is also a Diplomate Water Resources Engineer (D.WRE). He is an elected Fellow of American Society of Civil Engineers (F.ASCE). His pas- sion for teaching continues for over 15 years since his graduate school. He has been active with ASEE and engineering education research for over 15 years. He is interested in enhancing critical thinking skills among civil engineering students through various approaches and understanding student perceptions and experiences about high-impact learning activities and teaching strategies. His research interests are in the areas of resource-efficient desalination, resource recovery from used water, renewable biofuels, and sustainability.Dr. Benjamin S. Magbanua Jr., Mississippi State
Abadi, California State University, Sacramento Dr. Masoud Ghodrat Abadi is an assistant professor of transportation engineering in Department of Civil Engineering at California State University, Sacramento. Dr. Abadi’s research interests lie in the areas of active transportation, traffic control, traffic safety, and engineering education. He teaches graduate and un- dergraduate classes covering topics such as: Traffic Engineering, Engineering Statistics, and Transporta- tion Planning. Dr. Abadi serves as a member of TRB Standing Committee on Transportation Education and Training (ABG20) and ITE Transportation Education Council.Dr. David S Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. David Hurwitz is an Associate Professor of
sought to identify what features if any were consistent throughout all thedocuments. The features identified in the summaries from the semesters of the interventionwere used to review the summaries from the previous year(s). Once the structural features ofthe summaries were identified, one of the second authors read the summaries looking for thesame structural elements to confirm the structural patterns. Then the board comments/scores were also collected for the semesters used to identifyany patterns of improvement. This strategy did not work out as planned due to a few anomaliesinvolved in the semesters included in the study. There was no clear evidence of improvementbetween the semesters studied. As a result, word counts of the
firm, and the director of Missouri’s Dam and Reservoir Safety Program. Since 1993, he has been at the University of Evansville, serving as department chair for the past 21 years. He continues to work as a consultant on projects involving the design and construction of new dams, modifications to existing dams, and the investigation of dam failures.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner- Fairbank
than the SEI (i.e., fewer experts per department over shorter durations), and amplifiesthe impact of the experts by building intellectual communities around course transformation atmultiple levels. The University of Kansas launched its adaptation of the embedded expert model in the2013-2014 academic year, beginning in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS) andexpanding in 2014-2015 into the School of Engineering. The embedded experts are postdoctoralscholars with Ph.D.’s in the discipline that are hired by a unit (department or school) for threeyears to collaborate with faculty members on the incorporation of student-centered, active andcollaborative teaching practices into four-to-five undergraduate courses. To date we have
faculty mentor working with the student(s) receives a stipendranging from $1,000-$1,500.The SURE Program strives to improve student skills integral to performing research. Studentsand their research mentors are expected to work together for eight hours per week for one-on-one instruction and research skill development. In addition to conducting research with facultymentors, mentees are required to attend four lunch meetings throughout the summer experience.These meetings focus on professional development, mentoring, and providing an opportunity forstudents to discuss research progress with peers. In the first meeting, staff from the campusMultimedia Services Office conduct a poster preparation workshop in which they teach thebasics of designing a
Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal ofEngineering Education, July 2004.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P.Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,vol. 111, no. 23, June 10, 2014.[5] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies ofEngagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005.[6] M. D. Svinicki and W. J. McKeachie, McKeachie’s Teaching Tips, 14th Ed. Belmont, CA,Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014.[7] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman
. (2014). Resilience assessment for geotechnicalinfrastructure assets. Infrastructure Asset Management, 1(4), 95-104.[5] American Society for Civil Engineers (2009). The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025.Reston, VA: ASCE.[6] Dong, J. and Chen, P. (2014). A Case Study: How Collaborative PBL Affects Learning ofMinority Students in Engineering Courses at Senior Level. ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.[7] Fernandes, S. R. G. (2014). Preparing graduates for professional practice: findings from a casestudy of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 219-226.[8] Wu, W. and Hyatt, B. (2016). Experiential and project-based learning in BIM for sustainableliving with tiny solar houses. Procedia
consistent with the ones presented in this paper.All of the above seem to indicate that the active learning PBH should improve the classperformance, reducing the number of students failing the class, and as a consequence, increasingretention and graduation rates as well.References[1] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett and M. K. Norman, “HowLearning Works: 7 Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[2] R. Zaurin, "Preparing the Engineering Student for Success with IDEAS: A Second YearExperiential Learning Activity for Large-size Classes," in Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, https://peer.asee.org/30886, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] X. Chen, "Students
be slightly altered to reinforce the principles of diversity andinclusion as a consistent theme throughout the workshop. Finally, every seminar andevery piece of training literature should be reviewed with the specific awareness ofconsidering people of all races, genders and background.Clearly, this is not the final solution to a field that continues to evolve very quickly, but itrepresents a good start. Hopefully these steps will provide lessons learned and productivefeedback that will lead to even better changes in the future.Bibliography1 Estes, A.C., Ressler, S.J., Saviz, C.M., Barry, B.E., Considine, C. L., Coward, D., Dennis, N. D.,Hamilton, S. R., Hurwitz, D. S., Kunberger, T., Lenox, T. A., Nilsson, T. L., Nolen, L., O'Brien, J. J
