of Written Communication into Engineering Classes and CurriculaAbstractThe inclusion of writing-based exercises in technical courses has multiple learning benefits tostudents. Writing exercises not only serve to improve students’ written communication skills(i.e., “learn to write”), but can also be leveraged to develop critical thinking skills and promotedeeper understanding of technical concepts (i.e., “write to learn”). Nevertheless, while writing-intensive assignments are relatively common in upper-level technical courses, especially in theform of laboratory and project reports, writing is often absent in the larger, required core coursesthat are taken by large numbers of engineering students. This is a
of refining our interview protocoland planning to recruit students who registered for MCB80x but did not receive the at-home lab-kit. We will then perform a comparative analysis of the findings from the two groups in order tounderstand the similarities and differences in the range of student experiences between them.Additionally, we will also focus on understanding the effectiveness of the use of the at-home lab-kits and provide recommendations to instructional designers for developing effective labexperiences for engineering and other STEM courses.References 1. Atiq, S. Z., Chen, X., Cox, D. D., & DeBoer, J. (2015). International STEM Classrooms: The Experiences of Students Around the World Using Physical Remote Laboratory
pencil and more recently using the online systemConcept Warehouse available through Oregon State University or through Blackboard.The Muddiest and Most Interesting Points (MIP) exercise was implemented in three required,junior level classes of varying structure in biomedical engineering at a large public university:Introduction to Biomaterials (BM), Introduction to Statistics for Biomedical Engineers (ST), andTransport Phenomena for Biomedical Engineers (TP). Here, the students were asked whichconcepts were most unclear and most interesting. Biomaterials is a 4 credit, lecture-style class that has been shifting towards a student- centered class. A 2.5-hour guided inquiry laboratory accompanies the two 75-minute lecture
control. His research interest includes sensor based condition monitoring of CNC machining, machine tool accuracy characterization and enhancement, non-invasive surgical tool design, reverse engineering and bio materials.Dr. Warren Rosen, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Dr. Warren Rosen received his Ph.D. in physics from Temple University. He has served as Assistant Professor of Physics at Colby and Vassar Colleges where he carried out research in solar physics, medical physics, and instrumentation. Following this experience he was a research scientist at the Naval Air Warfare Center in Warminster, PA where he established a laboratory for research in high-performance computer networks and architectures for
. Camaratta, Jr.lends itself as the background for questioning the process and application of creating solids.Students are asked to reflect on the process of creating an object’s profile, and what kinds offunctions are well-suited for that purpose. Students are also asked to explain the changes orcomplications that arise when using a vertical rather than horizontal axis.Instruction on calculating volumes using disks (washers) and shells can then proceed in the usualfashion, using a variety of problem solving examples that showcase both methods, presentrotation about either axis, and use either x or y as the variable of integration. The capstoneexperience for these sections is a laboratory-type experience where students analyze a collectionof actual
. Demonstrate an experiential understanding of engineering design impacts relevant to the various engineering disciplines. 9. Apply basic calculation procedures and computational tools used in engineering. 10. Apply the engineering design process and employ it to solve real-world issues. Textbox 1: Stated educational objectives of the Impacts of Engineering course.the roles and responsibilities of an engineer in society. More in depth coverage of the writingaspects of the course will be presented in a later work. The second component of the course isorganized around a laboratory setting in which students explore the course curriculum through thecompletion of a comprehensive engineering design project. The intent behind the
rates of students at 2-year institutions to 4-year institutions.4,5These programs provide exposure to meaningful applications of basic scientific principles andreinforce knowledge presented in the classroom.This paper describes a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent ExpansionProgram (STEP) program at a2-year college whereby “outside” classroom instruction via STEMindustry visits and undergraduate research opportunities were provided to program participantsin an effort to increase graduation and transfer rates. During STEM industry visits, programparticipants interacted with STEM professionals, toured STEM industrial research laboratories,learned about cutting-edge technology, and gained information regarding skills that are
diagram best represents the system.Distractors include components out of order and incomplete or extra component interactions.Initial ResultsThe initial pilot of the test was conducted in a general-education engineering course at HopeCollege. The course satisfies a general education laboratory course for non-STEM majors. Atotal of 42 students took the test. Of these students 48 percent were male and 52 percent female.All of these students are majoring in a discipline that is not a field of science, engineering,technology, or mathematics. The material on the test was not covered in the course at the timethe test was given. The students had no opportunity to study or prepare, the test was given“cold.”Figure 1 shows the distribution of results for
