ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 35 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for Young Women

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University; Penny Louise Hammrich, Drexel Univeristy
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Paper ID #17805Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for YoungWomenDr. Jennifer S Gurski, Drexel University RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Drexel University, School of Education June 2016 Principal Investigator: Penny Hammrich Dissertation: Examining the Personal Nature of the K-14 Engineering Pipeline for Young Women ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE Danville Area School District, Danville, PA Director e-Learning Cyber Academy, AEDY & Home School Education 2013-present e-Learning Program Design and Im- plementation grades 6-12 Danville Area School District, Danville, PA Assistant High School Principal

Relevance Score: 0.63040364

Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a STEM intervention program and women’s engineering self-efficacy

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Christina S. Morton, University of Michigan ; Selyna Beverly, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Paper ID #19036Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a STEM intervention program andwomen’s engineering self-efficacyChristina S. Morton, University of Michigan Christina S. Morton is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. Christina has professional experience in Academic and Student Affairs, serving as an Academic Success Coach at Johnson C. Smith University and a Residential Direc- tor at North Carolina State University. Her primary research interests are in the motivation and persistence of underrepresented minorities in Science

Relevance Score: 0.63040364

Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier Mechanical Engineering Department: A Case Study

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kath Xu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dawn Wendell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Dr. Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Andrea Walsh is a historical sociologist who specializes in the fields of women’s and gender studies, rhetoric and communication and visual media. She teaches at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the programs in Women’s and Gender Studies and Writing and Comparative Media Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier

Relevance Score: 0.5043229

No More Duct Tape! Institutionalization of Advance Initiatives

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Maureen Valentine, P.E., has been a faculty member at RIT for more than 23 years. She held the position of Department Chair for the Department of Civil Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.31520182

Career Navigation Initiatives for Women STEM Faculty in Support of Institutional Transformation

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Sharon Patricia Mason, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); DeLois Kijana Crawford, Rochester Institute of Technology (GCCIS)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester

Relevance Score: 0.31520182

Ten Years Later: Where are they Now?

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Vicki Stieha, Boise State University; Ann E. Delaney, Boise State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

facilitator was aloneduring the second focus group. Although a small group, we gained valuable insights into ourquestions as the participants engaged in conversations with one another as well as the facilitator.During each session, notes were taken including verbatim comments as well as the nature of theconversation. A voice recorder was used as back up and furnished the ability to transcribehighlighted sections of the focus group that corresponded to emergent themes from the surveyfor the analysis.18 These qualitative data were added to the open-ended responses on the surveyand descriptively coded19 with the assistance of NVIVO software. Where we have excerptedquotes from the data, survey narratives (S) or focus group (F) are indicated for

Relevance Score: 0.015123703

Synthesis of K-12 outreach data on women in engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Emily Barnes , Rowan University; Nicholas Lenzi; Katherine G Nelson, Rowan University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

, Mathematics and Science, GEMS: A science outreach program for middle-school female students. Journal Of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 14(3), 41-47.7. Demetry, C., Hubelbank, J., Blaisdell, S. L., Sontgerath, S., Nicholson, M. E., Rosenthal, E., & Quinn, P. (2009). Supporting Young Women To Enter Engineering: Long-Term Effects Of A Middle School Engineering Outreach Program For Girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering J Women Minor Scien Eng, 15(2), 119-142. doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v15.i2.208. Safferman, A. G., Jeffers, A. T., & Safferman, S. I. (2004). Understanding K-12 engineering outreach programs. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Relevance Score: 0.014935283

Gendered Words in U.S. Engineering Recruitment Documents

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Agnes G. d'Entremont, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Hannah Gustafson, University of British Columbia; Katherine A. Lyon, University of British Columbia ; Jonathan Verrett P.Eng., University of British Columbia; Kerry Greer, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia; Atif Shoukat Ali, University of British Columbia
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

%), withdisciplines having an average of 26.3% women undergraduates at the schools examined.Table 1: Summary of schools included in analysis. All ASEE data (enrollment, disciplinecategories) from 2016 except for New Mexico Tech (2015) (ASEE 2015, 2016). Reg = Region(C = Central, E = Eastern, NE = Northeastern, S = Southern, SC = South Central, SW =Southwestern, MW = Midwestern, W = Western); No. ASEE Disc Cat = number of disciplinecategories (including “Other Engineering”) listed in the profile; FT = Full-time, PT = Part-time,UG = undergraduate, Fem = Female. No. ASEE Pub/ % FT % PTSchool

Relevance Score: 0.014935283

Development of a national survey focusing on the relationships between race, class, and gender on the persistence of women engineering faculty

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University; Jung Sook Kim, Ohio State University; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

larger mixed methods study that will inform policies for women faculty in engineering. Acknowledgement This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant Numbers 1535456 and 1712618. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References1. Bilimoria, D., Joy, S. & Liang, X. Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Hum. Resour. Manage. 47, 423–441 (2008

