Asee peer logo
Displaying all 6 results
Conference Session
ASEE TUESDAY PLENARY FEATURING BEST PAPERS & INDUSTRY DAY SPEAKER Sponsored by University of South Florida & University of Maryland
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors, Corporate Member Council
), where students are presented with a set of options to select theappropriate response. The responses of the students to the questions capture the level of awarenessand reflection on ethics. The final eight questions are designed to measure the level of interest ofengineering students on ethics.The concept questions were derived from the textbook by Barry and Seebauer13, and the shortcases used in the questionnaire were adapted from a list of cases published by the NationalAcademy of Engineers (NAE) (2014), National Society of Professional Engineers (2014), and theVanderbilt University Center for Ethics (2014). The questions were reviewed and endorsed by anexternal subject experts representing industry and academia who served as project
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lydia Ross, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
at the end of the semester after theworkshops (spring 2017). This study was framed by the following research question: To what extent are faculty beliefs about student-centered strategies reflected in instructional practices in the undergraduate engineering classroom?Literature ReviewStudent-Centered Teaching in EngineeringStudent-centered teaching, or active learning practices, engage key course concepts and materialin an adaptive and interactive manner. Scholars have conducted many empirical studies whichdemonstrate the effectiveness of student-centered teaching practices in higher education. Thesestudies have shown that student-centered instruction promotes greater learning andunderstanding than traditional content
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
engineering science courses and humanities and social science courses. So, while the technical engineering science courses focus and - and privilege the technical, the humanities and social science courses in many universities do just the opposite.The separation of technical and social within the curriculum reinforces the perceivedseparation in students’ minds, which is not reflective of engineering practice where the twohave to be considered simultaneously.Requirements vs. electiveSome interviewees also commented on the challenges associated with teaching ESI inrequired versus elective courses. Elective courses are conducive to high engagement andmotivation because student self-select into them based on prior interest. An interviewee whohas
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
institution with a response goal of10 percent of the faculty and 10 percent of the undergraduate student body. The goal for studentresponses was to have an equal number from each of the traditional four academic years. Asecondary goal was to have the gender and academic majors of the student respondent populationmirror institutional balance. Finally, the timing of the survey was critical as we needed to reachnewly matriculated students prior to completing their first course evaluations on campus.The survey contained ten Likert items, where each item was a statement that reflected one of theten questions from our current online course evaluation. The online course evaluation is shownin Appendix A, while the survey statements we developed are shown in
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
design of the VR teachingmodule to be more immersive and visualized. The current VR module is a semi self-paced tutorial.Concurrent research (Phase III) is being conducted to investigate how well students understand thequeuing theory concept using this updated VR teaching module versus traditional classroomlecture. Data is currently being collected using a different set of students with the same conceptualquiz but taught the topic in a traditional classroom manner (control group). Afterwards, we plan toprovide a comparative analysis of both approaches, control group versus experimental group anddisseminate the results.. The sections discussed below only reflects how well the students performusing the VR training module (experimental group
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors