ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008, pp. xxi, 232 p.[7] S. L. Gassman, M. A. Maher, B. Timmerman, and C. E. Pierce, "Pedagogical Techniques to Promote Development of Graduate Engineering Students as Disciplinary Writers," (in English), 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 2013.[8] A. Lee and R. Murray, "Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers," (in English), Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 558-570, Sep 3 2015.[9] S. L. Gassman, M. A. Maher, and B. E. Timmerman, "Supporting Students' Disciplinary Writing in Engineering Education," (in English), International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1270-1280
incapable of learning or discerningfact from fiction without the assistance of an intellectually superior individual to teach them ordumb-down the material through parables or simplified rules. Patrick Quin describes Aquinas’Super de Trin.2.4 “that theological truth is best transmitted to the faithful in parabolic form… itmight, he thinks, confuse the uneducated who would misunderstand it and be ridiculed byunbelievers who detest it anyway” [10]. Aquinas states: “…it is said in Luke 8:10, ‘To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables.’ Therefore one ought by obscurity in speech conceal the sacred truths from the multitude” (Pars 1 q. 2 a. 4 s. c. 3). “…the words of a teacher ought
for Literacy (CCSS-L)—The NGSS includes CCSS-M and CCSS-L aligned with various PEs as evidenced in the connection boxes. 9. Carefully construct a storyline — The constructed storyline can begin from students’ prior ideas and evolve into sophisticated ideas of how student understanding, especially, the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs, may develop over time. 10. Ask the following question, “How do the lesson(s) help students move towards an understanding of the PEs?’’ — After completing the lesson development process, it is important to review the developed lesson plan and reconfirm that it can build students’ knowledge and comprehension of the PEs. Here, it is vital to unpack the development of lesson level PEs
outcome. Table 1 lists the learning outcomes for which a statistically significantimprovement ( α = 0.05 ) was observed.Table 1: Competencies for which students reported statistically significant increase inpercentage of “often” or “always” after having taken the Grand Challenges course. Category Learning OutcomeTeamwork ● Respond to conflicts in a helpful way ● Listen and consider different points of view and perspectivesEthics ● Identify a potential position on an issue and consider the ethical implication(s)Writing ● Revise a written piece to make improvements ● Integrate evidence from and cite or document sources ● Organize and synthesize information from sources to
.) - Cancellations - What is the best way to notify each other in case a meeting needs to be postponed? Will you use MentorCity messages to notify each other of changes? What is the length of notice required if unable to keep a meeting appointment? (Mentorship Program requirement: Mentee is responsible for logging the cancellation in the MentorCity system.) - (A) Agendas - How will the mentee share an agenda prior to each meeting? The professionally- formatted agenda can include updates, specific discussion topic(s), action items and setting the next meeting date. (B) Minutes - How will the mentee document and share minutes from each meeting? These professionally-formatted meeting minutes can include highlights
of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Design, Build, Fly (DBF)team competitions.For example, the US Air Force Academy (USAFA) possessed hands-on student satellite androcketry programs beginning in the mid-1990’s (one author was a founding member of theseefforts). The satellite program has been a robust multidisciplinary effort, involving cadets from theastronautical engineering major, as well as those from mechanical engineering, electricalengineering, computer engineering, space physics, and management majors. These satelliteprograms could span 1-2 academic years, with cadet teams of roughly 20-40 participating for upto 2 years (junior and senior years). Cadets receive formal course credit and participate in all phasesof the systems
coverage sometimes leads to more learning.After the introduction to course mapping, the presenters guided participants to first construct aconcept map for their course and identify connections. Lastly, the presenters briefly discussedthe use of visual syllabi.Day 1—Working Reception The objectives of Day 1’s last session were to network with members of other cohortsand the leadership team and discuss ideas for specific course development modules. Participantsreceived a homework assignment to complete before returning for Day 2: create a draft modulefor a particular course that incorporates EML and bring that module for peer feedback.Day 2—Incorporating Entrepreneurship and Innovation into the Classroom Day 2 began with a
decision making and risk management. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2015.[6] B. V. Koen, Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.[7] C. Murphy, P. Gardoni, and C. E. Harris, “Classification and moral evaluation of uncertainties in engineering modeling,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 553–570, Sep. 2011.[8] I. van de Poel, “Investigating ethical issues in engineering design,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 429, Sep. 2001.[9] NSPE, “Code of Ethics for engineers,” 2007.[10] D. R. Haws, “The importance of meta-ethics in engineering education,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 204–210, Jun. 2004.[11] J. S. Busby and M. Coeckelbergh
how best the curriculum might be changed, tobetter meet this goal. Given Mina’s criticism of engineering students that they are nottechnologically literate, higher education might begin with a general programme of liberaleducation as suggested by Heywood. That model through problem based/project learningprovides a range of contexts that, should in principle, deal with the problem of control indifferent contexts. But, as Cheville recognises this is becoming increasingly difficult becauseof the tension between the increasing gap between technological and educational capability.He suggests that we should all master some (rather than many) aspect(s) of episteme andtechne, and we should learn to teach that aspect within “communities in which
disciplines andpossibly implement surveys. The results reported are important to consider for the developmentand/or re-design of the engineering design curriculum to account for industrial demands as oftoday as well as overall program enhancement.References1. Sharunova, A., Butt, M., Kresta, S., Carey, J., P., Wyard-Scott, L., Adeeb, S., Blessing, L. M., & Qureshi, A. J. (2017). Cognition and transdisciplinary design: An educational framework for undergraduate engineering design curriculum development. In Proceedings of Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference 2017.2. Gericke, K., & Blessing, L. (2012). An analysis of design process models across disciplines
, June), Prototyping Strategies: Literature Review andIdentification of Critical Variables Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21848[7] Wettergreen, M., & Hinds, T. J. (2016, June), Rapidly Deployable Prototyping Activities toTeach Engineering Design. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26036[8] Elegoo EL-KIT-003 UNO Project Super Starter Kit with Tutorial for Arduino available fromAmazon. https://www.amazon.com/Elegoo-Project-Starter-Tutorial-Arduino/dp/B01D8KOZF4/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1511792853&sr=1-1-spons&keywords=elegoo+arduino+uno&psc=1 [Accessed: 24- Jan 2019][9
encourage instructors to engage more often in interrogative approaches to learning, rather thanlimiting themselves to the easier, but possibly less substantive, interactions that might occur in aFigure 8: Timeline of interactions in traditional classroom and Live Platform environment for in-struction of identical content by the same instructor over a 10-minute interval. Instructor speakingis shown in orange and student(s) speaking is shown in blue.Table 4: Comparison of interactions in traditional classroom and Live Platform environment forinstruction of identical content by the same instructor over a 10-minute interval. Activity Traditional classroom Live Platform environment total
of the Project Management and Quality Research Group, and member of the Organisation, Quality and Environment Cooperation Group at the same University. Her current research fields of interest are competencies and professional skills applied to Project Management in multicultural contexts and for international development projects and qual- ity management. Currently she has a management position as Associate Vice Rector for Academic and International planning at UPM.Dr. Luis Ballesteros-S´anchez, Universidad Polit´ecnica de Madrid Luis Ballesteros-Sanchez is an industrial engineer and PhD from the Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, and holds a Master’s degree in the psychology of human behavior. He is Assistant
. Bairaktarova, “Teacher Learner, Learner Teacher:Parallels and Dissonance in an Interdisciplinary Design Education Minor,” IEEE Transactions onEducation, vol. PP, pp. 1–10, 2019.[17] S. H. Frost, P. M. Jean, D. Teodorescu, and A. B. Brown, “Research at the Crossroads: HowIntellectual Initiatives across Disciplines Evolve,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 27, no.4, pp. 461–479, 2004.[18] D. D. Gillette, E. Lowham, and M. Haungs, “When the Hurly-Burly’s Done, of Battles Lostand Won: How a Hybrid Program of Study Emerged from the Toil and Trouble of StirringLiberal Arts into an Engineering Cauldron at a Public Polytechnic,” Engineering Studies, vol. 6,no. 2, pp. 108–129, 2014.[19] L. D. McNair, C. Newsander, D. Boden, and M. Borrego, “Student and
identifyingbarriers and facilitators to students’ motivation by focusing on the basic needs of autonomy,competence and relatedness. In addition SDT is also a useful framework for pedagogicalinnovation that curriculum developments can use for the development of motivating andstudents centered learning contexts.References[1] M. Baeten, E. Kyndt, K. Struyven, and F. Dochy, “Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 243–260, 2010.[2] L. Postareff, A. Parpala, and S. Lindblom-Ylänne, “Factors contributing to changes in a deep approach to learning in different learning environments,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol
: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06016 [12] Edwards, M., Roy, S. (2017) Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science in the 21st Century. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1): 51-61. [13] Roy, S and Edwards, M. (2019) Citizen Science During the Flint, Michigan Federal Water Emergency: Ethical Dilemmas and Lessons Learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 12, pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.154[14] United Nations (2017) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017. New York: UN. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2017/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport201
is manager of HM&S IT-Consulting and provides services for Automotive SPiCE, ISO 15504+33000 and CMMI in the role of assessor and instructor. He performed more than 100 process assessments in software development departments for different companies in the finance, insurance, research, automotive, and automation sector. Currently, his main occupation is a consulting project for process improvement for an automobile supplier. On Fridays, he is teaching computer science introductory and programming courses at Joanneum University of Applied Sciences in Graz, Austria. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Investigation of the transition from order to chaos using a numerical
separate NetworkPolicy interface would alsoenable the system to handle specialized user interfaces; e.g., administrator, instructor. The latterwould be particularly relevant to provide real time statistics on the system to instructors andpotentially empower them to affect the system while it is running.4 System configurationSystem initialization is done through a set of configuration files, among which there should beone root file. This root file is provided as file://, http(s):// or ftp:// URL to the EvoParsons jar. Thisjar represents the server-side component of our project. A few scripts are meant to facilitate Table 1: Components of EvoParsons system and their purpose Interface/class Meaning
each competency, but we encouraged students to be creativeand make it their own. Question prompts guided students to define thecompetency, identify at least one experience and artifact that best exemplifiedtheir competency in each of the five areas, and then to reflect either in a writtenstatement or with multiple media on how that competency was developed throughthe experience(s), showing links between experience and learning.Students earned the distinction of Grand Challenge Scholar if they completed anePortfolio by April of 2018 that drew upon at least five experiences to showevidence of the five program competencies. Those who completed portfolios wererecognized at an academic awards ceremony, received a special cord to wear atcommencement