homogeneous groups [1, 2]. Yet, little empirical research has been devoted tointernational heterogeneous groups composed of different ethnicities and races, namely to howthese differences effect group effectiveness. Therefore, this research tries to narrow this gap andshed light on an exploration of international group analysis. At best, this research may serve asan engine to initiate more research with non-European American groups and understand theexpansive nature of human relations and interaction within international heterogeneous groups’domains. The aim of this paper is to examine the group dynamics of an international research groupcomposed of heterogeneous members. In this study, group dynamics refer to group effectivenesswhich is defined
development, and performancemanagement [1]. Competency models’ content is widely used in business for defining andassessing hard and soft competencies within organizations. Some competency model creatorschoose to build visual depictions of competencies; however, competency model creators rarelyexplain how these illustrations are to be interpreted or comparative advantage their visual modelprovides readers. Likewise, researchers have not explored how or whether these illustrationseffectively transmit their intended messages.Among the industries that have embraced competency models is advanced manufacturing (AM).AM covers new industrial processes that improve upon traditional methods in quality, speed, andcost. High-performance computing harnesses
integrated into web-based interactive textbooks and been viewed 30 million timesby over 500,000 students across 600 universities. The philosophy includes two general actions:Unveiling a complex concept, and visualizing a dynamic process. This paper describes thatanimation format philosophy, including pedagogical considerations made in designinganimations, multiple examples, and reasons for implementing an animation.1. IntroductionAnimations have increasingly been incorporated into learning materials to help explain difficultor hard-to-visualize concepts. Video-based animations have long been used to teach science andliberal arts topics [1][2][3], but as computer use has increased in classrooms, computer-basedanimations have been introduced to
focus primarily on mobile applicationdevelopment itself. These students, the makers of the future mobile technology, who areinvolved in app creation – from defining the concept to requirements gathering, to finalimplementation – takes into consideration how the app will work successfully and effectively.However, their design decisions are not always made thinking about how the application willinfluence the user, the community, and the society at large. To address this critical issue, in thispaper, we report our experience with weaving the notion of social and ethical computing whiledesigning and developing an upper-level computer science course on mobile questionnairedevelopment. Our primary course goals were twofold: 1) Teach students the
(TUEE) effort, representatives from industry rated systems thinking as ahigh priority for engineering education [1]. Even more noteworthy, this industry survey ratedsystems knowledge as more critical than “understanding of design.” According to these industryrespondents, “problems and challenges are generally system problems.” Industry representativesalso advocated for introducing students to systems concepts early in undergraduate engineeringprograms [1].Systems thinking also provides a means to develop the technological and engineering literacy ofnon-engineers. In Technically Speaking: Why all Americans need to know more abouttechnology [2], the NAE advocated a wider understanding of technology broadly defined as theproducts of all the
KSU in August 1999, Dr. Warren was a Principal Member of the Tech- nical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that support biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and
are compiled and presented in this paper, and show broadimprovement across a variety of subjects. The introduction of project-based learning with anemphasis on engineering communication skills in AE 100 has improved the experience of thestudents in the Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Illinois.1. IntroductionFirst-year students in the aerospace engineering program at the University of Illinois are stronglyencouraged to take Aerospace Engineering 100, a two-hour introductory course during their firstsemester. This class introduces students to aspects of aeronautical and astronautical engineeringthrough team-based competitive projects. Prior to this effort these projects had majordeficiencies, and the researchers used the
paper presents the results of converting several modules in an undergraduate engineeringcourse in a “flipped classroom”. The target course is EET 316 - Digital Design. This course is afour credit junior level course (theory-3 credits, lab-1 credit) for electrical and computerengineering technology majors at Farmingdale State College-State University of New York. Thecourse introduces students to VHDL Hardware Description Language as the design entry methodfor digital circuits and to Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) platforms for theimplementation of the circuits, using Xilinx design tools.The students enrolled in this course have a large range of skills in term of experience withlaboratory equipment, computer-based-tools, programming
