, financial and political barriers preventedoffering engineering courses, and native Skyline students had to complete their engineeringcoursework elsewhere in the district, a neighboring district, or worse, transfer without lowerdivision coursework completed. In Fall 2014, the college offered its first and only Engineeringcourse (Introduction to Engineering), developed and taught by an adjunct instructor in theirphysics department, whose technical background was in engineering. This adjunct professorbegan to develop a few other engineering courses over 2015, and in Spring 2016 the college wasleveraging external grant funds to hire him as a temporary full-time faculty member to begin thedevelopment of what was to become the Engineering and Computer
faculty member, discussingcareer plans and ambitions with a faculty member, and discussing personal problems or concernswith a faculty member. Also, HCCS participants, compared to the control group, reported greatersatisfaction with the social environment. HCCS program participants also reported greatersatisfaction with their academic experiences and research training experiences. The data fromthis section indicated that HCCS participants had the opportunity to engage in developmentalexperiences that have been shown to support retention and graduation outcomes20. For example,HCCS program participants receive career development information which helps students toobtain a comprehensive understanding of their career options in academia and corporate
certain degree programs, an issueespecially important for ET students due to the “loose coupling” of degree and employment [17].Where retention of students is concerned, peer mentoring has been shown to increase retentionand self-esteem among students [18]. Among first-generation college students, campus mentorscan provide meaningful messages that influence their decisions throughout their college careersand equipping them with the ability to deal with academic challenges [19]. Therefore, thesupport students receive from both faculty and peers can affect decisions to remain in theirmajor, their confidence, and their decision to remain in college. By asking graduates about thesupport they received through their college education, areas for
with the intention of empowering faculty to do this with their ownstudents. This exercise aimed to recognize from the outset that people arrive with different livedexperiences and values, and there can be a space created for people with different perspectives toshare ideas and have conversation on social and political topics. There was recognition thatfostering discussion and facilitating personal reflection with engineering students poses a greaterchallenge than other disciplines where students are regularly expected to engage in thesepractices. Therefore, the establishment of ground rules would be especially important in order toachieve buy-in from class members and create a space where all voices would be welcomed. Forthe purposes of the
design a curriculum and guides them through the process of developing a course in their field. • ENE 685 Engineering Education Methods (3 credit hours), provides students with a variety of techniques for teaching courses that are both engaging and effective. • ENE 687 Mentored Teaching in Engineering (1 credit hour), enables students to deepen their understanding of teaching and learning through feedback and reflection as they perform their regularly assigned teaching duties. • ENE 695 Succeeding as an Engineering Professor (3 credit hours), covers other skills valuable to faculty members such as writing proposals, selecting and mentoring graduate students, and managing projects.All four courses
Paper ID #26918Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research Needs Using TopicModelingMs. Qianjin Zhang, University of Iowa Qianjin (Marina) Zhang is the Engineering & Informatics Librarian at the Lichtenberger Engineering Library, The University of Iowa. As a subject librarian, she manages collection and provides instruction, reference and consultation services for the engineering faculty and students. Her work also focuses on data management education and outreach to engineering students through presenting Data Management topic to an Engineering Ethics course and library workshops. She holds a MA in
within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset. She completed her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Prior to ASU, she worked as an engineer at A. W. Chesterton, Boston Scientific, and Procter & Gamble.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr
, Community College of the Air Force Stephen Harris is an adjunct faculty member at the Pennsylvania State University’s Great Valley School of Graduate Professional Studies. He served in the USAF as an Electronic Warfare Officer and completed both a military and a civil service career with a total of 42 years of Federal service. In his final civil service position he served as the Dean of the Community college of the Air Force. His research and teaching interests include problem solving science and leadership with a focus on the impact of cognitive style based upon Adaption Innovation theory. Dr. Harris received his Ed.D. in Career Technology from Auburn University. c American Society for
WIP: Developmental Relationships in EngineeringAbstractThis work in progress paper discusses a study exploring informal faculty development ofengineering faculty leaders. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to better understand howmentoring relationships help promote faculty career advancement. Higher education rarelydevelops the capacity of its leaders in an intentional way: “colleges and universities, unlike manysimilarly sized corporations, do not view talent development as a strategic priority” [4]. Thecomplexity of higher education, as well as the increased demands and challenges, require betterprepared leaders. Despite this need, there is little research on informal one-on-one leadershipdevelopment tactics in higher education. To
