project leader. Figure 6: The Workflow of Processing the Number of RecordsConclusionsWe found the implementation of Python in engineering faculty publication records reviewprocess improves the effectiveness and efficiency of the review process, saves our library staff’stime and makes a contribution to the College of Engineering’s APR migration as the Universityof Iowa Libraries is increasingly involved in this campus-wide initiative.References1. Givens, M., L.A. Macklin, and P. Mangiafico, Faculty Profile Systems: New Services and Roles for Libraries. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 2017. 17(2): p. 235-255. Available from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/6532022. Andrews S. 2017. APR Publications Training
Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education and equity in education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Community: Voices from a Small CohortAbstractPEEPS (Program for Engineering Excellence for Partner Schools) NSF S-STEM scholarship wasdesigned to support students from low socioeconomic, first generation and/or underrepresentedgroups in obtaining an undergraduate engineering degree at California Polytechnic StateUniversity in San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). Students receive up to $10,000/year to aid in
. References:Crawford, S., & Stucki, L. 1990. Peer review and the changing research record. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 223.Follmer, D. J., Gomez, E., Zappe, S. E., & Kumar, M. (2017). Evaluation of a Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program in ChE indicates benefit from a collaborative model. Chemical Engineering Education, 51(3): 145-150.Hsieh, S-J. (2013). Research Experiences for Undergraduate Engineering Students. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA.Huffstickler, M., Zappe, S.E., Manning, K., & Slattery, M. (June 2017). Impact of a biomedical engineering undergraduate research program on student and
the academic and socialengagement provided by peer mentoring aspects of the program may be positive predictors ofretention for first year female students in science and engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.7686640. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman, and C. E. R. Logel, "Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 307-312, 2003.[2] N. M. Else-Quest, C. C. Mineo, and A. Higgins, "Math
socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in
devices for chemical engineering applications have also been developed, includingmicrofluidic devices (complete with valves, pumps, and mixers) [3–5], structured monolithiccatalysts [6], reactors with complex geometries to enhance chemical synthesis [7,8], andchromatography columns. Aside from their lower cost, the main benefit of these devices is thatthey can be specifically designed for unique applications in the lab. 3D printing also allows theuser to create complex structures and shapes that cannot be fabricated by other traditional methods. Labware Reference(s) Syringe pump [1] Centrifuge
shik’éí dóó shidine’é . Shí éí Melissa ******* yinishyé. Bééshbichʼahii nishłį́.Hashk’aan Bit'ahnii bashishchiin. Bééshbichʼahii dashicheii. Tódích'ii'nii dashinalí. Ákót’éegodiné asdzáán nishłį́. Ahéhee’.”Do you feel you belong in the Environmental Engineering Department? If so, why, if not why? “I think there are issues in any program, but I really have enjoyed the engineeringprogram so far. Engineering is not easy in any sense. The environmental engineering departmentit self is small but that [i]s one of my favorite things about it. I think we have credible staff thatknow their filed very well. Some instructors don't have the best class setup, but I assume alldepartment[s] have [a] class like that. I want to go in water focused
that revolvedaround other people included: considering others’ perspectives; the importance of applyingempathy in understanding; the potential in each human being for good and evil; the necessity ofholding paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and recognizing responsibilitiesto employer(s), coworkers, communities, and society writ large. Regarding ethical-decision-making, participants mentioned the importance of sustainability in decision-making; consideringthe prospect of unintended consequences; properly weighting cost and benefit analyses; making acommitment to principles and beliefs; having an understanding of specific ethical theories; thepotential role that culture can play in shaping ethical norms; and the role of
. Plattner, “Welcome to the Virtual Crash Course in Design Thinking,” Stanford d.school, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://dschool.stanford.edu/resources. [Accessed: 09-Dec-2015].[8] M. Lande and L. Leifer, “Introducing A ‘Ways Of Thinking’ Framework For Student Engineers Learning To Do Design,” presented at the 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2009, p. 14.796.1-14.796.12.[9] S. R. Daly, J. L. Christian, S. Yilmaz, C. M. Seifert, and R. Gonzalez, “Teaching design ideation,” in 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[10] J. P. Guilford, “Characteristics of Creativity,” 1973.[11] R. A. Finke, T. B. Ward, and S. M. Smith, Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications
mistakes may be critical to their success. In many subjectsmistakes are a sign of failure. Students who fail to memorize facts and procedures (e.g. spelling,grammar, multiplication tables) are less apt, yet in being a programmer may require analternative measure of success than counting correct and incorrect attempts. Programming doesrequire the memorization of details but equally requires improvement through trial and error.Papert et al. in the 70’s observed students learned through experimentation and play, noting“[p]resumably kids need this experience, no matter what the medium in which they are working”(Papert & others, 1978, p. 71). Yet the 6th graders with which Papert et al. were working werenot able to successfully learn from
surveys were administered at the beginning, middle, and end of the semesterto generate paired data used to investigate trends over time (Figure 2). Each survey took less than20 minutes to complete and gathered demographic information including age, genderidentification, race/ethnicity, and intended major(s)/minor(s). Survey 1 and Survey 3 consisted offour parts: self-ranking of technical skills competency (beginner, intermediate, advanced, orexpert), self-ranking of confidence in essential parts of the engineering design process using a five-point Likert scale (Figure 3), degree of agreement with statements related to general engineeringself-efficacy using a five-point Likert scale (Figure 4), and open-ended questions related to thosetopics. The