: persistence, peer interaction, belonging, international studentsIntroductionThe United States (U.S.) faces an urgent national need to increase both the diversity and numberof graduates to meet science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforcedemands and address societal problems [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The need for more constructorsis timely due to the role of these professionals in repairing and rebuilding nationalinfrastructure—an enormous U.S. challenge given the number of infrastructure systems ratedbelow a C grade on the ASCE Infrastructure Report Card [7]. One way to increase the numbersof constructors is by improving the quality of their educational experiences.While there are a multitude of ways to frame quality of
changed how products are built. Products can now becustomized to meet the unique demands of the consumer. Automobiles, for example, were onceassembled to be identical, whereas now customers are able to purchase cars online, select from apallet of colors, and install unique features and equipment, whereby no two of the same product,make, or model are identical [1].While both types of manufacturing remain essential to the industry, advanced manufacturing hascreated a need for technicians with new skillsets. Technologies such as 3D printing, the Internetof Things (IoT), nanotechnology, cloud computing, augmented reality, and next-level robotics,have made a home in advanced manufacturing, resulting in increased speed, customization,precision, and
in order to equip students to create various practical applicationsusing ARM Cortex M4F processors as well.The microcontroller architecture course (ESET 349) covers Verilog Hardware DescriptionLanguage (HDL), MIPS (Microprocessor without Interlocked Pipelined Stages), and ARMarchitectures. Students learn about these Instruction set architectures (ISAs) through assemblylanguages [1-3]. This course is a prerequisite for the next microcontroller application course,Embedded System Software (ESET 369). In this course, a TI MSP430 architecture is coveredfirst, and students learn the ISA through a low-level assembly language. Next, the ARM Cortex © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
recommendations observed appeared to be better applied to a typical business administration orconstruction management course of study. The amounts and types of credit recommended by ACEreviewers is also discussed, and recommendations are made to help direct warrant officers exiting theservice towards the shortest path to a four-year degree.IntroductionWarrant officers in the United States Army are a special type of soldier. The job specialties filled bywarrant officers are technical, the Army’s mechanics [1]. These specialties do not require a four-yeardegree prior to entering the service as is typical for commissioned officers. Many warrant officers do nothave four-year degrees. They work in technical job fields and receive military training in their
demands for qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)workers continue to increase, supporting diverse groups of students towards success in STEMmay help mitigate future shortfalls in the STEM workforce. Education benefits like the post 9/11GI Bill may provide a viable pathway for increasing the STEM-qualified, engineering technician,engineering technologist, and engineer (ETETE) workforce through the nation’s veteranpopulation. Supporting student veterans along ETETE pathways may involve three key tasks: 1)building early awareness of ETETE pathways; 2) ensuring academic recognition for priormilitary work experience; and 3) providing seamless support from government agencies,academic institutions, and industry. Student
Cooperation Committee. Recently, he has been appointed as a member of the Science, Technology and Innovative Technology Policies Committee of the Presidency. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019ASELSAN ACADEMY: A NEW MODEL IN INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA PARTNERSHIPIntroductionFrom the past to the present, technological and economic development has been stronglylinked with productive industry-academia partnership (IAP) [1]. Countries have tried todevelop methods that suits well to their own resources, geography, culture and principles andthen improve them in time.In this paper, Aselsan Academy, formed by Aselsan Inc. and four major Turkish researchuniversities is introduced. Firstly, employed
through the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) for theEngineering Physics program. Because ABET similarly offers accreditation for Physicsprograms through their Applied and Natural Science Accreditation Commission (ANSAC), wewill also seek ABET accreditation for our Physics program. The decision to seek accreditationfor both is feasible and practical because there is a significant amount of overlap between thecurriculum for the Physics and the Engineering Physics programs as well as overlap between theEAC’s and ANSAC’s Criterion 3, Student Learning Outcomes [1]. In an effort to streamlineassessment efforts for the two programs, while meeting the Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)from two different ABET commissions, it is our goal to
their finalgrades, which indicates that the students’ positive response on their learning experience was found to beindependent of their letter grade.Key Words: ethics education, engineering ethics, online learning, survey, correlationIntroductionEthics is defined as the “science of morals” or the “study of morals”, which dates back to the famous workof Aristotle, “Nicomachean Ethics”[1]. Oxford defines the term as “Moral principles that govern a person'sbehavior or the conducting of an activity.” [2]. While its etymology addresses the field of study and themodern definition targets the individual, ethics is of the up-most importance for the individual, as well asthe organization that the individual works for, and for the community/society that
education.Ala Qattawi, University of ToledoProf. Sachin Goyal, University of California, Merced Sachin Goyal is faculty member in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Califor- nia, Merced. He has research interests in the areas of continuum mechanics, dynamics and controls with applications to several engineering and biological systems. He started a research program on Biomechan- ics and Mechanobiology at UC Merced with two ongoing research directions (http://me.ucmerced.edu/research- areas/biomechanics-and-mechano-biology): 1. Understanding biomechanical symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease from the perspective of feedback control theory 2. Modeling constitutive laws of biological filaments from their
EngineeringIntroductionGraduate student instructors are essential to the teaching team at many research institutions.They often lead laboratories, discussion sessions, and/or hold office hours; and are the primaryliaison between students and faculty. As such, they not only influence student learning, but theycan also be agents of change and improve student retention [1]. Therefore, the training of studentinstructors is critical to enhancing the student experience as well as the classroom climate.Additionally, meaningful assessment of student instructor professional development is criticalfor ensuring quality of such training.To support their key role in the teaching-learning environment, the College of Engineering (CoE)at the University of Michigan requires training of
transferrable transdisciplinary graduate education and researchprogram to produce the next generation of researchers, educators, and decision makers focusedon dynamic collaborations across not only academic disciplines, but also among stakeholders.We are particularly interested in bringing together researchers, policy makers, and communitystakeholders in ways that foster mutual respect and value, and that adhere to the needs, goals,and engagement of the individuals most impacted by disasters.Previous work on disaster resilience demonstrates the importance of interdisciplinary teams indeveloping resilient solutions and effectively managing risk [1]. Disasters are complex problemsthat require solutions and collaboration from a wide-range of disciplines
underrepresented in engineering fields. According to the National Academy ofEngineering’s (NAE) [1] renewed call for change, “Only 40 to 60 percent of enteringengineering students persist to an engineering degree, and women and minorities are at the lowend of that range. These retention rates represent an unacceptable systems failure to supportstudent learning in the field [...] Without refocusing and reshaping the undergraduate engineeringlearning experience, America’s engineering preeminence could be lost [by 2020].” Prior researchstudies had discovered this trend and tried to interpret it in their own way [2], [3]. Some, e.g.,[2], [4], sought to substantiate further the narrative of why retention of engineering students islow, but few consider identity
NEWT’s logicmodel, and they are to (1) provide community college students, especially from underrepresentedminorities in science and engineering (URM), with professional research experience in NEWTlaboratories, (2) improve the program participants' communication skills, specifically posterelaboration and presentation, (3) increase the number of URM students choosing to pursuecareers or graduate studies in NEWT-related STEM fields, and (4) improve the mentorship skillsof NEWT graduate students and postdocs participating as mentors. The NEWT REU program isrun by NEWT staff from Rice and the participants are placed for ten weeks in NEWTlaboratories at ASU, Rice, and UTEP, where they are generally mentored by graduate students.From the inception of
course performance and that low confidence is a hindranceto successful performance. Differences in the roles of problem-solving strategies for engineeringstudents in physics compared to thermodynamics suggest that students use these strategiesdifferently in those courses.1.0 IntroductionLearning to solve problems is possibly the most prevalent skill that engineering students practice[1] [2] during undergraduate training. Especially in the first few years of undergraduateeducation, students spend considerable time observing instructors solve problems in theclassroom, studying worked examples in textbooks, and solving problem sets for homework.Because solving basic computational problems is considered a foundation for subsequentprofessional
asked toreview the code of ethics’ first canon. After reviewing the canon, students were directed toreflect on the conflict between safety and welfare and to keep this in mind during their designs.Groups of students from years 1, 2 and 3 of the undergraduate program were surveyed.The responses of students that did not review the canon were compared with those that did.Student responses were in the form of a number of helical piles to use for each design. Theproblems were designed to be technically similar. The responses show that students, across allyears in the program and independent of whether they reviewed the first canon, used a higherfactor of safety for the less wealthy client (the home) compared to the wealthy client (the pool).Using
