Computer Science (CS) and Integrated Science andTechnology (ISAT) departments who provided critical insight regarding the design of the coursewhich could address the issue of mobile technology development for social good.9. References[1]. Burd, B., Barros, J. a. P., Johnson, C., Kurkovsky, S., Rosenbloom, A., and Tillman, N.“Educating for mobile computing: Addressing the new challenges”. in ITiCSE-WGR 12, 2012,pp. 51-63[2]. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A.“Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning”, EducationalPsychologist, Vol. 26 No. 3, 1991, pp. 369-398[3]. Thomas, A. and Zyl, A. V., Understanding of and attitudes to academic ethics among first
literature, and the media.Yet, once past the title and initial discussion, the focus invariably is on entrepreneurship – notinnovation. This focus on entrepreneurship is fueled by the excitement of “the start-upexperience,” the aura of its founders as entrepreneurs, and the community for economicdevelopment. “Entrepreneurship leverages innovation to create value” [10] and “entrepreneursneed to search purposely for the sources of innovation” [11] to be successful. Whereas“[i]nnovation – or practical creativity – is mainly about making new ideas useful [and] aninnovator…solve[s] old problems with new ideas…or solve[s] new problems with old ideas usedin radically different ways.” [12] Innovation is possible without entrepreneurship
Outcomes Bloom's ABET Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Taxonomy Outcomes 1) Buoyancy K, App, A, E 2) Mass Flow Determination K, C, App, A a, b, c, d, e, 3) Pressure Drop K, C, App, A, S, E f, g 4) Time to Empty Tank K, C, A, E 5
wish to thank T.J. Nguyen for his work on the CyberAmbassadors project. We alsoappreciate the support and engagement of the many organizations partnering with theCyberAmbassadors project, including Tau Beta Pi, ACI-REF, CaRRC, the Carpentries, NRMNand CIMER. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1730137. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] H. Neeman et al., “The Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research and Education Facilitators Virtual Residency: Toward a National Cyberinfrastructure Workforce,” in Proceedings of the
for all.References[1] S. Reges. “Why Women Don’t Code,” Quillette, June 19, 2018 [Online]https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ [Accessed January 14, 2019].[2] B. Oakley. “Why do Women Shun STEM? It’s Complicated,” Wall Street Journal, July 13,2018 [Online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-do-women-shun-stem-its-complicated-1531521789 [Accessed January 14, 2019].[3] J. Steinke. "Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEMprofessionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017):716.[4] K. H. Collins. "Confronting Color-Blind STEM Talent Development: Toward a ContextualModel for Black Student STEM Identity." Journal of Advanced Academics 29.2 (2018): 143-168.[5] S. L
: NAFSA, http://www.nafsa.org/Professional_Resources/Publications/International_Educat or/STEM_Students_Go_Abroad_for_Research_and_Internships. [Accessed Feb.3, 2019].[8] V. L. Svetlana, E. S. Rachel, C. S. Scott, “Identifying factors that enhance undergraduate engineering students’ global preparedness,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015, pp. 1-18.[9] Z. Zhuo, T. Yang, “Research on the cultivation mechanism of innovative and entrepreneurial talents in top US polytechnic universities: take the engineering education at Worcester Polytechnic Institute for example,” Mod. Educ. Manage., vol. ED-4, pp. 109-113, Apr. 2016.[10] A. Bernard, S. Robyn, “Guiding
Engineering.AcknowledgementsThe author acknowledges the work of Dr. Jordan Trachtenberg and Dr. Tony Ribera in the Officeof Institutional Review and Project Assessment at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology foradministering the surveys, and conducting and transcribing the interviews.References[1] USEPA, "Constructed treatment wetland," O. o. Water, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 2004.[2] C. S. Campbell and M. Ogden, Constructed wetlands in the sustainable landscape. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.[3] R. H. Kadlec and S. D. Wallace, Treatment wetland, Second ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.[4] USEPA, "Combined sewer overflows: guidence for long-term control plan," O. o. W. Management, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 1995.[5] USEPA, "Greening CSO
starting acompany in their assessment process. Such assessment results will help practitionersbetter design course content and pedagogy to meet the desired learning outcomes, andalso simultaneously provide the research community with data to identify whichconceptualizations or constituent constructs of EM are most frequently targeted in currentengineering entrepreneurship programs.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through grant number1531533. The opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent theNational Science Foundation. 8References[1] N. Duval-Couetil, M. Ladisch, and S. Yi, “Discovery to
this interactivecourse, which introduces students to fundamental engineering skills – including teamwork,design, project management, technical writing, critical thinking, programming, communication(including written, oral, and graphical), and an introduction to engineering research. The courseincludes extensive introductory design pedagogy coupled with project management; includingtwo individual design challenges during the semester, and culminating in a team-basedCornerstone project that all students present at the end of the semester. For conveying keyinstructional topics to the students, a few select classes are held in the EG classroom(s), whileadditional instruction is delivered online via supplementary, instructor-created videos
. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, “A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 437–448, 2009.[4] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, N. W. Sochacka, and M. A. Brewer, “Fostering Empathy in an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Course,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016.[5] L. Mitchell, and L. Light, “Increasing Student Empathy Through Immersive User Empathy Experiences in First-Year Design Education,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June. ASEE Conferences, 2018.[6] E. Schmitt, E. Kames, B. Morkos, and T. A. Conway, “The Importance of Incorporating
Engineering from National Tsing-Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan, her PhD degree in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and MS degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California. She is a member of American Society of Engineering Education, American Society of Mechanical Engineering and American Educational Research Association.Dr. Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital controls, from the
Mathematics) wasdeveloped by the NSF (National Science Foundation), beginning as SMET and settling as STEMin 2001 [2]. The disciplines were grouped because it was recognized that they all emphasizeproblem solving and critical thinking skills [3]. STEM has been recognized in educationalreports since the 1980’s [2]. Though each discipline within STEM stands apart, they are alsointertwined-for example, physics and chemistry play a role in engineering and ET, and math isstudied in all disciplines [4]. STEM does not include the arts in this grouping.STEAM (Science, Engineering, Technology, Arts, and Mathematics) is an acronym developed atthe Arts-National Policy Roundtable in 2007 [5]. The acronym adds a “A” to STEM toemphasize the importance of arts
education. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, 77.2. Lattuca, L. R., Bergom, I., & Knight, D. B. (2014). Professional development, departmental contexts, and use of instructional strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 549-572.3. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning.4. Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM project-based learning. In STEM Project-Based Learning (pp. 15-27). SensePublishers, Rotterdam.5. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (Eds.). (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Springer Science & Business Media.6
, Washington, June 14-17, 2015.3. P. L. Hirsch, J.A.W. Linsenmeier, H. Davidsmith, J. M.T. WALKER, “Enhancing Core Competency Learning in an Integrated Summer Research Experience for Bioengineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 391-401, October 2005.4. R. L. Morley, J. J. Havick and G.S. May. “An evaluation of the Georgia Tech summer undergraduate program of research in electrical engineering for minorities,” Journal of Engineering Education. 87(3): pp. 321– 325, 1998.5. A. J. Soares, D. Kobelo, and C. Li, “Senior Design Projects Using Basic-Stamp Microcontrollers,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, Washington, June 14-17 2015.6. A. S. Khan, W. Herner, C. Olejiczak, A. Rybarski, and K. Ahmed, “Sensor-based
Paper ID #26988Board 40: Developing a Culturally Adaptive Pathway to SuccessProf. Eun-Young Kang, California State University, Los Angeles Eun-Young Elaine Kang, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Computer Science of the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at Cal State LA. Her research interests are in Computer Vision, Computer Graphics, Augmented/Mixed Realty, and Game Programming. She has served as prin- cipal undergraduate advisor for the Computer Science department for several years. Also, she has served as PI/Co-PI on multiple educational projects sponsored by NSF programs including NSF S
some period of time, until the protégés are capable of making expertise-relatedchoices autonomously.There are many cases where the duration of the mentoring relationship is just a few hours,typically at an outreach, i.e., recruiting-type event, with contact between mentor and protégé ofshort duration, often less than eight hours [9]. In many cases, the mentor vis-à-vis role model andprotégé(s) will most likely never meet again, so first impressions often become ONLYimpressions. The member volunteers who interact during these “one and done” events withstudents and the adults who accompany them are defined as “role models” for this study.Overview of studySince 2010, in collaboration with Exxon Mobil, Design Squad, and the Girl Scouts of the
⇤ ⇤ ⇤ ⇤ ⇤ Q3: The scenario presented in this problem seems realistic.Figure 6 shows the electrical modeling problem presented to the system dynamics class. For thisproblem, the context-rich version contained narrative placing the problem-solver in the role of astudent dealing with data being contaminated by 60 Hz line noise and also identified the circuitas a band stop filter.A) Consider the circuit shown in the figure below. L Vin C R Vout (a) Write a transfer function that relates the input voltage Vin to the output voltage Vout . (b) Of the three circuit components, which one(s) might be changed to alter the natural frequency of this circuit?B) Please answer the following
Orr for reviewing this paper.References[1] “Employment Outlook for Engineering Occupations to 2024,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/employment-outlook-for- engineering-occupations-to-2024.htm. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2019].[2] S. D. Sheppard, A. L. Antonio, S. R. Brunhaver, and S. K. Gilmartin, “Studying the Career Pathways of Engineers,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 283–309.[3] National Science Foundation, “NSRCG Public 2006 Data File,” 2006. [Online]. Available: https://sestat.nsf.gov/datadownload/.[4] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar
” by Young and Freedman[24]. Students of the course also attended weekly laboratory sessions where “Tutorials inIntroductory Physics” by McDermott and Schaffer [25] was used extensively. All courseactivities, including the tests, were conducted in Spanish.The E&M course uses active learning for instruction [26]. During the semester, besides the useof Tutorials, a very successful teaching strategy created by McDermott, et al. [25], the instructoruses Mazur´s Peer Instruction, a conceptual-based educational strategy [11]. He also employsproblem-solving activities using collaborative learning, conceptual building activities such asTasks Inspired by Physics Education Research (TIPER) [27] and educational technologies suchas Interactive
embedded systems; advanced methods for improving hardware and physical network security; evolvable hardware; and evolutionary and recon- figurable computing. He is a senior member of the IEEE organization and several societies, a member of the ASEE and ACM organizations.H. Shelton Jacinto, Boise State University H S. Jacinto received his B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA, in 2017, and is currently a Ph.D. candidate in electrical and computer engineering from Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA. From 2015 to 2017 he worked with Idaho National Labs in conjunction with the Advanced Energy Lab conducting research on self-powered wireless sensor
percent of the participants statedtheir sibling(s) did not have an influence on their decision to major in an engineering program.Fifty-four percent of the African American respondents and 40% of the Caucasian respondentsindicated their mother/female guardian had a strong positive influence on their choice of major.Thirty-one percent of the Caucasian respondents and 16.6% of the African Americanrespondents stated their mother/female guardian had a somewhat positive influence on theirdecision to enroll in an engineering major. Twenty-one percent of the Caucasian respondentsand 12.3% of the African American respondents felt that their mother/female guardian did nothave any influence on their choice of major.Fifty percent of the Caucasian
offering are moregregarious while students in the Spring 2019 offering are friendly yet reserved).AcknowledgementsThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Program underNSF Award # OIA-1655740. Any Opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of theNational Science Foundation. (http://scepscoridea.org/MADEinSC/acknowledgements.html).References[1] N. Thomas and R. Erdei, "Stemming stereotype threat: recruitment, retention, and degree attainment in STEM fields for undergraduates from underrepresented backgrounds," in 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
reviewers for constructive comments.ReferencesAnderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.ASCE. (2017). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/.Bachmann, B. (2017). Ethical Leadership in Organizations. New York, NY. Springer.Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A Meta-analytic Review of Ethical Leadership Outcomes and Moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536.Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005
completed using challenge activities. For spreadsheets, challengeactivities allow students to enter formulas, functions, and calculated values to test their strengthsusing spreadsheets. With hundreds of numeric combinations on many problems, students canrepeat a new version of any question until they compute correct answer(s). With over 100 differentquestions, the most difficult spreadsheet skills can be identified from students’ success. Thenumber of attempts before correct and total attempts will complement the percent correct to givemultiple metrics. Over 9,000 questions were attempted by the 2018 cohort and will be analyzedhere. Responses from the 2019 cohort will be compared in the conference presentation.Challenge activity scores varied
program, 40% of the population is comprised of women, a stark contrast to thesmall percentage of women represented in more traditional engineering programs. We felt thatinterviewing a proportionally larger number of women in a context different than traditionalengineering programs might provide insight into their construction, understanding, and valuingof knowledge(s). We acknowledge that this might risk having the male student having tokenrepresentation, and a follow-up study and analysis plans to address this gender imbalance.Data Collection: Participants were recruited from the AME capstone course and were chosenbecause the course is only taken by students approaching graduation; we felt that these studentshad ample experience with the program
projects were well balanced. On average, the studentsshared that the biological concepts were a bit more difficult than the mechanical engineeringconcepts (65% v/s 62.5%). Standardized pre-/post-summer experience surveys were also usedto assess the impact of the course modifications on the participants’ scientific self-efficacy andimpression of research (Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences, SURE) [18]. Theresults from the SURE survey at the end of the Summer 2018 show that out of the 21comparative learning gains, the EGGN 122 freshmen and sophomore were higher than thenational average in 11 and lower than the average in 5 gains. In response to the survey results,the last semester of the program involved improving the students’ preparation
issues for thecontrol valve outputs, but we would recommend using shielded wires on these measurements.This paper gives details of construction and operation for a new lab apparatus that is suitable forundergraduate experiments in fluid mechanics, process control, and secure operation ofcyberphysical systems. Hopefully, other instructors will be able to benefit from our experienceusing this equipment.References[1] A. Teixeira, K. C. Sou, H. Sandberg and K. H. Johansson, "Secure control systems: A quantitative risk- management approach," IEEE Control Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24-45, 2015.[2] H. Sandberg, S. Amin and K. H. Johansson, "Cyberphysical security in networked control systems: an introduction to the special issue," IEEE Control Systems
regulatory move,asking the group “how to work best together?” M2 responds in a joking manner with, “I thinksharing ideas is a good idea,” his gaze moving over the other group members while smiling. M1echoes M2’s response, evoking laughter from all group members. Following this interaction, theGTA addresses a separate, nearby group and offers several suggestions as to how to think aboutthis first bullet point. The group members in the study all look over and listen to the GTA’ssuggestions. After listening to the GTA’s advice, M1 laughs to his group and states, “Well thatdidn't really help.” The group laughs, then goes back to writing independently before F1 asks,“Are you guys writing actual stuff or just generic teamwork things?” M2 responds with a
representations listed in the two right columns include Pictorial, Symbolic, narrativeLanguage, Numeric, and Diagram. Item Relevant Vector Concepts Representations Question Answers 1 2D, position vectors, vector addition PL S 2 2D, cross product PLS L 3 2D, Cartesian components N D 4 2D, Cartesian components, vector addition DNS LN 5 3D, Cartesian components N D 6 3D
, textbooks, letters and diaries in the cause of providing somehistorical context for two centuries of physics education. Table 1. Special Collections Resources. Special Collections Resources Letters of CDT George Cullum USMA 1833, 9 Sept 1831 and 16 June 1832 [31] Letter of CDT John Pope USMA 1842, 24 Nov 1839 [32] Letter of CDT Ulysses S. Grant USMA 1843, 18 July 1840 [33] Letters of CDT William Dutton USMA 1846, 19 Oct 1842 and 3 Sept. 1844 [34] Natural & Experimental Philosophy Notebook of CDT James Runcie USMA 1879 [35] Diary of CDT Charles H. Barth USMA 1879 [36] Letters of CDT George S. Patton USMA 1909 [37] Letters & Diary of CDT Richard Von Schriltz USMA 1941 [38,39] Letters of