theory or concept based questions as opposed toproblem or application questions). In cases where the instructor notices lack of depth in thequestions, they can stimulate the discussion by injecting deeper questions on Piazza withoutproviding the answer.Stage 2 - Learning: The second phase, learning, happens periodically throughout the term in theday(s) before upcoming mini-tests. Students are given a schedule of when mini-tests occur at thestart of the semester. In this phase, discussion on Piazza is frozen, and students are given theopportunity to study each other’s questions in preparation for the mini-test.Stage 3 - Quiz: In the third phase students are required to take the test (individually), where thequestions in the quiz will be only from
,collectingdataviaacomputerinterfaceanddescribingexperimentalresults.TheavailabilityandcostofmaterialsandinformationassociatedwithfuelcelldevelopmentmaketheMFCtechnologyandexcellentfitforstudentrelatedprojects.References1. UnitedNations,(2012).Waterforlifedecade. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/africa.shtml2. Logan,B.,Hamelers,B.,Rozendal,R.,Schroder,U.,Keller,J.,Freguia,S.,Aelterman,P.,&3. Berman,J.,April2009.WHO:Waterbornediseaseisworld'sleadingkiller.Voiceof America.http://www.voanews.com/content/a-13-2005-03-17-voa34-67381152/ 274768.html4. Verstraete,W.(2006,July14).Microbialfuelcells:Methodologyandtechnology. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es06050165. Paulson,L.(2012,August20).Microbialfuelcelllatrinepromisessanitation,power. http://www.rwlwater.com/microbial-fuel-cell-latrine-promises-sanitation-power/6. Davies,C.(2010,Aug23).Solarenergybringspowertoruralafrica.CNN,http:// www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/08/10
. House, J. Livingston, and A. Watt, “Grandest Challenge: Models for Communication Development in Technical Contexts,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., Jun. 2014.[4] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development,” Sci. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 36–74, Jan. 2007.[5] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007.[6] K. W. Bauer and J. S. Bennett, “Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience,” J. High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 210–230, Apr. 2003.[7] M. C. Linn, E. Palmer, A. Baranger, E
women STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21, 141-157, doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011275 (2015).2 Herring, C. Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review 74, 208-224 (2009).3 Yoder, B. ASEE College Profiles. (American Society of Engineering Education, 2014).4 Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., 1957-, Bowman, N. A. & Oseguera, L. Extending Notions of Campus Climate and Diversity to Students' Transition to College. Review of higher education 31 (2008).5 Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M. & Holder, A. Racial microaggressions in the life experience of Black Americans. Professional Psychology: Research and
us to explore the process-oriented framework that Walther, Sochacka, & Kellamconceptualized and to attend to the procedural validation of our research process6. Walther et al.situate their framework in the understanding that ‘the nondualist ontology of interpretive researchdemonstrate[s] that neutral observation is, in principle, impossible.’6 Through the process ofwriting this research paper, we are developing ‘methodological awareness’ by explicitlyreflecting on how our own experiences created biases in developing the survey, which willultimately support us in ‘fostering a deeper understanding of the social system underinvestigation.’6 The qualitative framework conceived by Walther et al., and used by other EngEdresearchers in their
. Reference Services Review, 2013. 41(1): p. 125-133.2. Mikkelsen, S. and E. McMunn-Tetangco, Guide on the Side: Testing the Tool and the Tutorials. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 2014. 19(3-4): p. 271-282.3. Becker, B.W., Start Flipping Out With Guide on the Side. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 2013. 32(4): p. 257-260.4. Bowles-Terry, M., M.K. Hensley, and L.J. Hinchliffe, Best Practices for Online Video Tutorials in Academic Libraries: A Study of Student Preferences and Understanding. Communications in Information Literacy, 2010. 4(1): p. 17-28.5. Mestre, L.S., Student Preference for Tutorial Design: A Usability Study. Reference Services Review, 2012. 40(2): p. 258-276.6. Turner
positionof being the co-chair of a department may be viewed more as simply an administrative postionladen with managerial responsibilities and not as a genuine leadership role.What can be surmised from this study is that on the whole engineering faculty are shifting intheir predilictions regarding gender biases. This may mark a tipping point when the work oforganizations such as the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) 23,24 has begun to nudge attitudies and awareness of underrepresentation of women in engineeringand computing sciences and actually shift actions. References1 Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional
. Students then had time to reflecton the feedback before practicing again with another recruiter during the mock career fairexperience. Additionally, an important logistical element of the activity centered on the timingof the mock career fair in coordination with the actual career fairs on campus. Students werethen able to reflect on their experiences in the classroom, establish conclusions, and try out whatthey learned and refine their pitch during the actual career fair the following day(s). Thislogistical consideration provided ease in confirming employer attendance. One hour and fifteenminutes is ideal for a class of 30-40 students, requiring that each student speak with at least threedifferent recruiters for feedback. Fifty to sixty minutes
, pacedimplementation of the pedagogy, and collaboration with colleagues across institutions.ReferencesAdair, J. K., Reyes, M. A., Anderson-Rowland, M. R., & Kouris, D. A. (2001). Workshops vs. tutoring: How ASU's minority engineering program is changing the way engineering students learn. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 2.Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23.Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C
of knowledge, skills, and expertise between students - participants of the CoP-.Interviews conducted based on the principles of (Kvale, S, 2009). Interviews were thentranscribed and analyzed using definitions from Wenger’s CoP model to clarify and verify howthe Makerspace impacted the cultivation of a makers CoP on campus. We looked for evidence ofidea units that emphasized domain, community and practice.ResultsParticipants shared a common interest in “making”, tinkering, and realizing their designs. Therewere five categories of reasons for participation in the Makerspace: accessibility to resources,professional development, self-efficacy, Networking, social interaction and engagement, andlearning opportunities.Making use of Wegner’s
understanding of the importance of linking to professional practice through involvement of the department’s or college’s existing Industrial Advisory Board (or equivalent); An acknowledgement of additional example strategies, such as increasing the stature of professor(s) of engineering practice and their role as change agents or connecting the work with professional master’s programs. An incorporation of scalability and adaptability considerations.After Riley’s keynote, the webinar transitioned to the panelists who discussed questions, such asWhat is revolutionary and not-so-revolutionary? What does it mean to start and sustain arevolution? The panelists were Elsa Villa from University of Texas at El Paso, Milo
unnecessary delays, frustration,and potential harm due to lack of oversight. Comparison of the evaluations of the tool with PDPand the final DHFs for the same projects will be used to determine effectiveness of the fivequestions tool at early evaluation.Five Questions:1. Are any humans included in the testing plan?2. Is the data collected directly about the person(s) in any way? (e.g. physical, demographic, capabilities, etc. including personal identification information; name, picture, age, SES, etc.)3. Is the data collection from testing / evaluation resulting in any type of tables or graphs?4. Is there a plan to publish or present the results in any public format?5. Is there any risk of harm to any persons in any way? (If yes please
clients and stakeholders. By positioning students as experts and by explicitlyacknowledging their linguistic repertoires as assets, engineering teachers may enact educationthat is more responsive to and affirming of linguistically diverse students. 11 References[1] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 359- 379.[2] Fosmire, M., & Radcliffe, D. (Eds.). (2014). Integrating information into the
rendering.The nomenclature used (Figure 3) in the present work is: spacing (s), pitch (p), height (H),thickness (t), length (L), base width (W), and base thickness (tb) [19]. However, compared toactive cooling systems, passive cooling system have lower heat dissipation rates, andenvironment conditions such as air temperature and wind speed will affect the heatdissipation rates [20]. Active cooling system concludes micro-channels, spray cooling and jetimpingement, Abdolzadeh showed spray cooling could reduce cell temperature from 58°C to37°C [21], however, spray cooling require water usage and the heat from the cell is wasted.The active cooling system is more efficient and more technically feasible if the waste heatfrom cooling system can be reused in
State EdWatchWebsite: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/state_edwatch/2012/08/a_busy_year_for_states_third-grade_reading_policies.html.[3] Center for Community Solutions (2014). Northeast Ohio Regional Impact and Outcomes Report. Retrievedfrom: http://www.communitysolutions.com/assets/docs/NEORIO/thirdgradereading_neorio_2014_2.pdf[4] Sterling, S., (2014), Incorporating literacy in your STEM classroom, Retrieved from Learning Sciences website:http://blog.learningsciences.com/2014/11/18/incorporating-literacy-in-your-stem-classroom/.[5] Cervetti, G., Pearson, P., Bravo, M., Barber, J., (2006), Integrating literacy and science. In R. Douglas, M.Klentschy, K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp 221-244). Arlington, VA
engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.2. Ball, D. L., Hill, H.C, & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), pp. 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.3. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Horizon Research, Inc.4. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rodgers, C. (2008). Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369 – 387. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x5. Carlson, L., & Sullivan, J
collection efforts andinteractions with civil engineers—of the disconnect between education and practice. Knowingthat practicing civil engineers perform worse than students in most cases on concept inventoryquestions challenges the broad role and focus on concepts in undergraduate education. Theseresults can impact other fields that rely on potentially inappropriate and/or non-holistic means ofassessment, and encourage consideration of other means of assessment.References:1. Bornasal FB, Brown S, Perova N. The use, representation, negotiation, and interpretation of concepts in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education. 2016:Accepted pending revisions.2. Urlacher M, Brown S, Steif P, Bornasal FB. Practicing Civil
, functioning as initial core group, must then balanceproviding support without taking over the community. One must allow the active group tobecome the core group in order to maximize the possibility of a lasting and vibrant communitythat sustains itself after the project funding has ended. References(1) S. Brunhaver, C. Carrico, H.M. Matusovich, R. Streveler, P. Boyland-Ashraf, P., and S. Sheppard, “Professional Engineering Pathways Study: A longitudinal study of early career preparedness and decision-making”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, TX , 2015.(2) J. P. Sampson, J. G. Lenz, R. C. Reardon, and G. W. Peterson, “A cognitive information processing approach to employment problem solving and decision-making”, Career
? Science education reform and Mexican-Americans. High School Journal, 78(4), 244-252.Borman, G. D. & Overman, L. T. (2004). Resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 177-195.Bransford, John D., and Daniel L. Schwartz. "Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications." Review of research in education 24.1 (1999): 61-100.Brotman, J. S. & Moore, F. M. (20080. Girls and science: A review of four themes in science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971-1002.Castro-Olivo, S., Tran, O.K., Begum, G.F., Arellano, E.M., Garcia, N.M. & Tung, C.Y. (2013). A comprehensive model for promotion resiliency and preventing
failed to benefit from their mentor. The selection processused to pick mentors and mentees was also investigated with the research questionnaire to furtherunderstand student preferences and specific needs of those majoring in STEM fields.The sixty-four (N=64) participants represents a diverse sample of graduate students who pursueundergraduate STEM degrees. Students reported their mentors helped with the following: 1) providingfunding, setting goals, providing positive and constructive feedback on their work, and being supportiveof ideas which allowed the mentee to follow his/her own ideas for their work. Alternatively, someparticipants reported unmet expectations by their mentor(s), such as wishing the mentor had: 1)provided more exposure to
(2005).7. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2004).8. Page, S. E. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. (Princeton UP, 2007).9. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Contemporary Sociology 26, (Westview Press, 1997).10. Moller-Wong, C. & Eide, A. An engineering student retention study. J. Eng. Educ. 86, 7– 15 (1997).11. Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J. J.-J. & Reid, K. Comparison of four methodologies for modeling student retention in engineering. in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference
support faculty in their attempt toimprove teaching. Next steps for this research is to use continuing data from courses taught thispast year to see if the trends do indeed continue, or analyzing additional evaluation questions.References1. Anderson, O. S., & Finelli, C. J. (2014). A faculty learning community to improve teaching practices in large engineering courses: Lasting impacts. Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.2. Barr, J., Benton, S., Li, D., & Ryalls, K. (2016). Response to bias against female instructors. IDEA Editorial Note No. 2. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.3. Benton, S. L., & Ryalls, K. R. (2016). Challenging
