Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 34 in total
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Aadityasinh Rana; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #28812An Approach to Assess Achievement of EML through Integrated e-LearningModulesDr. Ronald S Harichandran P.E., University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and Experiential Learning Opportunities. Through this grant entrepreneurial thinking has been integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs.Aadityasinh Rana, Aadityasinh Rana graduated with an MS in
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Karl D. Schubert, University of Arkansas; Kristie Neff Moergen, University of Arkansas; Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas; Wen-Juo Lo, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
has her M.A. in Counseling and taught at the undergraduate level for five years prior to beginning her doctorate. Her research areas include organizational behavior, creativity and innovation, social networks and social issues in the workplace.Dr. Carol S Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Agnieszka Kwapisz, Montana State University ; Kregg Aytes, Montana State University; Scott E. Bryant, Montana State University; Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University; Elizabeth B. Varnes, Montana State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf[3] American Society for Engineering Education, "Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives - Workshop Report," National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, 2013.[4] L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, "The ABET "Professional Skills" - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 41-55, 2005.[5] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin, "Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tess Hartog, University of Oklahoma; Megan Marshall, University of Oklahoma; Amin G. Alhashim, University of Oklahoma; Md Tanvir Ahad, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
into engineeringeducation curriculum to promote creativity in engineers.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1561660 and 1726358, 1726811, and 1726884. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] K. H. Kim, “The Creativity Crisis: The Decrease in Creative Thinking Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 285–295, 2011.[2] K. H. Kim and R. A. Pierce, “Torrance’s innovator meter and the decline of creativity in America,” The Routledge
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sine Celik, Aalto University; Senni Kirjavainen, Aalto University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
security challenge. This group deeply elaborated on privacy concernsalready in their first report and used the privacy aspect as a starting point for ideatingsolutions for their challenge: “It is important to find a solution for our challenge as IoT devices are getting more common everyday and it is very likely that soon everyone is an IoT user. Because of this privacy will be an issue, since IoT is important as it guarantees equality and freedom. If IoT devices are not secured, soon everyone will have spying devices at home and the data these devices collect can be used against their users.” (group E, first report)A further four groups (L, N, R, S) increasingly raised privacy concerns. Their reports
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Entrepreneurship and IP
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Poly’s Orfalea College of Business and Penn State’s Engineering Library,Mark Bieraugel and Paul McMonigle, respectively, for their assistance refining the literaturesearching methodology for this paper.References:Ashford SJ, Tsui AS. 1991. Self‐regulation for managerial effectiveness: the role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal 34( 2): 251– 280.Atkins, L., Martinez-Moreno, J. E., Patil, L., Andrews, K. J., Wu, M. S., Dutta, D., Hug, B. & Bresler, L. (2015). Fostering innovative skills within the classroom: A qualitative analysis from interviews with 60 innovators. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.Author, 2018. Blinded for review.Bernal, A., Brackin
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
plan(s) and elevations of their building as well as the framing plan. Appendix 5 shows an example of the building layout. The evaluation rubric for the layout is shown in Table 2. 72% of students scored at least 90%, 16% between 75% and 90%, and 6% between 60% and 75% as well as below 60%.3- Design Handbook- 60%: Each member must submit a design handbook that includes hand calculations and/or software results of their building. The evaluation rubrics for the design handbook is shown in Table 2. 26% scored at least 90%, 42% scored 75% to 90%, 26% between 60% and 75%, and 6% below 60%.4- Written proposal- 5%: problem description, constraints, alternative solutions, analysis and design of each solution including hand calculations or
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laine E. Rumreich, Ohio State University; Faith Logan, Ohio State University; Zachary Dix, Ohio State University; Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
stakeholders.Defining important EM concepts and developing a consistent and clear set of course objectives iscritical to convincing more institutions and faculty to adopt EM curriculum.References1. “The Network,” KEEN - About. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx.2. What is the KEEN Framework?,” KEEN - The Framework. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters/framework.aspx.3. N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes”. International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 425-435, 2012.4. KEEN Framework Spread,” KEEN - The Framework. [Online]. Available: https
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Zhinan Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
