‘why’ we do what we do. These efforts have deepened trustbetween lecturers and administrators, and also helped to clarify the lecturer role and identity atthe college.ConclusionOver the past couple of years, we have put a concerted effort into building community andoffering support for the lecturers in our college. As we strive to set our lecturers up for success, itis important that they are an integrated part of the community and that they feel valued for theincredible contributions they make to the college. References[1] M. Lord, “Rumbling in the Ranks.” ASEE Prism, vol. 29, no. 2, 2019, pp. 28–32.[2] M. Fullan, Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass, 2001, pp.25.[3] L. L
AnIndustry Crisis", stating 3.5 M jobs world-wide will not be filled by 2021 [10]. A recentworkforce study published in 2019 by (ICS)2, [11] the world’s largest non-profit association thatcertifies cybersecurity professionals, reported that in order to meet the needs of cybersecurityworkforce globally, skilled cybersecurity professionals needs to grow by 145% to meet thedemand. The report further stated that in order to meet the crucial needs of American businesses,the US cybersecurity workforce needs to grow by 62%!The module was embedded in a junior level computer science class required to be taken by allcomputer science and electrical engineering students. The course introduces Unix commands andtools for software development and testing. Students
and Exposition, Austin, Texas, 2009.[9] Y. Chang, K. Devine, and G. Klitzing, “Can virtual reality enhance user performance and experience by reducing an individual’s cognitive workload?” presented at the ASEE EDGD 74th Midyear Conference Proceedings, Norfolk, VA, 2019.[10] D. C. Niehorster, L. Li, and M. Lappe, “The accuracy and precision of position and orientation tracking in the HTC vive virtual reality system for scientific research,” - Percept., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 2041669517708205, 2017.[11] K. Devine, “Integrating robot simulation and off-line programming into an industrial robotics course,” in Proceedings of the 116th American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas, 2009.
homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich
the United States of America,vol. 112, no. 40, 2015.[46] H.E. Jun, et al., “Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams.”Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, Fall 2007.[47] J. Mativo, U.Z. George, “Influences of Female/Women Engineering Professionals at theWorkplace, Home, and Community”. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
there wasn’t enough time to ‘speed date’ potential team members in class. - As completed teams left the room, remaining students felt that they needed to ‘hang on’ to their project or be left with no choice.In addition, we observed that student-formed team peer reviews were slightly lower throughoutthe course of the project.Please see [6] for more complete descriptions of the faculty-formed and student-formedprocesses, in addition to data on the effects of these two types of team-forming on the studentexperience in senior project. The rest of this paper presents a new hybrid approach developed toaddress the shortcomings of these two alternatives.Hybrid-formed: In Fall 2019, we implemented a hybrid process, blending the best aspects of
KickStarter Process. As colleges transitioned to sustaining mode, they wereencouraged to continue their participation as KickStarter Alumni. In this sense, they became partof a growing community that continues beyond their direct involvement in the KickStarterProgram.KickStarter CohortsThe four Cohorts of 2-year HSIs that have participated in KickStarter from 2015 to 2019 arelocated across six states, as shown in Figure 4. Ten HSIs were from California, five from Texas,four from Arizona, three from New Mexico, and one from each of Florida and Illinois. Theparticipating institutions varied in their characteristics. Some colleges belonged to large districtsin urban settings, that provided centralized infrastructure for grants and institutional data
, "Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance in Engineering Programs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 27-36, Jan. 2008.[7] A. Trauth, T.N. Barnes, J. Buckley, J.A. Enszer, S.I. Rooney, R. Davidson and X. Zhang, "How Granular is the Problem? A Discipline-specific Focus Group Study of Factors Affecting Underrepresentation in Engineering Undergraduate Programs," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun 23, 2018.[8] A. Trauth, J. Buckley, S.I. Rooney, J.A. Enszer, T.N. Barnes and R. Davidson, "Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs," in 2019 ASEE Annual
education and research. He is a licensed PE in the State of Colorado, a member of ASEE, a senior member of IEEE, and a senior member of SME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Pair-to-Pair Peer LearningAbstractIn this work, pair-to-pair peer learning (PPPL) as the simplest form of group-to-group peer learning(GGPL) is defined. GGPL is defined as a learning method where two or more peer groups interactto increase the knowledge of all members; while PPPL is defined as GGPL with group sizes ofonly two members each. A simple PPPL experiment was conducted and analyzed indicating anincrease in knowledge gain when compared to peer learning (PL) alone. The experiment
., P FIRMAN , A. L., ROBERSON , S. L., AND G RAMOPADHYE , A. High school technology as a NON-predictor of first college math course. In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Southeast (ASEE-SE) Annual Regional Conference. Raleigh, NC, March 2019. [9] M IDDLETON , J., K RAUSE , S., M AASS , S., B EELEY, K., C OLLOFELLO , J., AND C ULBERTSON , R. Early course and grade predictors of persistence in undergraduate engineering majors. 44th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (2015). Madrid, Spain.[10] NCES. Coming of age in the 1990s: The eighth-grade class of 1988 12 years later. Tech. rep., National Center for Education Statistics, 2002.[11] S OUTH C AROLINA D EPARTMENT OF E DUCATION. 2016 school
, pp. 449-465, 2008.[3] V. M. Jovanović, G. McLeod, T.E. Alberts, C. Tomovic, O. Popescu, T. Batts, M. L. Sandy, "Exposing Students to STEM Careers through Hands-on Activities with Drones and Robots." 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2019. Tampa, Florida.[4] V. Jovanovic, B. Terzic, M. Erten-Unal, V. Hill, G. McLeod, M. Covi, D. Burdige,[5] J. Alonzo, J. Mason, T. Sanford, C. Tomovic, C. “Improving STEM Recruitment through a Theme-Based Summer Residential Camp Focused on a Sea Level Rise”, 6th IAJC International Conference, 2018. October 11-14, Orlando, FL.[6] V. M. Jovanovic, O. Popescu, C. L. Considine, K. Arcaute, K. Kaipa, S. G. Adams, “Learning in Informal Environments through Engineering
International Conference on Learning with MOOCs. IEEE, 2019.[22] L. Singelmann, E. Swartz, M. Pearson, R. Striker, and E. Alvarez Vazquez, “Design and development of a machine learning tool for an innovation-based learning mooc,” in 6th International Conference on Learning with MOOCs. IEEE, 2019.[23] N. E. Perry and P. H. Winne, “Learning from learning kits: gstudy traces of students’ self-regulated engagements with computerized content,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2006.[24] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. Smyser, and H. McNamus, “Capstone prepares engineers for the real world, right? abet outcomes and student perceptions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE, 2019.Appendix A
, M-I., Nocito-Gobel, J., and Li, Q. (2018), Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students using integrated e- learning modules. Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1). 8. Harichandran, R. S., & Erdil, N. O., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Rana, A. (2019, June), EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e- Learning Modules. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32704 9. Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions
, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2015. [9] T. R. Jones and M. E. Cardella, “Informal pathways to engineering: Middle-school-aged homeschool stu-dents’ experiences with engineering (fundamental),” age, vol. 26, p. 1.[10] J. R. Elliott, “The influence of homeschooling on the lives of college graduates: A transcendental phenomenological study,” 2019.[11] M. D. Bramhall and K. Radley, “Promoting learner autonomy in engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Hawaii, USA, 2007.[12] N. A. Stahl, M. L. Simpson, and C. G. Hayes, “Ten recommendations from research for teaching high-risk college students,” Journal of developmental Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 2–4, 1992.[13] J. J. Sharp et al., “Does higher education promote independent learning? a
., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.[3] S. Bante, and E. Hilton, and K. Talley, and K. Shryock, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32398[4] B. Williford, and M. Runyon, and J. Cherian, and W. Li, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “A Framework for Motivating Sketching Practice with Sketch-based Gameplay,” in Chi Play ’19, Barcelona, Spain, October 22-25, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347175.[5] R. Brooks, and J. Koh, and S. Polsley, and T. Hammond, “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment
andthe Liberal Arts: An Institutional Case Study”, in Proceedings of the ASEE 126th AnnualConference and Exposition. Tampa, FL: American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[3] Lafayette College Engineering Division External Review Report to the President andProvost, 2011.[4] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2004.[5] Draft Engineering Strategic Planning Document, Lafayette College, 2006.[6] J. Roy, “Engineering by the Numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[7] D.H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea GreenPublishing, 2008.[8] M. H. Wake, “Integrative Biology: Science for the
