experiences and training.Dr. Stephanie Marie Kusano, University of Michigan Stephanie Kusano is an assessment specialist at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching at University of Michigan. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, M.S. in Biomedical Engineering, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, all from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include engaged learning and high impact practices, assessment, and learning analytics. Her teaching experience has primarily been with first-year engineering.Dr. Tershia A. Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan Tershia Pinder-Grover is the Director of the Center for Research on Learning in Teaching in Engineering (CRLT-Engin) at the University of Michigan (U-M). She
presentations and were expected to prepare students for theircapstone project thoroughly.Objective of the paperThis paper describes a relatively new and growing program (PMT) at KSP and uses a multi-disciplinaryteam-taught course (COT 706) as a case study to reflect on the outcomes from implementing industryadvisory board's recommendations. While low student enrollments characterize the program/course, theexperience and process involved in the design of COT 706 provide valuable insights on pedagogy, team-teaching, and best practices for student learning.The purpose of this pedagogical research study is to assess using COT 706 course whether a team-taught8-week hybrid format accomplishes the objectives of providing the flexibility in format and skill
approaches for developing an identity to their impact onengineering identity development. This research paper investigates the difference in students’engineering identity, engineering performance/competence, engineering interest, recognition inengineering, and affect towards six professional engineering practices in two differenceengineering departments: a traditional program that implicitly supports engineering identityformation and a non-traditional program that explicitly supports engineering identity formation.Survey data was collected from a total of 184 students (153 from the traditional department and31 from the non-traditional department). Using independent samples t-tests, results show thatengineering identity was higher for students in the
insights were provided by the literature on best studying practices, curricula of similarprograms at analogous institutions, and students’ performance on individual exam questions inone gateway course. Two SMEs were STEM professors (one in mathematics and one inbioengineering) who contributed to the design of Rice’s STEM summer bridge program (theRice Emerging Scholars Program), and the third was a director of Rice’s programming for less-prepared STEM students. The mathematics professor, who has worked at Rice University since1988 and is past chair of the mathematics department, is also co-founder and faculty director ofthe university’s NSF-funded STEM four-year transition program. The bioengineering professorco-designed a first-year engineering
Paper ID #26927Board 68: Problem-Solving Rationales of Practicing Transportation and Hy-draulic Engineers When Provided Multiple Contextual RepresentationsDr. Masoud Ghodrat Abadi, California State University, Sacramento Masoud Ghodrat Abadi is an assistant professor in Civil Engineering at California State University, Sacra- mento. He received his PhD in 2018 from Oregon State University. He is a member of standing committee on Education and Training in Transportation Research Board (TRB).Mr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil
Paper ID #27445Positionality: The Stories of Self that Impact OthersCynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech ynthia Hampton is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as program and student support for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED). While at Virginia Tech, Cynthia has directed summer bridge programs, led peer support initia- tives for underrepresented groups, and served on various commissions, committees, and research groups focused on student support, organizational change, graduate student policy, and culturally responsive evaluation
. Specifically, we note the ways in which tension occurred during the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis in engineering education research and how our process of addressing these tensions transfers to other cultural contexts [11]. 2. Making Sense of Missingness. This paper collates best practices regarding missing data, e.g. checking amounts of missingness and when to practice data imputation. In addition to detailing the missingness analyses conducted within this project, it also acts as a resource for others in engineering education and provides R code for other researchers to use [26].Future WorkAnalyses of Phase 2 data are continuing, with an ultimate goal of producing a testable model topredict and
Paper ID #25480Board 20: Engagement in Practice: First Year Students as ”Engineer for aDay” for Middle School StudentsDr. Cynthia Helen Carlson PE, PhD, Merrimack College Dr. Carlson worked as a water resources engineer for 10 years prior to earning her doctorate, contributing to improved water management in communities within the United States, Middle East, and Singapore. She has been a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) since 2002. Dr. Carlson’s research interests are broadly characterized as ’how civil engineering impacts public health’, and include storm water man- agement, modeling environment/engineering/social
accomplish a mode valueof at least 4 initially. Of course, the ultimate goal is to attain a mode value of 5 in all thefour.VARK Data Analysis Looking at the bar chart displayed in Appendix F we see that Visual (V) andKinesthetic (K) modes recorded Likert Scale mode values of 5. This is to be expected in an engineering classroom. We need to remember that we aretrying to assess the impact of delivery styles. Topics in the area of Advanced EngineeringMathematics are best learnt when students actually see and do. Hands – on learning tools helped the students understand the material better. Thisincluded Power Point Presentations, EXCEL spreadsheet exercises, Problem – Solving Sessions,Practical Applications, Mathematical Analogies
. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sus- tainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework.Mr. Charles McDonald Cowan II, Wake Forest University Mack Cowan is a recent graduate of James Madison University’s
-accredited engineering or computing programs, but two teams constructingaugmented-reality historical simulations include students majoring in History and GeospatialInformation Science. Most projects have external sponsors - typically a government agency thatappoints a senior engineer to serve as the customer. These customers provide project ideas, inputon scope and requirements, and financial support for equipment and travel.We have formulated an iterative “agile-waterfall” design process combining the traditional“waterfall” design practice found in engineering with agile methodology common to softwaredesign [8], [9]. This process encourages rapid prototyping and short term goal-setting (through aseries of “sprints”) and requires our students to
KU Civil, Environmental, and Ar- chitectural Engineering department, with a specialty in structural engineering and bridge structures. She works closely with KU Engineering’s post-doctoral Teaching Fellow and oversees the overall Engaged Learning Initiative in the School of Engineering. Caroline is responsible for overseeing KU Engineer- ing’s active-learning classroom design and usage, prioritizing course assignments in the active-learning classrooms, helping faculty to advance their pedagogy by incorporating best practices, and advancing implementation of student-centered, active-learning approaches in the School of Engineering. Caroline is also active in contributing to university-level discussions in the area
Surveys, Dimensions of Success (DoS) Observation tool, pre/post topic self-efficacy, and survey student interviews. The results showed that engineering design activitieshad a positive impact on attitude towards STEM learning and careers. Integration ofengineering design principles, student demographics and evaluation instruments and resultsare discussed in this paper.IntroductionEngineering is a natural platform for the integration of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) content into K-12 classrooms, while sparking creativity amongst youngminds. Research around effective learning in K-12 classrooms demonstrates that anengineering approach to identifying and solving problems is valuable across all disciplines.Educators and
engineering education. Kitana is an active member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) at WSU, and serves as their Graduate Student Chair for the 2018-19 academic year.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State
Carpenter and Raymond Hansen* {carpentera1, hansenr2}@wit.edu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering *Dept. of Computer Science and Networking Wentworth Institute of TechnologyAs cybersecurity grows as a specialty within electrical and computer engineering and computerscience, students increasingly choose to pursue projects in the area. These projects come in theform of class projects, senior design/capstone projects, and extracurricular research of varyingdegrees of difficulty and sub-genres of cybersecurity. However, it is easy for these cybersecurityprojects to put students in danger of violating laws or compromising equipment; thus, it is
given for Nicole to comment on the interview based on herunderstanding of experiential shame and to share any new insights. The interview lasted onehundred minutes.Data analysisAlthough Nicole’s interview was professionally transcribed, Mackenzie began her role asprimary data analyst in the study by completing a second iteration of transcribing the audio fileto ensure that the authenticity of the interview event was well-represented in the transcript. Inaccord with best practices of IPA research, she then completed thorough annotations of thetranscript, noting descriptive, linguistic, and conceptual comments throughout [19,20].After performing this level of analysis, designed to critically engage her with Nicole’sexperiences in shame, Mackenzie
for Teaching and Learning in Engineering at the University of Louisville. Her research includes studying changes in science and engineering teacher practice, best practices in teacher professional learning experiences, teacher and student learning in mathematical and computational think- ing, and the use of undergraduate learning assistants in introductory STEM coursework. Address: Depart- ment of Middle and Secondary Education, Porter Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292 Phone: 502.852.3948 Email: sbphil02@louisville.eduDr. Jason Immekus, University of Louisville c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What can we learn from a
entire SUNY system. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME Mechanisms and Robotics committee and served as the Program Chair for the 2014 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, as the Conference Chair for the 2015 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and has served as symposium and session chairs for many ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. He was the general Conference Co-Chair for the 2016 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC/CIE). He has won two SUNY Research Foundation Technology Accelerator Fund (TAF) awards, which helped bring a multifunctional Sit-to-Stand assistive device ( http://www.mobilityassist.net ) to the market. The device won
the workshopvenues and formats to reach a range of faculty types and disciplines. In addition, a secondworkshop will be conducted to help identify best practices in URE program design and mentoring.This workshop will be open to current URE administrators. We anticipate that their reflections onour model and findings will lead to additional ‘best practices’ for URE implementation that can bedistributed for first time administrators.AcknowledgementsThis research was funded through a grant from the National Science Foundation (Award #1531607 and 1531641).References[1] J. Fuchs, A. Kouyate, L. Kroboth, and W. McFarland, “Growing the pipline of diverse HIV investigators: The impact of mentored research experiences to engage