control with research contributions in the areas of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Networks and Computing Systems, and Mobile Cloud Computing. His research work has been published in over forty refereed papers, posters and journals, and one book chapter. Guirguis’ research and educational activities are funded with over $2.9M in grants from the NSF, DoD, AFOSR, IEEE, Cisco and Texas State. Guirguis received the NSF CAREER award in 2012. Guirguis has been a visiting faculty researcher at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in the sum- mers of 2012 and 2013. During the academic year 2014/2015 he joined the Mobile and Pervasive Com- puting Group in the ECE Dept. at UT Austin. Guirguis has a wide range of
projects related to engineering and engineering education: value-added manufacturing (Dr. Katie Whitefoot), taxonomy of engineering education (Dr. Cynthia Finelli), pioneers in engineering education (Dr.Cynthia Atman) and inquiry-based learning in mechanics (Dr. Brian Self).Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011
the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in the area of Haptics and Virtual Reality. His research interests are in the areas of unmanned vehicles particularly flapping flight, mechatronics, robotics, MEMS, virtual reality and haptics, and teaching with technology. He has ongoing research in flapping flight, Frisbee flight dynamics, lift in porous material and brain injury He is an active member of ASEE and ASME and reviewer for several ASME, IEEE and ASEE, FIE conferences and journals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integrated Development of Programming Skills using MATLAB
, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16374 NASA, NSF, FAA, DOE, and private companies. Currently, he and his students at the Advanced Tech- nology Systems Laboratory are pursuing cutting-edge research on the role of visualization and virtual reality in aviation maintenance, hybrid inspection and job-aiding, technology to support STEM education and, more practically, to address information technology and process design issues related to delivering quality health care. As the Department Chair, he has been involved in the initiation of programmatic initiatives that have resulted in significant
Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Denver and Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Virginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research focuses on understand- ing and characterizing human movement across healthy and pathologic populations through in vivo exper- imental measurement and musculoskeletal modeling. Applications focus on fall prevention, spine stabil- ity, rehabilitation after total joint surgery, and muscle
Engineering, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall.6. Yang, Horng-Jyh, (2015), Online resources utilization in geotechnical engineering laboratory for undergraduate civil engineering students, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE North Central Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education.7. Puchner, Richard, (2011), “Using Google Earth in geotechnical investigations”, Magazine of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Volume 19, issue 3.8. Kumar, Saneev, (2014), “Teaching Geotechnical Engineering using Professional Practice”, International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida.9. Boruff B. J., Emrich C., and Cutter S. L., (2005), Erosion Hazard Vulnerability of US Coastal Counties
5. A corresponding ThingWorxMashup can be designed to display the collected information as shown in Figure 6, and to sendout an email alert when the temperature or humidity exceeds a pre-set threshold. As part of our future work, IoT-based activities will be embedded in the curriculum, as aresult of which undergraduate students will be exposed to applications of IoT in the context ofcore electrical and computer engineering courses and laboratories. The author hopes to conduct astudy using qualitative and quantitative methods to determine impact of this curriculumenhancement in recruitment and retention efforts. In addition to the curriculum impact, IoTserves as an effective platform to motivate undergraduate research. The author and
6 • Social Sciences (Section D) 6 3 3 • Lifelong Learning (Section E) 3 3 0 • Comparative Cultural Studies (Section F) 6 0 6 • U.S. History and Government 6 0 6 Chico 48 28 20 •Oral and Written Communication, Critical 12 12 0 Thinking, Quantitative Reasoning (Group A) • Natural Sciences with Laboratory (Group B) 6 6 0
simple CCD cameras with LED lighting, are rich in data that studentscan harvest using basic image analysis techniques provided by software such asMATLAB or ImageJ. These experiments are low in cost, and can be easilydisseminated and supported by web-based resources. They are part of a largereffort whereby surface analysis tools for characterizing reflection, roughness, andcleanliness, are used as educational laboratories and projects in greenmanufacturing, image analysis, and quality assurance.References 1. J. HAUNSCHILD, M. GLATTHAAR, M. DEMANT, J. NIEVENDICK, M. MOTZKO, S. REIN, and E.R. WEBER, “Quality control of as-cut multicrystalline silicon wafers using photoluminescence imaging for solar cell production” Solar Energy Materials
engineering ethics dilemma.27 And in a related study, Loui usedinterview data to show how formal instructional interventions can help reinforce and expandstudent awareness of, and commitments to, social and ethical responsibility.28 Clancy, Quinn, &Miller similarly used focus groups and surveys to assess their “case study laboratory” approach,finding significant improvements in students’ awareness of ethical issues.29However, very different results emerged from Drake et al.’s comparison of two kinds of ethicsinstruction, namely a full semester ethics course and an engineering course that included anethics module.30 Their results, based on DIT-2 scores, showed that neither approach resulted insignificant improvement in students’ moral development
