, teachers, and parents.Second, it is important to elicit educator feedback and make changes based on that feedback.Through cycles of design, reflection, and feedback, we co-designed and vetted a sizablecollection of unique curricular materials which we hope will serve as a resource for teachers atLunar Prep for years to come. The chief drawback of engaging in this sustained encounter wasthe huge time commitment required of both parties. Collaborative activities included visits,biweekly meetings, curriculum development, and professional development. Investing less timein these activities would have undoubtedly decreased the success of the partnership.Conclusion and Next StepsIn the future, we plan to grow both the number of partnerships and the
accepted convention does not reflect the reality of theengineering and technology disciplines as truly exist.A better description of who’s who in engineering and technology is suggested as follows: Engineering Scientists: Academic or research engineers almost invariably holding a doctoral degree. Engineers: Private practice licensed professional engineers, or employed engineers holding bachelors or masters degrees. Engineering Designers: Technologists holding associate or bachelor degrees in engineering technology. Engineering Technicians: Equipment specialists holding manufacturer certificates or
.926, indicating high internal consistency of the measure. Allsurvey items were on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = Always, 4 = Most of the time, 3 = Sometimes, 2= Rarely, 1 = Never) with higher values demonstrating more effective tutoring behaviors orcharacteristics. We calculated the average score of the eleven items to reflect how effective atutor is as perceived by students.To address the second research question whether male and female SAS tutors were perceiveddifferently in their effectiveness by students who attended SAS tutoring sessions, we coded thesex of each tutor (0 = Male, 1 = Female). There were 10 female tutors and 11 male tutors. Thedata of students who visited the SAS program were recorded electronically by Academic
semester; they didnot start at Penn State as a first-time freshman due to transfer or being readmitted.A summary of the cohort demographics is provided in Table 1. On average, the freshman cohortsincluded about twice as many men as women. The demographics also reflect the regionalcampus population of fewer underrepresented minority (URM) students and higher percentage offirst generation college students. In general, first generation students are less likely to participatein undergraduate research [14].Table 1. Demographics of Research Program Participants Grouped by Cohort Freshman Total Head Gender FIRST Cohort Count F M URM INT GEN 2012 7
- Annual Conference of Australasian Association forEngineering Education (pp. 1-7). Auckland, NZ: Australasian Association for Engineering Education.6. Kelly, Patricia (2006) Towards Globo Sapiens : using reflective journals to prepare engineering studentsable to engage with sustainable futures. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.7. Immanuel A. Edinbarough, Adriana Olvera, “Process Automation in Smart Environments: Intelligent ClosetPrototype”, Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Conference for Industry &Education Collaboration, Feb. 7-9, 2018, San Antonio Texas.8. Lake, Danielle (2012) Sustainability as a core issue in diversity and critical thinking education, in Bartels,K.A. Parker, K.A, (2012
design, including the ability to switch between notes and chords,additional instrument voicings, an LCD screen, a shutdown command, and a custom-madeenclosure. The students wish to see variations of this project implemented in hospitals, nursinghomes, and schools so that no matter the stage of life or the physical capability, such as weakmuscle issues or joint-related disabilities, the user enjoys playing the piano. We also hope thisproject will reflect the power of engineering in a liberal arts education through the combination ofmultiple disciplines, experiences, skills, and interests.1. IntroductionThe Cornell College engineering major, established in 2013, focuses on general engineering andprepares students with the knowledge they need for
developing grounded theory (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: SAGE.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1222566. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.
Future DirectionsIn this brief review of literature relating to Industry 4.0’s implications for South Korea, it is clearthat Industry 4.0 has the potential to transform South Korea’s future workforce. This developingphenomenon offers several opportunities for researchers. Promising areas for explorationinclude:1. What sorts of competency skills would be required for advanced manufacturing workers tosurvive in Industry 4.0?McKinsey Global Institute [9] recommended that workers seek additional education and trainingto adapt to an automated workplace. In the context of South Korea’s two-year technical collegeprograms, researchers may wish to investigate the extent to which current curricula containsadvanced manufacturing topics and reflects
, which completedthe transition from curriculum-center to activity-center [8]. In this kind of collaborativeand interactive environment, engineering students can consolidate professional knowledgeand skills by applying and practicing what they have learned in the actual engineeringdesign process and strengthen self-reflection about projects by considering how to makefurther adjustments in the next period of projects. In response, Liu also indicated thatcollaborative, experiential, project-based and service-based learning forms in capstone 3design and its courses could contribute to improving engineering students’ employability[4]. In addition, numerous studies also explored mutually beneficial
, while I had not made up my mind on going to graduate school before,I now am certain that I want to get a masters.” Increased interest in Graduate schools is also seenin Figure 6, which shows the participant responses to survey questionnaire before and afterparticipation. Figure 6. Student responses to pre- and post-participation survey questions (average of 2017, 2018, and 2019 ratings).3. Lifelong Learning Skills and Acquisition of Interdisciplinary KnowledgeFigures 5 and 6 also show that the program has been able to instill lifelong learning skills in theparticipants and increase their knowledge of other disciplines. Mentor and participant qualitativefeedback reflected the value of participant exposure to the
Figure 3: Percentage of the video coverage by cohort (Pre-activity, Post-activity, and Pre-exam)3.2 Learning OutcomeTo help determine whether long or short-length videos were more effective, we also measuredstudents’ performance on in-video quizzes throughout the semester. The same quiz was given toboth groups. We continued using EQ 1 to determine which cohort students qualified for, and thecohort sizes were adjusted to reflect the earliest time period in which students watched the videos.In other words, now students only appear in one cohort. Figure 4 shows the percentage of studentswho took the video quiz in parenthesis for each cohort and the average percent scored for eachcohort on the x-axis. For the short group, the video quiz was at the
statistically significant effect ontheir self-efficacy, matched-pairs t-tests were performed on the six items. The results, shown inTable 4, revealed statistically significant increases in self-efficacy after the hands-on experiencefor each item. Not surprisingly, the students were very confident in their general knowledgeabout the drone assembly/building process but somewhat less confident in detail knowledgeregarding specific components. Given that all of the students reported being more interested inSTEM-related areas as a result of this camp and 64% were interested in participating in a similarcamp, this lack of confidence reflects a desire to learn more about drones to gain that confidence.Students responded on a three-point Likert Scale to each
offer the necessary helpand thus increase the possibility of student to successfully obtain his or her academic degree.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 1833869.Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance”, Journal of Vocational Behavior vol. 45, pp. 79-122, 1994.[2] M. Gibbons and M. Shoffner, “Prospective First-Generation College Students: Meeting Their Needs Through Social
and Marshall College. Hye Rin’s research interests are self-reflection, academic interventions, online learning in education, mea- surement, temporal motivation, and resilience in students with disabilities. Specifically, her research focuses on (1) creating an effective intervention that helps URMs persist and continue on in STEM ma- jors via the social media platform, YouTube; (2) examining the nuances related to various measures of academic self-related motivational beliefs; (3) resilient students who achieve high levels of academic per- formance despite their disability; and (4) combining aspects of cognitive and positive psychology to study individual differences in motivation, particularly in exploring
the cultural changes that manystudents, faculty, staff, and university leadership crave. He notes that the success of UMBC’sprograms are founded upon a shared vision that reflect the common values of all involved parties[26]. For any institution, including UMBC, the development of this shared vision requiredsignificant time, financial support, passion, safe space for difficult conversations, strategicplanning and detailed documentation [27]. Deeper investigation into UMBC’s academic historyrevealed that it was not always a highly regarded institution with prestigious accolades. In thebeginning, it was a school that lacked direction, with low expectations for and from its attendees.Given these humble beginnings, one could argue that the
our third funding cycle. The crucial information for our SURGE program is providedin Table 1 below, where the figures reflect the status quo [2] as of February 2020. We supported123 students; 2 of whom quit without getting a bachelor’s degree, 101 have obtained theirbachelor’s degrees, and 20 making timely progress toward their bachelor’s degrees. About 32%of the supported students have been URMs. 123 scholars supported 101 degree recipients 20 continuing 45% women 43% women 55% women 55% men 57% men 45% men 32% URMs 30% URMs 45% URMs Table 1. The supported student
fields that ABET accredits [26].Within this federated organization, updates to the EAC General Criteria require a consensus ofthe engineering member societies for any changes to the non-harmonized criteria (Criteria 3, 5,and 6) and a consensus of all member societies for any changes to the harmonized criteria(Criteria 1, 2, 4, and 8). The non-harmonized criteria are likely to require more frequent updates,because they more closely reflect changing industry needs. Yet any such changes require theengineering member societies to achieve a consensus on a single set of student outcomes(Criterion 3), a single set of curriculum requirements (Criterion 5), and a single set of facultyqualifications (Criterion 6) that meet the needs of all programs and
idea of reflective practice was not then part of the dialogue.Of equal interest is the fact that by and large the students preferred Social Studies as theirfirst choice. It was followed closely by Management Studies with special reference to humanrelations in industry. Whether or not these studies belong to what traditionalists call liberalknowledge is a moot point. But they certainly broadened their studies. Moreover,industrialists tended to support this approach to liberal studies and in both the US and UKhave continually complained to this day that graduates are inadequately prepared for industry.Korte has shown that graduates themselves wish they had been better prepared for their initialexperience of industry [26].Back in 1963 Andrews and
method approach to understand and assess student’s knowledge, level ofunderstanding, and perception of the 4+1 programs through the administration of a survey to 486undergraduate students at the College of Engineering and Computing in a minority-servinginstitution, Florida International University. A binary logistic regression model was thendeveloped to determine the variables influencing the expected student enrollment in thecombined programs. From the obtained results of the undergraduate graduating student survey,25% of the students indicated their intention to apply for graduate studies post theirundergraduate and 58% maintained a GPA above 3.0, which reflects their readiness and possibleeligibility to apply for a 4+1 program prior to their
successfully navigate and copewith the biases of their peers, faculty, and staff based on the complexities and intersections ofrace, class, and gender.Another building block of resilience forms from the past experiences that have helped shapedtheir inclination to persist within their programs. They are motivated to work harder and provethe naysayers wrong, especially when the nays are coming from faculty members that they arenot fond of [20].But, in some instances, the experiences at their respective institutions resulted in them exploringmore avenues that helped yield a greater resilience. Some students left their programs to self-reflect [19], some transferred to more supportive departments or universities [20], and someimmersed themselves in