differently to improve the accuracy of the data collection.ReferencesCummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740Deb, S., Carruth, D. W., Sween, R., Strawderman, L., & Garrison, T. M. (2017). Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. Applied Ergonomics, 65. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007Deb, S., Strawderman, L. J., & Carruth, D. W. (2018). Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic
/employment-outlook-for-engineering- occupations-to-2024.htm. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[3] CareerOneStop, United States Department of Labor, “Careers with Most Openings,” [Online]. Available https://www.careeronestop.org/Toolkit/Careers/careers-most- openings.aspx?persist=true&location=US. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[4] National Academy of Engineering, “Changing the Conversation,” 2008.[5] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 259- 278, Revised December 2008. [Online]. Available https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00978.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[6
community by influencingABET criteria, and by encouraging the need for additional academic requirements as aprerequisite for licensure, and hence professional practice, by NCEES, NSPE and the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE).In response to the release of the CE-BOK1, Policy 465 was changed accordingly in 2004:“ASCE supports the attainment of a body of knowledge for entry into the practice of civilengineering at the professional level.” The policy was again refined in 2007 to make it clear thatfulfillment of the CE-BOK “requires additional education beyond the bachelor’s degree forpractice of civil engineering at the professional practice,” although no mention was made of whatspecific advanced academic degree(s) or alternate pathways would be
upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1741611 Encouraging Civil Engineering Retention through Community and Self-EfficacyBuilding. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] "Infrastructure Report Card." American Society of Civil Engineers. (accessed 2 Feb., 2019): https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.[2] S. Hatch, Diversity by Design: Guide to Fostering Diversity in the Civil Engineering Workplace. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[3] "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2019-2020." ABET. (accessed 2
Society, 2015.[4] B. Swartz, S. B. Velegol, and J. A. Laman, “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses : Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions,” 120th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[5] A. Lee, H. Zhu, and J. A. Middleton, “Effectiveness of flipped classroom for mechanics of materials,” ASEE’s 123rd Annu. Conf. Expo., no. May, 2016.[6] A. B. Hoxie, T. Shepard, and R. Feyen, “The Flipped Classroom : A Means to Reduce Cheating?,” 122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., no. Paper ID #11445, p. 16, 2015.[7] J. Laman, M. L. Brannon, and I. Mena, “Classroom Flip in a Senior-Level Engineering Course and Comparison to Previous Version,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[8] G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K
agree.While the overall intent of this self-grading exercise was to give students another learningopportunity as they completed their homework assignment, it was observed that some studentscompleted their self-grading during the break immediately before class on the day that the gradedassignment was due; in retrospect, this defeated the purpose of the self-grading exercise. As analternative, students could be asked to qualitatively explain why a mistake was made, if oneoccurred. This tactic might be more conductive to learning; if the student is not grasping the rootcause(s) associated with errors in thinking then the effectiveness of this approach misses itsintended objective.ConclusionsA homework assignment represents one method to gauge student
, and for the benefit of future users of the online teaching platform.In Winter 2018 there were six major Xorro-Q deadlines comprising around 70 activities relatedto the stated curriculum course topics, students were required to achieve ≥ 75% grade on allactivities in order to receive the 5% of the course grade allocated for out-of-class assessments.Sample Student QuestionsTopic: Beam Shear, Moment, and DeflectionThe following is a selection of questions from a Xorro-Q activity that requires students toanalyze a beam and complete the following tasks (grouped by question type).Hotspot questions where students use mouse click(s) or finger tap(s) to select locations on adiagram and are graded against correct regions as defined by the instructor
the results of the anonymous student feedback surveys conducted atboth the mid-semester and end of the semester. A full assessment of Bloom’s learning objectiveswas not conducted as part of this initial and limited study.References1. G.V. Oddsson and R. Unnthorsson. (2017). “Flipped Classroom Improves the Student’s Exam Performance in a First Year Engineering Course,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(6), 1776-1785.2. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, P.W. Airasian, K.A. Cruikshank, R.E. Mayer, P.R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M.C. Wittrock. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn, & Bacon.3. S. Kiefer and S
Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[9] H. Zhu, “A Flipped Solid Mechanics Course Designed Based on the Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) Framework”, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[10] S. Gross and D. Dinehart, "Pre- and Post-Class Student Viewing Behaviors for Recorded Videos in an Inverted Sophomore Mechanics Course Paper," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016. 10.18260/p.25924.[11] S. Gross and E. Musselman, "Observations from Three Years of Implementing of an Inverted (Flipped) Classroom Approach in Structural Design Courses," in Proceedings of
