Nelson Pearson is an Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes, social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture as well as engineering pedagogy. His education includes a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno.Ms. Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Clemson University Jacqueline Rohde is a senior undergraduate student in Bioengineering at Clemson University. Her re- search in engineering education focuses on the development student identity and attitudes with respect to engineering. She is a member of the National Scholars Program, Clemson University’s most prestigious merit-based scholarship. She is also involved in efforts to
been shown toimprove critical thinking, confidence, problem solving, motivation, and student interest in thesciences and engineering2, 3.Given the benefits of inquiry-based learning, it has become an integral part of manyundergraduate education programs. Courses have been developed that focus on IBL such as theCourse-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) and Process-Oriented GuidedInquiry Learning (POGIL)2, 4. IBL has also been incorporated at the programmatic level, wherecurricula are built around inquiry-based learning techniques5, 6. IBL can take on many differentforms, ranging from structured approaches, where instructors provide guidance to students asthey explore a question or problem, to open inquiry, where students formulate
and integration13with an emphasis on conceptual understanding over a period of time14. The researchers were alsoconcerned with the way in which concept mapping has been used to evaluate interdisciplinaryknowledge integration and the manner in which instruction can play into that integration15. Ourmethod draws heavily from Shallcross’s16 methodology that targets semi-structured mappingactivities by single students in a short time frame. This affords an efficient deployment of conceptmapping within a course setting without being disruptive. Due to the exploratory nature of theproject and diversity of approaches taken within each section, the authors avoid assessing theconcept maps to an exemplar developed by an expert or a singular complexity
Paper ID #20000The Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Interdisciplinary InstructionalInstitute (QMRAIII) – A Platform for Cross Disciplinary Training of Engi-neers with Social and Biological Scientists to Address Public Health IssuesDr. Jade Mitchell, Michigan Sate University, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Dr. Jade Mitchell is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering at Michigan State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Pittsburgh in Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering, M.S. in Civil Engineering and Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from
learning is the inclusion of student skills associated with anentrepreneurial mindset, such as integrating information from many sources to gain insight,conveying engineering solutions in economic terms, and identifying unexpected opportunities.The resulting entrepreneurially minded learning activities emphasize “discovery, opportunityidentification, and value creation with attention given to effectual thinking over causal(predictive) thinking” [3]. At Lawrence Tech approximately 75% of the engineering curriculum,including mathematics and general education, is being modified to include ACL, PBL, and EML.These courses span the curriculum and range from multidisciplinary Introduction toEngineering [6, 7] to junior level technical courses [8, 9] to
Paper ID #17843Building Supports for Diversity through Engineering TeamsDr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in
, Virtusis aligned with the curriculum and structure of Flexus. For example first-year students arerequired to live in a common residence hall, participate in a one credit seminar each semester,and participate in various academic, social and professional development activities.Through various types of activities, programs, and services as living and learning communities,Flexus and Virtus facilitate both academic and social integration within the Clark School. All ofliving and learning students are required to participate in the peer mentoring program.SEEDS Peer MentoringThe SEEDS Peer Mentoring program was designed to be inclusive of all first-year engineeringstudents and new transfer students in the Clark School. The primary goal of the program is
solving problems, learning on their own, and comfortably navigatingthe information-rich environment we live and work in. There is also a growing body ofknowledge concerning how to most effectively teach modern students – highlighting the value ofstudent-centered learning, active learning experiences, and effective integration of technology.After an internal assessment, the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the USMilitary Academy determined that the initial sequence of mechanics courses provided thetechnical content our students needed but required updating in some important ways. First,mechanics was being taught isolated from the broader design process. Secondly, there was nointegration of computer programs to begin the education
CP4SMPVC+ grant – in which Georgia Tech is developing curriculum and project kits that will be used during the summer camps to be run at partnering Informal Education Institutes.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Tagliatela College of Engineering, University of New Haven, CT. She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2008. She received her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT in 2000. Her research focuses on the nontraditional engineering student – understanding their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal
Paper ID #17938Promoting Entreprenuerially Minded Learning through Online DiscussionsDr. Lisa Bosman, Marquette University Dr. Lisa Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Her research interests include solar energy performance modeling, entrepreneurial minded learning, and STEM education.Dr. Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette UniversityProf. Patrick McNamara, Marquette University Dr. McNamara is beginning his 4th year as an assistant professor at Marquette University. His research group focuses on understanding how consumer product chemicals impact microbes and antibiotic resis
Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Col- orado State University. She received her B.S.E. (2011) and M.S.E. (2014) in Structural Engineering from the Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Evaluating the effectiveness of implementing active learning opportunities for first year engineering students who are taking math, physics, and chemistryIntroductionUndergraduate engineering students are typically required to take introductory math,chemistry, and physics concurrently with their first-year engineering curriculum.According to previous studies, success in these core courses is an integral part of asuccessful engineer's training
details about my current research projects, check out my website: http://wauck2.web.engr.illinois.edu/Mr. James M. Leake, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign James M. Leake joined the Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems (formerly General) Engineer- ing in August 1999. His educational background includes an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (1993) from the University of Washington, a B.S. in Ocean Engineering (1980) from Florida Atlantic University, and a B.A. in Art History (1974) from Indiana University. His current research interests include engineering education, integration of CAD/CAE software in the engineering curriculum, building information mod- eling, spatial visualization, and reverse engineering
provide evidence of significant integration and cross-pollination between STSand what has come to be known as TELPhE. In their historical overview of “EngineeringPractice as an Emerging Field of Inquiry,” Williams and Figueiredo provide a representativetimeline depicting major contributions to research on engineering practice between 1911 and2014. Many of the authors and works included on the timeline would qualify as canonical, or atleast easily identifiable as, works in STS, for example, Latour’s Science in Action (1987), Law’s“Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion” (1987), Downey, TheMachine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers (1998), and Mukerji’sImpossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on
through the CU Teach Engineering program. Additionally, she mentors graduate and undergraduate engineering Fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s TEAMS initiative, is on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library, and is faculty advisor for CU-Boulder’s Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education and curriculum development.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the Engineering Plus program at the
, Schwartz accepted a lecturer position in the Department of Computer Science to teach computer programming and develop new introductory courses. Recognizing the academic potential of games, Schwartz founded the Game Design Initiative at Cornell (GDIAC) in the spring of 2001. Soon after, he designed the Cornell Library Collaborative Learning Computer Laboratory (CL3), which started hosting GDIAC courses in August 2004. In May 2006, these efforts established Cornell’s Minor in Game Design offered by the College of Engineering, the first formal Ivy-League game design program. In the summer of 2007, Schwartz joined the Rochester Institute of Technology’s Game Design and Development program as an assistant professor. In 2009
who completed the workshopbecame strong contributors and leaders in the Innovation Space.The workshop itself utilizes team-based experiential learning [6], coupled with real-life problemsto demonstrate the steps required to work through the engineering design process. By practicingand learning these skills the students become better prepared to interact in their engineeringcourses. Many of the personal interactions required of the workshop participants between facultyand their peers are what would be expected of them in their engineering curriculum. By havingthe students work on actual university related design problems, their interest level remains highand they tend to display more ownership of their solutions. Having an open-ended
statistics of local studentsgoing abroad through the short-term exchange and study abroad winter programs. 200 150 Exchange Winter 100 50 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Figure 2. Statistics of Students Studying AbroadAt the onset of JI, all technical program requirements and curriculum structures were carefullydesigned to allow for curriculum integration between the corresponding programs of the JI andUM. This curriculum alignment allows some students of the JI to pursue dual undergraduatedegrees in two different but related engineering or science disciplines at two universities, knownas the dual-degree program. In the
in undergraduate student retention. Where innovation spaces help foster entrepreneurship and industry partnerships, research spaces play an integral and direct role in classwork. They help turn the theoretical into the physical, and allow lower-level students to translate book learning into hands-on exploration and imagination along with the opportunity to help solve real-world challenges at both local and global scales. These spaces also encourage collaboration among students and faculty and help break down barriers both within the hierarchy of a single field and across engineering disciplines. For faculty, they also accommodate a growing interest in continuing research and engaging with students in hands-on work to complement
organize purchased pantry items both by physical locationand itemized inventory as well as purchase routine groceries more efficiently. Throughincorporating elements of software integration in the user interface and a motor controlstructure, the development of this project encompasses a wide range of the team members’acquired skills. The unit allows a user to scan an item and add it to a specific physical locationwhich is then stored in a database on the microcontroller. When retrieving said item, the usersimply makes a selection on the generated list on the touch screen display causing the motorto drive the carousel to the location in which the item is stored. The data is stored in an SQLdatabase which is also available on a developed smartphone
how they are connected together. Aninstructor could also add a prototyping area so that students have to wire components to theboard and learn how to map them to the FPGA. These are the additional outcomes that can beachieved through custom design. Soldering skills are another additional outcome. Using a custom board designed for studentsto assemble in lab provides an extended period of time to improve surface mount and throughhole soldering skills. It is still possible to integrate soldering into a course using a commercialPLD board by giving students an add-on board to assemble. This may be a convenient alterna-tive to achieve the same goal. The impacts of soldering and assembly on time and quality withcustom boards is discussed in
