an important part of who I am Jaussi, et al. Overall, my creativity has little to do with how I see myself. Jaussi, et al. My ability to be creative is an important reflection of who I am. Jaussi, et al. Being creative is important to me personally. 69. Rate your degree of confidence (i.e. belief in your current ability) to perform the following tasks byrecording a number from 0 to 100. (0 = cannot do at all; 50 = moderately can do; 100 = highly certain cando) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Conduct engineering design Identify a design need
, much, some, little, or no. The rating processmakes students reflect upon each item. Similar to DIT-2, the most important metrics are P (Post-conventional) and N2 scores where higher score values indicate higher ability to participate incomplex moral reasoning.To assess the effectiveness of our proposed ethics education framework, we obtained permissionfrom the EERI developers to use this instrument. EERI will be used as a pretest-posttest toevaluate the level of students’ ethical reasoning skill level before and after participating in the KIactivities. As we are interested in the development of students’ ethical reasoning skillsthroughout the curriculum we have also developed a system for longitudinal tracking of students’performance on the
, it was seen as the best option. A heat-reflective layer was also attached to the interior ofthe walls. Inside the drying space, we installed 2 shelves made of a coated mesh framed with cedarwood. A nickel-chrome wire powered by a 12 volt battery acted as a heating source. Internaltemperature was measured and regulated with a thermocouple and a controller, respectively. (a) (b) Figure 2 the Final Design for the Dryer, (a) Design Assembly, and (b) Explosion View of Assembly3.5 Analyze the designThe engineering analysis was conducted from three aspects: 1) structural analysis, 2) flow analysisin the NX CAE environment, and 3) cost analysis for the prototype
level of comfort aperson has as it relates to people that are different from them.Intercultural Learning Goals. In preparation for the study abroad experience, the leaders of thiscultural experience identified the following intercultural goal for the program.Students acquire knowledge in ways they did not anticipate through the learning, social, andcultural experiences at the German university. Ultimately, students experience curiosity, opennessto different cultural norms, and can identify components of other cultural perspectives respondingwith their worldview.The leaders also added a reflection to the end of the Miville-Guzman Universality – Diversity Scalewhen administered post-event to further their understanding of what the students
participation criteria. The survey instrument included the aforementioned published andpreviously validated measurement scales. The measurement scales included the following: 1)identification with engineering 17 to measure engineering identity; 2) ethnic identity scale 19 tomeasure the level of identification with racial or ethnic identity; 3) Womanist Identity Attitudescale (WIAS) 20 to measure attitudes reflective of the four stages of womanist identitydevelopment (i.e., Pre-encounter, Encounter, Immersion–Emersion, Internalization); the RacialMicroaggressions Scale (RMAS) 21 to measure students perceptions of racial microaggressions;and 4) the Patients Health Questionnaire 22 is a self-report measure of symptoms of depression.Each scale include
activitieshad a higher interest in engineering than girls. This study also showed that biomechanics-basedactivities could increase interest in considering careers in engineering, regardless of initial interest.Of note, when both boys and girls had little to no interest in engineering, boys were more easilydrawn in by the outreach activities than girls. The challenge with engaging girls in engineeringmay be a reflection of intrinsic differences such as gender stereotypes (Bieg et al., 2015), andpsychological factors (Stoet et al., 2016) between boys and girls that are more pronounced at lowindividual-interest levels. Thus, it may be necessary to tailor interventions (e.g., biomechanics-based activities) that target girls with low interest in engineering
. MENG 242 (Dynamics) objective is to understand the kinematics and kinetics of particles and rigid bodies using vector analysis; force mass acceleration, work and energy, impulse and momentum, translating and rotating coordinate system. The two types of homework problems (in-house and textbook) were similar in difficultyand did not cover the same topic in every course. For example, if in one quarter, Newton’s SecondLaw is covered by in house assignment, it may not be the case for the next time around. This is toensure that the data does not reflect the difficulty of the topic. In addition, some in house problemswere assigned more than once, without given any kind of solution to the students. For MENG 242 (Dynamics
of recommendation 8 To enhance my resume 7 To have a good intellectual challenge 6 To work more closely with a particular faculty member 6 Other Option 1In Tables 4 and 5 on the following page, the responses indicate that the students had a greatworking relationship with each other as well as with their faculty mentors, at least mostly. Thiscertainly reflects the assessment of the seed vibrations team. Further, Table 6 indicates thatstudents generally felt well supported during their summer work