University,” Sci. Sci. & Manag. S&T, vol. ED-9, pp. 145-149, Sep. 2006.[3] C. Zheng, “Example of Entrepreneurial Universities: Experience of Technical University of Munich,” Jiangxi. Educ., vol. ED-10, pp. 57-61, Mar. 2016.[4] D. Sang, J. Zhu, “Taken Innovation and Entrepreneurship College as Carrier to Promote Effective Development of Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities,” J. Ideo. & Theor. Edu., vol. ED-11, pp. 72-76, Jun. 2011.[5] M. Jin, J. Zeng, M. Do, “Current Situation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship of Engineering Students,” J. Nat. Sci., vol. ED-9, pp. 293, Sep. 2017.[6] D. Dai, “An Empirical Research of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition on Improving College Students
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Siddharthsinh Jadeja, Rowan University; Elise Barrella P.E., Wake Forest University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
students’ weaknesses and strengths in domain knowledge [16].Instructors can assess students at earlier time points in a course, to identify potential areas ofweakness that can be addressed throughout the remainder of the instruction. In order toassess student learning, either formatively or summatively, an instructor needs to select anappropriate scoring method(s) for the concept maps. Several quantitative and qualitativescoring methods have been developed and applied to engineering students’ concept maps,with each taking a different approach to capturing a map’s complexity. Concept map scoringmethods typically include measures of conceptual depth, breadth, and connectedness [19].A concept map can be used before the start of a course to assist
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Courtney A. Lemasney, Rowan University; Hayley M. Shuster, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs
KEEN “3Cs” - Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value.ReflectionIt is a practice of human nature to reflect on experiences of the past and present. However, in thecase of reflection, most people fail to recognize the use of these experiences to aid in the future.True reflection “on experience can be framed as an intentional and dialectical thinking processwhere an individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she is aware and uses one ormore lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guide future action (and thusfuture experience)” [1]. It takes various elements and perspectives to achieve reflective thinking.Schon simplified reflection down to two categories known as “reflection-on-action” and“reflection
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Andrea T. Kwaczala, Western New England University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Gilmore and Baylee Houldson with the College of Engineering at XXX.Thank you to our clinical sponsors, Matt Solomito and Drew Cohen at Connecticut Children’sMedical Center for their technical support and lab demonstrations for the students.References[1] J. Perry and J. M. Burnfield, " Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles," in Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1992, p. Ch 13.[2] T. Marasovic, M. Cecic and Z. Vlasta, "Analysis and interpretation of ground reaction forces in normal gait," WSEAS Tansactions on systems,, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1105-1114, 2009.[3] S. Gandhi, M. Jimmy and S. Taghazadeh, "A comprehensive review of entrepreneurship course offering in engineering programs," in
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
EML in structural analysis course. The students wereassigned a project competition to design a prototype balsa wood bridge truss for ODOT. Basedon students’ feedback and observation of the instructor, the project competition based on theframework discussed herein can expose students to EML effectively and improve theirperformance.AcknowledgementsThe author acknowledges the financial support of 2018-19 KEEN Cross Network Grant at OhioNorthern University. The input from Dr. Heath LeBlanc is greatly appreciated.References[1] Svihla, V. and Reeve, R., 2016. “Facilitating Problem Framing in Project-Based Learning.”Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2).[2] Mikesell, D. R., and Yoder, J-D. S., 2011. Teaching dynamics with a
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sandra Furnbach Clavijo, Stevens Institute of Technology; Matthew Wade, Stevens Institute of Technology; Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
business processes necessaryto nurture new technology from concept to commercialization.Concluding remarksThe pitch presentation as a communication technique is an effective tool in the arsenal ofentrepreneurial thinking. Considerable work, preparation and motivation are required to deliveran effective and persuasive presentation of this kind. At Stevens we have developed a companioncourse to the senior design sequence that involves a required participation in a pitch competition,involving prizes of considerable monetary value that are externally endowed in perpetuity. Wehave found that the format of our pitch presentation is well-structured, with both internal andexternal validation. The engineering teams select their best pitcher(s) to represent
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Heidi Morano, Lawrence Technological University; Susan Henson, Lawrence Technological University; Matthew L. Cole, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Technological University S. Henson’s career includes working as a chemist, finishing engineer, and materials scientist. In this re- spect, her expertise focused on material analysis and selection. After obtaining her Masters in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), she went on to teach GIS to civil engineering students at Lawrence Tech- nological University. After training in entrepreneurial engineering, she began teaching Fundamentals of Engineering Design Projects. She also acted as the civil engineering capstone coordinator. She is now a project engineer working in the Entrepreneurial Engineering Design Curriculum.Matthew L. Cole, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Matthew Cole is a tenured Assistant Professor in the