Lockette, P. 2000. "Improving the engineering and writing interface: An assessment of a team-taught integrated course." Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference.Kittleson, J. M., & Southerland, S. A. 2004. "The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (3): 267-293.Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. 2009. "“I really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages." Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (4): 347.Lundy, Kathleen. 2015. Conquering the Crowded Curriculum. Stenhouse .Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. 2010. "Feedback to
technology) Theory and practice of management, use and integration of Spring MET30200 computer aided design systems, and related engineering (’16) (CAD in the 10 tools and practices are studied as they are applied in the enterprise) industrial enterprise. Emphasis is on course projects. MET40200 (Capstone Project management and system engineering methods are 4 project II) applied to solving an engineering problem.Notes. 1CGT16300/11000 contained the same
Paper ID #17731MAKER: Smart Packaging Machine Simulator for Teaching Ladder LogicProgrammingMr. Robert Barham, New Caney ISD Robert Barham has been teaching secondary math and technology courses for twenty years. Currently, he teaches engineering courses at Porter High School in Porter, Texas, some forty miles northeast of Houston. He is working with the local community college to articulate acceptance of high school robotics and au- tomation courses toward the requirements of an A.A.S. degree in mechatronics. Email: rbarham@newcaneyisd.orgDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is
work in curriculum, Dr. Linder has multiple national publications relating to early childhood and elementary mathematics motivation and achievement, preservice and inservice teacher quality and professional development, cross-curricular and technology integration in mathematics, and teacher beliefs related to mathematics pedagogy.Dr. Cindy M. Lee, Clemson University Cindy M. Lee serves as the department chair of Clemson University’s Engineering and Science Education Department, a graduate-only department that offers a graduate certificate program in STEM education pedagogy and introduction to education research methods as well as a PhD program in STEM education research. Cindy’s research and teaching has focused on
heavily integrated into the classroom piece whichwould be not be replicable in our project as we had no classroom piece to use to grade such. “Inengineering, there are many examples of service-learning programs ranging from freshmanintroductory courses to senior capstone courses. Despite their successes, an area that theengineering education community has yet to fully develop is the reflection component of service-learning.”3 We have made a conscious choice to keep the project housed outside the bounds of a forcredit course due to student feedback which will be specifically discussed in the results section.RESULTS The exhibits that have been created over the years have varied greatly in design and have grown in depthand complexity over that
academic year with a huge success [2]. Our two courses wereoffered as technical elective courses. The two courses are the only two project-based courses oncutting-edge computer technologies in our curriculum. These courses provided students with theopportunities to learn and practice real-world software engineering, and gain experiences insolving multidisciplinary practical problems. Furthermore, these courses help students to attainseveral ABET student outcomes that are difficult to accomplish via traditional lecture-based andlab-based courses, such as (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (i) arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge ofcontemporary issues.These
practices(Brophy et al., 2008; NRC, 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013; Roth, 1996).Methods Context and Participants. This study took place at a medium-sized land grant universityin the eastern United States. Students from two separate undergraduate programs, MechanicalEngineering (ENG) and Early Childhood Education (ECE) participated in the study. Participantswere enrolled in one of three courses; namely, ENG students were enrolled in a 200-level designcourse that covered 3D drafting and modeling, while ECE students were enrolled in either a 400-level course on inclusive curriculum and assessment for infants and toddlers, or a 400-levelcourse on integrated early childhood teaching that emphasized science curriculum, instructionand assessment for
paperdescribes an effort using short readings, which require minimal effort on the part of the studentsor instructor, in class topics that require some effort, and research papers that requireconsiderable effort to complete and grade. The goals of these readings and topics are diverse andinclude building character, encouraging creativity and compassion, and gaining a betterunderstanding of the modern business environment. Appropriate topics can also encouragestudent interest in the subject.References 1. Hartman, J. C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998. 2. Evans, E., Nachtman, H., Needy, K.L., “A look into the Engineering Economy Literature”, ASEE Annual
engineering makerspaces have on engineering students. It was clear in our initialefforts of survey development and implantation that there was a greater depth and moreopenness to the questions that we were asking about makerspaces. These three studies thatwe have presented here address our current state of research on makerspaces. While itconstitutes both a review of previous literature that has been published and new findings, thispapers aims to showcase how to integrate different approaches for studying a highly complexand uncontrolled space. Longitudinal data of design self-efficacy, retention, GPA, demographicsand makerspace involvement are all being collected. In order to interpret and expand on thedata, we pursued implementing an ethnographic
other AP science teacher mentioned that a recent restructuring of the AP Physics coursecontent and sequencing led him to change from implementing IC as a required in-class program,which he did in previous years, to a voluntary after-school program, which was the case for the2015-2016 school year. He indicated that after the restructuring of the course, he did not have thetime or flexibility in the curriculum that he felt is needed in order to implement IC as a required,in-class program.Further, the elementary school teachers also discussed how they appreciate the opportunities theprogram offers, such as providing an integrated STEM experience and allowing students andteachers to move beyond the confines of their regular classroom and curriculum