in order to ensure topicality and the provision of adequate resources.In addition to technical or “hard” skills, recent graduates need – but very often lack – “soft” ortransferrable skills, including communication, leadership and teamwork [22]. Therefore, in thesubsequent spring semester students will receive training on key transferrable skills in a 3 credithour 600 level seminar course designed to integrate these skills with the research-related contentcovered in the foregoing 500 level course. This seminar course will train participants incommunication, teaching, funding procurement, entrepreneurship, management, teamwork,conflict resolution, mentoring, leadership, and outreach as well as ethics and research-relatedskills. All NRT
appropriate principles of construction management, law, and ethics, and; (i) perform standard analysis and design in at least one sub-discipline related to construction engineering.The average performance of students in CON 357 for each of the four course objectives ispresented in Figure 1. The offerings from 2013 through 2018 were made without anyconsideration for the use of OER, using only traditional materials. There is some minor variationin performance from year to year for these offerings. It was mentioned in the “Background”section that several variables, which are difficult to control, may have led to these variations.Among them are size of the class, institution, and timing aspects (e.g. day vs. night, one longweekly session vs. two
that scored low on the participantsurveys are areas the evaluation team felt that project leadership should revisit in future iterationsof the Young Scholar programs. Those included: • Students feeling like they designed and/or implemented their own investigation under supervision • Improving onboarding process. Students were sent journal articles and slide decks • Intensifying the review and discussion of research ethics at weekly meetings • Increasing utility and importance of the weekly meetings • Creating a deeper sense of community among the Young Scholars during the weekly meetings. As mentioned in the design-change section of the overview changes were made to improve these sessions and additional
Engineering; I teach microbiology (lecture and lab) to under- graduates and graduate students and do research on microbes in natural and engineered environments.Dr. S. Ismat Shah, University of Delaware Professor S Ismat Shah has a joint appointment in the Departments of Materials Science and Engineering and Physics and Astronomy. He is also the Director of the Energy and Environment Policy Program. In addition to the STEM courses in his the Departments, he teaches policy and ethics courses.Prof. Sheldon Allister Hewlett, University of DelawareProf. Jenni M. Buckley, University of Delaware Dr. Buckley is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Delaware. She received her Bachelor’s of Engineering (2001
skills with 100% entrepreneurial pursuit. 3 Demonstrate understanding about innovation process (including User 100% Innovation, technical, legal, and financial aspects associated with Technical Ventures and Technical Startups). 4 Show an understanding about entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, 100% and intrapreneurship. 5 Conduct a patent search and examine and evaluate the quality of patents. 100% 6 Analyze value proposition, including economic, cultural, and ethical 92% aspects of a tech venture. 7 Use effective and appropriate communication skills (including a written 92% term project report, oral presentation, and
understanding of the procedures and objectives. Inorder to keep students as engaged as possible, the labs are designed to only take ~ 1.5 – 2 hours,with efficiency increased by using prelab assignments to ensure that appropriate planning hasbeen completed prior to attending. In addition, a lab notebook is required to document allexercises with an emphasis on data integrity, and ethics of recording and presentation. Althoughanalysis associated with most lab exercises is done within the lab group, the analysis from fourexercises is done individually. Combined with individual effort from the lecture portion of thecourse, 50% of the grade is individual while 50% is team based. This helps to ensure thatstudents are not simply carried by their teammates.1
Corporations, States, education..The authors [p. 7] characterize this generation as: Wanting to find solutions to problems Knows how to use technology to do so Having a strong work ethic like Boomers Responsible and resilient like their Gen X parents Technologically savvier than Millennials (Gen Y) Describe themselves as: Loyal (85%), thoughtful (80%), compassionate (73%), open-minded (70%), responsible (90%)While individual studies are important in that they provide data for future comparison andunderstanding, by themselves, they are simply a snapshot in time. To truly understand cohortcultural change over time, specific ages of individuals within one cohort must be compared toages of
Paper ID #31749HuskyADAPT: A Project-Based Accessible Design Course (Experience)Dr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM
concepts again; there are multiple group projects and researchprojects in their time at our school, as well as courses on ethics and professionalism. However,introducing these concepts in their first semester prepares students for future courses, and helpsthem understand that engineering is not just problem sets and robotics.Background: The College and the CourseEngineers often do not arrive at college with an appreciation for the importance of professionalresearch and communication skills [1]. These skills are necessary not only for their successfulundergraduate career, but also for a successful engineering career. Engineering students areoften unaware of the number of reports and presentations they will be expected to deliver, or theamount of
education has been mainly focused onproblems that are open-ended in nature (e.g. design problems) or enabling skills more broadly(i.e. ethics, communication). For an open-ended problem, multiple viable and correct solutionsexist. Students’ writings, portfolios, or design-based projects, laboratories, or fourth-yearcapstone projects are areas in which outcomes-based research has been extensively investigated[9]–[12].Most of the work done on closed-ended problem solving is related to aiding students with self-regulation and building their problem-solving capability, rather than aiding the feedback process.Examples of the former include models of problem-solving in engineering and informationprocessing [13]–[17]. These models provide guiding
. A diagram outlining the stages of the research project. Selected results from highlighted elements of the diagram are discussed in this paper.Table 1 raises ethical concerns. To improve six-year graduation rates and retention to degree, thecalculated option is to focus recruiting efforts on students from low-poverty high schools andminimize enrollment by students from high-poverty high schools. This would cause harm to thepopulations we are most interested in helping in this study and we stress that these results shouldnot be used to support such a decision. Rather, these results should be used to to help stakeholdersunderstand the impact of systemic inequities on individuals so that those inequities can
& Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA, USA).Dr. Eliana Christou, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. Benjamin B Wheatley, Bucknell University Benjamin Wheatley was awarded a B.Sc. degree in Engineering from Trinity College (Hartford, CT, USA) in 2011 and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA, USA). His pedagogical areas of interest include active learning ap- proaches, ethics, and best practices as they relate to computational modeling. He runs the Mechanics and Modeling of Orthopaedic Tissues
Paper ID #29212Pre and Post Tenure: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments forMechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology FacultyDr. Benjamin B Wheatley, Bucknell University Benjamin Wheatley was awarded a B.Sc. degree in Engineering from Trinity College (Hartford, CT, USA) in 2011 and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA, USA). His pedagogical areas of interest include active learning ap- proaches, ethics, and best
Career Supports Integrated into Design 1). Concurrently, I am working on mymaster’s in Counselling Psychology. The first year of the study described herein comprises mythesis research. I am also a Research Assistant (R.A.) to the second author of this paper for thebroader, longitudinal study in which this paper sits. 3.5 EthicsThis study has received approval from the University of Manitoba’s Research Ethics Board.Student work were not collected and interviews were not conducted until the grade appeal periodfor the course was over. Course instructors have no knowledge of who participates in the study. 3.6 Career Supports Integrated into Design 1All students who took the biosystems Design 1 course in Fall 2019 engaged in careerdevelopment
accomplish more than 40 various types of scientific and technological innovation projects, 6 of which won the first prize in China. Moreover, he won the first prize of the Beijing Teaching Achievement Award in China. In addition, he published 12 papers and obtained 6 invention patents.Dr. Xiaofeng Tang, The Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Prof. Zhonglian Zhang, Beijing Institute of TechnologyProf. Hai Lin, BeiJing Institute of Technology
senior year, recenttrends emerged to weave PBL in the first year and throughout the curriculum in semester-long projects.Students are being introduced to design methods, team dynamics and ethics in parallel with the analysis-focused courses (Dym et al., 2005). However, the systematic integration of design and analysis in coursesis still lacking (Carberry & McKenna, 2014). Some of the outstanding research questions about PBL asproposed by Dym et al. (2005) include: “What are the best proportions of problems, projects, teamwork,technology, and reality for a given state of student development,” and “how do the proportions changewith regard to the context of different engineering disciplines and institutional missions?” (p. 112).There are some
Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Programs”, Criterion 3, as follows [2]: • Outcome 2: “an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.” • Outcome 4: “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.”Various experiential learning strategies in general and service learning in particular are some oftools in educators’ disposal to teach these skills [3]. Service
Paper ID #30235A Course as Ecosystem: Melding Teaching, Research, and PracticeDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Course as Ecosystem: Melding
. The new space, MIL, is openly branded as a “Safe Space”(by use of AIChE & ASEE branded Safe Zone signs). To warrant such a claim, the MIL issupervised by faculty with extensive diversity and inclusion training, who has had years ofexperience addressing related issues, should they ever arise. Additionally, inclusion training andconflict resolution is part of the curriculum of the courses taught in MIL, as well as theprerequisites to these courses. Each course in this space is also guided by a class diversity andinclusion statement, in which it is made clear to the students on the first day that inclusion is akey part of professional engineering ethics and is expected in our classrooms and laboratories.Furthermore, care is taken to signal