Relevance Score: 0.014610887

An Exploration of Female Engineering Students’ Functional Roles in the Context of First-year Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Juebei Chen, Shanghai Jiaotong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Tianyi Zheng, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1): 27-34.[8] Baker, D., Krause, S., Roberts, C. (2007). An intervention to address gender issuesin a course on design, engineering, and technology for science educators. Journal ofEngineering Education, 96(3): 213-226.[9] Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases andrecommendations. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal, 5(1),83.[10] Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.The Clearing House. 83(2): 39-43.[11] Alfonseca, E., Carro, R. M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., & Paredes, P. (2006). Theimpact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study.User

Relevance Score: 0.01313488

Examination of Implicit Gender Biases Among Engineering Faculty when Assigning Leadership, Research, and Service Roles

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Robert J Culbertson, Department of Physics, Arizona State University; James A Middleton, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

positionof being the co-chair of a department may be viewed more as simply an administrative postionladen with managerial responsibilities and not as a genuine leadership role.What can be surmised from this study is that on the whole engineering faculty are shifting intheir predilictions regarding gender biases. This may mark a tipping point when the work oforganizations such as the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) 23,24 has begun to nudge attitudies and awareness of underrepresentation of women in engineeringand computing sciences and actually shift actions. References1 Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional

Relevance Score: 0.013068372

Women Engineers in Entrepreneurship: An Alternative Pathway

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lesley Cremeans, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse P.E., Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

research andprograms continue to foster innovation and discovery in science and engineer (S&E) academics.Moreover, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) released the publication, “Changing theConversation” in 2011 to strongly encourage engineering communities to alter the messagingpresented to underrepresented populations to increase and attract more diversity (NAE, 2011).According to Dzombak et al. (2016), the NAE describes the work of an engineer as, “Engineersmake a world of difference, are creative problem-solvers, help shape the future, connect scienceto the real world, and engineering is essential to health, happiness, and safety” (p. 5).Broader Impacts of Entrepreneurship EducationEntrepreneurship education provides students with

Relevance Score: 0.011807378

“Build it and they will come!” Reversing the gender gap: women enrolling in engineering programs and preparing for careers in the oil and gas industry in the UAE

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sami Ainane, Pertoleum Institute Abu Dhabi UAE; Ali Bouabid
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

1993-1998 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MD President, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MD HONORS AND AWARDS Best Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En- richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses”, 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective

Relevance Score: 0.011807378

miniGEMS 2016 –STEM Summer Camp for Middle School Girls

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sreerenjini C. Nair, University of the Incarnate Word; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

# Strongly Agree Agree Unsure/ Disagree Strongly Avg Check the best answer Neutral Disagree1 I plan to go to college when I 25 2 4.93 finish high school.2 My parents/guardians are 23 4 4.85 encouraging me to go to college.3 My friends plan on going to 18 6 2 4.80 college.4 I enjoy school. 18 6 2 4.805 My teacher(s)/counselor(s) care if 23 2 1

Relevance Score: 0.011201462

What is the Relationship between Mindset and Engineering Identity for First Year Male and Female Students? An Exploratory Longitudinal Study

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Heather Lysbeth Henderson, West Virginia University; Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University ; Christina Paguyo, Colorado State University; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

identity does slightly change over time for students- unfortunately, engineeringidentity decreased.ReferencesBlackwell, L.S. & Trzesniewski, K.H., 2007. Implicit Theories of Intelligence PredictAchievement across an Adolescent Transition : A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention Author( s ): Lisa S . Blackwell , Kali H . Trzesniewski and Carol Sorich Dweck Published by : Wiley onbehalf of the Society. , 78(1), pp.246–263.Burns, K.C. & Isbell, L.M., 2007. Promoting malleability is not one size fits all: Priming implicittheories of intelligence as a function of self-theories. Self and Identity, 6(1), pp.51–63.Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15298860600823864.Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

Retaining Female Students in a Robotics Program

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gloria Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Lili Ma, New York City Colledge of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

). After school student club practices in U.S. kindergarten thru 12th grade educational institutions. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2(3), 235-244.4. S. Crowe, Robotics playing a bigger role in STEM education”, May 27, 2015,5. A. Welch and D. Huffman, "The Effect of Robotics Competitions on High School Students' Attitudes Toward Science”, School Science and mathematics, Vol. 111, No. 6, 12/2011.6. F.B.V. Benitti," Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review", Computers & Education, 2012.7. G Nugent, B Bruker, N Grandgenett, "The impact of educational robotics on student STEM learning, attitudes, and workplace skills", Robots in K-12 education: A

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

A middle school engineering outreach program for girls yields STEM undergraduates

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Suzanne Sontgerath, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

collection, and to their supervisors in the Enrollment Management division for supportingtheir efforts.ReferencesBieri Buschor, C., Berweber, S., Keck Frei, A. & Kappler, C. (2014). Majoring in STEM-Whataccounts for women’s career decision making? A mixed methods study. The Journal ofEducational Research, 107, 167-176. Table 5. Development of Pipeline Programs at WPI* Year Program Time Age Audience Founded Frontiers Summer 1985 High School Boys and Girls Camp Reach Summer 1997 Middle School Girls

