biosensorrequire the cooperation of professors and graduate students in biology, chemistry, computerscience, electrical and computer engineering, and mathematics.To mirror the practice of this interdisciplinary research students participating in this study werechallenged to design and test “sensing” related problems of their choice. For example, teams made up of math, anatomy/physiology, and engineering and technology students designed bicycle helmets fitted with sensors to test impact absorption and collect data related to helmet materials and design
Evaluation of Interactive Multidisciplinary Curricula in a Residential Summer ProgramAbstract Previous studies have indicated that women account for about 18% of the engineeringdegrees awarded in the United States. Consistently low populations of women in engineering areoften attributed to discrimination, the perception that engineering is a masculine domain, and alack of understanding about the roles and responsibilities of an engineer. In order to increaseparticipation of women in engineering, universities develop outreach programs designed to bettereducate students (and the public) about engineering. Programs in the form of informationsessions, seminars or research activities are informative but often are not
, Iowa State University Dr. Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director
Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania.Dr. Dustyn Roberts P.E., University of Delaware Dustyn Roberts received her B.S. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity (2003), her M.S. in Biomechanics & Movement Science (2004) from the University of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She has six years of pro- fessional experience in the robotics and medical fields, and is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016STUDENT BENEFITS OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY VERSUS SINGLE-DISCIPLINARYDESIGN EXPERIENCES: A COHORT STUDY OF A CAPSTONE DESIGN
-10 school year and the ASEE Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award in 2014.Ms. Tessa Alice Olmstead, Highline College Tessa holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering from the University of Washington, and a second bach- elor’s degree in Dance. She is currently researching the use of reflective practices to improve engineering education at Highline College. She also serves as a research scientist for the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Washington.Ms. Judy Mannard PE, Highline Community College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practices in an Introduction to
Identity Formation, Research in Science Education, vol. 43, issue 5, p.1979-2007 (October, 2013).17. Schultz, L.A., Barriers for Wilmot High School Female Students not Enrolling in the Mechanical Design Technology Program at Gateway Technical College, Thesis, University of Wisconsin, http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2011/2011schultzl.pdf (2011).18. Tully, D., Jacobs, B., Effects of Single-Gender Mathematics Classrooms on Self-Perception of Mathematical Ability and Post-Secondary Engineering Paths: An Australian Case Study, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35:4, 455-467 (2010).19. Wee, S.; Cordova-Wentling, R.M.; Korte, R.F.; Larson, S.M.; Loui, M.C., Why Many Smart Women Leave Engineering: A
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Making Learning Whole: Toward the Development of An Instrument Operationalizing Perkins’ ModelAbstract The push for stronger links between engineering education research and practice requiresthat taking a more scholarly approach to teaching became the norm instead of the exceptionacross all engineering education. This paper seeks to make the case that there is a lack of toolsavailable for achieving some of the goals of the field, such as the one aforementioned, andpresents findings from a set of research activities designed to help address this need. Morespecifically, this work in progress paper describes the early stages of a study that uses
leveraged in a multi-semester undergraduate research course at ClemsonUniversity with focus on creating holistic and sustainable community impacts in developingcountries. Through a cycle of three stages (moving between basic research, field testing, andpractice ready implementation and cycling back), students from more than 30 disciplines acrossthe university and from all levels (freshman through graduate students) work in teams toinnovate solutions to the most critical problems facing humanity in the 21st century using newknowledge from basic research. Translational research is especially appropriate formultidisciplinary work, as it takes numerous expertise areas to move a solution from conceptualresearch to practical application. Minimal
) and the graduate faculty of Computer Science. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Cornell University, and the M.S. degree in electrical engineering and computer sciences from the University of California, Berkeley. He then worked for awhile at several Silicon Valley startup companies before re- turning to Cornell to pursue a Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering in 2006. Prior to his arrival at WWU, he worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Sup´elec/LSS near Paris, France, and was an assistant professor at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Self-Corrected Homework for Incentivizing
, Stanford UniversityBeth Rieken, Stanford University Beth Rieken is a sixth year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her PhD in Mechanical Engineering with a focus on the relevance of mindfulness to engineers. Beth completed a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2010 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford in 2012.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element
