Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom through Reciprocal Questioning. American Educational Research Journal. 27 (4): 664–87. 1990.7. Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 69 (1): 21–51. 1999
students with positive team experiences see greatergains in self-efficacy than students with poor team dynamics and cohesion?Using a modified version of Carberry et al.’s senior design self-efficacy tool,6 we examinedpotential correlations between self-efficacy, team dynamics/cohesion, and team performance.Students were given three self-efficacy surveys, one early in the term, one mid-term, and one latein the term, corresponding to times where they were working on an individual project only, bothon an individual project and group project, and just on a group project.Because we have had low participation in past studies, we were hesitant to use the full Carberryinstrument that contains 36 items (nine items in the context of four self-concepts: self
, I’ll be like,alright, I’m never doing this again. Like I try it, I mess up, and you know what, forget it, I quit.But like I just learned to just stick with something all the way through, try a little harder. Itshows result[s].”Cyrus’s claim here is that the experience helped to develop persistence, broadly. He elaboratedon this by giving an example from school, where he persisted on a difficult presentationassignment that normally would have prompted to quit:“I was doing it, I kept getting stuck, you know. So I just took a break really fast because mybrain was fried from irritation and stress. And you know, I finished it, and I’m glad I did, and atfirst I was like, ‘Look, dude [to his partner], you’re going to have to do it.’ But you know
Paper ID #16398Analogy Methods to Address Warping and Plasticity in TorsionProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Somnath Chattopadhyay teaches mechanics, materials, manufacturing and design at University at Buffalo He has authored a text on Pressure Vessel s and till recently was an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. His research interests are in the areas of fatigue and fracture of metals, carbon nanotubes, multi-scale material modeling and engineering education. He had a very successful industrial career with Westinghouse Electric where he directed and performed
questionscores, average scores and normalized gain values were generated for each student’sperformance for each question overall score. Results indicate that students had more incorrectpreconceptions regarding bandwidth than with resource reservation, network utilization andefficiency. This study will expand the breadth of knowledge about student preconceptions inSTEM by including the subject of QoS in the telecommunications discipline, identify thepreconception(s), statistically analyze the effects of these preconceptions and offer instructionalinsights than can ameliorate or eliminate negative effects on student learning related to theseconcepts.ConceptsThe following explanations of each of the paired concepts are provided for readers not familiarwith
curriculum are involved in course-embeddedassessment. The choice of courses is guided by the followingprinciples: • Each Student Outcome will be assessed with student work in a course(s) termed “benchmark course(s).” • Required courses in the program curriculum will be selected as benchmark courses. We chose this approach because all students take the required courses. • Although a benchmark course will likely address multiple Student Outcomes, typically one or two of its learning outcomes will be designated for course-embedded assessment. • Because Student Outcomes are assessed in two groups on a rotating schedule, the benchmark courses are organized and assessed in two alternating
problems, and but also achieve personalized,real-time, economic production utilizing additive manufacturing technology, in particular, 3Dprinting technology, and ultimately to produce the real products which can actually be soldand used. The lab is a typical cyber-physical-social system (CPSS) that enables students tohand on and experience the entire social manufacturing process.Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.61533019 and 71232006).References[1] E. F. Crawley. Creating the CDIO syllabus, a universal template for engineering education, Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002, 2:8-12.[2] E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur. Rethinking
Altera Cyclone FPGA, 64 MS/s dual ADC, 128 MS/s dualDAC, and USB 2.0 connectivity. The USRP1 platform can support two complete RFdaughter boards and can operate from DC to 6 GHz. The daughter board we used on eachmotherboard is RFX400, which has 2 quadrature frontends for transmitting and receiving,and the bandwidth is 40MHz for both frontends (see Figure 1). Figure 1: A USRP1 Motherboard with RFX400 Daughter Board2.2. Software SetupIn order to improve undergraduate students' understanding and learning, the followingstep-by-step laboratory modules were developed:I) Ubuntu/Windows duel operating system installation. Many SDR development tools,including GNU Radio, only officially support Linux operating system. However
