how teacher motivation translates into student self-efficacy, informingthe design of pre-college curriculum and teacher training.(4) Learning and achievement of science, technology, and mathematics content and practicesWe coded 44 papers as having goals related to learning and achievement of science, technology,and mathematics content and practices. Of these, 18 (41%) provided outcomes that wereinterpretable. We identified few large scale and multiple small scale studies. Broadly, there isevidence that K-12 engineering activities sometimes enhance science and mathematics learning,but this is dependent on effective integration, an issue that has been noted elsewhere [20]. Forinstance, students who participated in Project Lead the Way had
commonly and classically taught, tendsto remove the human and social context from consideration. While the EPS method produceswell-posed problems with easily checked solutions, it unintentionally reinforces the worldviewthat engineering is value-free profession where the rigor of one’s technical analysis is moreimportant than the context in which engineering is practiced1. Recognizing this consequence, agrowing body of literature calls for changing engineering education to be more human-centeredthrough awareness of the limitations of purely technical solutions2-5.Changing one’s approach to teaching in this way poses big challenges: how to add ideas to anoverstuffed curriculum—particularly ideas that involve a disciplinary background different
student designed projects), a course in biomedical ethics, and oversees an off-site undergraduate clinical experience. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Sophomore Design Course on Virtual Prototyping1. IntroductionA sophomore-level design course (BME282) teaches students how to apply the design process toa biomedical product. Course objectives are for students to be able to: (1) apply principles fromcourses they have completed and from courses that they will take in their BME curriculum tobiomedical product design and development to determine quantitative design constraints criticalto biomedical device design and (2) integrate these principles and resultant design constraints
concept-mapping approach both reduces the cognitive load, andimproves learning achievements of the students. Triplett et al. 18 propose Concept-in-Contextmaps (CCmaps) to link a wide array of different types of information that reflect the organizationof content within a topical area in an introductory materials course.While concept maps are deemed to be a good tool to portray knowledge structure and diagnoselearner’s misconception, we are more interested in their integration with generic learningparadigms and in this regard, our research shows the combination of active learning strategy withconcept mapping has led to plausible results for student oriented learning. Tembe and Kamble 19have studied 414 concept maps from 207 basic school students
, manage, and improve operations. Skills Include: Systems Integration Planning RFP Development/Grant Writing Technical management including software development, system administration , telecommunications Professional Development Process Re-engineering Disaster Recovery End User Training ERP Design/Implementation IT Manage- ment Project Management Solution Engineering Systems SupportProf. Dennis O. Owen, Purdue University Dennis Owen is an Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. His primary teaching interests include application development and computer hardware. He is active in recruiting and curriculum transformation. c American Society for
construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1955.[7] L. Vygotsky, Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.[8] M. Alias, T. A. Lashari, Z. A. Akasah, M. J. Kesot, Translating theory into practice: integrating the affective and cognitive learning dimensions for effective instruction in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 39 No. 2, 212- 232, 2014.[9] O.A. Hassan, Learning Theories and Assessment Methodologies – An Engineering Educational Perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 36 No. 4, 327–339, 2011.13 | P a g e
Paper ID #19742Freshman Design Course: Device Design for Low-Resource SettingsDr. Emma K. Frow, Arizona State University Emma Frow is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University, with a joint appointment in the School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering and the School for the Future of Innovation in Society. She has graduate training in both the natural and social sciences, with a PhD in biochemistry and an MSc in science & technology studies. Emma is interested in the engineering imagination, particularly in the emerging field of synthetic biology. Over the past 7 years, her curricular and
instructional tasks, and how to assess learning 20. In order tosuccessfully impact student learning, teachers must have deep understanding of mathematics andscience they teach. Well-designed professional development experiences are integral todeveloping such knowledge and skills 5. Project TESAL targets improved mathematics andscience content knowledge in an engineering design based approach 21. We strive to shiftstudents and teachers from being processors of information toward becoming creators ofmathematics and science models as tools to help solve societally relevant scientific challengesthrough design/development of appropriate technologies 22.The Project TESAL ModelOur model utilized iterative design/redesign to address “the engineering problem
disengagement from the instructorand course material. To increase student engagement and provide an enriched learningenvironment that combines practical experiences with theoretical knowledge, an alternativeapproach to a flipped classroom was explored. With a senior and graduate mix of 28 students,roles in the Flight Vehicle Performance (FVP) course were partially flipped, as students wereasked to take ownership of their learning through two main efforts. First, integration of theMerlin Flight Simulator early in the course built off of previous use to provide a practicalexposure to the course material, even before it was presented in class. Second, the students wererequired to prepare lectures that cumulatively covered around 25% of the core course
theiterative design process. In this way, design failures within EDPs are a means to an end, the endbeing a final product that meets or exceeds design criteria. Engineering and Failure in Elementary Schools According to the Committee on K12 Engineering Education, with support from theNational Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, one principle of elementarythrough high school engineering education is that it should emphasize engineering design.3Inherent in engineering design is that students have opportunities to “learn from failure andredesign,” one of six characteristics of high-quality STEM integration identified by Moore andcolleagues.4 Further, engineering design knowledge is