Economy. Working with amultidisciplinary student team for testing and reflection turned out to be very informative andinsightful.References[1] M. Amrine, “The Real Problem is in the Hearts of Men”, New York Times Magazine,June 23 1946, pp. 7.[2] M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N.M.P. Bocken and E.J. Hultink, “The Circular Economy –A new sustainability paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production. 143, 2017, pp. 757–768.doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048[3] E. mac Arthur, “Homepage of Ellen MacArthur Foundation”. [Online]. Available:https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy [Accessed Jan. 26, 2018].[4] L.R. Lattuca, “Creating interdisciplinary: Interdisciplinary research and teaching amongcollege and university faculty”. Nashville, TN
Instructional Consultant of the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning at the University of Washington. He taught design, education-research methods, and adult and higher education theory and pedagogy courses for over 35 years. He has been involved in instructional development for 20 years, and currently does both research and instructional development in engineering education. Jim has taught courses on the development of reflective teaching practices, and has presented workshops on learning how to learn and developing metacognitive aware- ness. He has published and presented on engineering design, engineering pedagogies, and instructional development topics. c American
provide recommendations to manufacturing and service systems.The class involves lectures, online quizzes, two midterm exams, in-class problems, a case study,and a final exam. The course grade reflects the student performance in six quizzes (15%), twomidterm exams (40%), in-class questions and attendance (10%), case study (15%), and finalexam (20%). The instructor of the course does not provide homework assignments. In previousoffers of this course, the instructor noticed that many students received perfect grades in thehomework assignments but they received low grades in the high stake assignments and/or exams.This rendered the homework assignments ineffective in this course and other courses taught bythis instructor. Nowadays, students are able
this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the aforementioned agencies and university.REFERENCES 1. G. B. Sanders1, W. E. Larson2, K. R. Sacksteder, C. Mclemore, K. Johnson, NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Technology and Development Project Overviews, Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) Albuquerque, NM, 10-14 Feb. 2008. 2. C. Muscatello, and E. Santiago-Maldonado, Mars In Situ Resource Utilization Technology Evaluation, Commercial/Civil Next Generation Space Transportation; Human Space Exploration. AlP Conference Proc., V. 654, pp. 1116-1123, Melville, NY, 2003. 3. Steven Siceloff, Engineers Building Hard-working Mining Robot, NASA, May 22, 2016
attachment, etc. Which variables are the most important (i.e. how does the force on the deltoid change if you change a variable such as arm length versus arm weight by 10%)? What happens if you double the weight held by the arm, change the shape of the arm, etc.? What additional design criteria do you need to include motion in your prosthetic? Specifically, does the arm need to be stronger to throw a ball than it does to hold the ball? How can a model help with the design of an experiment?The comments in Table 3 reflect whether the arm model prepared students to develop their ownmodel. Table 3: Student Comments on the Arm Model Developing a model of an arm demonstrated, somewhat convincingly, that
Centers, grant number EEC 1441825. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also would like toacknowledge the effort from Dr. Matthew Verleger, who helped conduct the project in hisclasses, Dr. James Pembridge who offered suggestions on the project design and implementation,Dr. Joseph R. Keebler who helped analyzed the survey results, and the support from theInstitution Research at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University who conducted and collected thesurvey data for this project.References[1] Janet Siegmund et al., “Understanding Understanding Source Code with Functional Magnetic Resonance
self-reflect. Students are invited to complete the assignment more than one time if they wantto demonstrate knowledge gained in previous iterations or see a broader range of the possiblescenarios.Figure 1: Screen shot of Resultant Force & Moment GeoGebra interactive available athttps://ggbm.at/GqURw4N4. Students are able to manipulate all aspects of interactive and theinteractive provides a graphical solution as to the resultant force and moment of the givenapplied forces and couple moments about the designated ‘Point’Fall 2017 data (231 respondents across two on-campus sections and 1 online section) to thisassignment was analyzed. The feedback question yielded a median value of 7 and a mean of 7.3.Anecdotally, I find that anytime
