, incorporating design work, self-assessmentand reflection, prototyping and creation, all with supervision and support. Another corecomponent is empowered peer-to-peer mentoring: PRL course assistants (CAs) are graduatestudents who have themselves been burnished in the cauldron of the PRL. They understand theelation of success and the opportunity within failure – and know how to turn both into learningmoments for students. The PRL CAs are guided by four faculty, and these groups collectivelyform a community of practice with mixed levels of experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities.Students learn from faculty, CAs, and peers; CAs learn from faculty, students, and other CAs;and faculty learn from students, CAs, and each other. This forms a rich fabric
textbooks used in networkingcourses, the ''contents of these textbooks vary substantially even though these textbooks are usedfor courses having similar descriptions." They noted that subnetting was not covered in enoughdetail for student to understand their basics.Students need to be able to work through practical networking scenarios relying on their grasp ofnetwork fundamentals, perform suitable calculations and device configurations referring to textand online resources along with communicate their ideas to peers in an effective way. Often theextensive calculations required for setting up sub networks and advanced topics such as variablelength subnet masking, super networks, or the use of client-server configurations, can be difficultto
at the university level and as they pursue careers in industry. Graduating this December, she hopes to retain this knowledge for the benefit of herself and other women engineers as she pursues an industry career.Dr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is Associate Professor of Engineering Education Research in the Division of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at the Colorado School of Mines, USA. Dr. Leydens’ research and teaching interests are in engineering education, communication, and social justice. Dr. Leydens is author or co- author of 40 peer-reviewed papers, co-author of Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (Morgan and Claypool, 2010), and editor of Sociotechnical
a Turbulent Era.Katie JohansonDr. Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College Dr. Kinnis Gosha (Go-Shay) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Di- rector of the Culturally Relevant Computer Lab at Morehouse College. Dr. Gosha’s research interests include conversational agents, social media data analytics, computer science education, broadening par- ticipation in computing and culturally relevant computing. More specifically, Gosha’s passion lies in his research in virtual mentoring where he has several peer-reviewed research publications. Gosha’s Cultur- ally Relevant Computing Lab is comprised of approximately 10 top undergraduate researchers each year from Morehouse College, Spelman College
each. During the first brainstorm session,students were allowed to discuss with each other topics within the local wicked problem thatinterested them. A follow up discussion was facilitated by the teaching assistants and generalresearch topics were then established by the TAs based on student interests. Students alsoidentified deliverables they would like to see for this project, and these were then incorporatedinto the syllabus.At the second brainstorming session students completed personalized index cards stating theirresearch interests with the class project and then worked for the first time with peers on theirselected group project. In groups of 3 to 8, they shared ideas with each other on the topicssummarized by the TAs and wrote these
formed and assigned one of the activities to work on during their tutorial and write anaccompanying report. These groups were later able to experience one of the other activities andasked to create a video report. After both activities and reports were complete, about two monthsinto the term, students were shown one of the videos during class. They were also directed to theother videos and encouraged to watch them on their own time outside of class. Once everyonehad an opportunity to watch the videos, a quiz was given based on the content of the activities,for which students answered questions only about the activities their group participated in duringclass. Around this time they were also sent a survey to provide their opinions about the
innovation. Such models of development-and-dissemination are widely used totransform undergraduate instruction [15] and demonstrate that successful implementation in oneeducational context can be transferred to another with potential for similar success [16, 17].A report by the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Creating a Culture forScholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education, endorses the creation of such aculture for scholarly and systematic innovation within engineering education [18]. The reportconceptualizes innovation in engineering education as intentionally engaging the faculty in acycle that reciprocates between “research” and “practice”. The authors write, “In an instantiationof the model, and practitioners
Centerwith a planetarium and rooftop star deck and observatory. Students volunteer to operate thetelescopes for the public on Friday nights. The professional development workshops includeresume writing, creating a LinkedIn profile, club officers’ retreat, e-portfolios, scholarship essays,transfer tips and research paper sessions. In 2017, 98 students participated in these workshops; in2018, 94 students participated. Because families think the students spend an inordinate amount oftime at the MESA Center, Family Night was implemented to share some of the projects in a fun,engaging and interactive environment. Another highlight for 2018 was the center’s visit byCongressman Joaquin Castro, who wanted to learn more about the undergraduate
tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig consults with faculty across the university about bringing scholarly teaching and learning innovations into their classroom and assessing their impact. He has regularly published and presented work on a variety of topics including assessment instruments and methodologies, using technology in the classroom, instructional design, team-based learning, and peer coaching. Dr. Utschig completed his PhD in Nuclear Engineering at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Connecting Theory with Practice: Four Change Projects in Faculty
design and present their results and findings to the class.The design portion of this class is emphasized through the use of semester-long projects,complimented with instruction about the design process through expert guest lectures fromindustry. The teams are allowed to experiment with their designs through SolidWorks and arerequired to build their entire prototype in SolidWorks using assemblies. Documentation is alsoan important aspect of the design process, as it requires students to have a series of status reportscontaining a portion of their project for each report. These reports help ensure that students aremaking progression throughout the semester and help them with skills to write an effective statusreport for future classes and
Distributed Systems” publishedby Scrivener Publishing, an imprint of John Wiley and Sons. Furthermore, Dr. Zhao published over200 peer-reviewed papers on fault tolerant and dependable systems (three of them won the best paperaward), computer vision and motion analysis, physics, and education. Dr. Zhao’s research is supportedin part by the US National Science Foundation, the US Department of Transportation, Ohio State Bureauof Workers’ Compensation, and by Cleveland State University. Dr. Zhao has served on the organizingcommittee and the technical program committee for numerous international conferences. Dr. Zhao is anAssociate Editor for IEEE Access, an Academic Editor for PeerJ Computer Science, and is a member ofthe editorial board for
Engineering, and Civil Engineering from Ohio University, and B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Istanbul Technical University, Turkey. His re- search interests cover a variety of topics that include engineering education, applied optimization and simulation modeling, social, economic and environmental life cycle assessment, data analytics, energy and sustainability, input-output analysis, transportation sustainability and safety. Gokhan has over 50 peer-reviewed publications in prestigious academic journals, books, and conference proceedings related to sustainable development, life cycle assessment, manufacturing system design and control, supply chain management, transportation safety assessment, and predictive modeling
formulatingquestions and hypotheses, justifying theories and methods, and arguing the relevance andsignificance of results. Innovative thinking is meaningless without the ability to communicate anidea in a meaningful way. Future innovators and entrepreneurs must be armed with the skills tocommunicate with their colleagues and peers as well as with decision-makers if they are topromote their work effectively.Given the growing societal impacts of scientific research, STEM practitioners have aresponsibility to communicate to the general public and enhance understanding of science [3],[4]. Public skepticism is increasingly directed at science based issues appearing to conflict withsome public values or religious beliefs. Targeted training of STEM students in
Statics and Mechanics of Materials and motivatesthe groups to write their lines. Once complete, each group leaves the classroom to record theirlyrics (which must be appropriate) and then uploads the videos to an online file drive. When allthe teams are done, the class watches the videos. I then have a rap of my own to share live,dramatically revealing my ‘dyed’ Eminem style hair (Figure 1a) and then rapping the entirecourse outline. The major learning objective for the day is for students to become comfortabletalking in front of their peers and not being afraid to ask any questions, because as I say, “onceyou have rapped in front of each other, how hard is asking a question?”Greek Rush DayThe value for this theme is its applicability to many STEM
ESPTs and in engineering praxis, they experience apowerfully rich and authentic identity, they experience becoming an engineer.In the following, we used three cases, that is, three women participants (Nickie, Bhee, and Annie– all pseudonyms) to illustrate the overall thematic findings noted in the passage above.Nickie is a member of an upper middleclass family with two parents (neither of whom areengineers), one sister and two brothers. She was born in the northeastern part of the UnitedStates. She differentiated herself from the other members of her family, “I was probably the leastathletic person ever, so I had to find other things….” She enjoyed reading, writing and drawing.“I became very artistic … and “was super curious” about space
Graduate Research Assistant on the VT PEERS project studying middle school students regularly engaging in engineering activities. Drawing on previous experiences as a mathematics and engineering teacher, her current re- search interests include studying the disconnect between home and school, with a specific emphasis on prekindergarten students. She will continue to pursue these research interests in the coming years with the support of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowships Program. In addition, she dedicates her spare time to exhibiting at the Virginia Tech Science Festival and hosting several sessions for the Kindergarden-to- college (K2C) Initiative.Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral
networking topics.Teams are collaborating across the UW System through the Canvas learning environment, whichhas recently been implemented at all campuses. Canvas “courses” have been created for each ofthe IoT modules, and “instructors” – those with read/write privileges – have been assigned.These instructors come from multiple campuses, with some from industry also participating.b IT/OT = Information Technology / Operational Technologyc MES = Manufacturing Execution System; ERP = Enterprise Resource PlanningUsing Canvas allows instructors to readily share and develop materials, and it will also facilitatedissemination after the modules are completed. The Canvas course modules in progress thus farare listed below. IoT Networking Protocols
major in one ofthe engineering specialty areas upon matriculation, or soon thereafter. Previous research hasshown that significant factors influencing choice of major for college students include (1)general interest subject; (2) family and peer influence; (3) assumptions about introductorycourses, (4) potential job characteristics, and (5) characteristics of the major. The student'sdecision on choice of major is often difficult because traditional university-aged students havelittle to no direct experience with the engineering profession or practicing engineers. Someuniversities confront this problem with a common first-year engineering experience, whereinengineering majors are given the opportunity to explore the specialty areas and make a
isolation, individualism, lack of financial support, insufficientfaculty interaction and other factors contribute to the lack of diversity in computing fields,particularly at the doctoral level3. Providing students with effective mentorship could assist inalleviating these circumstances and improve their willingness to continue in the computingsciences4. Additionally, developing ecosystems or networks that create, promote, and increasesocial capital of underrepresented students could factor into their ability to persist and transcendthese and other unfavorable experiences. In 2016, Charleston et al. revealed that parentalinvolvement, mentorship, counseling, and peer interaction can deeply impact self–efficacy andpersistence in students pursuing
education curriculum with a focus on laboratory courses for the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His courses leverage project-based learning, experiential learning, and self-paced activities. David has over ten years of industry experience specializing in mixed-signal RF integrated circuit design, power systems, and power electronics.Prof. Kia Bazargan, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Prof. Kia Bazargan is an Associate Professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Minnesota. Has has published over 70 peer-reviewed papers and book chapters related to FPGAs and VLSI computer-aided design. He received his Bachelors degree
. Johnson et al. write, “…there is nothing special about the waterthat stays in the pipe and that which leaks” [7, p. 342]. Still others note that careers are morecomplex than the “leaking only” action of the pipeline – some successful scientists may leaveand then return, or may find fulfillment in other fields [22]. As an alternative, authors haveproposed other models, such as Etzkowitz’s [23] “vanish box” in which underrepresentedstudents (women, in particular) tend to vanish from scientific careers, but reappear in careers thatcombine science with business or communication skills. Perna [24] also suggests a “multiplepathways” model, which has been picked up by advocates for minority engineers [19]. Perna’smodel allows for alternate routes within
through in-formation gathering, proof-of-concept, prototype development, beta testing and now production-on-order stages: 1. Research, design and build appropriately sized physical hardware (e.g., intake and sorting tables) and optimize flow through their use. 2. Develop, wire and test individual units that use industry-proven commercial electronics to build robust totalizers that reduce errors and that can be maintainable by NYSARC staff. 3. Employ an industry-proven commercial industrial electronic controller/ display and write software for it, to collect and log data from all totalizers in a given plant, provide a real-time display to staff, and allow for the printing of individual receipts or bag labels.Proof of ConceptIn
aimed at supporting underprepared students through theirprerequisites, both academically and emotionally. The program was designed afterinterviewing many students, both those who persisted and those who left engineering,researching programs at other schools, and building upon prior experience. The mainprogram goals include an increased retention rate in engineering amongstunderprepared students and the creation of meaningful relationships and networks forthese students within their engineering experience.Specific program goals: ● Support the development of meaningful relationships for underprepared first-year students within their engineering experience. A student survey about interpersonal experiences with peers as well as
, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2200 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Keith D. Hjelmstad is President’s Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of Sustainable Engineering
]. Unfortunately, it is also perceived as an area of under-preparation by recentgraduates [26]. Women’s experiences in engineering design teams has been the subject of a number ofstudies, with several studies noting that women’s experiences in teams could potentially“recreate sexist environments already found in the university environment for undergraduatewomen if they are not properly managed” [28, pp. 82]. Negative experiences in teams (not beingaccepted, heard, or respected by her peers) could have significant long-term impacts, i.e., it couldbe the difference between staying or abandoning engineering after graduation. During teamwork activities, students negotiate their identities, status, and authenticity.[29] showed that gender is a
students with a clear picture of what theycould expect in the classroom.Each in-class lab module was designed with a series of learning objectives in mind, targeted atkey concepts covered in the course. Priority for lab topics was given to concepts that studentstypically find challenging or confusing in introductory materials courses [6]. Brief descriptionsof each lab, along with the lab supplies required, and the teaching purpose of each activity [7],are presented in Appendix A of this paper.The collaborative in-class lab activities described in Appendix A, when integrated into a broaderlearning experience involving lecture, discussion with professors and peers, and homeworkassignments, provided students with a positive introduction to the field
University.Dr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and her PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural history of engineering, and the aerodynamics of sports projectiles. She writes the essay series ”An engineer reads a novel” for Public Books. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Integrative Education in Engineering and
interdisciplinary design, art, activism, andengineering, culminating in a DJ/VJ set. Students were also engaged in weekly career andcollege planning activities where they reflected on their interests and career goals through vlogson websites they created. In addition, seminars were given on resume-writing by our collegeadmissions team along with advice on how to ask for recommendation letters (and what shouldbe in them). These activities were common among all sections and have been offered to betterprepare students for the college and career planning process and to place engineering in abroader, social context, particularly in endeavors championed by people that looked more likethem. ection DescriptionRacecar SThe Racecar section was composed of
the students with techniques to evaluate a job offer, and lesson 11 is an optional sessionthat provides information on graduate school opportunities for engineers.Table 3: Senior ESSP Lessons Lesson Session Title Assignment 1 Strategy to Find Full-Time Employment 2 An Effective Resume (Same as Update Professional Resume Sophomore Video) 3 Career Fair Preparation (Same as Attend Career Fair and Speak to Four Sophomore Video) Companies Minimum 4 Interviewing Complete, Evaluate, and Upload Interview Session with Peer 5 Written