Innovation, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva. p. 205.[3] Mckeown, M. (2014). The innovation book: how to manage ideas and execution for outstanding results. FT Press, p. xxvii.[4] Schubert, K. D., Massey, L. B., & Ellstrand, A. E. (2019) Expanding and Evolving an Innovation Concentration. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Tampa, FL USA. https://peer.asee.org/32787[5] National Science Foundation. (2018). Building the Future: Investing in Discovery and Innovation. Strategic plan for 2018-2022. https://nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18045/nsf18045.pdf, accessed: February 7, 2020.[6] Brown, K.W. & Ryan, R.M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality
-13-2018.pdf [Accessed: November 18, 2019][4] Turner, Stu; Tung, Kalyn; Cooper, Cory. Transitioning to the New ABET Student Outcomes: Architecture Development for a Systems Engineering Degree Program. ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[5] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019-2020.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2019-2020/ [Accessed: November 18, 2019].[6] Miller, Ronald L. and Olds, Barbara M. “Performance Assessment of EC-2000 Student Outcomes in the Unit Operations Laboratory,” 1999 ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., 1999.[7] EvalTools®, http://www.makteam.com
Purdue Mechanics Freeform Classroom: A new approach to engineering mechanics education. In Proceedings from the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN.[12] Evenhouse, D. A., Zadoks, A., de Freitas, C. C. S., Patel, N., Kandakatla, R., Stites, N., Prebel, T., Berger, E., Krousgrill, C., Rhoads, J. F., DeBoer, J. (2018). Video coding of classroom observations for research and instructional support in an innovative learning environment. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 95-105.[13] Stites, N. A., E. Berger, J. DeBoer, and J. F. Rhoads. (2019). A cluster-based approach to understanding students’ resources-usage patterns in an active, blended, and collaborative learning environment
served as the Founding Director of the Innovation, Design and Entrepreneurship Program at Stevens ( IDEaS) and prior to that, as the Director of the Design and Manufacturing Institute, a research center at Stevens. Prof. Pochiraju received his Ph.D. in 1993 from Drexel University and joined Stevens after working as a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Delaware. His expertise spans product design, advanced manufacturing, materials insertion, and knowledge-based systems integration. His current externally-funded research is on the design of real-time lightweight robotic systems, high-temperature materials, and micro-/nano-scale devices. He is a member of ASME, ASEE and the American Society for Composites (ASC
& Analytics. pp. 11–47, 2018.[Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics- UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf[2] R. Dzombak, S. Mouakkad, and K. Mehta, “Advances in Engineering Education Motivations of Women Participating in a Technology-Based Social Entrepreneurship Program,” Adv. Eng. Educ., 2016.[3] A. D. Christy, T. G. Wilson, and O. Meehl, “Thermodynamics for Citizenship: Entrepreneurial Engineering through Project-based Learning,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings, 2019.[4] C. Skokan and J. Gosink, “Gender participation in humanitarian vs. traditional multidisciplinary senior design projects
internet tool use affect conceptual change and impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and persistence. The other is on a large-scale NSF faculty develop- ment program and its effect on change in faculty teaching beliefs, engagement strategies, and classroom practice. Recent honors include coauthoring the ASEE Best Paper Award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and the ASEE Mike Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award in 2018.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Keith D. Hjelmstad is President’s Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment at Arizona State University.Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Kara Hjelmstad has been a
increased visibility for the Libraryresources and services. It also discusses the positive impact on the students’ research skills andon their literature reviews. Consequently, the training sessions contribute to achieving theUniversity learning objectives for graduate students in research programs.IntroductionIntroductionFounded in Montreal in 1873, Polytechnique Montréal is a francophone engineering universityoffering more than 120 academic programs. In Fall 2019, the institution had 9,000 studentsenrolled, with more than 2,200 in a graduate program [1]. Polytechnique Montréal stronglyencourages diversity among its student population, so as of Fall 2019, 28% of its students werewomen and 29% were international students. Moreover, international
trips. If networkintrusion attacks succeed to compromise IoV systems, intruders will control the autonomous vehiclescommunicating with the infrastructure, and this may lead to serious fatal consequences. Therefore,using an IDS to protect the IoV system is very crucial. In this project, students will use traditional IDSto protect the IoV system.REFERENCES[1] Cisco, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017–2022 White Paper," 2019.[2] IBM, "The demand for cybersecurity professionals is outstripping the supply of skilled workers," 2019.[3] T. Omar, S. Venkatesan and A. Amamra, "Development of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Program: A Literature Survey," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt
COVID-19 related campus closures makes this a pertinent issue for thenear future.References[1] W. Bolton, Mechatronics: Electronic Control Systems in Mechanical and ElectricalEngineering 7th Edition. Harlow, UK: Pearson, 2019.[2] M. Gennert, N. Lotfi, J. A. Mynderse, M. Jethwani, V. Kapila, “Work in progress: Buildingthe mechatronics and robotics education community,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 15-19, Tampa, FL, USA, Paper ID #25660.[3] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” 2018 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology Colleges, American Society for Engineering Education, July 15, 2019. Available:https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2018
for measuring student programming effort during solution development," in Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 2016.[33] S. H. Edwards and Z. Li, Designing boosters and recognition to promote a growth mindset in programming activites, ASEE, 2019.[34] J. Allen, G. Ferguson and A. Stent, "An architecture for more realistic conversational systems," in Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 2001.
ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. Gattis, P. A., M. Cleary, X. Delgado Solorzano, J. Popp, D. Nix, and B. Hill, "Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural Engineering Students Succeed," Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[2] Arkansas Department of Education, ADE Data Center, 2018.[3] University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research and Extension, “Rural Profile of Arkansas 2015: Social and Economic Trends Affecting Rural Arkansas,” University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Printing Services, United States Department of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, and County Governments Cooperating, 2015. www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/MP-531.pdf
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[9] Killingworth, J., Ogden, M. & Elliot, J. (2017). “Integrating Composition Skills within Construction Curricula: A pilot study.” In ASC Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA. 2017.[10] Metzinger, J., Cabral, J., Debs, L. and Zimpfer, M. (2019). “Construction Management Curriculum Transformation through Project-Based Learning: Initial Implementation.” In ASC Annual Conference Proceedings, Denver, Colorado. 2019.[11] Easterby-Smith, M., & Olve, N. G. (1984). Team teaching: making management education more student-centred?. Management Education and Development, 15(3), 221-236.[12] Welch, M., Brownell, K., & Sheridan, S. M. (1999). What's the
assignment in later years negatively predicts degree completion.Although the results are not unexpected, it is important to use empirical evidence to supportpolicy decisions related to allocation of graduate student funding. This research will helpgraduate program leaders make policy decisions related to allocation of limited fundingresources to improve retention and completion rates of all engineering PhD students.IntroductionRecent work in doctoral STEM and engineering education has considered how graduate fundingmechanism impacts skill development and career preparation, including job prospects(Kinoshita, Knight, Borrego, & Bortz, in press) and future career trajectory (Blume-Kohout &Adhikari, 2016; Denton et al., 2019). Skills developed
, “Engineering Programs,” 2019.[7] E. Dringenberg and Ş. Purzer, “Experiences of First-Year Engineering Students Working on Ill-Structured Problems in Teams,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 442–467, 2018.[8] M. E. Goodwin, “An Experimental Course for First-Year Students : Leadership in Engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2005.[9] G. M. Warnick, “An experiential learning approach to develop leadership competencies in engineering and technology students leadership,” 121st ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 1– 14, 2014.[10] D. B. Knight and B. J. Novoselich, “Curricular and Co-curricular Influences on Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 44– 70