Relevance Score: 0.010331456

Brewing Change: A Forum for Women in Engineering and the Sciences

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alandra Kahl, Pennsylvania State University, Greater Allegheny
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Offers Encouragement, Support to Women in STEM." Group Offers Encouragement, Support to Women in STEM | UC Merced. University of California Merced, 2 Feb. 2016. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.5. "Female Stem Groups Summary." (n.d.): n. pag. 10 Mar. 2016. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.6. "Harvey Mudd Launches BRAID Initiative to Increase Diversity in Computer Science | Harvey Mudd College News." Harvey Mudd College. N.p., 24 Sept. 2014. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.7. National Science Board, National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. "S&E Indicators 2016 | NSF - National Science Foundation." S&E Indicators 2016 | NSF - National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation, Jan

Relevance Score: 0.009334552

New Faculty Learning Community as Retention Tool for Underrepresented Minorities

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anne-Marie A Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Christopher Frayer, University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Learning Communities: Building Connections among Teaching, Learning, andTechnology. Jeffrey S. Nugent, R. Martin Reardon, Fran G. Smith, Joan A. Rhodes, Mary Jane Zander,Teresa J Carter. 1, s.l. : International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 20.51-58. 12AppendicesAll new faculty and academic staff are invited to participate in anonymous surveys at the end of eachsemester of their first year. This survey is Appendix 1: Biannual Survey. The post survey is for new facultyonce they have been at UW-Platteville for two years, and can be found in Appendix 2: Post SurveyAppendix 1: Biannual Survey 1. If you attended any meetings of the New Faculty Learning Community

Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Impact of Instructor Gender on Student Performance and Attitudes in a Chemistry Course for Freshman Engineers

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University; Rachel Lauren Shapiro, Northeastern University; Paul DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

that the effects ofgender on other forms of SI available to students be examined. This outcome could be madepossible by expanding the scope of the research to other freshman engineering courses with moremale and female lecturers. Lastly, partnering with counterparts at other universities can provideadditional data to support and augment findings presented here.References[1] S. E. Carrell, M. E. Page and J. E. West, "Sex and Science: how professor gender perpetuates the gender gap," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1101- 1144, 2010.[2] L. MacNell, A. Driscoll and A. N. Hunt, "What's in a name: exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 291-303, 2015

Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Minority Women in the Workplace: Early Career Challenges and Strategies for Overcoming Obstacles

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nicole Yates, National Society of Black Engineers; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.008731674

Encouraging Young Women to Pursue Engineering: 25 Years of Summer Camp Successes and Challenges

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jessica J. Lofton, University of Evansville
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

pursue STEM.Confidence boosting activities play a bigger role in the middle school program to empowerparticipants to overcome negative messages and improve self-efficacy.A third camp was introduced in the late 2000’s after receiving multiple inquiries and interestabout a similar program for boys. The OPTIONS camp for boys is hosted as a day camp, not aresidential experience, on the university campus and includes many of the same components asthe programs for girls. Mentors and networking are not as heavily emphasized in the camp formiddle school boys; workshops with hands-on learning and industry tours are coordinated tointroduce the young men to the myriad of opportunities engineering presents.After 25 years of operation, the essential

Relevance Score: 0.00808396

Female vs Male Secondary Students: Comparing and Contrasting Perceptions of Engineering

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

]. Available:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/why-more-women-arent-becoming-engineers/article1216432/[7] Editors, “Why aren’t there more women engineers?,” ParisTech Review [Online]. Available:http://www.paristechreview.com/2010/09/29/why-more-women-engineers/[8] D. Moore, “Gender Traits and Identities in a "Masculine" Organization: The Israeli Police Force,” Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1999, 139(1), 49-68.[9] J. Mills et al., “Introduction: Why we need Gender Inclusive Engineering Education,” in Gender InclusiveEngineering Education, New York, Routledge, 2010.[10] J. Archer and S. Freedman, “Gender-Stereotypic perceptions of academic disciplines,” Br. J. educ. Psychol, 59,306-313, 1989.[11] J. Calnan and L

Relevance Score: 0.0074676415

Gender Differences in Pathways to Faculty Career Satisfaction

Conference Session: Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Heather Walling Doty, University of Delaware; Robin Andreasen, University of Delaware; Dandan Chen, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering

H12 Mentoring H15 H11 Transparency of & Policies ProceduresFigure 2 Hypothesized Model of Academic Job Satisfaction (Model 2). This figure shows proposed expansions toBilimoria, et al.’s model, with their original hypotheses in light blue. New hypotheses (11-15), which involve thetransparency of policies and procedures, are labeled.• H11, H12: Perceptions of transparency will be positively related to career satisfaction ratings (H11) and to