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kali Lynn Morgan; Paul Benkeser, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
, Reflecting backwards, reflecting forwards,” The Open University. [Online]. Available: www.open.edu/openlearn/.[4] J. Dewey, How we think. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications, 1997.[5] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1984.[6] D. A. Schön, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.[7] S. Martinez-Conde et al., “The Storytelling Brain: How Neuroscience Stories Help Bridge the Gap between Research and Society,” J. Neurosci., vol. 39, no. 42, pp. 8285–8290, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1180-19.2019.[8] P. Deane, S. Somasundaran, R. R. Lawless, H. Persky, and C. Appel, “The Key Practice
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Making and Maker Spaces
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David G. Alexander, California State University, Chico; Colleen Robb, Florida Gulf Coast University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
$5.00 per yard Juki Industrial Sewing By Appointment User Provided Machine Wacom Cintiq 13HD Drop-in No Charge Creative Pen Display Button Maker Drop-in $2.00 per 10 buttons Cutting Board and Cutting Drop-in No Charge Tools Epson Perfection V800 Drop-in No Charge Photo Flatbed Scanner Einscan-S 3D Scanner Drop-in No Charge Ultimaker 3 3D printers Operated by Makerspace 3 hours per user per month, (Extended) Student Advisors Only No Charge 3D Printer Pen* By Appointment
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside; Ville Mikael Taajamaa, City of Espoo; Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
persona of-fers a metaphor for understanding impact. How is a persona different from a stereotype? Willa stereotype inform a persona? Applying the similarities and differences of a persona and astereotype has concrete classroom use with potential for amplifying understanding of inter-personal perceptions. The gendered findings in the study indicate there is a relational qualityto interpersonal perceptions of gender. Therefore, who and how we pay attention to others isimportant. The attention that is given to women and men in the classroom, women and menon internships, and women and men in male-dominated work environments is worthwhile.References[1] Lee, H., Choi, J., and Kim, S. “Does gender diversity help teams manage status conflict?An
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich, Rowan University; Ted Howell, Rowan University; Jennifer Tole, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
team re-designed each of these three major coursedeliverables, with the goal of fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset in students and leveragingsynergies between the Entrepreneurial Mindset and the existing goals of the course (engineeringdesign and technical communication). In particular, the faculty team created a new linkagebetween the research sequence and the humanities assignment. The new research sequence isbuilt around the U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals; each student chooses one of the goals toexplore through their individual rhetorical analysis, annotated bibliography, and literaturereview. The humanities assignment is a team project in which students explore solutions tosustainability problems on the campus of Rowan University
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Making and Maker Spaces
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kimberly B. Demoret P.E., Florida Tech
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Making and Maker Spaces
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Donna M. Ebenstein, Bucknell University; Matthew Lamparter, Bucknell University; Sabrina Shankar; Nathan P. Siegel P.E., Bucknell University; Stu Thompson, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A 116(39):19251–19257. Available at: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.3. Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C (2011) Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332(13 May):862–864.4. Foster C, Wigner A, Lande M, Jordan SS (2018) Learning from the parallel pathways of makers to broaden pathways to engineering. International Journal of STEM Education 5(1)Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0098-8.5. Jordan S, Lande M (2013) Should makers be the engineers of the future? Frontiers in Education (Oklahoma City, OK), 815–817. Available at: http
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Assessment Tools and Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
-programs-2019- 2020/. [Accessed: 08-Jan-2020].[5] “Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, 2019 – 2020,” ABET, 02-Nov-2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2019- 2020/. [Accessed: 08-Jan-2020].[6] J. K. Estell, “Streamlining the Assessment Process with the Faculty Course Assessment Report,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 941–951, 2009.[7] J. K. Estell, J.-D. S. Yoder, B.B. Morrison, and F. K. Mak. (2012). Improving Upon Best Practices: FCAR 2.0. Presented at 2012 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., San Antonio, TX. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/21512[8] M. Eltayeb, M. Fong and O. Soysal, “Work in
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 1990.[6] B. Garbers and K. Periyasamy, "A Light-Weight Tool for Teaching the Development and Evaluation of Requirements Documents," in ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, 2006.[7] D. Brown, "Requiring CS1 students to write requirements specifications: a rationale, implementation suggestions, and a case study," in SIGCSE '88 Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Atlanta, 1988.[8] W. Hankley, "Software Engineering Emphasis for Engineering Computing Courses: An Open Letter to Engineering Educators," in ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, 2004.[9] J. Preston and S. Acharya, "Using Software Engineering Concepts in Game Development - Sharing Experiences at
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Timothy Cone, Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
an uncertain world. Research-Technology Management, 2012. 55(6): p. 49-57.6. Moore, R., et al. The K-12 InVenture Challenge: Inspiring Future STEM Innovators. in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.7. National Research Council, Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education. The Bridge on Undergraduate Engineering Education, Summer 2013. 43(2).8. Weiler, S. Six Charts that Illustrate the Divide between Rural and Urban America. 2017; Available from: http://theconversation.com/six-charts-that-illustrate-the-divide-between- rural-and-urban-america-72934.9. McLaughlin, D.K., C.M. Shoff, and M.A. Demi, Influence of perceptions of current and future community on residential aspirations
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012.[3] B.J. Tewksbury, “Specific Strategies for Using the “Jigsaw” Technique for Working in Groups in Non-Lecture-Based Course,” Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), pp. 322- 326, 1995.[4] D. Fitzgerald, “Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3), p. 88-90, 2013.[5] D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, and S.A. Bernhardt, Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol 128, pp. 21-29, 2011.[6] S. Freeman, et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23) pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[7] S. Martin, D
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology; Michael Scott Richards
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
education: introduction tothe thematic issue,” International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, vol. 3.1, pp. 3-26,2010.[4] M. Lackeus, “Entrepreneurship in education – What, why, when, how, Entrepreneurship360Background paper”, OECD, 2015.[5] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students andentrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes”. International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 28(2), pp. 425–435, 2012[6] E. M. Eisenstein, 2010. “Engineering and entrepreneurship: Creating lasting value fromengineering”. IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skillsfor Complex Global Environments, Dublin Ireland, 2010.[7] R. M. Carey and R. D. Shonat, “Assessment of Self-Paced
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Thien Ngoc Y. Ta, Arizona State University; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Ryan James Milcarek, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
of innovative projects:A theoretical concept and empirical evidence." Organization science, vol.12, no.4, pp. 435-449,2001.[10] S. W. J. Kozlowski, and K. J. Klein, "A multilevel approach to theory and research inorganizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.", 2000.[11] G. A. Neuman, and J. Wright, “Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability.”Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 376-389, Jun 1999, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376.[12] J. R. Mesmer-Magnus, and L.A. DeChurch, “Information sharing and team performance: Ameta-analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 535 -546, 2009, doi:10.1037/a0013773.[13] J. Bradley, B. J. White, and B. E. Mennecke, "Teams and tasks: A temporal
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Entrepreneurship and IP
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Soohyun Yi, Texas Tech University; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
rights. With furtherresearch and understanding, best practices for undergraduate IP generation can be applied toavoid further IP challenges for faculty, students, and academic institutions. REFERENCESAlexander, D., Beyerlein, S., and Metlen, S. (2014). Processes to formalize sponsored educational activity agreements between industry and universities related to capstone design projects. In Capstone Design Conference, Columbus, Ohio.Running Head: FACULTY VIEWS OF UNDERGRADUATE IP POLICIESDuval-Couetil, N., Pilcher, J., Weilerstein, P., & Gotch, C. (2014). Undergraduate involvement in intellectual property protection at universities: Views from technology transfer professionals
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jared Schoepf, Arizona State University; Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Alison Cook-Davis, Arizona State University; Kristen Peña, Arizona State University ; Courtney Argenti, Arizona State University; Daniel J. Laxman, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
cultural acceptance of proposed engineering solutions 5. Social Consciousness Competency: understanding that the engineering solutions should primarily serve people and society reflecting social consciousness [3].Each university in the NAE GCSP network creates their own GCSP requirements through whichthey utilize available university resources and opportunities to support their students in achievingall five competencies. These requirements may include coursework, extra-curricularopportunities, other organized programming, or approved individual experiences. Donaher etal.’s survey of 35 GCSP programs across the US highlighted various ways in which programs arestructured to meet the competencies [4]. There is no stated level of minimum
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich, Rowan University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs
possible that differencesobserved between sections is due not to the performance of teams but to the instructor(s) whosestudents examined those teams. We spoke to the faculty prior to their use of the rubric tohighlight each of the items and what they were intended to measure. The faculty have alsoworked extensively with the course’s project rubrics and hence the authors feel comfortable withwhat should be looked for in student’s report when grading.ConclusionsWe implemented a project related to the design of children’s toys, that leverage the principles ofUniversal Design, in a multidisciplinary, first-year engineering course. The project alsointentionally integrated aspects of EM by incorporating them into the overall project learningoutcomes