her research interests involve investigation of the toxicological effects of carbon-based nanomaterials and polymer nanocomposites to wastewater microbial communities and their potential applications for water treatment and corrosion prevention. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Professional Preparation of Underrepresented Minority PhD's and Post-Docs for a Career in Engineering Academia Teresa J. Cutright1,*, Rebecca K. Willits1, Linda C. Coats2, Lakiesha Williams2, Debora Rodrigues3 1: University of Akron, Akron OH 44325 2: Mississippi State University, Starkville MS
incomingunderrepresented Engineering students for over 20 years at the flagship University Parkcampus. The overarching goal is to increase graduation rates in a STEM major,particularly Engineering, among incoming underrepresented students. Consistent withthe Meyerhoff Scholars Program, this goal can be achieved through academic andsocial integration, skill development, support, and monitoring and advising (e.g., Maton& Hrabowski, 2004). Both Penn State University Park bridge programs are residentialand math-intensive on the campus of a large Research 1 university. The daily bridge 4schedule is full. Academic instruction and support are scheduled for most of the day
attracts large numbers of women, a acquired is continually accelerating and yet this data issignificant number of students from UR groups, and has useless without someone to process and analyze it.compelling needs for CS technology. The interdisciplinary In addition to suffering from a dearth of interestedprogram is training the next generation of innovators in students, the field of CS suffers from a lack of diversity inthe biological sciences who will be prepared to cross its workforce. In 2014, only 18% of bachelor degrees in CSdisciplinary boundaries. The program consists of the were award to women, only 7% to African Americans, andfollowing: (1) computer
retain female and URM students to engineering disciplines,their numbers are still very low. In 2016, only 20.8% of recipients of Bachelor’s degrees in engineeringidentified as female, and 18.2% identified as an under-represented minority [1].Table 1 presents demographic information from the 2000 U.S. Census for individuals between the agesof 20 and 24 (age groups just above or below this age range show similar results). 48.9% of individualsbetween 20 and 24 identify as female [2]. 26.8% identify as an under-represented minority (URM) [3],which we define to include Hispanic or Latino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Black or AfricanAmerican, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.Table 1. U.S. Census demographics age 20-24. Female- Identifying
)topics while the students in the class literally cast light—building LGBTQA-themed electronic light displays. An engineeringprofessor will teach the students how to create and program the displays, and the director of the Stonewall Center will lead thestudents in discussions about LGBTQA issues in the news and in their own lives. Some of the topics to be covered include theintersections of racial and LGBTQA identities, the campus climate for LGBTQA students, and the legal and political rights ofLGBTQA people today”. The intent is to offer students from all campus majors an interesting, accessible combination of topicsand an inclusive learning environment.1. IntroductionSTEM fields, and engineering in particular, struggle to achieve diversity [1
via conformational changes, post- translational modifications, and protein:protein interactions. Her research areas include proteins in the nitric oxide/GC-1/cGMP pathway crucial to the cardiovascular system, non canonical protein:RNA inter- actions, ligand:protein interactions and novel methods to detect protein:protein interactions. At UMBC, Dr Garcin is a member of the Women in Science and Engineering faculty group (WISE) and the Commit- tee on Strategies and Tactics for Recruiting to Improve Diversity and Excellence (STRIDE).Dr. Wayne G. Lutters, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Wayne G. Lutters is the director of the multi-disciplinary Interactive Systems Research Center and an Associate
for college-wide diversity that includes having representatives from the Office ofAdmission involved, the two-week Summer Bridge experience, and GoldShirt curriculum.Components of the Summer Bridge program include fall course placement, orientation tocollege life, learning technical skills, creating shared core values, interdependent learning andcreating close friendships. The academic performance of the first cohort of EngineeringGoldShirt students was very good with a median grade point average of 3.44 at the end of theirfirst year. Student feedback was also gathered and presented as related to three goals: (1)increasing engineering student interest and knowledge of an engineering career; (2) building asense of community among GoldShirt
, gender identity and expression,nationality, race, religion, sexual orientation, veteran status, and more.The present times have put much of our progress in the area of STEM diversity at grave risk.Over the last decade, a movement has grown up that puts a new face on old and familiar whitesupremacist ideas. Using social media tools and focusing in part on campus communities, the alt-right has gained mainstream exposure through its support of Donald Trump’s presidentialcandidacy and administration. The Trump White House has incorporated policy ideas, rhetoric,and individual leaders from numerous hate groups. 1 There has been some debate about whetherthe term alt-right masks the group’s clear ties to hate such that some have advocated not usingthe
