ethical implications inherent in its applications. A course module, named ‘Robotsat Your Service’, was developed to engage students to critically think about the social and ethicalimplications while performing technical research assignments and identifying new opportunitiesin robotic applications. Active & collaborative learning (ACL), such as jigsaw and gallery walk,are used for effectively engaging students and promoting self-learning. Initial assessments of itsfirst deployment in Spring 2018 showed positive outcomes for its feasibility. This module wasdeveloped for an undergraduate junior/senior robotics course; however, its generic format makesit suitable for graduate level adoption as well.IntroductionEngineering students traditionally
Communication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014). In 2016, Dr. Leydens won the Exemplar in Engineering Ethics Education Award from the Na- tional Academy of Engineering, along with CSM colleagues Juan C. Lucena and Kathryn Johnson, for a cross-disciplinary suite of courses that enact macroethics by making social justice visible in engineering education. In 2017, he and two co-authors won the Best Paper Award in the Minorities in Engineering Division at the American Society for Engineering Education annual conference. Dr. Leydens’ recent research, with co-author Juan C. Lucena, focused on rendering visible the social justice dimensions in- herent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences
and affective domains in the CEBOK3 [3, 5, 6, 9]. Onereason behind this was the deemed importance of civil engineers internalizing a sense of valuefor the people served by the profession and for their human experience.The CEBOK3TC initially considered including the affective domain for all of the CEBOK3outcomes. While possible, the committee ultimately felt it best to formally introduce theaffective domain into the CEBOK for a selection of outcomes only. The sustainability outcomeand all of the professional outcomes (communication, teamwork and leadership, lifelonglearning, professional attitudes, professional responsibilities, and ethical responsibilities) wereselected by the task committee as being the most appropriate to including in both
• Track II: Construction Management”MS in Technology Management program outcomes [15] are listed as: 1. “Graduates will have knowledge and competency in the field of technology management with an emphasis on engineering technologies. 2. Graduates will have the knowledge and skills necessary to be imaginative, critical thinkers who are able to discover problems and questions, develop logical answers, and apply effective solutions in the practice of technology management. 3. Graduates will have knowledge of ethical behavior in professional positions in all aspects of technology management. 4. Graduates will have competency in the management and leadership of technology in global
. Studentsurveys conducted at two different institutions show why students select to become engineers andtheir preference for the different course components.Introduction “Introduction to Engineering” is a core course given to freshmen students of all engineeringdisciplines. The course aims to familiarize students with the engineering profession, the differentengineering disciplines, the design process for exploratory projects, the work in interdisciplinaryteams, the ethics and professional behavior, the lifelong learning, the written and oral presentationof technical concepts, and problem solving. As curriculum often changes, an online research wasconducted on the most current catalogs (2018-2019) of 182 higher education institutions offeringdegrees in
of a model structure to earthquakes. Students will build an Caring 1. Students will appreciation of the societal understand impact of structural professional and engineering decisions ethical responsibilityFor each criterion, there is a standard to determine how well the criteria are met.For example for the Caring criteria 1, the standard is the hypothesis “ Can identify an
. This course enhanced my awareness of professional ethics and responsibility. This course helped me develop my ability to identify and acquire new knowledge as part of the problem. Assistance is available inside and outside lab. Course Support The content of the lectures and skill sessions were relevant to the course. The lab facilities supported my team’s needs.Quantitative evaluation have always focused on specific course/program objective but the specificquestions changed slightly. Table 2 shows the original questions and the percentage of studentsrating the course with an A or B grade for each objective, accumulated over the first 15
more effective in educating themselves, will develop more creative solutions to problems, will practice more efficiently, and will be more competitive in the global economy [2]. Information literacy is just one of many professional skills that students need to succeed in both their academic and professional careers. Colwell outlines 14 such skills including oral and written communication, time management, ethical decisionmaking, and leadership [3]. The Bern Dibner library at NYU Tandon hosts between 20 and 30 workshops a semester on topics including data services, research skills, and information literacy. Over the
