursuing her learning14. Further features of SRL includestudents’ “self-oriented feedback loops” and the students’ choices of learning processes,strategies, and responses14. Key components in SRL are planning, goal setting, strategyselection, environmental monitoring, help seeking, and maintaining a sense of self-efficacy12.Whereas metacognition covers all aspects of the person, tasks, and strategies from boththe knowledge of and process using domains, self-regulated learning is more focused onusing
for the usersto plan their tracking system.Tag readability depends on many variables, such as type of tag and antenna, distance from tag toantenna, tag orientation and tag placement. Also interferences with the surroundings due to otherwireless devices might have some effects on tag readability. The major interest in this research isto obtain a foot print depending on the tag readability in 3-D space in real time.EQUIPMENTResearches performed with RFID system requires a specific Antenna, Tag and Receiver. There aretwo types of tags, active and passive tags. Active tags require a continuous source of power. Theyare either connected to a power infrastructure or they use energy from an integrated battery. Onthe other hand, passive tags do not
. • Be sure to include o Scope (i.e. campus wide policy, specific utilities process, timeframe of analysis in current state or if historical data available, etc.) o Methods of research planned. (See assignment on Moodle for definitions and examples of primary, secondary, and tertiary) • You should complete this BEFORE lab on dd/mm/yy • If you see another entry with a similar topic, that is OK, but if more than 3 students are researching the same thing, please choose a different topic. • Recall, any surveys or interviews planned must also be discussed with the instructor BEFORE they are to be conducted.One week prior to the scope definition due date, the instructor
easing the transition to college and providing structure and support foracademic resource-seeking and planning [1,2]. Lastly, we considered the administrative overheadof the course, both in its original format and following the redesign; and we compared our resultsto anticipated expenditures for a small-section PBL format course.MethodsDescription of Prior Version of the Course Our FYE engineering course, Introduction to Engineering (EGGG101), is a 2-credit, 14week course, with two lecture sections of 325 to 350 students. The course is open to all students,with 98% of enrollees being first-semester freshmen engineering students (all majors), excludingthe recently launched Biomedical Engineering major. Prior to the course revision, a
common reading program” for incomingfirst year students.1,2 Typically, a book is selected by a campus committee and introduced duringsummer orientation activities. Students are expected to read the book in early fall and participatein discussion groups and other activities during the fall and/or winter semesters. Our first yeardesign and communications course at The Schulich School of Engineering at the University ofCalgary participated in 2013 for the first time because the book – No Impact Man by ColinBeavan - addressed questions about sustainable living and added value to a planned designproject. Students were asked to read one chapter of the book, to critically discuss this chapter intheir ‘chapter’ groups, and assign a spokesperson to
communications for the Depart- ment of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Department of Chemical Engineering. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Utah in Rhetoric and Writing Studies and an M.A. in English from Montana State University. His research focuses on land management policy in two discrete areas. The first relates to civil infrastructure projects and landscape-scale impacts on habitat, community resilience, and long- term land use planning; the second involves the utilization, conservation, and management of big game wildlife resources. For the past five years he has led various transdisciplinary teaching and research projects examining land and wildlife resource management conflicts vis-`a-vis
interaction and help break thetraditional lecture dominant pattern when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. Thepaper will illustrate how cooperative learning can advance academic success, quality ofrelationships, psychological adjustments, and attitudes toward the college experience. Whatneeds to be done to move the process forward? What are the key components of successfuldeployment of active learning in general and cooperative learning in particular? How tofoster and expand the community of engineering faculty who use cooperative learning?What plans, efforts, and resources need to be mobilized to institutionalize pedagogies ofengagement including cooperative learning at the department or college level?Next, it identifies barriers to
quality efforts have been focused onenhancing the quality of our graduate engineering programs, this knowledge is also being appliedto gap courses. As part of the WPI’s new strategic plan, one of the elevate impact initiatives isfocused on pioneering competency-based online education with a focus on engineering educationat the graduate level. This focus and investment has allowed us to reexamine the gap coursesand identify areas for enhancement. Efforts are currently underway to transition those coursesfrom traditional lecture-based courses to competency-based courses. While we expect the moveto competency-based graduate courses to be a large undertaking, we expect the gap course effortto be minimal since the courses had already been modularized
; Middle School Student Interactions. Students in attendance during the fourth Saturday were asked if they enjoyed interacting and working with the undergraduate student volunteers. In the future, we hope to encourage more robust mentor/mentee relationships by allowingfor more interactions outside of the program. These strategies could include a PenPal program, ora visit day on campus so students can see what a typical day at a university looks like for theirmentors.Future Plans Research shows that providing long-term engagement is crucial in moving youth fromsimply having an interest in science to actually having the skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy topursue careers in science13
. Itshould be noted that Algiers is located in the West Bank district of New Orleans and was one ofthe less-impacted areas after Katrina, an “Immediate Opportunity Area”a as it would later becalled in the action plan set forth by the Urban Planning committee for the Bring New OrleansBack Commission.23 The vice president and Algiers legislators presented the proposal for thenew charter schools to an invitation only group on October 5, 2005 without informing theOPSB.21 The vice president for Algiers schools emailed the proposal to board members the nightbefore the scheduled OPSB meeting, which was held on October 7, 2005. It was announced atthe OPSB meeting by New Orleans Governor Kathleen Blanco that charter schools were to bebuilt in New Orleans and
parameters on the relay, connectingthe test leads, developing the test plan in the Doble software, and running the tests. Based onpreliminary feedback, the students also prefer this arrangement. The only drawback to this iscoordinating individual student testing times, since setup and running the tests can sometimestake two hours (more if the students run into problems).In the future, the plan is to add SEL-321 relays (already in the lab) along with a SEL-311 (in theprocess of being donated by a local utility), to match the protection schemes of local utilities.While this lab is similar to laboratories at some universities3, it does not have the advancedcommunication capabilities or other advanced features of some of the premier laboratories4, 5
that purpose. A third component is beliefs – knowledge and conceptions that arestated as being true about the world or about a domain, such as engineering. The fourthcomponent is action possibilities – plans, intentions, strategies, and behaviors that the individualfeels are possible or impossible in the role. These four components emerge continuously throughsocial interactions in different contexts, and interact in a dynamic fashion among themselves, andwith analogous components that belong to other important roles of the person. The four components interact dynamically to form the basis for motivated decisionmaking and action in the role. For example, a student might have a particular set of beliefs aboutthe field of engineering such
Paper ID #16271From Workplace to Classroom - Document Workflow and Engineering Com-munication PedagogyDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment and Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include tech- nical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on
to engineering materials which include metals, ceramics,plastics, and composites in two 100-level courses. Primarily, the contents of these coursesconsisted of topics such as the nature of materials, structure-property relationships,manufacturing methods, and techniques of determining engineering materials’ propertiesaccording to industrial procedures described in the standards such as those of the AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials. These same students, according to their academic plans, wererequired to take a freshman technical design graphics course, where they are introduced to 3Dprinting. Thus, it seemed reasonable to synergistically utilize the skills acquired from two tothree freshman courses in a project-based learning
for human use B 5 Nanostructure synthesis and characterization C 3 Development of SPASER technologyFor this study, we employed a mixed methods research plan which included survey data andcontent analysis methods. The surveys employed are evaluative rather than predictive, andrequired trainees to rate their performance and their team’s performance in a number of differentcategories. The surveys were compiled from important elements of teamwork as found inliterature. The same survey was sent to participants each week for four weeks, so short-termlongitudinal data on the same criteria is collected. The survey protocol is given in Appendix A.As a
simplifies the designprocess, so pre-planning a modeling strategy is not necessary as compared to history-basedmodeling. Users working on existing models do not need to understand the modelingstrategy used to create the model, and do not need to search through the feature tree toidentify specific feature parameters in order to make a change to the geometry. The directmodeling approach facilitates quickness and responsiveness-to-change, making it an idealapproach where speed and flexibility are important3. Due to the absence of the history tree, models created using the direct modelingapproach exhibit greater interoperability. Files can be saved in standard formats such asSTEP, Parasolid, or ACIS, and imported into other CAD packages without loss
recorded or included in this study.FindingsThe main findings for the instructors’ experiences are reported in 7 categories grouped accordingto timing: 1) Before DH session (interview), 2) During DH session (video recording), and 3)Reflection after DH session (interview) (Table 2).Table 2: Capturing the findings Time Category Description 1. Before DH A. Past experience Instructors’ experience before, during and session teaching DH further the DH session / Future plans for using them in their classrooms B. Preparations Meetings, planning, and discussions regarding
laboratories.To fulfill our third goal, we plan to hold a pilot phase, which is scheduled from April to May2016. In this phase, all remote labs will be presented to international partners – secondaryschools from Romania and Slovenia. Apart from this, the Austrian Federal Ministry ofScience, Research and Economy held a month-long contest in October 2015 to involvestudents into science projects. Applicants were between 10 to 18 years old and it was hoped toboost their interest in STEM subjects. We found this to be a great opportunity to promoteremote labs to a wider audience and to get first impressions of how students use them. Thus,we took part in the contest with already existing remote labs and provided a survey for thestudents to fill out for each lab
training, culminating in the 10-week charity bike ride.During the training months, riders train by riding 2000 miles with their team, raise at least$4500, and volunteer for 50+ hours in their community. The Texas 4000 training programincludes a comprehensive curriculum based around Eight Foundational Skills – Self Awareness,Communication, Resiliency, Efficient Planning, Peer Respect, Situational Leadership, TechnicalKnowledge & Skills, and Vision & Action.Goals of interaction between the BME CUReS REU Site and Texas 4000The interaction of the BME CUReS and Texas 4000 was intended to be mutually beneficial in anumber of ways. The first is that the Texas 4000 riders and riders-in-training get to interact withcancer researchers. This allows
in responsefollowing the event. Question 3 was not directly tied toan activity, requiring students to extrapolate from theirexperiences. The other two questions (2 and 6) wereanswered correctly by more than 80% of students atthe start.Student inspiration is more difficult to track, in partbecause we did not link responses from specificstudents between surveys. Hence, the lack ofsignificant change on these questions could represent asubset of students with increased interest and anothersubset with decreased interest, cancelling one anotherout. In relating biomechanics to careers, our activitiesmay have communicated the relevance ofbiomechanics to athletics, but in the future we plan tocreate clearer links between biomechanics andadditional
Workshop/Lab MON. Brainstorming & Solution Selection, Solution Mockups Workshop/Lab Week 3 TUES. Basics of Prototyping and Testing, Solution Selection Workshop/Lab WED. Proof of Concept Testing Lab THUR. Guest Speaker, Proof of Concept Testing Workshop/Lab MON. Call with Customer (Uganda), Business Planning in Design, Prototyping Workshop/Lab TUES. Prototyping Lab Week 4 WED. Prototyping
improving the student engagement. Another aimof the Project is to facilitate the participants’ learning during the process of the design andconstruction. Understanding by Design (UbD) described by Froyed et al as an increasinglypopular tool for educational planning that is a teaching method focused on a betterunderstanding of students throughout a design process 8.4. MethodologyTo appraise the potential benefits of the DAD Project, as an example of employment of full-scale physical models in civil engineering education, a ‘mixed method’ has been utilised. Toelaborate, mixed methods are defined as the third methodological approach following thequantitative and the qualitative methods. In a mixed method, data collection or analysis maybe done