the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Doug E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery
manual assembly operations within a laboratory setting, there was a PFRthat specified that the components had to be appropriately configured and sized to be easilymanipulated by robots. There was a PFR that specified the component swapping, rather thanscaling product family differentiation would be used for the product family. This PFR wasnecessary to ensure that the developed product family would have a significant impact on theperformance of the WeRMST. The remaining PFRs specified that the product family needed tobe cost effective and aesthetically pleasing.Following the specification of the PFRs, the next step involved the search for candidate PFs thatmet the PFRs. This search was performed in four (4) sub-steps. First the team identified
public policy, assessing stakeholder needs and desires, resource analysis, and collective impact engagement. Currently, he is working closely with several local and national organizations to research and rally opposition against the transfer of federal public lands to state governance.Dr. Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian is an associate professor in the Urban Water Group in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans more than a decade during which he has worked in design engineering, as a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a profes- sor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a director of
. Four of the six give direct measures based on student work (SW, CP,SD, FE) and two are indirect measures based on surveys (SS and AS).The courses are reviewed to ensure coverage of all of the Student Outcomes which each graduateof the program is expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. These skills,knowledge and behaviors are acquired as they progress through the program and differentcourses emphasize different outcomes. For example, the laboratory courses emphasize (b)experimental skills and the numerical methods class emphasize (k) computer skills. Syllabi arereviewed by the Assessment Committee which provides feedback to the instructor. Each syllabiis consistent with the overall expectations of SOs for the program
Paper ID #14457Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses Using a Novel Reme-diation HierarchyProf. Ronald F. DeMara, University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) with 23 years of university-level faculty experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. He has completed 180+ technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and established two research laboratories. He serves as the Computer Engineering Program Coordinator, the founding Director of the Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC) in CECS, and
, Brookhaven National Laboratory, European Southern Observatory (Chile), Simula Research Laboratory (Norway) and the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign. Christine works closely with Penn State University faculty Michael Alley (The Craft of Scientific Presentations and The Craft of Scientific Writing) and Melissa Marshall (TED, ”Talk Nerdy to Me”) on these courses. Christine is also the director of the Engineering Ambassadors Network, a start-up organization at 25 plus universities worldwide that teaches presentation skills to undergraduate engineering students, particularly women and underrepresented groups in engineering. These Engineering Ambassadors develop valuable leadership and communication skills, which
learning can take on many forms – from traditional tests and quizzes towritten laboratory reports, research papers, projects, etc. The focus of this paper will be toprovide a discussion about ways to incorporate writing into the curriculum as well as to providesome examples of how writing-based tools can be used to assess student learning. To this end,the use of rubrics can be very worthwhile for both the students and the instructor. As Spurlin hasindicated and modeled, the use of carefully crafted rubrics can be a useful way to demonstratethat students have met the criterion whether the communication is through either written or oralform3. In addition, the use of a carefully crafted rubric can help reduce the overall time neededto grade a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Low-Cost Robot Positioning System for a First-Year Engineering Cornerstone Design ProjectAbstractResearchers in autonomous robotic design have leveraged a variety of technologies to simulatethe Global Positioning System (GPS) on a smaller laboratory or commercial scale. In the interestof cost and accuracy, a system was developed for The Ohio State University Fundamentals ofEngineering for Honors (FEH) Program's "Cornerstone" Design Project. The system utilizes highdefinition commercial web cameras to accurately simulate a GPS for the autonomous robotscreated by students.For the past 21 years The Ohio State University has provided a "Cornerstone" Design
housed in the School of Engineering,coordinates a network of entrepreneurship-related programs and activities open to all studentsregardless of major or school within the institution. We start with the premise that there are twokinds of innovation: market-pull and knowledge-push. Market-pull innovations are those inwhich entrepreneurs identify a customer need first through customer discovery and then seek thetechnology required. Business schools traditionally focus on teaching entrepreneurs how torespond to market-pulls. Knowledge-pull innovations originate with an inventor or scientist; theentrepreneur then strives to connect the laboratory discovery and technical innovations with acustomer need. We believe that knowledge-push innovations often