different tools and machines for prototyping and manufacturing,ranging from simple hand-tools like screwdrivers to high-tech 3D printers. These facilities allowfor plenty of hands-on experience and bring together diverse groups of people, promoting studentinteraction and the exchange of ideas, where the benefits of physical modeling and communitiesof practice are well-documented [6].The literature addressing the impact of makerspaces on engineering students continues to growand is an active area of research. Studies have shown these facilities have a number of positiveeffects on users. Early exposure to hands-on, team-based design work has been shown toimprove retention rates for engineering students [7]. Surveys have shown users feel these
Paper ID #27514The Impact of Participation in Multiple International Learning Experiencesfor Engineering StudentsJiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Miss Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yaxin Huang received a Bachelor’s degree in
practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering stu- dents’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2016 American Society of Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Best Paper Award and the 2018 Benjamin J. Dasher Best Paper Award for the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
improve learningand retention in STEM with particular impact on underrepresented groups [1]. However, despiteadvances in classroom design for interactive teaching and pockets of enthusiastic adopters, thechallenge to bridge the gap from research results to common classroom practice remains.Workshops to introduce evidence-based teaching practices are prevalent, but one-time effortsrarely result in sustained change, and hence ongoing support is needed [2], [3].The study presented in this paper takes place in the context of the SIMPLE Design model forfaculty development, which was studied in implementation over a two-year period [4]. Asdescribed in more detail in the next section, the SIMPLE Design model employs ongoingdiscipline-based faculty
and Evaluation Gale A. Mentzer, PhD, the owner and director of Acumen Research and Evaluation, has been a profes- sional program evaluator since 1998. She holds a PhD in Educational Research and Measurement from The University of Toledo and a Master of Arts in English Literature and Language—a unique combination of specializations that melds quantitative and qualitative methodologies. She and has extensive experience in the evaluation of projects focused on STEM education including evaluations of several multi-million dollar federally funded projects. Previously she taught graduate level courses for the College of Education at The University of Toledo in Statistics, Testing and Grading, Research Design, and Program
, we designed asurvey targeting graduating senior students. These senior students have experienced all thecomputational modules throughout their curriculum and, therefore, best represent the studentsaffected by the SIIP project. This survey was distributed in the Materials Design course (MSE395), which is a required course for all senior MSE students. The survey focuses on three majorparts: (1) Computational learning experience; (2) Research and job hunting experience; and (3)Attitude towards computational tools. We received 32 responses out of a class of 103students.5.1 Computational learning experienceTo understand the influence of computational modules on student learning throughout thecurriculum, we asked the following three questions
in the workforce and their daily life. She is a subject matter expert in product design/development and digital engineering/manufacturing especially from prototype or service to marketplace. Prior to joining NTID, Dannels worked for several engineering corporations.Mr. Chris Campbell, Rochester Institute of Technology Chris Campbell is a Research Associate Professor with the Center on Access Technology at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, one of the colleges at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research and development focus is on access technologies that will positively impact post-secondary educational experiences for deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals.Mr. Brian Trager, Rochester Institute of
Ph.D. levels and enter the world of research. However, some of themdo not have an appreciation for the nature of research. To remedy this situation, faculty couldrecommend to these students to visit research labs of different faculty members and volunteer toconduct a short research project. This short research project could be defined by faculty membersas a senior design project for a student team that would be conducted over two academic termsand require 10 hours work per week. The method of involvement of undergraduate students inresearch by faculty members may be one of the key determining factors to motivate them tocontinue their education. Although there are many general studies evaluating the impact ofacademic advising on the students
industrialengineering and industrial engineering technology. There were no recent articles for curriculumreform for industrial engineering technology curricula. The authors did find articles discussingcurriculum redesign for industrial engineering programs. Researchers at a medium-sized privateuniversity in the northeast United States applied a systems engineering approach to develop anew industrial engineering curriculum. They designed a “flexible” program with acceleratedgraduate programs, a second major, various minor options, study-abroad programs, and practicalhands-on education [4]. Another article investigated how industrial engineering education inSouth Africa is embracing Industry 4.0. The study found that technical universities are morepositively
Paper ID #26427Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income,Rural STEM Students SucceedDr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
microsensors for in situ investigation of physical and chemical dynamics in microenvironments (e.g., biofilm, corrosion, emulsions, or plant) by combining with nano and biotechnology. His other research interest is to develop renewable (bio)energy processes for environmental sustainability. He is currently a registered professional engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Promoting Undergraduate Research and Education through Extracurricular EPA P3 ProjectsIntroduction and ObjectivesThe importance of multi-interdisciplinary design experiences is well-highlighted in the ASCEBody of Knowledge [1] and the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission [2]. However