external rewards, and others,briefly reviewed below.During the 60’s and 70’s, a deviance hypothesis found some support in studies of work values.Career oriented women “stressed intrinsic features of the work including the kind of people in agiven occupation, the high prestige of the occupation, the opportunity to use special abilities, andwhether the work left enough time to spend with family.”7 By comparison, non-career orientedwomen preferred “more feminine values including working with people rather than things, livingup to their parents' ideas of success, a stable secure future, and helping others.”8Other research at the time, however, showed limited support for a ‘deviance hypothesis’. In afour year longitudinal study of 110 college women (a
) where f s(x) is an activation function. Typically this activation function is a sigmoid function, such as (4): (4) An ANN consists of multiple interconnected artificial neurons, arranged in several layers. The neurons are arranged in layers: one input layer, one output layer, and multiple hidden layers. The neurons in the input layer have the activation function f s(x) = x . Hidden layers and output layers may have sigmoid or other activation functions. ANN First Implementation An ANN so implemented is called a “feed forward” network. This consists of two layers of neutrons, in which one of the layers evaluates the synaptic weight of each input and sums the weights as input
.99CH37011 2, 12D4/26–12D4/31 (Stripes Publishing L.L.C, 1999).[13] Erwin, B., Cyr, M. & Rogers, C. LEGO Engineer and RoboLab: Teaching Engineering withLabVIEW from Kindergarten to Graduate School. at[14] Williams, A. B. The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTORMS robots to teach computerengineering. IEEE Trans. Educ. 46, 206–206, 2003.[15] Grahame, K. S., Freeman, S., Goldthwaite, D., Love, J., Pfluger, C., Maheswaran, B., Hertz, J., Variawa, C.,"Shall I Try This? An interactive workshop on assessing hands-on teaching", American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE) Northeast Section Conference, Boston, MA, April 30, 2015.[16] Hitt, J. Problem-Based Learning in Engineering. United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 2010.[17] Bédard
student demands as well asleader roles in STEM graduate programs will be fundamental to understanding the specificfactors that foster the academic and professional development of underrepresented graduateSTEM students.Bibliography1. Folt z, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors That Contribute to the Persistence of MinorityStudents in STEM Fields. Planning For Higher Education, 42(4), 46-58.2. Ghosh-Dastidar, U. u., & Liou-Mark, J. j. (2014). Bridging Pathways through research and leadership forunderrepresented students in STEM. Mathematics & Co mputer Education, 48(3), 214-2263. Graham, E. (2013). The Experiences of Minority Doctoral Students at Elite Research Institutions. New DirectionsFor Higher Education, 2013
just an American problem, it is a global problem as well. According tothe United Nations World Urbanization Prospects report, urban population grew from 30% of theworld population to 54% in 2014 and is expected to be 66% by 2050.[4]Since the 1990’s, scientists have traced global warming and climate change to the Green HouseGases (GHG) emitted by the fossil fuels burned in the transportation sector. The UStransportation sector, which is the movement of people and goods by cars, trucks, trains, ships,airplanes, and other vehicles, emitted 1,802 million metric tons of CO2 according to theEnvironmental Protection Agency; this is 27% of all GHG emissions in 2013.[5]Thus from an environmental perspective, pollution due to the burning of fossil fuels
appropriate). 8. Control charts process capability templates in Excel (whenever appropriate). 9. Other tools (e.g. access to Minitab statistical software)Course components 1-5 in the list are mandatory as rubric demands varieties of interactivelearning methods active and engaging learning. If at least two out three methods out of quiz,forums or case study is used in each chapter, it satisfies several essential standards.Quiz may contain True/False type questions, multiple choice questions, question requiringcalculations, matching questions, etc.Case study on QC course related topics can be assigned as an individual assignment or groupassignment which student/s post on forum after interacting with group members and other groupor individual
challenges requires iteration and planning, skills that are germaneto the engineering design process but difficult to teach. These rapidly deployable prototypingactivities embrace active learning while also providing valuable hands-on experience with theengineering design process.Bibliography[1] ABET, "ABET Accredition Requirements," [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016- 2017/. [Accessed 26 1 2016].[2] J. S. e. a. Lamancusa, "2006 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture*: The Learning Factory: Industry‐Partnered Active Learning.," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 5-11, 2008.[3] D. Knight, L. Carlson and J. Sullivan, "Staying in
, Washington, 2013.[5] K. D. Purcell, "5 Ways to Get Girls into STEM," Edutopia-George Lucas Educational Foundation, 2015.[6] Girl Scout Research Institute, "Generation STEM: What Girls Say about Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math," Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, NY, 2012.[7] G. M. Faitar and S. L. Faitar, "Teachers’ Influence on Students' Science Career Choices," American International Journal of Social Science, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 10-16, July 2013.[8] S. Flynn, "Brain Blasts," 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.fit2bsmart.com/brain-blasts.php. [Accessed 30 January 2016].[9] R. Pica, Early Elementary Children Moving and Learning: A Physical Education Curriculum, St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press, 2014, p. 8.[10] Phoenix Contact
* Corresponding author, jafar@nsula.edu 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, data received from the OPTN/SRTR Annual Report, 2009. 2. Lysaght, M. J., Jaklenec A., Deweerd E. (2008 Febrary) “Great Expectations: private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics,” Tissue Eng Part A, (2); 305-15 3. Kumareswaran, K., Evans, M. L., & Hovorka, R. (2009) “Artificial pancreas: An emerging approach to treat type 1 diabetes” .Expert Review of Medical Devices, 6(4), 401-10. 4. Engler, J. A., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., Discher E. D., (2006) “Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification”, Cell Volume 126, Issue 4, 25, Pages 677-689
that the projects served as a great engagement tool and facilitated subject learning.References:1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 121‐130, January 2005.2. Campbell, J. O., R. J. Bourne, P. J. Mosterman, and J. A. Brodersen. "The Effectiveness of Learning Simulators in Electronic Laboratories," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 81‐87.3. Hodge, H., H. S. Hinton, and M. Lightner. "Virtual Circuit Laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 507‐511.4. Leva, A., “A Hands-On Experimental Laboratory for Undergraduate Courses in Automatic Control,” IEEE Transactions
. NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. (2015). at 3. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G. & Bieschke, K. J. Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science- based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 38, 424–430 (1991).4. Hackett, G. Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psycholy. 32, 47–56 (1985).5. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal Vocational Behavior. 45, 79–122 (1994).6. Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale : Psychometric Data. Journal of
studentscome from a wide range of backgrounds and my experience of over 30 years of teachingundergraduates is that most undergraduates do not have a strong command of unitconversions. This is easy to determine by giving your class a pop quiz. Ask them todetermine the potential energy of 10 lbm 100 ft above the ground in Btu using PE=mgh if1 Btu=550 ft lbf and g=32.2 ft s-2. My experience is that a significant number ofundergraduates (not just first-year students) are not proficient at applying gc for unitconversions. Because units are such an integral part of engineering calculations, it justmakes sense to invest a little time to ensure that all freshmen know how to systematicallyapply unit conversions including the use of gc.COMMUNICATIONS It
requesting the users to open an account and provide contact information. This willprovide information regarding the number of students/teachers/researchers using the material.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food andAgriculture, BE AWARE project (2015-38422-24064).References1. National Research Council (US) Committee on a New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution. Natl. Acad. Press 1–120 (2009).2. Gilbert, N. Climate-smart Agriculture is Needed. Nature News (2011). doi:10.1038/news.2011.1313. Shames, S., Friedman, R. & Havemann, T. Coordinating Finance for Climate-smart Agriculture. Ecoagriculture
learning: concepts andcases. Peter Lang, Oxford ; New York.4. Tannhäuser, Anne-Christin, and Claudio Dondi. “It’s Lab Time–Connecting Schools to Universities’ RemoteLaboratories.” In Pixel International Conference, 1–5, 2012.5. Charette, Robert N. “The STEM Crisis Is a Myth.” IEEE Spectrum 50, no. 9 (September 2013): 44–59.doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2013.6587189.6. Govaerts, Sten, Yiwei Cao, Andrii Vozniuk, Adrian Holzer, Danilo Garbi Zutin, Elio San Cristóbal Ruiz, LarsBollen, et al. “Towards an Online Lab Portal for Inquiry-Based Stem Learning at School.” In Advances in Web-Based Learning–ICWL 2013, 244–53. Springer, 2013. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_25.7. V. J. Harward, J. A. del Alamo, S. R. Lerman P. H. Bailey, J
accessible technology with multisensory learning and assessmentopportunities allows with VIB to access STEM fields more readily. Therefore, it is essential thatthese types of engineering activities be further incorporated into science classrooms as they makethe material accessible to all students.Bibliography1. Erickson, W., C. Lee, and S. von Shcrader. “Disability Statistics from the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS).” 2015 [cited 2015 January 26]; Available from: http://www.disabilitystatistics.org.2. Bottomley, L., et al., Engineering Summer Programs: A Strategic Model Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seattle, Washington. , 2015(June): p. 10.18260/p.23982.3. Napper, S.A., P.N. Hale, and F.J. Puckett
experiences indicate that MDS is apromising educational program, as well as inform future evaluations of learning outcomes. Nextsteps will include true pre-post student surveys, evaluations of students’ creative process usingthe AAC&U VALUE rubric on creativity, and a comparative analysis of students’interdisciplinary attitudes by comparing students and medical learners who participate in MDSversus students and medical professionals who have not participated in MDS.Works Cited1. Hall L, Scott S, Cox K, Gosbee JW, et al. Effectiveness of patient safety training in equipping medical students to recognize safety hazards and propose robust interventions. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2010;19:3-8.2. Gosbee JW, Anderson T. Human factors
new to the student s/he may feel somewhat at a loss inthe beginning, finding that learning is to be self-motivated rather than directed by the instructor.The second design challenge built upon principles of the first challenge, extending these intechnological complexity and duration. Students presented their solutions to faculty and peers atthe end of the quarter.Design Challenge I (shown below and in Figures 2-4) was planned to span approximately threeweeks, and asked students to design a wheelchair ramp for a home on a very restricted lot,requiring difficult geometric constraints. Each student team was presented with a differentresidence configuration in relation to its vehicle driveway, and asked to design a ramp so that aresident who was
are reproduced below for clarity. Students are prompted to circlethe correct responses on a line shown here: A B C D E F NONE.In order to correctly answer the majority of the questions, students would need to circle morethan one letter. All correct responses need to be marked to receive a point, there is no partialcredit.On the last page are six velocity versus clock reading histories which describe the onedimensional motion of six objects that started out from the origin x = 0m at time t = 0s. Circlethe correct answer(s) for each of the following questions. (a) Which object (or objects) are located at the origin, x = 0, at the clock reading t = 2s? (b) Which object (or objects) spends at
whole to their object(s). We use the term object here in its activity theory sense to referto the problem or purpose towards which an activity is directed. An activity is a set of variousactions (such as ideating, negotiating, planning, agreeing, disagreeing) carried out by a group, asocial unit such as a team, motivated by a socially constructed goal. For our use, the activitiesstudied in this paper are team meetings in which a team uses a whiteboard to mediate a decisionor series of decisions.Togethering, as described by Radford and Roth, “has the purpose of realizing a collectivelymotivated object”9. The concept of togethering allows us to analyze the actions and interactionsof the team members from the different perspectives of the team
2014001),” National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2013.[2] E. F. Redish, “Discipline-based education and education research: the case of physics,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 21, 2000.[3] E. Longfellow, S. May, L. Burke, and D. Marks-Maran, “‘They had a way of helping that actually helped’: A case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 13, 2008.[4] C. Wilson, A. Steele, W.Waggenspack, and W. Wang, “Engineering Supplemental Instruction: Impact on Sophmore Level Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, June 2015.[5] P. Dawson, J. Meer
., and Hernandez, A., “Designing Effective Project-based Learning Experience usingParticipatory Design Approach,” 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015-11660, American Society forEngineering Education.[5] Ericksen, S., “The essence of good teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.[6] Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., “Seven principles for good practice,” AAHE Bulletin 1987, 39(7), 3-7.[7] Kaul, S., and Stone, W.L., “Learning outcomes of a junior-level project-based learning (PBL) course:preparation for capstone,” 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014-11102, American Society for EngineeringEducation.[8] Widmann, J.M., Self, B.P., Slivovsky, L.A., and Taylor, J.K, “Motivating design and analysis skills acquisitionthrough the