access to apipeline of local graduating women in STEM while improving their workplace culture fordiverse employees.IntroductionThe percentage of women undergraduate students continues to increase and reach parity withmale students in higher education; however, women remain underrepresented amongst STEMfaculty, particularly in tenured and senior ranks, and administrative positions. In academia,women in STEM account for less than 20 percent of qualified applicants [1], 31 percent of full-time faculty, and 27 percent of deans and department heads [2]. Women also comprise adisproportionately low number of full professorships in STEM, with women accounting for 42%of instructors and assistant professorships, 34% of associate professorships, and only
like me like me like me like me like meA person who feels finding an answer to a newengineering problem is thrilling.Not at all Not A little Somewhat Very much Like me like me like me like me like me like me Not at all Not Like Very muchA person who.. like me like me me like meThinks it’s valuable to findways to apply the world’s 4 123scientific knowledge 1 2Feels finding an answer toa new engineering problem 3 4is thrillingThinks engineersdiscussing
the next phase of ECAP, ECAP 2.0. ECAP is a proven example that applying the best practicesoutlined in the publication can effectively increase the success of underrepresented engineeringstudents. Participants will learn and discuss successful practices, learn about the program, anddiscussion tangible outcomes to take back to their home institutions.Format: This special session will start with a presentation of the current literature followed by a casestudy and a facilitated roundtable discussion on how to develop and implement a similar program at theparticipant’s institution.Learning Goals: Participants will 1) gain insight into literature, 2) review a case study of a successfulprogram, 3) discuss how to develop, implement and evaluate a
the results of the study in context, the authors conducted a literature review of related workon the study of women and URM students in STEM programs. The primary focus was on thechallenges and the causes for success and failure. Allen-Ramdial & Campbell [1] state thatisolation is one of the biggest challenges faced by URM students in STEM fields. One way tosolve this challenge and promote diversity in education is to achieve a critical mass. Unfortunately,this may not be quickly remedied in most environments, thus other intermediary options must beembraced. Isolation may diminish self-efficacy and re-affirm the negative stereotype of the lackof suitability of URM students for STEM study. The presence of peers has been shown to have
and math (STEM) fields have increased inoverall importance from a variety of perspectives during the past few decades. In terms ofindividual employment opportunities and overall quality of life, STEM occupations have higherthan average job growth projections and higher than average wage rates [1] . STEM occupationsare also closely linked to high prestige and economic prosperity from a national standpoint [2] .In terms of practical application, STEM fields are responsible for identification of solutions tomyriad challenges in multiple business sectors, government, entertainment, and everyday life.It is widely acknowledged that the United States must increase its production of individualsskilled in various STEM fields in order to maintain and
interviewer, given that diversity -related topics can be sensitive todiscuss, efforts were made during protocol development to avoid language that might stigmatizeparticipants and prevent them from being authentic. In total, 19 undergraduates and 22 graduatestudents participated in the interviews (see T able 1). T he interviews lasted between 30-75 minutesand all participants were compensated for their time with a $20 Amazon gift card. Table 1: Summary of participant demographics Gender Race/Ethnicity Total Men Women Asian
teaching and research. 66 Faculty members in 5 departments 1800 undergraduate students 500 graduate students 75 doctoral studentsDefining Diversity Research shows that there are many ways to define diversity Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Nationality, Education and Work status are the common areas covered when discussing diversity Diversity can be defined as groups of two or more people referring to demographic differences of one sort or another among the group members [1] At CSU, here is how we are assessing diversity.Engineering DDC Overview History Mission and Goals Success Stories ChallengesDDC Mission Statement To promote a culturally and intellectually rich environment for diversity and inclusion,support the education successand
& Practice. She received her PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018CONFERENCE TITLE: CONECDPRESENTATION: TEACHING TO INCREASE DIVERSITY AND EQUITY IN STEMPRESENTERS: KELLY MACK, KATE WINTERINTRODUCTIONWhile the US economy is expected to create over 120,000 new jobs requiring at least abachelor’s degree in computer science, only approximately 48,000 computer sciencebaccalaureates are produced each year [1]. This dilemma is further complicated by the systemicmarginalization of the “new majority” of undergraduates [2] who represent rich sources ofuntapped talent and the diverse worldviews that are essential for
