Study of Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy by Gender, Ethnicity, Year, and Transfer Status. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2009;18(2):163-72.9. Concannon JP, Barrow LH. Men's and Women's Intentions to Persist in Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2010;19(2):133- 45.10. Shull PJ, Weiner M. Thinking inside the box: Self-efficacy of women in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2002;18(4):438-46.11. Roald Hoffmann, Saundra Y McGuire. Learning and Teaching Strategies. American Scientist. 2010 September 1,;98(5):378.12. McGuire SY, McGuire S, Angelo T. Teach Students How to Learn : Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve
] A. Pawley, “Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[6] D. Dutta, “Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences of international female engineers in U.S. graduate programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 326–344, 2015.[7] S. Gibson and M. Espino, “ Uncovering black womanhood in engineering,” NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56–73, 2016.[8] S. Davis, S. Nolen, N. Cheon, and E. Moise, “Investigating factors related to disciplinary identification and persistence in
doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching of STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high-quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and
primer [3], there are between 105 and 252 STEMeducation programs or activities at 13 to 15 federal agencies; the key agencies involved in theeffort are Department of Education, National Science Foundation, and Health and HumanServices.Given that the interests are broad and federal efforts are spread across multiple agencies, there isa concern with perceived duplication of effort and a lack of coordination in the federal effort.Therefore, efforts to improve accountability and coordination have gained prominence in recentyears. The data currently available about STEM education paints a “complicated” picture [3].According to many indicators [3], overall graduate enrollments in science and engineering (S&E)grew 35% over the last decade; S&E
Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1733636. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohmann, Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring engineering has the right people with the right talents for a global society. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.[2] ASEE. (2016, Dec 18, 2017). About: ASEE Action on Diversity. Available: https://diversity.asee.org/[3] M. V. Svyantek, "Missing from the classroom: Current representations of disability in engineering education," in
. Winter has worked with major NSF initiatives (e.g., ADVANCE, HBCU-UP, S STEM) since 2003. KWE is the external evaluator for the AAC&U Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) initiative, Metacommunity for Broadening Par- ticipation; AAC&U PKAL’s Undergraduate STEM Education Reform (USER) project; and two five-year long consortia-based projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education (a FITW and an HSI-STEM). KWE’s areas of evaluation expertise include diversity in STEM, college student access and retention, professional development for faculty, and institutional cultural change. Dr. Winter is a member of the American Evaluation Association (AEA) and the European Evaluation So- ciety (EES), adheres to AEA professional and
minimize doctoral attrition- A four stage framework. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2(1), 33-49.Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundemental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. The Adult Learner, 85.Brookfield, S. D. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241.Cole, D., &
Kansas City, in the late 90’s. She earned her M.S. in Youth Development from the University of Nebraska and her B.S. in Family Studies at Kansas State University.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Lee received his Ph.D in engineering education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in industrial & systems engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in
)haveworkedcollaborativelytoimproveinstructionmethodsusedinsevengatewaySTEMcoursesidentifiedtohavehighfailureratesacrossthecampuses.Theflippedclassroommodelisbeingphasedinoverthreeyearsonthecampusesthroughcollaborativeeffortsbyfacultytodevelopmaterialstosupportknowledgeacquisitionoutsideofclasstimeandengagestudentsinhigher-orderapplicationssuchasproblemsolvingandpeerinstructionduringclasstime.Resultsshowincreasedpassratesforstudentsinmostflippedclassroomsectionswhencomparedtosectionstaughtwithtraditionalmethods.FirstsemesterresultsforYear2coursesindicatingapositiveimpactonstudentachievement,thoughresultsarepreliminaryandwillbevalidatedwithfurtherdatacollectioninsubsequentsemesters.Grantactivitiesarecurrentlyfocusedondevelopingcoursematerialsfor3additionalgatewaycourses,conductinganextensivestudyontheinfluenceofflippedclassroompedagogyinCalculusIcourses,andcreatingacultureofchangeacrossthecampusesbyprovidingtrainingandfundingforfacultyinsupportoftheirdevelopmentofflippedclassroommaterialsinavarietyofSTEMcourses. This project is supported through the First in the World Program at SJSU which is funded through theU.S. Department of Education (P116F150112) 1 Department of Education. First in the World Program. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/fitw/index.html2 SJSU’s Four Pillars of Student Success. http://www.sjsu.edu/provost/docs/Student_Success_Plan_5-5-16.pdf3 Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped
. 2, pp. 172– 209, 2011.[12] E. Litzler, P. N. Mody-Pan, and S. G. Brainard, “Intersections of gender and race in engineering education,” 118th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. June 26, 2011 - June 29, 2011, 2011.[13] M. J. Bruning, J. Bystydzienski, and M. Eisenhart, “Intersectionality as a Framework for Understanding Diverse Young Women’s Commitment to Engineering,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2015.[14] D. J. Mitchell, C. Y. Simmons, and L. A. Greyerbiehl, Eds., Intersectionality & Higher Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2014.[15] M. A. Armstrong and J. Jovanovic, “Starting at the Crossroads: Intersectional Approaches to Institutionally Supporting Underrepresented Minority Women STEM
outreach programs at WPI including Camp Reach and several other summer and academic year programs for students and parents.Mrs. Ryan Nicole Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs during the summer and academic year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Comparison of Changes in Science Interest and Identity and 21st Century Learning Skills in a Mixed-Gender and Single-Gender Robotics
, Communication three questions: 1.) Access for what 1999 Informatics purpose(s)? 2.) Access for whom? 3.) Access to what? Access is defined by five dimensions of health Levesque, Harris, care services including, approachability, Health Care Russell, 2013 acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.As illustrated in Table 1, access can pertain to a broad range of barriers including social,educational (Carlson & Sullivan
STateAcademic Redshirts (WA STARS) Program at University of Washington (UW) and WashingtonState University (WSU) suggests that the “redshirt in engineering” model is a successful tool forimproving outcomes for students who would be otherwise excluded from engineering. Theexpansion of the model to three additional schools -- University of California, San Diego(UCSD), Boise State University (BSU), and University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) --will allow for an examination of its malleability and potential for further dissemination. Lessons1 Note: much of the information in the introduction was drawn from the NSF S-STEM proposal to fund theRedshirt in Engineering Consortium.learned from existing redshirt programs and the first two years of the
engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM pro- grams.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a
). “FemaleandMaleEngineeringStudents’PersonalityCharacterizationofSuccessful EngineeringStudents,Engineers,andThemselves,”2011WEPANNationalConference Proceedings.Frehill,Lisa(2004).“WomenofColorintheEngineeringPipeline,”WEPAN2004National ConferenceProceedings.Kim,Drew,PhD.,LeoMcAfeePhD.,CraigFriedrichPhD.,PattyFarrell(2004).“WinningwithWIMS: CreativeStrategiesandAlliancesbetweenUniversitiesandCorporatePartnerstoBenefit StudentLearning,”2004WEPANNationalConferenceProceedings.Le‐Huu,Marianne,DominiqueMathot,IBM(2007).“EnhancingYourCareerPathThrough IncreasedVisibility,”2007WEPAN/NAMPEANationalConferenceProceedings.Meilt,Marsha,Franks,S.,Whitlock,J.,Arnold,S.(2003).“PromotingDiversityinKansas’Future
mentors,● The introductory CS courses had many students with although they are much more advanced academically. programming experience, and thus were not true beginner Most of the PINC mentors had no prior mentoring classes; (imposter syndrome) experience. In order to train these peer and near-peer mentors effectively and efficiently, we implemented a● They were the only one (or one of a few) women and/or series of monthly workshops facilitated by a PINC faculty URM student(s) in the room; (stereotype threat) member. The overall number of mentors was small (i.e
. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/20/republicans-skeptical-of-colleges-impact-on-u-s-but-most-see-benefits-for-workforce-preparation/6 See, e.g., Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, 1785, for views on public education and theimportance of educating all genders and classes. Karl Smith deserves recognition for this idea of returning to firstprinciples for public higher education, which he shared in personal conversation at the 2017 FIE conference inIndianapolis.7 Lieberman, D. (2017) Death Threats are Forcing Professors Off Campus. CNN, December 21, 2017.http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/21/us/university-professors-free-speech-online-hate-threats/index.html)8 Scheurich, J.J., Valenzuela, A., Merchant, B.M., Lugg, C., López, G.R
science, law, and business, Zawada has interned with the NIH Office of Technology Transfer, the Law Library of Congress, the Goldwater Insti- tute, and Quarles & Brady LLP. Graduating from UA with a bachelor’s in biochemistry as the Class of 2015’s Gold Medal Senior, Zawada was the recipient of the General Electric/LULAC Scholarship (2012- 2015) and a NASA Space Grant (2012-13). As a U.S. Senate intern, she assisted in the development of a HELP Committee memo during the landmark Supreme Court case that ruled in favor of cDNA patentabil- ity. She has promoted science-policy dialogue as editor of the ABA Biotechnology Law Newsletter, an AMSA Just Medicine Committee member, and an international representative to the
ENGINEERING IDENTITY 10 ReferencesAuthor. (2017). [omitted for blind review]Bix, A. S. (2004). From "engineeresses" to" girl engineers" to" good engineers": A history of women's US engineering education. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 27-49.Bruning, M. J., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhard, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-26.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2013). The borderlands of education: Latinas in engineering. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.Carlone, H. B
4MessagesaboutEngineering Somegroupsofstudents aremorelikelytobe interestedinengineeringif theyareabletoseehow engineeringcanmakea positiveimpactonour worldPersonalinterests arethecharacteristicsofapersonthatinfluencehisorherengagementininteractionswiththesocialornonsocialenvironments.Situationalinterests istheinterestingnessofthesocialornonsocialenvironmentsthatevokeorencourageinteractionswithpeopleorobjects.Krapp,A.,Hidi,S.,&Renninger,K.A.(1992).Interest,Learning,andDevelopment.InK.A.Renninger,S.Hidi&A.Krapp (Eds.),Theroleofinterestinlearninganddevelopment.Hillsdale,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.ResearchQuestion:Whatisthealignmentbetweenthepersonalinterestsofchildrenin3rd- 5th