Conflictproductive and useful results. However, Absent(ofrather than simply discussing each Trusttopic, students engage in experientialactivities that allow them to discover The$Five$Dysfunctions$of$a$Team$by(Patrick(M.(Lencioniand build the elements of successfulwork teams that are associated with that function.The activities and exercises reflect the teamwork requirements illustrated by Google researchersin Project Aristotle. That is, the exercises allow - actually require - participants to enactbehaviors that Google
second experiment inwhich the bratwurst was left to cool in air as would be expected for a human corpse in a real-world situation.A similar experimental procedure was followed, except that the temperature of the air wasmeasured to remain constant at approximately 24 °C. Figure 3 shows the results of a log-linearplot of the temperature difference between the bratwurst and ambient air as a function of time,which is tracked very well by a linear-regression fit. The slope value equals to 0.031 min-1,corresponding to a value of k = 0.07 min-1, which is about a third of the rate in the waterexperiment, reflecting both, the smaller temperature differential as well as the differingconductivities of the water versus air pockets adjacent to the
policyData indicated that most of the engineers are not involved in public decision making due to theirlack of knowledge related to this discipline. 9 Participants out of 13 mentioned that introducingengineering students to public policy concepts is important. One noted remark from Engineer 10who stated “I reflect for myself, Am I qualified enough to voice my concern? Lack of education Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE North Central Section Conference 4 Copyright © 2018, American Society for Engineering Educationwhen it comes to policy making. I have to ask two to three times of how can I bring this attentionwith comparing notes of the best way to bring my attention. It may be for those who are
that, overall, student reported significant pre-and post-change on only 3 out of 10 items regarding their skills/abilities.IntroductionStudents’ disconnectedness to the presented contents in engineering courses is a challengingissue in engineering education. Even in technical elective classes which students shouldexperience practical aspects of their core classes, they cannot make a connection betweentheoretical materials presented during lectures and real world projects. Wlodkowski’s model ofeffective instruction [1] listed expertise of the presenters/instructors, relevance of content, choicein application, practice and reflection, and group work as motivating factors for adult learners.The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
work in healthcare seems critical to thesuccessful deployment of educational content. Money Magazine named this profession as one ofthe top five professions no one has heard of [5]. Interestingly, every hospital engagesengineering technicians who maintain medical devices, with many actively involved in the lifecycle management of this equipment. The threat of medical device vulnerability to hackers isespecially concerning since the patient/equipment interface, if compromised, can cause harm orwithhold vital therapies.The ability for the HETM program director to adequately convey the need for this specializedacademic credential was greatly lacking as evidenced by the confusion and concern at variouslevels and areas. In reflection, several
of belonging, self-efficacy). By providing studentswith honors level academic coursework, coupled with real world skills development, such asresearch and design projects, and practical leadership experiences, WISE Honors will positionstudents to become effective agents in science and engineering communities. Future researchwill explore longitudinal impacts of program participation, and how students might be betterprepared to balance the demands of their personal and professional lives.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1647405. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
students are much more likely to seekout tutoring. The authors believe that female students are more likely to think that they either“have what it takes” or not and this will be reflected in their grades. The data shows that femalefirst generation students are also not joining programs like TRIO (aimed specifically to help firstgeneration students), which the authors believe is a contributing factor to these students avoidingSTEM fields. The male students were more likely to be members of STEM organizations andother support programs on campus, which may be why they feel a much lower need ofmentoring. Increasing peer and faculty mentoring for our female students as well as encouragingthem to join STEM organizations may help fill some of these
students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1664264 and 1664266. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] N. A. of Engineering., “Educating the engineer of 2020 : adapting engineering education to the new century.” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2005.[2] N. Nielsen, N. R. C. (U.S.)., and P. C. on E. on S. I. in U. S. Education., “Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education : summary of two workshops.” National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011