Paper ID #19733Developing and Improving a Multi-Element First-Year Engineering Corner-stone Autonomous Robotics Design ProjectMr. David Joseph Frank, Ohio State University David J. Frank is a 4th year Computer Engineering honors student at The Ohio State University and an Graduate Teaching Assistant for the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program. He will graduated with his B.S.E.C.E in May 2017, and his M.S.E.C.E in May 2018.Ms. Kelly Lynn Kolotka, Ohio State University Kelly L. Kolotka is a third year Chemical Engineering honors student at The Ohio State University with a minor in Biomedical Engineering. She is
. Kristen Parrish, Arizona State University Kristen Parrish is an Assistant Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environ- ment at Arizona State University (ASU). Kristen’s work focuses on integrating energy efficiency measures into building design, construction, and operations processes. Specifically, she is interested in novel design processes that financially and technically facilitate energy-efficient buildings. Her work also explores how principles of lean manufacturing facilitate energy-efficiency in the commercial building industry. Another research interest of Kristen’s is engineering education, where she explores how project- and c American Society for
more inclusive and welcomingclassroom; and ultimately increase retention, particularly of underrepresented minoritiesincluding women. Herein, we discuss the development and implementation of a new hands-onfreshman engineering design course, Design Practicum, with an emphasis on improvements incurriculum and teaching strategies, and creating a more inclusive environment.Development of Design PracticumWe began by looking through student survey responses to determine areas needing improvement,and which features of past courses were the most effective at engaging students, retainingstudents, and creating a more inclusive environment. From there, participating faculty and ourteaching intern developed curriculum and strategies to implement in our
knowledge. Individualstudents have team roles to help keep all team members engaged. Instructors act as facilitators,observing student teams and providing support where needed. POGIL originated in collegechemistry teaching [27,28] and has since spread across STEM disciplines with over 1,000implementers. POGIL has shown potential to improve learning, develop teamwork and keyprocess skills, and encourage individual responsibility and meta-cognition [4]. The guidedlearning applies a learning cycle of exploration, concept invention, and application. Thus,POGIL is an active, constructivist, collaborative, student-centered learning approach.The NSF TUES CS-POGIL Project applied POGIL to the CS curriculum, including topicsin data structures &
engineering students through engagement in innovation and entrepreneurship, and a Co-PI for an i6 Challenge grant through the U.S. Economic Development Admin- istration (EDA) to foster regional economic development through innovation and new business start-ups. She is institutional integrator for the Partnership for the Advancement of Engineering Education (PACE) at NMSU. She is also co-lead for a NSF funded Pathways to Innovation cohort at NMSU with a focus on integrating innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum through a blending of indus- try and educational experiences. Patricia serves as a commissioner for the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE), is a member of the
ago.Engineering Analysis Curriculum, Advising Practices & OutcomesEngineering analysis (EA) is a four-course sequence that covers several engineering-relatedtopics. By design, engineering analysis was developed in the mid-1990s to create a single unifiedcurriculum taught by engineering professors during the freshmen year, and this shift towardsengineering courses to freshmen was largely successful. At the time, the preparation level ofincoming students in math and physics was relatively uniform, and the curriculum wassufficiently advanced that the playing field was relatively even.The first three quarters of the EA sequence are required for all engineering majors. EA1introduces linear algebra and computational methods from an applications viewpoint
Engineering StudentsAbstract. While an introduction to Material Science and Engineering (MSE) course is part of thecore curriculum in many Engineering fields such as Mechanical and Chemical Engineering,many students often display a lack of interest in the subject matter, and struggle to see therelevance of the material to their Engineering field. To address this issue, the authors adopted aproject-based learning approach in two introductory material science classes. The goal is tostimulate interest in the subject matter by providing students with the opportunity to applyfundamental Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) principles learned in the classroom to amaterial of their choice and interest. The student learning outcomes of this project are
College and University Partnership – Year Two ProgressAbstractIn rural locales like Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, students and employers alike can struggle intheir search to find STEM-based educational opportunities or qualified graduates to fill openpositions. Due to the diverse needs of the small employers found in such an area, Bay de NocCommunity College quickly realized that creating a different degree for each industry needwould be an unsustainable and unreasonable approach. Instead, a partnership was formed withMichigan Technological University to create highly customizable and stackable credentials inthe fields of mechatronics, robotic systems, and electrical engineering technology. By co-developing this curriculum and partnering on a
and sensorimotor integration in the context of functional restoration of grasp.John G. Davis, University of Wisconsin, Madison John G. Davis, PE John holds dual appointments at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, College of Engineering. He is an Assistant Faculty Associate and Program Director in the Department of Engineering Professional De- velopment and a Research Engineer at the Industrial Refrigeration Consortium (IRC). John’s professional interests include HVAC products and systems, DX refrigeration, industrial refrigeration, geothermal sys- tem design, thermal systems optimization, building science and building energy management, technical leadership and project management. John is a member of
Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing systems; computer-aided design methodology; and engineering education.Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Dr. Bimal Nepal is an assistant professor in the Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M University. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization, pricing optimization, supply chain risk analysis, lean and six sigma, and large scale optimization. He has authored 30 refereed articles in leading supply chain and operations management journals, and 35
understanding of four groups. The groups are students and faculty inengineering and industrial design. A survey was created to identify the perspectives, ideas, andthe definitions of engineering and technological literacy as well as the purpose, and the contentof the classes in these areas. There have been challenges to get responses from engineering andindustrial design faculty and engineering students.The department of Industrial Design (in the College of Design) is the only department that hasincluded technological literacy as their core curriculum. The two technological literacy classes(“From thoughts to things” and “How things work”) have been selected as the core requirementsfor industrial design program. Students take these classes in their
addition, mechanical engineering experiencehelped to take this project’s concept into completion. Utilizing the mechanical engineeringstudent’s experience with modeling and operations research, the group was able to modify theGridLab-D to model the experiment. As the nation’s only urban land-grant university, the University of the District of Columbia hasa special focus on urban sustainability, which is reflected in its curriculum and research focuses.The experience that these students brought to the framing of this project was integral to itssuccess. Collaboration through the capstone project allowed students to share the lessons they’velearned through their internships or research projects in a concrete manner. One student, who haddone
concepts in the language spoken in thehomes and communities of their students, and miss opportunities to appreciate the family andcommunity structures that American Indian students rely on in their everyday lives [7] [9]. WhenAmerican Indian children are taught by a majority of non-American Indian teachers, the teachersand students may struggle to identify with one another, which research shows negatively impactsthe ability of teachers to mentor and motivate children, particularly toward a love of math andscience [10]. Sharing an understanding of one another’s core beliefs and value systems is criticalto implementing a culturally responsive curriculum and building the much needed teacher-student trust that improves URM retention, particularly for
water and wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education.Dr. Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Hasan Deniz is an Associate Professor of Science Education at University of Nevada Las Vegas. He teaches undergraduate, masters, and doctoral level courses in science education program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. His research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the
-quality massproduction system, optimizes for efficiency by standardizing processes. In undergraduateengineering degree programs, this is apparent from the relatively inflexible standard curricularpaths within any given major and the use of midterm and final exams as “go or no-go”measurement gauges to determine which “products” (students) are of sufficient quality to moveonto the next step (or class) in the assembly line of curricular requirements. An important aspectof this factory model is that colleges are systematically indifferent as to which students graduateand which go elsewhere since standardization of the process and objective assessments arepresumed to ensure fair treatment for all students.This paper integrates findings across student
, without the traditional expectations and pressures of making the“grade”; this is an underutilized avenue that has significant potential to provide reinforcement ofclassroom learning, as well as insights that could be used in classroom lectures. Based on thispremise, within the framework of this current effort, the author has the following objectives: i. Identify and evaluate methodologies that reinforce undergraduate in-class learning experience in the lifecycle of a systems engineering based Student Unmanned Aerial System (SUAS) competition, particularly as it pertains to concepts of aircraft dynamics, stability and control. Note: This should by no means be interpreted to mean that traditional topics in an aerospace curriculum
. Mathematics: Mathematics instruction was designed to reduce loss in proficiency during the summer and support the 3D modeling and app development curriculum. Topics included geometry, mathematics tricks and shortcuts, division, exponents, square roots and logic. Entrepreneurship: Participants were introduced to entrepreneurial ventures through topics like marketing, financing, business models and visits from local technology entrepreneurs. Final Project: In the fourth week, participant teams were asked to develop an entrepreneurial venture. The teams brainstormed and refined a concept that integrated an app, a 3D model, business plan and a website or social media page. Ventures ideated were a) Customized key chain with GPS locator, b) Online
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
. A., Sattler, B., Yasuhara, K., Borgford-Parnell, J., & Atman, C., “Integrating reflection into engineering education”, Paper presented at the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 201413. Ambrose, S. A., “Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge”, The Bridge, 43(2), 16-23, 201314. Landis, R.B., “Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career”, 4th edition, Discovery Press, Los Angeles, California, 201315. Nilson, L., “Creating Self-Regulated Learners: Strategies to Strengthen Students' Self-Awareness and Learning Skills”, Stylus Publishing, 2013.16. Peuker, S., & Schauss, N. A. G., “Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: An Innovative
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Adapting Tested Spatial Skills Curriculum to On-Line Format for Community College Instruction: A Critical Link to Retain Technology Students (SKIITS)I. IntroductionSpatial Skills Instruction Impacts Technology Students (SKIITS)1 is developing an online,transportable course that community colleges can use as a resource to offer spatial skills trainingto their students with a nominal investment of institutional resources. The course is based onresearch and materials funded by NSF that have successfully been used in face-to-faceinstruction in four-year universities.SKIITS focuses on three research questions:1. Can effective materials developed through