experiences are asked to indicate the gender of thefaculty or other university employee (e.g. counselors or administrators) with whom they firstdiscussed their experience provided they have discussed it with a university employee and howimportant the employee's gender was in their decision to approach them with the situation. Ifstudents indicated that they have not reported the incident(s), they are asked to indicate why andare provided with information regarding how to make such reports. The following are a list ofhypotheses the authors wish to test with these questions: ● Harassment, discrimination and unwelcomed gender-related comments towards gender- minority students is negatively correlated with the minority gender’s representation
events. Faculty advisors and staff assistantsare available to help and advise, but the students are the ones who do most of the work.In addition to planning events for the UD engineering community, all department representativesare liaisons, or points of reference, for other women in their departments. Similar to anombudsperson, WIE members are available to provide their peers guidance or information, or alink to a supportive faculty member. WIE committee members have in the past made criticalconnections between a student and the dean’s office, resulting in interventions that improved thestudent’s situation.Officers The committee elects officers, including a chair, a co-chair, webmaster(s) andpublicist(s). The role of the chair is to plan and
interviewed, hadgraduated over one thousand women doctorates but had hired only seven in the period in question. Apartfrom recruitment challenges, underrepresentation in engineering may also be due to poor science degreecompletion rates among these groups as racial minority students have much lower STEM completionrate than their white counterparts (Higher Education Research Institute [HERI], 2010). This createsscarcity of minority Ph.D.’s that feed the faculty ranks in engineering and related fields.The literature discusses many factors that affect recruitment of diverse faculty. Implicit bias is one ofthem. Greenwald and Krieger (2006) introduces implicit bias as “an aspect of the new science ofunconscious mental processes that has substantial
analysis from Stanford, and continues to build upon research in the design and implementation of programs.Ms. Jan Rinehart, Northeastern University Jan Rinehart is Executive Director of the Northeastern ADVANCE Office of Faculty Development. She has over 20 years in higher education, with most of her work focused on diversity in STEM fields. She previously served as Executive Director of the Rice University ADVANCE and Director of Engineering Student Programs at Texas A&M University. While at Texas A&M, she was co-PI on NSF RET, S- STEM, STEP grants, and senior personnel on the NSF Coalition and LSAMP grant. She sits on several ADVANCE External Advisory Boards.Dr. Rania Sanford, Stanford University Rania
://www.vip.gatech.edu/how-vip- credits-count. [Accessed: 06-Feb-2018].[9] J. Sonnenberg-Klein, R. T. Abler, and E. J. Coyle, “Correlation between Academic Credit- use Policies and Student Persistence in Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Courses,” presented at the Manuscript submitted for publication, 2018.[10] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, “Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548–549, 2007.[11] S. A. Webb, “The Importance of Undergraduate Research,” Science | AAAS, 06-Jul-2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2007/07/importance- undergraduate-research. [Accessed: 27-Dec-2017].[12] J. C. Norcross, “Getting involved in research as an undergraduate
, piloting,and implementing new course content, we have been able to identify the strategies employed andthe challenges we have faced. As we continue to navigate this ongoing process, we areconsidering the lessons we have learned and continue building upon our strategies forimprovement. It is our hope that we can encourage further discussion regarding strategies forincorporating diversity and inclusion into curriculum, as well as programs and practices, invarious engineering contexts. 15 ReferencesBurgstahler, S. (2009). Universal design of instruction (UDI): Definition, principles, guidelines, and
solutions for increasing diversity.Amy’s storyAmy is the youngest of five children and the only member of her family to have graduated fromcollege. Her father was one of eight children and he completed his formal education at the end ofeighth grade in order to find a job to help support the family. This was typical of the time(1930’s), and within his community and social economic status of first generation immigrants tothe United States. Amy’s father learned a trade (welding) that enabled him to have a lifetime ofsteady employment in order for him to provide for his family. Amy remembers that her father atvarious times worked overtime, double time, second or third shift, each of which had differentincentives that increased the hourly wage for the
. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.[5] M. R. Banaji & A. G. Greenwald, Blindspot: The Hidden Biases of Good People. New York:Delacorte Press, 2013.[6] C. Herring & L. Henderson, “From affirmative action to diversity: Toward a critical diversityperspective,” Critical Sociology, vol. 38. ED-5, pp. 300, 2012.[7] C. Herring, “Diversity and departmental rankings in chemistry,” in Careers,Entrepreneurship and Diversity: Challenges and Opportunities in the Global ChemistryEnterprise, H.N. Cheng, S. Shah & M.L. Wu, Eds. Washington, DC: American ChemicalSociety, 2014, pp. 225-236.[8] A. Kalev, F. Dobbin & E. Kelly, “Best practices of best guesses? Assessing the efficacy ofcorporate affirmative
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering