Division.Dr. Christopher Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is Associate Dean at the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civil Life and an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Department of Education and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on learning through service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also researches the development of reuse strategies for waste materials.Dr. David W. Watkins, Michigan Technological University Dr. Watkins’ teaching and research interests include hydrologic
BDS supporting theHetNet operations will be proposed together with the recommendations of an analyticsframework. The BDS architecture together with the analytics framework aims at helping theMSPs in forecasting the network traffic. The results of the traffic big data analytics and thenetwork load forecasting can be used to adjust different network operating parameters. Theseadjustments can definitely enhance the HetNet performance. The proposed big data architectureand the analytics framework proposed in this study will be used as a decision support systemcomponent in an educational and research pilot project that aims at introducing the role of bigdata analytics in guiding the self-healing process used in cellular self-organized
cohorts. The initialfaculty cohort team comprises five of the six facilitators of the new cohorts. Moreover, all sevenmembers of the initial faculty cohort continue to meet. This community of practice is leading thedevelopment of additional workshops, implementation of an assessment/evaluation framework todocument the effect of active learning as this continues and expands through SCSE, writing grantproposals to enable further dissemination of the multidisciplinary cohort model approach acrossa college of engineering and science, and supporting each other’s individual research endeavors.IntroductionThis paper describes Work in Progress (WIP) efforts to increase active learning in a college ofengineering and science. Motivation for this project
. In addition to his administrative roles, he has guided several research and industrial related projects. He has been involved in receiving over $7 M funding from various industrial and government sources and has been the principle author of numerous papers in national/international journals and publications. He is a fellow of the ASME and an evaluator for the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) as well as member of several national and international organizations. He is also the recipient of Temple University exceptional research award. His current research interests are in the areas of dental materials (NIH), Bioengineering (Various sources), and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems.Carnell Baugh
Paper ID #17428Comparison of AUN-QA and ABET AccreditationDr. Scott Danielson, Arizona State University Dr. Scott Danielson is a faculty member in the engineering programs within the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). Before returning to the faculty, Dr. Danielson was an Associate Dean for almost four years in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and the College of Technology and Innovation. Before assuming the Associate Dean’s role, he had been a department chair at ASU for over 13 years. He also serves as the project director for the USAID-funded
an emphasis on Microelectronics from Louisiana Tech University. His current activities focus on project based learning and online student assessment.Dr. Miguel Gates, Louisiana Tech University Miguel Gates is a lecturer at Louisiana Tech University in the department of Electrical Engineering and Cyber Engineering. He is currently the chair of the Cyber Engineering program. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An expanded study to assess the effect of online homework on student learning in a first circuits courseIntroductionTo meet the needs of today's students and to maximize efficient use of faculty resources,electronically delivered homework is becoming ever more
postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element methods. He has work for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combustion engines—power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method), and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Analytical Solution, Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Cantilever BeamIntroductionThe purpose of this work is to show how a series of labs can be used to provide
structural health monitoring capabilities. She is a teaching assistant for the Industrial Engineering program’s Senior Design Project course, is a coordinator of the summer internship programs (NSF-REU-RETREAT and AFRL-DREAM), and has extensive STEM outreach experience through Drea- mOn as well as local chapters of the Society of Women Engineers, the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Golden Key International Honour Society, Phi Kappa Phi, and Tau Beta Pi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Retaining Engineers through Research Entrepreneurship and Advanced-Materials Training (RETREAT): Expansion and
year engineering course. For thequantitative portion of the study, all participants (control and experimental) were asked tocomplete a pre and post survey, which consisted of the Motivated Strategies of LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ) and several demographic questions. The MSLQ was used to categorizestudents as low, medium, and high self-regulated learners. Participant grades in the first yearengineering course were also collected to look at the performance of the control andexperimental groups. The quantitative data will be used to determine if the FYS 101 course had asignificant impact on the SRL skills and performance of the experimental group when comparedto the control group. Data collection for this project is on-going and results will be
Learning. She is actively involved in the development and the assessment related to MIT’s national and international educational projects and collaborations, and conducts research at the K12 and higher education levels, in the efficacy of innovative learning mechanisms and pedagogical approaches used in all initiatives mentioned above. Furthermore she collaborates with the team of engineers working on MIT’s edX platform and on the development of software modules that support teaching and learning. Dr. Bagiati’s research interests are in the areas of early engineering, STEM curriculum development and teacher training, and Design Based LearningProf. John G. Brisson II, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
experience as a bridge construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods, innovations in construction process administration, engineering education, hybrid learning and online learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Transportation EngineeringAbstract: The flipped classroom approach has gained increasing popularity in higher
twenty competency clusters. We have developed our framework based on thecompetencies proposed by Waychal et al. 8, who have proposed a smaller reasonable subset ofVloke‘s cluster. That, we posit, is a good starting point.We developed the framework with an axiom that the throughput of a learning process increasessignificantly with active participation, intense reflections, and collaborative working on casestudies and real-life projects i.e. student-centered learning. We have synergistically combined theelements to ensure the targeted outcome of the workshop - the ability to explain creativity andinnovation and their underlying dynamics, and the ability to apply the understanding to provideinnovative solutions to real-life problems. We do not
degrees between 2012 and 2017. In the Midwest, companies projected a need for214 additional technicians in the next year and 725 technicians from 2012-2017. IHCC onlygraduates about 20 students per year so the supply of well-educated photonics graduates was notkeeping up with demand.The Midwest Photonics Education Center (MPEC), a National Science Foundation (NSF) fundedregional center for Advanced Technological Education (ATE), was established in 2014. TheCenter’s goals are to increase the supply of well-educated photonics technicians in the Midwest,and to serve as the national leader in photonics applications for advanced manufacturing andlaser materials processing.2. MPEC goals and objectivesThe MPEC brings together nine colleges and
international colleagues. He has a broad background in mechanical and electrical engineering, and physiology with specific training and expertise. His work includes mod- eling the cardiovascular system, ventricular assist devices, cardiac physiology, instrumentation systems and leadless cardiac pacing. He help developed and was the inaugural director of a project-based-learning engineering curriculum. He is now involved in discovery-based-learning on multi-disciplinary teams.Mr. Ronald R Ulseth, Itasca Community College Ron Ulseth directs and instructs in the Iron Range Engineering program in Virginia, Minnesota and he teaches in the Itasca Community College engineering program in Grand Rapids, MN. He was instrumental in
response to self-reported vulnerabilities and concerns of engineeringstudents. This paper presents data from practical efforts to identify and mitigate anxiety amongengineering students. A group of twenty-seven engineering and engineering technology studentswho were part of a scholarship program was asked to submit journal entries in which theyreflected on their fears and anxieties related to their participation in their degree program.Prominent themes which emerged from student reflection included time management and itseffects on academics and social activities, the likelihood of degree completion and success inengineering-specific coursework (e.g. senior capstone projects), and aspects of life followinggraduation such as handling accumulated
Paper ID #14882Promoting Technical Standards Education in EngineeringMiss Janet L. Gbur, Case Western Reserve University Janet L. Gbur is a Doctoral Candidate at Case Western Reserve University in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. She obtained a B.S. in Biology/Pre-Medicine at Kent State University and a B.E. in Materials Engineering and M.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering both from Youngstown State University. During her time at CWRU, she has mentored numerous high school and undergraduate student research projects that have focused on the mechanical characterization of wires used in biomedical
% selected Problem sets/homework assigned which contribute to course 82.0% grade ② Encouragement and facilitation for students to work 68.9% collaboratively on their assignments ② Group projects or assignments ① 67.2% Paper or project (an assignment taking longer than two weeks 60.7% and involving some degree of student control in choice of topic or design) ① Problem sets/homework assigned or suggested which do not 31.1% contribute to course grade ⓪Feedback and TestingThe inventory included several questions about feedback and testing. Table 5 summarizesresponses to a
this need was amajor outcome of the recent “Engineering Design and Practices Roundtable: Working Togetherto Advance Pre K-12 Engineering Design” convened by the Museum of Science in Boston inJanuary 2015. Without a shared understanding of what engineering design practices (orcomputational thinking in this case) look like in pre-college settings, researchers and curriculumdevelopers will result in numerous inconsistencies across the broad spectrum of implementation.The project reported in this paper aims to integrate computational thinking into an existingintegrated STEM curriculum. In order to develop computational thinking supplementsappropriate for young children, the team analyzed the existing curriculum and videotapedobservations of
engineeringexperience. This paper discusses how the Robotic Mining Competition is used to providestudents with a multidisciplinary, systems engineering learning experience. Specifically, itpresents the general design process used by the University of North Dakota Robotic MiningCompetition Team. The paper also contains a discussion of how the team evolved from year toyear based on their successes and failures.IntroductionAs engineers develop more complex systems there is a need for every engineer to have at least abasic understanding of systems engineering. NASA defines systems engineering as “a robustapproach to the design, creation, and operation of systems.”1 This process involves theestablishment of a set of project objectives, creation of a set of design
were empirically-derived from three data sources. These sourcesinclude: 1) analysis of over 400 award-winning products32; 2) over 200 sketches of a long-termhousehold design project by an experienced industrial designer31,37; and 3) protocol studies ofapproximately 50 industrial and engineering professional designers and students30, 31, 34, 36, 37.Empirical studies of novice, experienced, and professional designers have demonstrated theefficacy of 77 Design Heuristics as a tool to cultivate idea generation. This empirically-developed tool has been studied in several contexts and engineering courses, and few of thesesettings have been documented in prior research35-37.Research Context and QuestionsWhile 77 Design Heuristics has been established
interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive psychology at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace.Ms. Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Annie is the Assistant Director of the
each rotation, teams present problem statements based on insights fromtheir primary research and potential design projects to address the identified needs. Participantsmaintain a blog to capture and reflect on their observations, which also allows them to share theirexperience with the other students. Upon completion of the Bioengineering Clinical Immersionprogram, students are well prepared for the senior design capstone course that emphasizesdevelopment of medical devices conceived from validated end-user needs. This paper alsodiscusses implementation challenges and program modifications, including having medicalstudents team with bioengineering students.2. IntroductionEngineering students entering the medical product industry are often
Technology program. B´arbara is a proud graduate of NMSU, she earned a Bachelor of Science in Elec- tronics and Computer Engineering Technology and a Masters of Science in Industrial Engineering with an emphasis on Engineering Management. Prior to serving NMSU, B´arbara served as a Software Engineer at one of NASA’s Tracking and Data Satellite System Ground Terminals where she provided real-time support, lead projects, and managed software deliveries. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Automated Entrepreneurial Team Selection Tool College of Engineering, New Mexico State University Dr. Rolfe J. Sassenfeld, Luke M. Nogales, and Barbara A
Engineering Design CurriculumAbstractFunctional modeling is often covered as a critical element of the engineering design process inengineering design texts, but little empirical data clearly demonstrates that functional modelingimproves engineering designs or that teaching functional modeling makes students betterdesigners. The overall objective of this project is to determine the impact of teaching function onengineering students’ design synthesis abilities. Two studies are being performed as a part ofthis project: (1) a longitudinal study following students through their sophomore, junior, andsenior year following some being taught functional modeling, while others not, and (2) a yearlystudy looking at capstone project quality of students from
is the recipient of multiple teaching and advising awards including the COE Excellence in Teaching Award (2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor Award (2009, 2010, 2013). Dr. Darabi has been the Technical Chair for the UIC Annual Engineering Expo for the past 5 years. The Annual Engineering Expo is a COE’s flagship event where all senior students showcase their Design projects and products. More than 600 participants from public, industry and academia attend this event annually. Dr. Darabi is an ABET IDEAL Scholar and has led the MIE Department ABET team in two successful ac- creditations (2008 and 2014) of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering
, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction Informatics and Visual Analytics; Building Information Modeling (BIM), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Construc- tion Management; and Interactive Educational Games and Simulations. E-mail: leen@ccsu.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction
, Boulder Arthur L.C. Antoine obtained a BSc. degree in Civil Engineering from The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago in 2003 then moved on to practice his trade in the Caribbean engi- neering/construction industry. He graduated from Texas A&M University in 2009 with a MSc. degree in Ocean Engineering and subsequently, he returned to the Caribbean region to continue his career and professional development. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Construction Engineering and Manage- ment at The University of Colorado at Boulder. His research interests are in the areas of procurement, project delivery, alternative contracting methods and the use of incentive/disincentive strategies to en
Safety 1 16 Semester (7)Fall Course Course Title Credits Number SOET 361 Project Management 3 Program Elective 3 ELEC 386 Electronic Communications II 3 ELEC 416 Microelectronics Circuit Design 3 GER 3 15Semester(8)SpringCourse Course Title CreditsNumber Program Elective 3 Program Elective 3ELEC 477 Capstone Project 3SOET 370
in projects related to the design, implementation and assessment of learning technologies, especially in the domains of language learning, health communication and public discourse.Prof. Donald R. Sadoway, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Donald R. Sadoway is the John F. Elliott Professor of Materials Chemistry in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He obtained the B.A.Sc. in En- gineering Science, the M.A.Sc. in Chemical Metallurgy, and the Ph.D. in Chemical Metallurgy, all from the University of Toronto. After a year at MIT as a NATO Postdoctoral Fellow, Dr. Sadoway joined the faculty in 1978. The author of over 150 scientific papers and holder
of the math, science, andengineering improve students’ appreciation of the integrated nature of STEM disciplines.14Furthermore, this research also shows that engaging student in projects that integrate acrossSTEM disciplines is impactful on those that have relatively low perceptions of the integratednature of STEM.Research questionsRQ1: Do students make gains in content (e.g., physics) self-efficacy or knowledge (i.e., quizscores) over the course of the intervention?RQ2: Does that pattern of gains in iSTEM scores match the pattern described in prior research(i.e., students with initially low iSTEM scores exhibit the most gains in iSTEM perceptions)? MethodParticipantsThe four schools had differing