. Inseminars on research and teaching and in the PFMF Symposium, students explored critical issuesin the areas of Career Development, Disciplinary Expertise & Interdisciplinary Connections,Global Awareness & Cultural Sensitivity, Research, and Teaching. At these events, PFMFstudents learned from established faculty members about the specific topics shown below inTable 1.As students in the PFMF program develop their e-portfolios in year 2 of the program, they willcategorize their activities and artifacts in the associated Core Competency areas. Beyond thePFMF activities, students are able to participate in workshops and other activities offeredthroughout the academic year by the Graduate College and various other units on campus, all ofwhich
of adaptations in the course based on industry feedback. The paper concludes with asection on lessons, challenges and possible solutions that can be adopted.Course SettingEvolution of the courseTo keep up with the changing landscape in graduate studies and to ensure students are well prepared forthe demands in the industry, the graduate faculty members at KSP initiated an advisory board meetingand worked towards adopting their recommendations in the PMT program with a review cycle of 3 years.Industry advisory boards differ in purpose and in what they contribute. According to Windsor et al.(1992) advisory board contributions are valued in the following areas: a) share advice, such as hiringtrends or skills needed among graduates; b) add
Grant Fore is a Research Associate in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute (SEIRI) at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis. As a SEIRI staff member, Grant is involved in research development, qualitative and mixed methods research, and programmatic assessment and evalu- ation. His research interests include ethics and equity in STEM education, the intersubjective experience of the instructor/student encounter, secondary STEM teacher professional development, and issues of power in STEM education discourse. He is also an Anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Cape Town, where he was previously awarded a Master’s degree. His dissertation research is focused on exploring the
Paper ID #25579It’s Not Just What TA’s Know: Exploring the Role of Teacher Efficacy amongEngineering TA’sJoanna Wright, University of Washington Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development.Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington Lauren N. Summers is a doctoral student in the College of Education at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests focus on the
that influence students help-seeking behaviors.Mr. Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rohit Kandakatla is currently a Ph.D. candidate in School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He has his bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering from India. He currently serves as the Chair-elect of the ASEE Student Division as has been an active member of the international engineering education community while serving as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education De- velopment (SPEED) and as the Vice-President of Student Engagement for the International Federation for Engineering Education Societies (IFEES). His research interests include education policy, faculty de
Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student
Colorado Boulder.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Dr. Samantha R. Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset. She completed her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Prior to ASU, she worked as an
members hold [28, 30].Epistemology relates to the justifications, warrants, or rationale that support decisions or actionswithin the community about what knowledge is true[28, 30]. There are “things to know, ways ofknowing them, and ways of finding about them” [31], especially in design and engineering.“Epistemic frame theory suggest that learning to solve complex science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM) problems from being part of a community of practice” [32]. In this exercise, we defined a summer college preparatory engineering and design class asa community of practice where students were performing authentic tasks in which they coulddevelop or expand an epistemic frame. We focused on the interactions that occurred
for Wright State’s engineering college: to develop a first semester course experiencethat addresses the inability of first year engineering students to successfully advance quicklyenough through the traditional calculus sequence, resulting in unacceptably high attrition [3].Like at Wright State, the Engineering Math course is centered on hands-on lab experiences,emphasizing an application-oriented, active approach to studying math topics subsequentlyapplied in core engineering courses. Taught by engineering faculty, course topics includeexamples from physics, engineering mechanics, electric circuits, and programming. A goal of thecourse is for students to demonstrate their prowess in applying mathematics knowledge, so thatthey can begin to
departments of computer science and engineering. Her interests focus on broadening participation in computer science and engineering through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields.Prof. Zahra Hazari, Florida International University Zahra Hazari is an Associate Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning and the STEM Trans- formation Institute as well as an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Physics. Dr. Hazari’s research focuses on reforming physics
frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University.nHer re- search interests focus on higher education equity and access, particularly within STEM.Dr. James Collofello, Arizona State University Associate Dean of Academic and Student Affairs Professor of Computer Science and Engineering School of Computing Informatics and Decision Systems
the final draft stage.Despite these shortcomings, the members of the FLC agree that other goals of convening an FLC[1] were fulfilled. We certainly created a stronger sense of community among interdisciplinaryfaculty members, and all advanced our knowledge of the scholarship of teaching and learning inthe process. Additionally, several other project ideas and collaborations grew out of this FLC thatinclude subsets of members as well as other faculty, so the positive results of this effort are notlimited in duration to the initial FLC.Our suggestions for others attempting to define a similar FLC include clarifying the goals of theFLC early in the process, incorporating the 10 qualities necessary for community in FLCs, andincorporating most or
Statistics predicts growth of 13.4% from2014 to 2024 in jobs for STEM-related post-secondary teachers [1]. Women are a growingpercentage of PhDs in STEM but are not proportionately represented among assistant professors[2]; to support this employment growth it will likely be necessary to attract more women to thefaculty. Of even more significance is that STEM faculty play a critical double role in the healthand gender make-up of the future STEM workforce. Research shows that role models have animportant impact on career pathway decisions made by women engineering students [3]. Mostengineers are first exposed to the profession through their STEM faculty, so if this group is notdiverse, or if diverse workers (such as women) are perceived to be
career engineers to adapt to engineering workplace culture.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Dr. Samantha R. Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset. She completed her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford
inengineering programs. Problem and Project-based Learning (PBL) methodologies were chosento teach the course, and strategies to develop students’ soft skills were included. The course wastaught in the fall of 2017.In this paper, we describe the redesign process that CIE followed in collaboration with threeengineering faculty members teaching the course. Also, we present the results of the qualitativestudy which sought to explore the experiences of the eight professors teaching the redesignedcourse.2. Literature Review2.1 Engineering teaching and learningEngineering colleges and universities face a large number of students leaving their programsbefore graduation, despite years of research and efforts to increase retention rates. In the U.S.over
, course content, and teaching methods and the impact of those interactions onteaching and learning. Each of these factors impacts different levels of interaction in theclassroom. For example, dynamic interactions occur between both faculty members and students,as well as students with their peers in the classroom. The model posits that a deeper awareness ofthese variable and critical interaction patterns is valuable for the shaping of students’ uniquelearning experiences. Further, it serves to foster the importance of being aware of students’ andone’s own unique background, experiences, and social identities and how this influences theteaching decisions that faculty make, as well as how the classroom experience is received bystudents. Applying
choose between a career in professional baseball orengineering; with his father’s prompting, he chose engineering: “And so my dad maybe didn’twant to see me do that, to be working as a janitor. Which I am not saying anything, it’s a job atthe end of the day, but I had the opportunity to pursue a career so why would I not follow thatpath?” For Francisco, the decision to pursue engineering was a decision rooted in economicstability, which he referenced more than once in his interviews. The decision was also verystrongly influenced by his father, who was also an engineer; this will be explored in more detailin a later section.Two ME students, Elisa and Alfonso, also expressed career-oriented aspirations. In her account,Elisa emphasized her affinity
Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 66-75, 1982.[7] H. Tsai, “Development of an inventory of problem-solving abilities of tertiary students majoring in engineering technology,” World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 268 – 272, 2010.[8] P.P Heppner, T. E. Witty, and W. A. Dixon, “Problem-solving appraisal and human adjustment: A review of 20 years of research using the problem solving inventory,” Counseling Psychologist, vol. 32, pp. 344-428, 2004.[9] Y.P. Huang, and L. Y. Flores, “Exploring the validity of the Problem-Solving Inventory with Mexican American high-school students,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 431-441, 2011.[10] N. Kourmousi, V. Xythali, M. Theologitou, and V. Koutras
students in their own learning environment. (5) Challenge students to construct knowledge from their experiences.During sophomore year, engineering students take Technical Writing and Communicationswhere they are introduced to the fundamental principles of technical writing and use a project-based learning model.Taking the aforementioned points into consideration, the technical writing instructor andengineering faculty tried a new approach to add realism to the technical writing course content.The course recently implemented a team exercise with iFixit [13] where student teams of fourhad to troubleshoot an unserviceable item (laptop, kitchen appliance, smart phone, etc.) andrepair it. As part of the project, teams documented their written
-disciplinary research initiatives among students and faculty. Reframingthe seminar as a research group meeting will allow the faculty members to focus more onproviding opportunities to grow as a researcher and develop professionally. For example, facultymembers have explored hosting a session to discuss how to become an interdisciplinary scholar,and students are now regularly bringing work (grant proposals, abstracts, talks) to share with oneanother for feedback – and consequently deepening their awareness of one another’s fields. Byexplicitly discussing with students how to think interdisciplinarily and how to conduct researchacross disciplines, students will be more likely to develop a functional understanding of theinterdisciplinary space.We
teaching practices.Dr. Emily Anna Dare, Florida International University Dr. Emily Dare is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at Florida International University. Pre- viously, she taught at Michigan Technological University from 2015-2018, where she is still an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences. Dr. Dare’s research interests are focused on K-12 STEM education. In particular, she is interested in supporting science teachers’ reform- based instruction while simultaneously understanding their beliefs. As science classrooms shift to more integrated STEM approaches, this is especially critical. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to