dilemmas developed in theEPSRI are based on case studies and investigations from process safety failures to provide arealistic context for the decision making process. An example of a dilemma will be discussed aspart of the presentation at the conference. Each author was responsible for creating twodilemmas. These dilemmas were then reviewed by all authors for clarity, grammar and spelling.The considerations provided are meant to reflect pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional decision making as described by Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory.8 Thistheory represents the “transformations that occur in a person's form or structure of thought,” (pg.54) and occurs through six stages.8 The first two stages are considered pre-conventional
' time.For each of the tour, students were assigned a trip report. The trip reports assignments requiredstudents to write a summary and reflection about the trip, as well as respond to specific questionslike “ what is the procedure of materials recycles?” “what did you learn from the facility tour?”These questions helped students to attend the tour with a purpose. Not only the students got thechance to visualize the concept learned from class in reality, but also they had a deeper thinkingon the topic. For example, a lot of the students expressed in the trip report “ the material recoverycenter tour was an eye-opening experience” “ the tour made me realize how much waste wecreate and everyone should practice sustainability principles in my daily
and enhancethe mathematical and statistical aspects of AM for other disciplines. Hence, students’ learningcritically depends on an inter-domain experience consisting of inventory control, engineeringmathematics, and additive manufacturing. Keywords—Abstract Mathematical Concepts; Visual and Tactile Aids; LearningOutcomesIntroduction Students have been characterized by their learning styles which affect their ability tolearn and the teaching modalities that make teaching effective [1] [2]. The Felder-Silvermanmodel describes learning styles using the dimensions of Active/Reflective, Sensing/Intuitive,Visual/Verbal, and Sequential/Global [3]. The majority of undergraduate engineering studentswere classified as having an Active, Sensing
newmaterial. Students will eventually need reliable feedback on their performance thatallows them to move forward as learners and deepens their understanding of thesubject matter. This feedback could come from the instructor, their classmates, theirown self-reflection, or a combination of the three. (27, 28)Another important factor in the optimization process is to integrate the differentcourse components (learning goals, teaching/learning activities, feedback, andassessment), in such a way that the course becomes well-knit while the variouscomponents support and complement each other in a coherent manner, i.e., thesequencing of learning activities, feedback, and assessment should build energy,engage students, and allow learning to develop as the
and data set as well as the methods used to collect and analyze our data.The third section reviews our key findings for this stage of the research process, drawingextensively on students’ articulations of the role of ethics in their individual lives, theireducational experiences, and the profession. In the fourth section, we identify implications of ourfindings and how they offer insight into both the teaching of ethics to engineering students andthe broader challenges facing engineering educational environments having to do witheducational and disciplinary cultures. Finally, we conclude the paper by reviewing our keyfindings and reflecting on what they portend for the project, and engineering ethics teaching andresearch, moving into the
fellinto the categories of curriculum and pedagogy, developing reflective teachers, and disseminatingpolicy. For example, respondents identified faculty and graduate student seminars as an effectiveway of disseminating policy, new curriculum, and teaching pedagogy. They felt that teachingportfolio programs, or faculty participation in the development of instructional materials wouldincrease teacher introspection. Despite identifying these seminars and portfolio programs as usefulvenues for professional growth, however, only 36.5% of faculty attend a teaching workshop, and19.7% write educational materials/curricula annually. None of the professor, department chair, ordean’s responses were categorized into the “shared vision” category [10].This lack
instructor, administrators, and researchers biases the narrative in favor of the actorswho were empowered and incentivized to bring the WSM to the LPU, side-stepping theexperiences of the students who remained in the course for the duration of the semester as wellas the faculty and departmental entities who were not in favor of creating a WSM course at theLPU. The enrolled-student data is still being collected in the form of qualitative interviews andlongitudinal tracking; hence, we save analysis of that data for future work.We are reflective and aware of the tendency of classical actor-network studies to focus on thedecision-makers and those in charge, rather than those at the network margins or those powerlessto contest the processes of organizing