Paper ID #26585Know Your Role! Defining Faculty and External Stakeholder Roles in a Mul-tidisciplinary Capstone CourseDr. David Paul Harvie, United States Military Academy David Harvie is an active duty Army officer and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy. David has a Ph.D. in Com- puter Science from the University of Kansas, a M.S. in Computer Science from North Carolina State University, and a B.S. in Computer Science from the United States Military Academy.Dr. Tanya Thais Estes, United States Military Academy Tanya Estes has a Ph.D
engineering,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 255–263, May 2005.[22] P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Assessment and Classroom Learning,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–74, Mar. 1998.[23] National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2000.[24] D. Fisher and N. Frey, Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2015.[25] A. Erlinger, “Outcomes Assessment in Undergraduate Information Literacy Instruction: A Systematic Review,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 79, no. 4, May 2018.[26] C. R. Henrie, L. R. Halverson, and C. R
, a Designer, and a tenure track Assistant Professor at Mississippi State Uni- versity. She believes that well-designed digital experiences and technology can improve the quality of human living, and her goal is to design, make, and create things that have an impact on society. Having this personal mission statement in mind, her design and research have been focusing on human-centered design for the greater good. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Measuring Individuals’ Systems Thinking Skills through the Development of an Immersive Virtual Reality Complex System ScenariosAbstractThe proposed virtual reality (VR) gaming scenario provides a virtual profile that assesses
students to establishsuch a mental model using solid mechanics concepts is a reasonable approach, which may benefitstudents in their entire engineering career. As shown in Figure 6, fundamental concepts inmechanics can be completely separate in students’ mind before they have a firm understanding oftheir meaning. The M3E approach is expected to help students connect these abstract concepts anddevelop their mental model to represent a network of such complex concepts. A well-developedconcept map, externalization of the mental representation, will show the fundamentalunderstanding of these concepts. Once students have such capability, they can easily adapt it forother engineering applications. The effectiveness of the proposed M3E approach will be
Paper ID #25251Developing a Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient andSustainable InfrastructureProf. Carla Lopez del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Carla Lopez del Puerto is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying at The University of Puerto Rico - Mayag¨uez.Prof. Humberto Eduardo Cavallin, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus Experienced Faculty with a demonstrated history of working in the higher education industry. Strong education professional with a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) focused in Design Theory and Methods in Architecture from
Paper ID #25079Direct and Indirect Assessment of Student Perspectives and Performance inan Online / Distance Education Chemical Engineering Bridging CourseDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at NC State University where he teaches courses in Material and Energy Balances, Unit Op- erations, Transport Phenomena and Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished
cohort of secondary level math and science teachers,the research team concluded that more hands-on manipulatives would be required to support ahigher level of engagement necessary to bring IoT-based building automation and energymanagement into their classrooms. Specifically, the team agreed that having a buildingautomation and IoT house that could be used by the teachers would significantly improve andaccelerate the engineering concepts and processes. With this goal in mind, the team looked atseveral implementation paths to create such structures. The ESET, MMET and MXET programsused their Capstone Design Project students to design, implement and document prototypes ofthese structures. These included three different levels of capability and
technology practitioners along with others interested in thestate of engineering technology published a report entitled “Engineering Technology Educationin the United States.” This report garnered a list of recommendations and things that needed tobe investigated to further our understanding of this student population; specifically focusing onthe students and how they relate to other students studying both similar and different material.A team of like-minded engineering technology education researchers have been workingtogether to ascertain the answers to the findings. They prepared two surveys, obtainedinstitutional approval, and distributed it throughout the United States. One survey was designedto query undergraduate students and the other
developing and evaluating alternatives. Similar toawareness, cognitive, situational and institutional factors may influence all of these activities.Intent and Action are generally not represented in more traditional rubrics for engineering ethics,but at the same time, play an important role in determining a course of ethical behavior. Intentrefers to the degree to which an individual is committed to a moral course of action and dependon an individual’s personal moral intuition, identify and affect. Action involves the ability totranslate awareness, judgement and intent into action. Again, the different cognitive, situationaland institutional factors described above may influence both a person’s intent and action.With these concepts in mind
Paper ID #27301A Collaborative Process Leading to Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Consistent withABETDr. Kevin G. Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kevin Sutterer is Professor and Department Head of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, Indiana. He received BS and MS degrees in Civil En- gineering at University of Missouri-Rolla, a second MS in Civil Engineering at Purdue University, and a Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology. Kevin was a geotechnical consultant with Soil Consultants, Inc. of St. Peters, Missouri from 1984-1988. He also served as Director of
, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, 3. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, 4. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, 5. Able to take a position towards an engineering-related question and defend their position in front of others, 6. Able to describe examples of applications and outline the state of the art in nanobiotechnology, 7. Able to contribute to and build upon team ideas through discussion. 3.2 Designing the course Once the learning objectives were set, the structure of the class was considered as a
Paper ID #24850Senior Mechanical Systems Design Capstone Projects: Experiences and As-sessmentProf. Raghu Echempati P.E., Kettering University Professor Echempati is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, (Flint, Mich.). He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and SAE. He has won several academic and technical awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Senior Mechanical Systems Design Capstone Projects: Experiences and AssessmentAbstractOrganizing and completing an undergraduate senior design capstone project course that lastsonly ten to
., Understanding by Design, Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development, 2005.[3] ABET new outcome 7. URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#4 Retrieved January 2, 2019.[4] Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.), How people learn: Brain, mind, experience,and school (Expanded E). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2000.[5] Bornasal, F., Brown, S., Perova‐Mello, N. and Beddoes, K., Conceptual Growth inEngineering Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 107: 318-348, April 2018doi:10.1002/jee.20196 Page 17 of 18[6] Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L
Paper ID #25837The Art and Science of Fluid Mechanics As a General Education CourseDr. Azar Eslam Panah, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Dr. Eslam-Panah is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Penn State University at Berks and her specialty is in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. Her research interests include unsteady aerodynamics of biologically-inspired air and underwater vehicles, fluid dynamics in human bodies (e.g. cardiovascular and respiratory), and engineering education. She uses various experimental techniques such as Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and dye flow visualization and try to
Paper ID #26787Homework Assignment Self-Grading: Perspectives from a Civil EngineeringCourseDr. Kevin Chang P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow Kevin Chang, Ph.D., P.E., is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Univer- sity of Idaho, where he is focusing on traffic operations and safety, transportation security, and engineering education. Prior to his current position, Kevin was a traffic engineer with the King County Department of Transportation where he managed the Traffic Management Center and supervised the implementation of neighborhood transportation plans, livable communities, and
, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architectural educ. and practice. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.Christensen, S. H. , Didier, C., Jamison, A. , Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., & Newberry, B. (Eds.). (2015). Engineering in Context: Engineering Identities, Values, and Epistemologies. Springer.Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738
Paper ID #27122Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspec-tives of Academic LibrariansDr. Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jeanine Williamson is the engineering librarian and a professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Dr. Natalie Rice, University of TennesseeProf. Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Carol Tenopir is a Chancellor’s Professor in the School of Information Sciences, College of Communica- tion and Information, University of Tennessee.Ms. Jordan Kaufman Research Associate for the Center for Information and Communication Studies with an
, and design - field team interaction.Mariana Watanabe, Purdue University Mariana Watanabe is an undergraduate in Civil Engineering specializing in Architectural Engineering at Purdue University, main Campus. During her time at Purdue, she has done research in the Applied Energy Laboratory for the ”Biowall for Improved Indoor Air Quality” project, has participated as team captain in two DOE Net-Zero Energy Building Design Competitions (Race to Zero Competition), and was elected president of the ASHRAE Purdue Student Branch in 2017. Mariana’s interests span the fields of sustainable engineering, high performance buildings and STEM outreach for girls. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #26813Introduction to Environmental Modeling: Results from a Three-Year PilotDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science & Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE, FAAN, FRSA, FRSPH, FCIEH, ANEF, FSEE, joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Oerther earned his B.A. in biological sciences and his B.S. in environmental health engineering from Northwestern
their core business activities inthe same way but with a slightly different workforce.3 The category of local hiring couldtherefore represent a compromise in the minds of students, perhaps signaling their beliefs thatlocal communities should receive more economic benefits from industry activities but thatbusinesses do not necessarily need to change their core practices to appease the concerns of thosecommunities. The students’ broad preference to imagine excellent CSR in this way suggests agreater comfort with a moderate rather than radical approach to CSR. It can also leave in place asocial/technical dualism [20] found in engineering education and practice more generally, as itleaves the core “technical” activities of industry outside the
companies in Brazil. Her research in- terests include team work and collaboration in construction, effective communication in spatial problem solving, and design - field team interaction.Prof. Jiansong Zhang, Purdue University Dr. Jiansong Zhang earned his Bachelor of Construction Management from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China (2009) with top grade in his department, his M.Sc. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University (2010), and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2015). He worked in the Civil and Construction Engineering Department at Western Michigan University as an Assistant Professor for two years be- fore
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
Paper ID #27557Forming Key Partnerships to Enhance Graduate Student ProgrammingEmily K. Hart, Syracuse University Emily Hart is the Science and Engineering Librarian at Syracuse University. She is a liaison librarian serving 10 STEM related departments, including the College of Engineering & Computer Science. Emily completed her B.A. in English with a minor in Education at St. Bonaventure University, and her M.L.S. and an Advanced Certificate in Educational Technology at the University at Buffalo. Emily has special- ized in supporting science research for over 10 years. She is an active member of the American Society
Paper ID #24615Scalable and Practical Interventions Faculty Can Deploy to Increase StudentSuccessMr. Byron Hempel, University of Arizona Byron Hempel is a PhD Candidate at the University of Arizona, having received his B.S. in Chemistry at the University of Kentucky and Masters in the Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Arizona. Working under Dr. Paul Blowers, Byron is focusing on improving the classroom environment in higher education by working in the flipped classroom. He is a University Fellow, a Mindful Ambassador, and Chair of the Graduate Student Working Group for the ASEE Chapter
, scientist, and engineer identities and perceptions of task difficulty. 2. Demographic markers (e.g., gender identity) moderate the effect of salient identities on perceived task difficulty.Theoretical Framework: Identity-Based MotivationIdentity-based motivation (IBM) is a theory “that explains when and in which situations people’sidentities motivate them to take action towards their own goals” [10]. Particularly, IBM explainshow the identities that come to individuals’ minds influence how individuals perceive taskdifficulty in different contexts to pursue goals [10]–[12]. For example, Oyserman and colleaguesused IBM theory to examine how students’ demographic identities (e.g., race/ethnicity,socioeconomic status, gender) matter
the class make contact with thesepartners at least 2 times a semester, with an end-of-semester showcase to display the finishedproduct. The community partners not only partake in creating a ‘consumer’ that satisfies thedesign process, but the children are also involved with a hands-on STEM-related project thatthey have had a large impact on its development. The hope is to create a growing interest inSTEM in the minds of children and upcoming teens in the area, as well as creating lastingrelationships and growing positive impacts on organizations in and around the city vicinity.ResearchResearch is being conducted on how to improve the course.Unfortunately, there is no way to calculate the retention rate of Engineering undergrads impactedby
Paper ID #26456SISTEM: Increasing High School Students’ Engineering Career Awareness(Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Schetema Nealy, University of Nevada, Las VegasDr. Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Erica Marti completed her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). She holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Master of Education from UNLV and a Bachelor of Science in chemistry from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to graduate studies, Erica joined Teach for America and taught high school chemistry in Las Vegas. While her primary research
years of undergraduatebiological and agricultural engineering (BAE) curricula, which are usually dominated by moretheoretically focused engineering science courses. This paper describes one effort to introducean entrepreneurial minded engineering project into a 3rd year BAE Thermodynamics course.Thermodynamics is a required course in 94% of BAE undergraduate programs (Kaleita andRaman, 2012). The goal for this project was to have the students apply their newly developedthermodynamics skills in a real-world setting, while developing an entrepreneurial engineeringmindset and making a difference in peoples’ lives.2. MethodsA compelling context. The context for the project is food insecurity (Dubick et al., 2016). Oneproblem at the local foodbank’s
camps started.ResultsOnly two researchers received the opportunity to participate in this program, and unfortunately,this left us with an objectively small sample size. Other engineering students were spoken to in apublic setting, both former and current, on the potential benefits of the program.Both participants reported using skills learned during the program during their followingsemester at the university: Their 50 hours of coding experience was used to help sort data andconstruct graphs for classes. Their CAD experience came into play when they were able tomodel problems in an online space to assist in solving them. Their project oriented mind set gavethem an edge with planning and completing all assignments and projects on time
were two middle school units enacted in this study. One focused on the challengeof conserving, filtering, and reusing water in extreme environments, and the other challengedstudents to learn about and design multiple remote sensing technologies, and then to use thosetechnologies to explore a model “mystery moon.” Each unit consists of eight one-hour,sequenced activities. Throughout each unit, youth are introduced to engineering practices andhabits of mind through an Engineering Design Process (EDP), which they use as a guide whileworking in small groups to design a solution to an engineering challenge. The EDP begins withidentifying a problem that needs to be solved and investigating what has already been done.Next, engineers imagine different