-solving skills by organizing a course around aseries of smaller, or one to two course-long problem(s) that add a substantial contextual elementto class assignments and activities. Typically, the PBL approach integrates the theoretical side ofeducation with the practical aspects of a profession, and involves students in not just the solvingof the problem, but also the investigating, developing, explaining, and checking of solutions [3,4]. This pedagogical approach has long been used in medical education, and has more recentlyemerged as an important approach for the undergraduate classroom [4]. Emphasizing theinvestigating and developing aspects of the PBL approach, open-ended problem (OEP)-basedlearning has roots in the constructivist
implementation of ourapproach.IntroductionEfforts to integrate the teaching of knowledge / skills across a curriculum are wide spread acrossmany institutions with efforts such as Writing Across the Curriculum being undertaken since theearly 1970’s [1]. A “pervasive method” of teaching ethics to law students was described by Link[2] where every professor in every course at the Notre Dame Law School would include ethics intheir course. Each course, thereby, served a dual purpose: the teaching of law as well as theteaching of ethics. Ethics was to be spread widely - be pervasive - throughout the lawcurriculum. Refining this pervasive approach, Davis [3] described a method called “micro-insertion” where knowledge / skills can be added to a course without
Cognitive BarriersDuring Design: A Case Study Approach Using the Envision Rating System for SustainableInfrastructure” for American Society of Civil Engineers International Conference on SustainableInfrastructure 2017, New York, NY USA October 26–28, 2017.[4] J. A. Cantor, J. A., Ed. (2006). Lifelong learning and the academy: The changing nature ofcontinuing education. ASHE higher education report, volume 32, number 2. ASHE HigherEducation Report, 32(2), 1-100. doi:10.1002/aehe.3202[5] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.2nd edition. Pearson, 2015.[6] J. Piaget, J. (1999). Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: London: Routledge.[7] L. S. Vygotskii, The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky
) MDOF Animations: Experimenting with MATLAB GUI to visualize mode shapesThree clarifications on the list presented above: 1. The activity described in the section “SDOF System: Harmonic Forced Vibration” was divided into two questions as students experimented with the shake table without recording any acceleration data and then were given an Excel file with the acceleration time histories for a range of forcing frequencies to process with Matlab. 2. The MDOF Mode Shapes for portal frame refers to two videos of frequency sweeps (conducted by Professor Oh-sung Kwon while at Missouri S&T)18-19 rather than the models described “MDOF System: Planar Frames” as there was not time to implement an
Paper ID #25531Longitudinal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple StructuralEngineering CoursesDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner- Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He
structural responses. GM1 0.5 Fixed Isolated Acc [g] 0 -0.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time [s] GM2 3 Fixed Isolated 2 1 Acc [g] 0 -1 -2 -3 0 5 10 15 20 25
students understanding theconcepts presented in the course. We also identified that there was an increase in the studentsexpressing “Very High Interest” in the civil engineering discipline when compared between thetotal number of students at the beginning and end of the semester. Our assessment resultsindicate that the lectures have helped the students understand the concepts of sustainability aswell the current US Infrastructure rank. However, we do note that the assessment questions needmodification to correctly understand the reasons for students varying interest in CivilEngineering discipline. REFERENCES[1] S. L. Star and K. Ruhleder, "Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access
students had never heard of these goals but were alleager to incorporate the sustainable development applications into their proposed design projects.Each student was asked to conduct research on the UN Goals and then write a brief essay onwhich goal(s) they wanted to incorporate into their proposed design project. Each group selectedgoals that were most applicable to their design project which can be found on Table 2. Of the 17UN Goals the engineering students selected eight as illustrated in Figure 2. • Goal 5: Gender Equality • Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation • Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy • Goal 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure • Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities • Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and
andTeaching Sustainable Design and Construction,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.6 ASCE. 2008. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the CivilEngineer for the Future, Second Edition,https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/Body_of_Knowledge/Content_Pieces/body-of-knowledge.pdf, accessed January 2019.7 D. R. Lynch, W. E. Kelly, M. K. Jha, and R. S. Harichandran, “Implementing Sustainability inthe Engineering Curriculum: Realizing the ASCE Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2007American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007.8 ABET, 2018, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019
future. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2007.[14] NSF’s 10 Big Ideas - NSF 2026. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ideas/nsf2026.jsp [Accessed Jan. 15, 2018].[15] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vision2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education. 16 pp. 2012.[16] C. Atman, S. Sheppard, L. Fleming, R. Miller, K. Smith, R. Stevens, R. Streveler, “Findings from the Academic Pathways Study of Engineering Undergraduates 2003-2008,” slides presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Austin TX, June 16, 2009.[17] C.B. Masters, S.T. Hunter, and G. Kremer, “Design Process Learning and Creative Processing Ability: Is there a Synergy?” in
CSCL,” Interpers. Comput. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 56–77, 1995.[7] K. Alfrey and E. Cooney, “Developing a Rubric to Assess Critical Thinking in Assignments with an Open-Ended Component,” in 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009.[8] T. Ceylan and L. W. Lee, “Critical thinking and engineering education,” 2003.[9] & R. Mattingly, Weatherton, Druzic, Frost, “Critical Thinking in the Curriculum : Making Better Decisions Critical Thinking in the Curriculum : Making Better Decisions,” 2010.[10] B. Arend, “Encouraging Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions,” J. Educ. Online, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2009.[11] J. C. C. Chan, K. F. Hew, and W. S