engineering, highway design. engineering management, geographic information systems, and land surveying. He has served in numerous leadership positions in ITE, ASCE and TRB. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Students’ Prior Knowledge and Learning in an Undergraduate Engineering Management Course for Civil EngineersAbstractThe objectives of this study were (1) to use a pre-test to assess the knowledge of CivilEngineering students at The Citadel in their understanding of engineering management topicsprior to taking a required junior-level course in engineering management, and (2) to use a post-test to assess student learning as a result
relates to the expandingemployment opportunities related to data analysis skills. Further, these results may help toinform potential programmatic evaluations and changes.BackgroundDuring the last three decades, there has been controversy about what data analysis knowledge isrequired by engineers in order to make sound decisions. An important precedent to the modernABET criteria asserted that engineers should appreciate five aspects of statistics [1]: • the omnipresence of variability, • the use of graphical tools such as histograms, scatterplots and control charts, • the concepts related to statistical inference, • the importance and elements of well-planned experimental designs, and • philosophies of data quality derived from
physics requirements and have taken courses in Statics,Materials and Manufacturing, and a two-course sequence in Computer-Aided Design (CAD).In the past, ET 349 focused almost exclusively on machine shop practice and the use of NCmachine tools. Assignments focused on selection of cutting tools and process conditions, use ofCAM tools, NC programming, and operation of Haas NC mills and lathes. Lab assignmentsconsisted of a series of small machining projects in which students followed step-by-stepinstructions to make a pre-designed product. Table 1 lists the topics covered in the courseduring the past few years.In Fall 2017, a change in instructors presented the opportunity to update the content andstructure of the course. It was decided that the
students in the traditional sections (i.e., the control group) versus thoseof the students in the Peer Instruction section (i.e., the experimental group). The learninggains were measured by pre/post application of an adapted version of the DIRECT conceptinventory which was translated into Spanish. Preliminary results suggest that theimplementation of a Peer Instruction approach in an electric circuit analysis courseimproves the performance of students on the adapted version of the DIRECT test.1. INTRODUCTIONElectric circuit analysis is a common topic in electrical engineering undergraduateprograms worldwide. Although there is abundant educational literature on the adoption ofinnovative pedagogical strategies for teaching this topic, courses on
wanted faster, and overall advance in their careers.IntroductionAn engineering capstone design project is meant to be the culminating achievement ofgraduating senior undergraduate students as they demonstrate their competency of designingeconomically feasible solutions to complex and interdisciplinary problems [1]. As such,capstone projects are meant to provide real-world experience with a clear objective for solving apractical problem where a team of students use their engineering knowledge and use their skillsto solve an unstructured problem [2]. However, the project experience can be disappointing, andan invaluable learning opportunity undermined if students are not provided with challengingprojects and lack the guidance of a rigorous problem
in Engineering Mechanics at Iowa State University (ISU). Her research expertise includes ”Resilient and Sustainable Civil Infrastructures” and ”Smart Materials for Structural Health Monitoring”. In addition to her academic experiences, Dr. Nazari worked as a structural design engineer for five years, where she participated in several seismic rehabilitation projects. Her recent research grants and awards include SB-1 California Transportation grant, ASCE Fresno Best Research Project, SEI/ASCE Young Professional Scholarship, and ISU’s Research Excellence award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Assessing the networking preferences and resource satisfaction among engineering
the field of engineeringeducation more broadly.IntroductionEngineers require precision and reliability in the tools they use to conduct research. For instance,the optimal design of planning vessels that transport goods around the world relies on theconsistency of repeated particle image velocimetry measurements of flow characteristics arounda ship [1, 2]. Yet much work is still required to develop tools for use in engineering educationthat meet the same rigorous standards of accuracy and repeatability when it comes to theassessment of student outcomes [3-5].The attempts in engineering education to meet the demands of accountability and to provideassurances in the assessment of student knowledge have been marked by several components.There are