inquiry-based K12 science education and design learning using sensor technologies, computationally-enhanced paper-based craft kits, and augmented learning environments.Ariel J Ortiz, Lawrence Hall of ScienceMrs. Kathryn Chong Quigley, Lawrence Hall of Science Kathryn Quigley is the director of the Inventor’s Learning Lab at Lawrence Hall of Science, which is a space for visitors to explore design thinking and cutting edge technology while solving engineering challenges. In her work with the Inventor’s Lab she also oversees the Hall’s teen engineering program TechHive. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018TechHive:ASTEMLearningLabforTeensArdiceHartry 1 ,MaiaWerner-Avidon 2
higher than the malestudents irrespective of the gender of the instructors. The survey questions for qualitative researchon the perception of success for female students are also included.1Assistant Professor, California State University, Fresno2Assistant Professor, California State University, Fresno 1 1. IntroductionLocated in the San Joaquin Valley of central California, Fresno State is home to about 25,000students. Being a state university, affordability is an important criterion for most students. Themajority of the students in engineering come from local high schools and maintain close ties withthe surrounding community. Recent reports
CommunityBackgroundThe need for STEM graduates in the United States is growing at an alarming rate. A 2012President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report predicted that therewill be a 1 million college student deficit in science, technology, engineering, and mathematicsover the next 10 years (Olson & Riordan, 2012). For years now, there has been a call for moreunderrepresented groups in STEM fields. According to the National Center for EducationStatistics (NCES), only 18.4% of the students earning engineering degrees in the year 2014 werefemales (Digest of Education Statistics, 2015). Given this underrepresentation of women, it isimportant to determine why so few earn engineering degrees. Studies have shown that onepossible
satisfaction.1 The workshop for international students was so well attended each year that OISS started offering it regularlythroughout the academic year. It is therefore no longer on WIE’s annual calendar.Networking activities provide students the opportunity to meet and learn from role models.These events tend to center on hearing people’s stories. Our signature networking activity is anannual career panel, which brings engineers from across the country to campus to talk to studentsabout their jobs and career paths. Panelists provide brief introductions, but most of the session isreserved for audience questions. The discussions are always lively and appreciated by thestudents.Another example of a networking event is our “Meet Your Faculty” lunches
for the Center for the Enhancement of Engi- neering Diversity and has four years of industry and government experience as a human factors engineer. Dr. Artis holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Too Black to be Woman and too much Woman to be a Man. Black women attempting to reconcile their multiple identities in Academic and Professional Engineering Spaces.Black women are often underrepresented in engineering despite reports that a higherpercentage of Black women (9.7%) are enrolled in college than any other group, exceeding Asianwomen (8.7%), White women (7.1%) and White men (6.1%) [1].The proposed
support grit development in first-generationcollege students.Introduction First-generation college students face numerous unique challenges within higher educationthat offer particular opportunities for research and interventions to improve their enrollment andretention. This population has potential to add to the field of engineering as they bring with themunique lived experiences. First-generation college students have been described as invisibleinnovators [1]. Smith and Lucena [1] argue if first-generation college students’ funds of knowledgeare equally valued knowledge as that of the dominant engineering culture, these students’ can belegitimate creators of knowledge and contribute to innovative solutions in the engineeringenterprise
Initiative Letter to support efforts to increase theparticipation of women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) in engineering education. Inthat letter, the signatories pledged to provide “educational experiences that are inclusive andprevent marginalization of any groups of people because of visible or invisible differences” [1,Para. 3, emphasis mine]. Beyond race/ethnicity and externally perceived gender, visible andinvisible differences encompass dissimilarities of physical and mental abilities, religious andpolitical beliefs, as well as sexual and gender identity. However, those topics have beenfrequently overlooked in the context of engineering. The lack of data regarding engineers whoidentify across these spectrums has limited the full
about faculty satisfaction reveal faculty of color perceivedepartmental climates as less positive than peers across multiple dimensions. Through interviewswith departing faculty, as well as faculty negotiating retention packages, we clarify additionalfactors affecting faculty of color retention. In this paper, we (1) discuss main findings about theclimate for faculty of color on our campus, (2) describe how social science research, institutionaldata, and evaluation inform our programmatic work, and (3) highlight how the strategic use ofdata allows us to better engage campus stakeholders in institutional change efforts in support offaculty diversity.IntroductionThe underrepresentation of faculty women of color in academia remains a national