, together withpolicy, to address societal ills resulting from natural disasters, man-made disasters,irresponsible and non-sustainable consumption of resources, pollution and contamination,and lack of opportunity. This program trains students to pursue practical solutions thatproactively promote peace and reduce the potential for disputes in a world plagued withproblems that require unconventional thinking to overcome. Students are exposed toinnovative approaches toward addressing multidimensional problems in addition togaining skill in economic, social, environmental, political, ethical, legal, cultural, andhistorical aspects associated with the effort of building enduring peace. This paper willdetail the elements that constitute a peace
designed to contextualize the experience in a wider,transferable sense [3].Rupnow et al. [4] stated that engineering programs have, “increasingly begun to incorporateservice-learning into their coursework.” ([4] p. 4) The contextualizing of engineering in light ofreal world application, engagement, and service, whereby there is a real partner in the work thatis being done, has been connected to students’ consideration of the real-life complexities thataccompany any engineering challenge. These real-life complexities influence designs,approaches, and dynamics of a task [5]. Additionally, engineering as a field recognizes itscommitment to social responsibility as identified explicitly in their Code of Ethics, “...engineering has a direct and vital
students to determine if these perceptions could beused to enhance Veteran retention in engineering. Social responsibility is embodied in theEngineer’s Creed and is directly related to engineering ethics [10], so much so that theengineering accrediting agency ABET requires that graduates can approach their work in asocially responsible manner [11]. The principles of social responsibility are what attract manystudents to engineering, specifically those from underrepresented groups [12]. Matusovich et al.[13] and Mehaffy [14] identified the need to incorporate students’ personal values, such as socialresponsibility, into the engineering curriculum to allow them to personally connect with theirengineering identity and thereby increase retention. The
courseobjectives at Northeastern University. Capstone is effective for teaching and assessing ABET outcomes 2,3, 5, 6, and 7. Student Outcome #1 on problem formulation and complex problem solving may not bedirectly assessed, but it is a necessary skill in order to successfully complete a design. Student Outcome#4 on ethical and professional responsibilities and global/cultural factors may be difficult for students toapply consistently, and may not be captured by typical capstone assessment instruments, yet theimportance of this factor is emphasized.Previous work has discussed the challenges of assessing the ABET objectives, particularly those relatingto professional skills [9]. Although the ABET criteria, program objectives and student outcomes
software, and teaching students how to regularlybackup information to the cloud [6]. At Le Moyne College, an interdisciplinary non-majorscourse was offered titled ‘Cybersecurity for Future Presidents.’ This course, like the one atLoyola, taught students technical skills like encryption, decryption, and packet switching[4].The non-majors courses in cybersecurity that have been designed vary greatly in the style andcontent [6]. Some of the topics covered in these courses are similar to ours: computer networks,cryptography, access controls, threats and human factors, forensics, privacy, ethics, and freespeech, and other computer science fundamentals like, digital representation of information, dataencryption, time complexity, packet switching
how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of
softwareengineering plays on sustainability. It arose as the outcome of a cross-disciplinary initiative tocreate a common ground and develop a focal point of reference for the global community ofresearch and practice allowing a deeper thinking on software engineering and sustainability. Ithas proven its usefulness for effectively communicating key issues, goals, values, and principlesof sustainable design. Moreover, it has been adopted by researchers addressing a wide variety ofsubjects in software engineering (e.g. software requirements, software engineering curricula,systems thinking, design thinking, engineering ethics, and multidisciplinary engineering, amongothers) [10].BackgroundSustainable software approaches and modelsA systematic mapping study on
better understand and plan for undergraduate studentsand exchange students joining the program from a different background. This study further shedlight on essentials such as project management, engineering education and ethical principleswhich were not discussed expansively during undergraduate coursework.This paper will report the knowledge gap analysis conducted via survey forms which wereevaluated by professional instructors. Study objectives include: (1) assessment of each formwhich evaluators perceived students’ knowledge gap of course material of BAE course andprogram outcomes, (2) Correlating the evaluated data on knowledge gap with the common coresubjects.Methodology:A survey was created based off of the knowledge levels from a previous
performing than the other labs. The disparitybetween Q&P, SDP and the remaining labs was quite large in the first major category, withboth of them scoring high in opportunity, design, and impact.Additionally, with the exception of the Artificial Muscle lab, all got a majority of points inthe communication category and, with the exception of the SDP, most labs scored low pointsin the final major category, ‘Collaboration, ethics, and professionalism.’Curiosity, Connections, and Creating ValueAs seen in Table 1, most labs fell short in the Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Valuecategory, the foundation of the KEEN program, while the Software Design Project (SDP),Quality and Productivity (Q&P), and Wind Turbine performed slightly better
fundamental influences of public policy on engineering 2-Comprehension standards, design requirements, and professional practice. 7. Explain legal and ethical responsibilities of professional engineers. 2-Comprehension 8. Identify leadership principles and proficiencies use to address 2-Comprehension challenges within the engineering profession.CEE Department Embedded IndicatorsDepartmental outcomes aligning the curriculum along professional skills were established to linkcourse goals across a course-by-course strategy for student development. An essentialcomponent of this plan was adoption of Embedded Indicators, aligned with CEE Departmentoutcomes, and mapped across all four years of the undergraduate curriculum
curriculum modules that for a broad range of students. Finally, he shared theEducational Outcomes expected of all accredited engineering programs (per ABET [4]), as apoint of reference: participants were encouraged to also think beyond technical skillrequirements and to consider other skills that are part of science, technology, engineering &mathematics (STEM) curricula such as teamwork, consideration of ethical/societal issues, andmore.At this point, the industry participants and academic participants were split into break-outsessions to focus on delineating their needs, before coming back together as a large group beforelunch.Industry Break-out: SummaryThe industry “room” brainstormed and focused on shared key “Abilities,” “Skills” and
. Although they are mostly working outside of theinstitutional setting, especially as they work to establish alternative space and practices outside ofthe dominant discourse, the work and motivations of both feminist hacker collectives and opensource science hardware communities have implications for thinking through how to organizeand enact real-world change in terms of pedagogy, design, and more deeply weaving ethics andexplicit value-systems into engineering education and practice.In a previous paper, we sought lessons for change in engineering education from movements notonly within science and technology cultures, but also within higher education institutionalsettings. Prior higher education change movements we examined include the efforts to
architecture students conceptualize knowledge and design. To date, the study has been designed and has gained approval to proceed from our ethics review board. Three pilot interviews have been conducted and these have been used to adjust the research design and widen the parameters for the sample group. The research team secured ethics approval for the proposed changes. This paper describes the overall design of the study and what was learned from the pilot interviews.IntroductionHow do students interpret the act of creation and how does their understanding change over time?We aim to understand students’ experiences of design in civil engineering and architecture. Wewant to understand how students interpret creating, and we want
are looking for as they look to get themost from each employee in terms of output. Guinn [13] described how the needs of anemployer have changed from the “old world” manufacturing to the new in Figure 2. Figure 2 - The Changing Needs of EmployersAs can be seen, what was once a very straight forward skill is turning into a more complex set ofskills and while this is representative of the manufacturing industry, a person could take thosesame skills and transfer them across the private sector in a variety of combinations. Beyond thechange in skills needed with technological advances there are some core attributes that have notchanged in the private sector: education, work ethic, experience, and dependability.Education
students have been involved in theproject. Data Collection, Sources, and ManagementInitial and Ethical Considerations The process for collecting and using data in P-12 school settings is significantly differentthan other fields, such as social networks or e-commerce (Carmel, 2016). Those who have accessto the data need to have clear boundaries and parameters on what to access and whichinformation can be made available in which levels of the data (Carmel, 2016). Therefore, ethicalconsideration is vital when conducting research. In this context, ethics are the norms of conductthat must be followed when conducting research as they aid in distinguishing between acceptableand unacceptable behaviors (Resnik, 2011). The
of their classroom will be conducted and filmed on aday where epistemic issues will be discussed. This researcher will prepare clips of moments inthe lesson pertinent to epistemic belief, such as discussions of assumptions or ethical dilemmas(often associated with safety and process decisions). A second interview will then be conductedwith this faculty member to discuss what thoughts and motivations were associated with thesemoments. Interviews will also be conducted with three students from each classroom in order tosee how these lessons were interpreted by the students.For the first interview, the protocol will largely follow the process described by Montfort et al.(2014), featuring semi-structured questions centered around Hofer’s (1997
about the value of the ECE profession, theirinterest in the class, and their intensions to persist. The surveys also measured personalendorsements including the importance of ethical considerations in engineering decisions,the value of professional skills compared to technical training, and empathy. Data analysisrevealed that among novice students, the more they believed that the ECE professionafforded opportunities to benefit society and work with others (i.e., had prosocial value), themore interested they were in the class and in turn, the more they intended to persist in theirECE degree program. This persistence intentions relationship was not true for studentbeliefs about the ECE profession affording opportunities to gain wealth, power, and
. Bill Gates came up for his service to society to improve societal conditions (e.g. global health and Gates scholars for low income students). Parents Mother or Father who were the primary caretakers and serve as an example of strong work ethics, risk taking and success. Parent(s) that took risks, such as immigrating to US to begin a career or seek a better life, starting their own business. Parent(s) that worked hard to endure economic hardship. Close Similar role model as a parent. They are role models of people that took risks Family such as starting their own business and were successful. Club Cub Scouts and Girl Scouts organization provided
embeddisciplines as distinct knowledge bases [7] and communities of practice [8].Figure 1 illustrates the intertwined evolution of a profession’s preparation and practice [9]. AsFigure 1 suggests, the enactment of a professional discipline is guided both by ethics andstandards of practice; these activities define competencies, job roles, and ultimately career paths.Professional societies codify these elements by defining ethics and competencies, but also byFigure 1. Model of a Professional Discipline [6]reflecting professional performance. Professional societies span another boundary:governmental. By promoting and facilitating certification and licensure, professional societieslegitimize and allow external bodies to monitor and enforce professional
Social factors Ethics, social systems, four public policy goals, public policy solutions Data security Threats, protection, response or recover, and social topicsProcedural analysis includes 11 short papers and a project. Unlike traditional classes whereassignments are isolated from other works, each paper will add towards the students’ projects.This way, students are not working on the project last-minute, and actively working towards afinal project product. The last type of analysis is the critical analysis. This ISAL class is anintroduction class to data science. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy, students are minimally expected tobe able to identify
enterthe STEM/knowledge workforce and/or graduate school. For three years, the program recruits acohort of 10 students/year who work on a number of advanced manufacturing related projects for10 weeks in the summer starting from last week of May through first week of August. Eachstudent has to complete both research ethics and lab safety training before starting their research.All students are mentored by a professor and also a graduate student. In other words, eachstudent has a faculty and as well as a graduate student mentor. For 2018 cohort, all facultymentors were from College of Engineering. The mentors guide the students in selecting theresearch project and also throughout the progress of the research. Students participate in weeklymeetings
engineering students should possess to successfully enter the labormarket. In the systematic review of Passow and Passow [4], planning and time management,problem-solving, communication and teamwork were identified as highly important byengineers. Identified as less, but still important, were ethics, lifelong learning, taking initiative,thinking creatively, and focusing on goals. Does this mean that engineering students needmore teamwork skills than lifelong learning skills? Or do students need to finish theireducational program with an advanced level mastery of lifelong learning and an expert levelmastery of teamwork? These questions raise the need to not just investigate the importanceof the competencies but also of the competency levels required