make sure that we continually connecthigher with the lower knowledge. This is the wayo Integration of Physics in the State-of-Art technology courses:• MMIC Design and Fabrication In this course, the author covers a variety of topics including connecting ABCD parameters ofcircuit theory, S-parameters in microwaves, Low noise, High power and broadband amplifiers, oscillatorsand connection of S-parameters with device physics parameters such as trans-conductance. However,examples are chosen from transmission line losses, input impedance and stability of amplifiers based onS-parameters.Example 1: A lossless transmission line is connected to a load with 𝑍! =0. The characteristic impedanceof the line is 50Ω. (a) Plot 𝑉 𝑥 as a function
Press, 2007).5. Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS Early Ed. (2014). doi:10.1073/pnas.13190301116. Hake, R. R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64–74 (1998).7. Hora, M. T., Ferrare, J. & Oleson, A. Findings from classroom observations of 58 math and science faculty. Madison WI Univ. Wis.-Madison Wis. Cent. Educ. Res. (2012).8. Fiore, L. & Rosenquest, B. Shifting the culture of higher education: Influences on students, teachers, and pedagogy. Theory Pract. 49, 14–20 (2009).9. Hjalmarson, M. et al. Developing interactive teaching
, chemistry, and mathematics. Each respondent alsomet the following requirements: 1) The student identified his/her race/ethnicity as Black/AfricanAmerican on his/her application to Tech College; 2) The student stated that s/he was educated ina high school either in the U.S. or in a sub-Saharan African country; 3) The student enrolled atEC prior to transferring to Tech College; 4) The student was at least 18 years of age at the timethat s/he participated in the research study. A roster of Black transfer students was generated by the Admissions office at LandingUniversity (Landing University is the main campus on which Tech College of Engineering andseveral other academic colleges is housed). After obtaining this roster, undergraduates who
) q[n] DCC s[n] RFFE A/D (N) q(t) q[n] s[n] t n nFigure 2: Illustration of the software defined radio receiver and its operation in converting an in-tercepted analog passband signal r(t) to a digital baseband signal s[n]. The analog-to-digital con-verter (A/D) identified in the illustration is emphasized at the beginning of the course to highlightthe importance of the translation between the analog and digital domains.Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and Internet-of-Things (IoT).In
Paper ID #18647ECE Teaching and Learning: Challenges in Teaching Digital Signal Process-ingDr. S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, Idaho State University is the principal investigator of the National Science Foundation’s research grant, National Wireless Re- search Collaboration Symposium 2014; he has published a book (with Dr. Hu of University of North Dakota) on mobile computing in 2013. Professor Mousavinezhad is an active member of IEEE and ASEE having chaired sessions in national and regional conferences. He has been an ABET Program Evaluator for Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering as well as Engineering Education
visualizationskills, both, for development of imagination and creativity, as well as development ofcompetencies directly related to technical fields such as engineering graphics and design.In this field of graphics and design, which is more linked to STEM education, there are acceptedtest such as the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test - Rotations PSVT:R (Guay, 1977), the MentalCutting Test (MCT) (Sorby, 1999) and the Shepard-Metzler Rotation (S-M) Test (Shepard, 1971)and its modification (Vandenberg, 1978). All of these tests have been used to measure thevisualization skills in an individual at a given time, thus providing a reference for comparison. Theunderlying concept in these tests is the mental rotation of 3D given objects. PSVT:R is perhapsone of the
=conference_papers&space=12974679 7203605791716676178&type=application%2Fpdf&charset=Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 151-185. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.xJohri, A., Olds, B. M., & O'Connor, K. (2014). Situative Frameworks for Engineering Learning Research. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 47-66). NY: Cambridge University Press.Kusano, S., &
to employment. In the future a survey will be made of alumni addressingthat underlying goal as more alumni have performed their capstone projects in this way.AcknowledgmentsThis work was partially supported by a grant from the Student Activities Committee of the IEEEConnecticut Section. The authors would like to acknowledge and publicly thank the section forall of the support provided, both financial and otherwise.References [1] K. Chintalapudi, A. P. Iyer, and V. N. Padmanabhan, “Indoor localization without the pain,” in Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM, 2010, pp. 173–184. [2] J. Duckworth, D. Cyganski, S. Makarov, W. Michalson, J. Orr, V. Amendolare, J. Coyne, H