excellence so our members can live authentically, fully engage, and flourish. In order to strengthen the college and progress its mission, the college dedicates itself to intentional and ongoing reflection to meeting the evolving needs of [the College], the surrounding communities, and the State. In the first row of Table 7, we again report institutional breakdown by Basic CarnegieClassifications. Our analysis including postings from six Associate’s and/or BaccalaureateColleges, six Master’s Colleges and Universities, and nine Doctoral Universities. Below the firstrow, the counts of targeted language subcodes among the different institution types aredisplayed. We found that the most intentional type of targeted language
) demonstrated – 1 point; or not – 0 points 3 options (levels) fully – 2 points; partially – 1 point; or not demonstrated – 0 points 4 options (levels) fully – 3 points; some – 2 points; less – 1 point; or not demonstrated – 0 pointsIn the development of this rubric, reflection on the previous implementation of a similar problemwere considered – findings discussed by Rodgers et al. [28]. The two biggest changes were: (1)rubric items related to the shareability dimension were incorporated in and (2) some rubric itemshad more levels rather than having as many dichotomous rubric items. The first change was toadd another dimension of analysis in the study. The second change was primarily based on thedifferent context of the problem aligned better with
part of thisprofession. Without many experiences in classes or through co-curricular activities that showhow personal and professional experiences can be integrated, students are likely tocompartmentalize those senses of social responsibility. Those who do have significantopportunities to consider how their personal goals positively impact their work will go throughan evaluative and reflective process, visualized below, to take stock of how they can live theirpersonal social responsibility goals through their profession. Thus, Canney and Bielefeldt argue,the professional connectedness realm of social responsibility development requires engineers toconsider the opportunity costs and benefits of their decisions. For example, working to
librarians now "believe that‘understanding some ethical, legal, economic, and socio-political information issues’ is anelement of IL" [9]. This approach is reflected in the ACRL’s Framework for InformationLiteracy for Higher Education [4].IL instruction for graduate students takes various forms. It can be integrated into a graduatecourse or delivered as a stand-alone workshop. It can also be offered as a one-shot session or as aseries of sessions. The latter offers the opportunity to establish a relationship with students,compared to the one-shot session, and appears to have a much greater impact on studentretention [9, 10]. The course-integrated sessions have the advantage of strengthening the linksbetween librarians and professors and are directly
/assignments. Therefore, as part of this study, the participating faculty regularlyengage with two social science research experts in engineering education who serve as mentorsfor survey, focus group, evaluation, and reflection best practices in course design andassessment.In sum, the unique features of the HEPE offer the following features: (i) students working inteams, (ii) students working across disciplines, (iii) students working on an open-ended problem,(iv) students having access to professors from multiple disciplines, and (v) students havingaccess to external expertise and critique. The next section (section 4.2) describes the details ofthe course offering.4.2 Course implementation structureTwenty-one students are enrolled in the initial
mentors to create a network of support; iii) reflect on the past to learnmore about oneself and others; and iv) develop new ideas through critical thinking and questioning to becomestronger each day. In effect, EduGuide seeks to develop one’s mind-set, confidence, knowledge, skills,resilience/grit, and self-control, to enhance one’s personal development, understanding of the college culture andwhat it takes to succeed in college.The EduGuide program is used by each STEMGROW student intern throughout the summer and evaluated on theeffectiveness of both the program itself and of the mentors that act as coaches through the online platform. In thismanner, each intern can get coaching and mentoring from all the graduate, undergraduate and faculty
empathized with each other, and teachers’actions and language. Observations also include student notebooks which have lesson reflectionquestions as prompts for connecting lessons, empathy and real-world connections. The thirdmeans of data collection is interviews with students. Participants are asked interview questions atthe end of the program reflecting on the lessons and how they connected empathy andengineering. The interviews consist of questions such as: was there a time during the day whenyou connected with a peer or teacher and learned about how they felt about their project or thetopic at the time? If so, how did this connection affect you? and think back to a time today whenyou were faced with a challenge. What did you do to try and tackle
essential for the creation of attitudesrelated to solving social problems as well as for developing the abilities that could help them. This vision has been appropriated for American engineering curricula considering thatengineering can have a humanistic approach through specific courses or methodologies, theassessment of their activities from a perspective of the ethics, and the reflection about therelationship between engineering and technology, including its impacts [8]. In that sense, themain objective is deconstructing engineering from a utilitarian perspective, based on effectivityand loyalty to institutions, to reconstruct it in a libertarian or communitarian perspective based
and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Dr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is the Associate Director for Research Initiation and Enablement in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering at UGA. Supported by over 1.5M in funding, Dr. Sochacka’s research interests include systems thinking, diversity, STEAM (STEM + Art) education, and the role of empathy in engineering education and practice. Her work has been recognized through multiple best paper awards and keynote presentations at international and national conferences and workshops.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida