Paper ID #30199How We Teach: Chemical Engineering in the First YearDr. Laura P Ford, The University of Tulsa LAURA P. FORD is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches engineering science thermodynamics, mass transfer, and chemical engineering senior labs. She is the advisor for TU’s chapter of Engineers Without Borders USA. Her email address is laura-ford@utulsa.edu.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie Brennan is a Lecturer of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemical
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
feedback joysticksfor the emulation of a ‘rubber extension’ experiment. The opportunities for students to explorematerial property changes in response to defined microstructural changes are described. Finally,we elaborate the implementation of the device in a laboratory course on Colloids, Polymers andSurfaces that is being offered at the Chemical Engineering Department at Carnegie MellonUniversity.IntroductionWhen selecting materials for engineering applications, considerations of ‘mechanical properties’typically play an important role. Teaching of the ‘Mechanical Properties of Materials’ is thus atopic that is of fundamental importance to all engineering disciplines. The discussion typicallystarts with the consideration of the materials
Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira M. Azarin Azarin, University of Minnesota Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the
Laboratory at Bucknell, where they use computational and experimental techniques to better understand the mechanics of musculoskeletal soft tissues and human movement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Chemical Engineering FacultyAbstractThe tenure process has been both applauded and criticized since its inception in 1915. Whilesome institutions have chosen to move away from the tenure process, it is still prevalent in theUS higher education system. The title of tenured professor is a sought after prize by untenuredfaculty, and those in chemical engineering are no exception. Anecdotally, faculty know that
(Taxol) through the use of plant cell cultures from the Taxus Yew Tree. Throughout her time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Performance in an Online Chemical Engineering
. Robert has received over 4.4 million in external funding for educational and technical research projects. Robert’s dedication to teaching has been rewarded by receiving several educational awards including the 2006 Chester F. Carlson, 2002 Robert G. Quinn Award, 1999 Ray W. Fahien Award, 1998 Dow Outstand- ing New Faculty Award, the 2001, 1999 and 1998 Joseph J. Martin Awards, and four teaching awards. Robert is one of the founding professors of the chemical engineering program at Rowan University.Prof. Martha Grover, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is also the Director of
size of buttons or ads on ascreen has been thoroughly studied and optimized – in many cases to increase revenues [2]. Ingeneral, big data comes from interactivity, i.e., either a person clicking or scrolling on a webpageor sensors in either a home or chemical plant. In the same vein, combining interactivity withtextbooks has begun to create big data in the engineering classroom.Student-centered teaching techniques are commonly called active learning [3-8]. This type ofpedagogy focuses on students learning by doing in many cases. Despite the large body of evidencesupporting these best practices of teaching, adoption is not the norm. While not adopting the newstandard techniques in laboratory research leaves faculty behind, the same expectation
the Uni- versity of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 37 years and for the past 23 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research and technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. He was also the recent recipient of the inaugural 2016 Innovation in Teaching Award given to one WSU faculty member per year.Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University Kitana Kaiphanliam is a second-year doctoral student in the Chemical Engineering program at Washing- ton State University (WSU). Her
experts in teaching and research directly related to the light hydrocarbon industry and shalefuel conversion. Second, we will send the survey to our list of 26 industrial partners. Thesepartners range from multinational oil and gas companies to boutique consulting and advisoryfirms focusing on oil and gas, energy, and chemicals. This list also includes national laboratories(i.e., Argonne, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandia), international universities, andfoundations. The list will also be distributed through networks of the CISTAR faculty to expertsin the field. Together, this list encompasses a wide range of experts across a number of divisions.If the first survey reveals a lack of input from a particular sector, purposeful sampling will
a specific laboratory environment.These later interventions do not help their understanding when they are initially taught theseconcepts. To address this, miniaturized hands-on modules have been developed to compelstudent engagement in sophomore and junior level engineering classes, specifically within theheat transfer and fluid mechanics classroom context. These highly visual low-cost desktoplearning modules (LC-DLMs) have been shown to improve student understanding compared topassive lectures, especially at higher Bloom’s levels such as evaluation and creation [4-5].Even with significant data to support the fact that active learning leads to more cognitive gainscompared to traditional lecture-based teaching, there are still perceived
oxygen conducting mixed oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing online resources and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engage- ment and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Creating and Facilitating an Engaging, Rigorous, Fully-Online Technical Course (or just Online Content
intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 210-216.5. Leroy, N., and P. Bressoux. 2016. Does amotivation matter more than motivation in predicting mathematics learning gains? A longitudinal study of sixth-grade students in France. Contemporary Educational Psychology 44-45: 41-53.6. Vigeant, M., D. Silverstein, K. Dahm, L. Ford, J. Cole, and L. Landherr. 2018. How we teach: Unit Operations Laboratory. Proceedings of American Association for Engineering Education.7. Vigeant, M., M. Prince, K. Nottis, and A. Golightly. 2018. Curious about student curiosity: Implications of pedagogical approach for students’ mindset. Proceedings of American Association for Engineering
such as EngineeringWithout Borders6, and collegiate engineering design and laboratory courses7-12. Engineering-related curricula about water have been developed for use in K-12 classrooms and outreachevents13-15. We sought to develop inexpensive activities using household materials that coulddemonstrate chemical engineering separations concepts connected to our teaching and researchinterests in fluid mechanics, mass transfer, and biomedical engineering. Additionally, wedeveloped a physical game as an analogy for particle motions through pores of different sizeswith various surface properties. We have not seen documentation of a similar game in any of thefiltration educational materials published or distributed elsewhere. The lesson plan
the U.S. Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) Fellowship Program Grant Number P200A180055.Landon Bassett, University of ConnecticutDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Dr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and
the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the Uni- versity of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. He teaches a variety of topics with a focus on design in chemical and biological engineering. His pedagogical interests include open education, peer-learning and leadership development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Evaluating a new second-year introduction to chemical engineering design course using concept mappingAbstractIn recent years engineering curricula have had a renewed focus on engineering design. At theUniversity of British Columbia undergraduate students have a general first year and then apply toengineering majors for their
University of Applied Sciences in Groningen, where he taught both in Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course