information waswell-advertised. Students in biomedical and environmental engineering from the majoritypopulation felt that they had to seek out the opportunities. Women in the same programsperceived lab environments in these departments provided valuable experiences. One studentwho is a member of a URG noted that her research experiences have helped the student tobuild an identity as a budding engineer: “I feel like I do [response to being asked if (s)he feels like (s)he is becoming anengineer], because I’ve done research for so long. So, I started my first research project thefall of my sophomore year. And that one was not really my project. I was just mostly doingdata collection for a professor. But I’ve been doing a project that’s mostly
data on design processes. In thesubsequent year, the data collected through the DEFT system will be used to develop apedagogical framework and a class efficacy evaluation framework for engineering design.References[1] C.L. Dym, A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer, "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning", J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103-120, Jan. 2005.[2] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams and G. M. Bodner, "What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 187- 219, Apr. 2012.[3] J. Ball and T.C. Ormerod, “Structured opportunistic processing design: a critical discussion,”. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol.43 no.1, pp.131—151
& Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 6. Hake, R. R. (1998). “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand- student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.” American journal of Physics, 66(1), p. 64-74.7. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), p. 8410–8415.8. Beach, A. L., Henderson, C., and Finkelstein, N. (2012). “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM education.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(6), p. 52-59.9
InterviewsMSEN teachers, student participants, and mentors participated in either focus groups or interviewsto determine the program’s impact on the items outlined in the evaluation criteria. Semi-structuredinterview protocols were used to guide discussions with participants. Interviews and focus groupswere digitally recorded and transcribed. A reflective analysis process was used to analyze andinterpret interviews and focus groups.Test of Students’ Science KnowledgeA student science content knowledge assessment aligned to the instructional goals of the researchcourse was developed and administered at the onset and conclusion of each part of the course.S-STEM SurveyThe S-STEM Student Survey measures student self-efficacy related to STEM content
abilities of most high school STEM teachers. Pre-planning with these circuit boards was a significant factor in the project’s success (Appendix B).Results and AnalysisResults from the 2017 implementation cycle are presented in this paper; these results indicatethat the unit successfully met its three objectives. Results from the 2018 cycle, in which a fewimprovements to the unit were incorporated, will be included once they are available.Objective 1: Before starting the unit, all 59 students were given a survey with twenty statementsadapted from the Friday Institute highschool S-STEM survey [9], NGSS 21stCentury skills statements, and NGSSengineering design standards. Thesewere grouped according to threethemes: students’ interest inengineering (ex
least to each outcome,followed by students in other STEM fields, with non-STEM students attributing the highestperceived gains from their leadership role(s).Students across the board felt their leadership role provided the greatest benefit in their ability towork effectively with others, with only a slight difference between non-STEM and other STEMstudents (1.7%) and a much larger difference between non-STEM and engineering students(13.3%). Students felt their leadership roles contributed to understanding concepts in their majorsthe least, ranging from less than one-third among engineering students to slightly more than halfof non-STEM students. One of the starkest differences was with regard to becoming a leaderoutside of college. While more
themselves [12]. For thisdemonstration, students will be asked prior to the activity to describe what they think they willsee, as well as a direct question regarding the relative velocities. They could also be asked howthey think the various velocities could be measured with this setup. After showing thedemonstration, students will be given a reflection activity on their homework assignment, inwhich they will be asked to directly address any differences in their understanding between thepre-demonstration activity and afterwards. Students will also be asked for feedback forimproving the activity. As before, some indirect assessment of learning gains may be achievedby comparing scores from 2017 and 2018 on relevant problem(s) from quizzes and
flip their classes. Whatstarted out as a faculty development program designed for local STEM faculty quickly expandedto include faculty around the country and the world, across a wide variety of disciplines and K-12teachers as well. The program included three modules – backwards design applied to the flippedclass [1], creating online materials (video lectures), and active learning strategies for the face-to-face classroom. These modules were taught in a variety of different ways for different audiencesincluding in-person workshops, flipped semi-in person workshops, and completely online massiveopen online course (MOOC)s. The online MOOCs are now taught each semester by our Center forTeaching and Learning Excellence through Canvas.Net.We
century.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by a National Science Foundation EEC CAREER grant (1554057). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. C. Thursby, “The Importance of Engineering: Education, Employment, and Innovation,” The Bridge, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 5–10, 2014.[2] J. Miller, “The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing Americas Potential,” Natl. Sci. Board Natl. Sci. Found. Rep. NSB, pp. 03–69, 2003.[3] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the engineering workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005.[4] W. Wulf, “Diversity in Engineering,” The Bridge
[Accessed December 16, 2017] 2. FMI (2017). “U.S. Markets Construction Overview 2017: Featuring FMI’s construction outlook”, Available: https://www.fminet.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/03/USOverview_FINAL-1.pdf [Accessed December 16, 2017] 3. Van Epps, A. S., “Educating for evidence based decisions in engineering: The view as librarian and instructor”, Conference Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013. 4. UNC Taskforce 5 Evidence, Analysis, Interpretation and Critique, 2017, Available: http://curriculum2019.web.unc.edu/files/2017/09/TF5-Evidence-Reasoning.pdf [Accessed December 16, 2017] 5. J. D. Miller, “Scientific Literacy: a
classroomapproach in multiple setting would provide deeper insights into this area.ReferenceBrownell, S.E., Kloser, M.J., Fukami, T., and Shavelson, R.J. (2013). Context Matters: Volunteer Bias, Small Sample Size, and the Value of Comparison Groups in the Assessment of Research-Based Undergraduate Introductory Biology Lab Courses. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 14, 176–182.Eagan, M.K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M.J., Garcia, G.A., Herrera, F.A., and Garibay, J.C. (2013). Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs. Am. Educ. Res. J. 50, 683–713.Harrison M., et al. (2011). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: changes in career choices and attitude. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 10, 279-286
2 Final product development - design output: medical device with improved characteristics, verified performance and initial requirements. To insure compliance with various medical device regulatory standards HIV-VL was designed following medical device regulation documents, international standards, and guidance and recommendations documents. The list of such regulations used in design and design process management is provided below with the specificity and applicability of each standard and requirement. F IGURE 2. S URVEY OF S TAKEHOLDER FOR P RODUCTTechnical DescriptionStudents assessed the market to determine the product tobe produced with a survey (Figure 2
, The NMC horizon report:2016 Higher education edition. [Online].www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2016-higher-education-edition/[2] Babson Survey Research Group, 2015 online report card: Tracking online education in theUnited States. [Online].https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-education-united-states-2015/[3] CAST, Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author, 2011.[4] Burgstahler, S. E, Universal design in higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard EducationPress, 2015.[5] Smith, F. G, Analyzing a college course that adheres to the universal design for learning(UDL) framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31-61, 2012.[6] Scott
row. In Figure 2, this was the standard deviation for each ofthe three rows for each of the four dimensions under “Rater 1” label. Then the three row-wisestandard deviations were averaged, then placed in a matrix of average dispersions andreferred to as the dispersion for the Rater 1’s ratings for all the team members including Rater1’s self-rating. This procedure was repeated for Rater 2 and 3 accordingly. The same methodswere used to calculate the dispersion matrix for the rest of the secondary school teams as wellas the FYE comparison group.Figure 2 - Raw Peer Evaluation DataA repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare the differences in dispersions between theK12 and FYE comparison samples for each of two peer reviews. The time delay
student. Examining that data in addition to the data included in this paperwould give further insight into the changing elements of student perceptions of an engineeringmajor.Overall, it appears as though a student’s detailed knowledge of a career path is loosely connectedwith certainty in a major. Providing more concrete details of post-college life in the workplacemay allow students to make their major choice with more confidence. This paper provides aninitial investigation in chemical engineering major selection and lays the foundation for futurestudies.References [1] Montmarquette, C; Cannings, K; Mahseredjian, S, "How do young people choose college majors?" Economics of Education Review, 21, 2001, 543-556. [2] Arcidiacono, P, "Ability
the beginning of upcomingsemesters to evaluate how beneficial the vertical integration strategy is to the internationalstudents. Conclusions to be drawn from the data may clarify if technical competency levels willbe improved and if any distinction exists between the two groups (international and domesticstudents), confirming (or not) if communication skills are a factor in that distinction.References[1] L. Konevas and K. Duoba, "Developing Core Competencies: Student Mobility Case," in 9th International Strategic Management Conference, Riga, Latvia, 2013.[2] C. Y. Oh, B. S. Butler and M. Lee, "Information Behavior of International Students Settling in an Unfamiliar Geo-spatial Environment," Proceedings of the American Society for
which the heat exchangers were to be tested is shown inFigure 2. Figure 2. Schematic of the wind tunnel to be used to test heat exchanger performance.Finally, the students were given the fan curve supplied by the manufacturer of the fans and anapproximation of the pump curve for the pump to be used to provide the heated water to the heatexchangers.The students were asked to provide the Solidworks file(s) for their heat exchanger along with areport detailing their design process and predicted heat exchanger performance. They were alsoasked to simulate the performance of their heat exchanger design at the conditions for the test(using the given water inlet temperature and fan and pump curves).This simulation included using correlations for
. It would need long term monitoring and afollow up survey of students to see if it has made a significant impact on their critical thinking,problem solving, and retention of concepts.References[1] J. Heywood, Empowering Professional Teaching in Engineering: Sustaining the Scholarshipof Teaching. Morgan & Claypool, 2018 (to be published).[2] J. Spurlin and H. Ozturk, “Assessing the Connectivity of an Electrical and ComputerEngineering Curriculum,” 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, 2006, June.ASEE Conferences, 2006.[3] S. Sheppard, et. al Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Vol. 2. Jossey-Bass, 2008.[4] R. Toghiani, A. Minerick, and K. Walters, “Making The Connections: Facilitating