the 21st century has been built squarely oninformation, communications, and computational technology (ICCT). In this WIP, we explorehow ICCT impacts the way that engineering is learned with the goal of establishing a researchagenda for propagating the effective use of ICCT in engineering education. We seek to informaction and generate conversation amongst administrators, instructors, researchers, and students.We can approach this goal from two broad perspectives. First, ICCT has fundamentally changedengineering practice by supporting discovery, collaboration, and innovation processes.1 Intandem, learning technologies promise to provide an unprecedented opportunity to improveinstruction, provide adaptive learning, and foster increased access
registered professional engineer, project management professional and LEED accredited professional. Her career vision is to become a global leader in research that builds capacity and broadens the participation of students completing construction and engineering degrees and entering the technological workforce by shaping practices and policies in retention, informal learning, pedagogy, professional competency, work- force development and life-long learning. Her research interests are in investigating students’ develop- ment of leadership skills and other professional competencies and in students’ involvement in curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular activities. Dr. Simmons is a NSF CAREER award recipient for her
science education includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) honored Dr. Spiegel for his efforts in teacher education with the Innovation in Teaching Science Teachers award (1997). Dr. Spiegel’s current
IRB-approved consent forms and wereassured of anonymity. The interviews were conducted according to a semi-structured interview,beginning with standard questions but allowing for follow-up or clarification questions. Theinterview was designed to elicit students’ perceptions of the impact of NSBE on their academicand professional careers. The interviews ranged from 15 to 45 minutes. Interviewees includegraduates from Spring 2015, Fall 2015, and anticipated graduation of Spring 2016; therefore,they capture a recent snapshot of impactful practices according to recent alumni. They took thepseudonyms Johnny, Shan, JT, Brie and Marissa. The interviews were transcribed by-hand, imported into NVivo, and analyzed utilizing acombination of
challenges exist to theintegration of engineering in traditional science classrooms. For example, Yasar and colleaguesfound that (a) K-12 teachers held stereotypical views of engineers, (b) elementary teachersplaced less value on teaching engineering design than secondary teachers do, and (c) teachers, ingeneral, lacked confidence in the abilities to teach engineering design activities.13,14 Further, thelimited available research indicates that elementary teachers report feeling unprepared to teachengineering practices.15, 16 Below we explore these interrelated challenges to teacherprofessional development in engineering education, as well as some challenges uniquely facedby teachers in rural schools. Misconceptions about engineers and
ABET Evaluators Team site visit in 2013. EEET received excellent comments for the display materials presented by Dr. Subal Sarkar ABET team chair which was managed to completion by Wajid. He is Digital Integrated Quality Management Systems Expert for Automated Academic Student Outcomes based Assessments Methodology He has taught several courses on electronics, microprocessors, electric circuits, digital electronics and instrumentation. He has conducted several workshops at the IU campus and eslewhere on Outcomes Assessment best practices, OBE, EvalTools R 6 for faculty, E learning with EvalTools R 6 for students, ABET accreditation process. He is a member of SAP Community, ISO 9001, Senior Member IEEE, IEEE
GTP content and impart skills to faculty teams from these institutions inorder to strengthen their capacities and arm them with additional resources to support theirefforts in recruiting and retaining students in STEM programs offered at their institutions.The objectives are as follows:Objective #1: Increase the number of STEM faculty from San Antonio College with enhancedprofessional development experiences via the proposed trainings in green energy andsustainability topics as well as best practices in pedagogy and culturally effective instruction. Activity 1.1: Design and develop a permanent renewable energy research and education lab at the Eco Centro. Activity 1.2: Provide training workshops for the faculty, staff, and selected
Paper ID #17246Using Concept Maps as a Tool for Assessment and Continuous Improvementof a First-Year CourseDr. Elise Barrella, James Madison University Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at James Madison University, who focuses teaching, scholarship, service, and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engi- neering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she con- ducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering
problems. This wasachieved by using a variety of active learning and pedagogical techniques such as, annotatedtextbook readings of current journal publications, oral presentations highlighting the balancebetween nature and technology, laboratory demonstrations, and a semester-long group projectmotivated by student interest in nature and chemical engineering.In this paper, the opportunities and challenges associated with developing a new course in anemerging multidisciplinary research area will be addressed. In addition, suggestions for bestpractices in course development will be provided for instructors who seek to develop similar newresearch-based elective courses.BackgroundIn 2014, a new graduate-level course intended for Master’s students on
at New York University.Dr. Bruce Ankenman, Northwestern University Bruce Ankenman is a Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. He received a BS in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and after working in the automotive industry for five years, returned to graduate school for an MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research interests primarily deal with the design and analysis of experiments that are used to build models for physical systems or metamodels for simulated systems. Professor Anken- man is the co-director of the Segal Design
Industrial EngineeringAbstractThis research paper is a pilot of a larger, mixed methods study that aims to capture theexperience of sophomore engineering students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) strategy use andthe connections with the student’s motivation with respect to the future. The overarching goal ofthe project is to understand the motivations and attitudes of undergraduate students inengineering, which is vital to answering the call for increasing the number of engineeringgraduates. Our project aim is to study engineering students’ future time perspective (FTP) andhow their FTP affects their use of SRL strategies. The quantitative portion of this study describesa cluster analysis of data from a motivation survey that characterizes students
interdisciplinary research with the goal of improving engineering programs at the undergraduate level. Her research interests include cognitive theories, memory, problem solving, theories of the mind, and the role of identity and motivation in education.Mariaf´e Taev´ı Panizo, James Madison University Mariaf´e Panizo is a first year graduate student in JMU’s Graduate Psychology Doctoral program. She has been working on engineering education research projects for two and a half years, focusing on non- cognitive factors that impact engineering student academic success.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How PBL Graduates Experience Self-Directed Learning: A Phenomenographic StudyAbstractThis research paper describes the study of the impact of a project-based learning (PBL)curriculum on the learners’ development of self-directed learning abilities. Themotivation for this study is that self-directed learning (SDL) ability is positioned as oneof the essential outcomes of engineering education. This can be seen in the followingquote from the International Engineering Alliance1 “The fundamental purpose ofengineering education is to build a knowledge base and attributes to enable the graduateto continue learning and to proceed to formative development
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in
from 6-17%. As a first step inmeasuring the effectiveness of techniques used in the program, this is promising and is helping toestablish a framework for more detailed assessments in following cohorts.The Gordon Institute of Engineering Leadership at Northeastern University is enthusiastic aboutsharing any of the techniques or approaches with other institutions involved in engineeringleadership development. The background material and use of it in structuring this yearlongassignment is an example of a best practice and it is hoped that the description and frameworkcan be of use by other leadership programs.In summary, as an assignment in a select graduate program in engineering leadership, studentsare tasked to strategically practice and
Paper ID #17059The Impact of STEM Experiences on Student Self-Efficacy in ComputationalThinkingJoshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University Josh Weese is a PhD candidate in the department of Computer Science at Kansas State University. Fo- cusing on education research, this experience comes from work as a graduate teaching assistant, various outreach programs, and time spent as a NSF GK-12 fellow. His downtime is spent in outreach programs aimed toward enriching local K-12 students’ experience in STEM, especially in computer science and sensor technologies.Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State UniversityMr. Nathan H. Bean
, complex system governance, infranomics, systems engineering, systems of systems engineering, and systems theory. His research has been published in several journals including International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, International Journal of System of Systems Engineering, and Journal of Requirements Engineering. He is a co-editor of ’Infranomics: Sustainability, engineering design and governance.’Dr. Joseph M Bradley, Leading Change, LLC Dr. Bradley has had an extensive career in ship operations, maintenance, repair and organizational design. Repeatedly called upon to start new activities for the United States Navy, he successfully met a succession
action to reduce earthquake risk.Dr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is the Associate Vice President of Graduate and Undergraduate Programs at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. She is a past-president of the Earthquake Engi- neering Research Institute, and from 2009 to 2014 she served as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training (EOT) for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES), a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities.James Mallard, UC San Diego c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Promoting School Earthquake Safety through a Classroom
University. The competition, as it exists today, consists of an autonomous navigation challenge, a design competition, and an interoperability challenge. The IGVC offers a design experience that is at the very cutting edge of engineering education. It is multidisciplinary, theory-based, hands-on, team implemented, outcome assessed, and based on product realization. It encompasses the very latest technologies impacting industrial development and taps subjects of high interest to students. The competition practice team organization and leadership skill development, and there are even roles for team members from business and engineering management, language and graphic arts, and public relations. Students solicit and interact with
popularity and many universities have beenintroducing them into their curriculum.1-10, 14-18 These courses may be taught by a dedicatedgroup of faculty with engineering experience in industry, who may be more design-oriented (asopposed to research-oriented), and who may have demonstrated exemplary teaching abilities thatengage first-year engineering students.11,12 Additional motivations for this approach includebetter career preparation for engineering students and improved engineering education ingeneral.The University of Virginia found that cornerstone courses had better course ratings by studentsthan traditional sections and that graduation retention rates were higher with students who hadtaken the cornerstone courses compared to the traditional