ecology goes back to C. Everett Hughes [13], symbolicinteractionists, and the theories advanced by the Chicago School of Sociology. Within the historyand sociology of science, derivative ideas about the ecology of knowledge and its organizationalimplications may be found in the works of Charles Rosenberg [14] and Susan Leigh Star [15].See also [16].to their specific situation. Given the absence of a unified professional vision, engineeringeducators may also need to remain cognizant of the moral and ethical dimensions of their work,and pursue change initiatives aligned with the needs of their own student body, and other locallydefined interests.2. The Epistemic culture3 of engineers, and how this influences their educational reformsIf the
years and older [6, 7]. Despite the extended timeframe for degreecompletion, SCS students have shown a strong commitment to completing their degree withexceptionally strong work ethic and engagement [8], while prior work experience provides SCSstudents with a valuable perspective that the career switch allows to recover losses in theirprofessional development [9]. A number of critical environmental supports/resources and barriers/demands cansignificantly affect the academic success of engineering students [5, 10]. Traditional and SCSundergraduate students typically face different combination of environmental supports/resourcesand barriers/demands. This is due to the intrinsic differences in the professional development thatboth groups
innovator who initiates significant changes with new ideasduring problem solving, experiments, etc. [16]. The Control orientation focuses on the“managing process” aspect of leadership. An individual will act as a coordinator who wouldcontrol projects, monitor the progress and develop control and checkpoints [16]. The Competeorientation focuses on the “producing results” aspect of leadership. An individual in this aspectwill act as a producer who communicates the team goals, emphasizes hard work ethic andclarifies priorities [16]. Collaborate Create Control Compete Figure 1. Leadership Orientations and Roles from the CVF
with work assignments and deadlines is needed • Communication has improved over the 1st term • As a team they can accomplish more as individuals, with different skills to contribute • Shared desire to improve leadership and technical writing skills • Team mates do not want to be pigeon-holed into one work task • Seeing prototypes and the space in person changes perspectives and ideas vs. on paper • The educational and community aspects of the project are important to all teammates • The students care deeply about doing a good job on this project Persistent themes from the 2nd set of self-reflection questions • Communication has improved, but still needs work • Teamwork ethic has improved as a whole, but some think
in Table 1. Table 1: CIS 375 ABET Student Outcomes and Course OutcomesABET Outcomes addressed in this course:• Outcome 1 – Ability to analyze complex computing problems and apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions.• Outcome 2 – Ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specific needs with respect to public health, safety, and welfare keeping into consideration, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.• Outcome 3 – Ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.• Outcome 4 – Ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, with consideration
had hoped for, and studentresponse to the courses has been positive. To assess our goals more rigorously, we havedeveloped a set of rubrics which we have described in detail. Results of the initial assessment arepositive and have provided insights that we will use to improve the Cornerstone courses. Forexample, we will insist on more formal planning of testing, and better presentation of prototypetesting results. We will also emphasize the difference between debugging and testing, which areoften confused by students. In the future we also plan to expand our discussion of the designprocess and to introduce topics on ethics in engineering.The novelty of our approach is in: 1. Introducing a project-based design course sequence in the sophomore
engineering practice. The ABET accreditation criteria for engineering programsoutlines required student outcomes which prepare graduates to enter the professional practice ofengineering [21]. We believe human-centered design activities can directly benefit at least thefollowing three criteria, quoted here: • An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors • An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences • An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed
incredible benefit of research experience, and will often volunteer to work in a research lab, however volunteer students will often lose interest and/or prioritize other tasks ahead of volunteer lab work, so we do recommend paying research students. o Lab equipment – this could be as basic as protective eyewear and lab coats, and as expensive as outfitting a dedicated work station for the student researcher. o Training – students will need to be trained on everything from how to clock in and out, to safety procedures, to keeping a log book, to using specialized equipment in the lab, to research ethics. Most, if not all, of the required training may be viewed as not
participants were informed of the conditions,risks, and safeguards of the project.Additional steps were taken to ensure the study was conducted ethically and avoided any ethicaldilemmas such as protecting the anonymity and confidentiality of the participants. Steps toensure anonymity included assigning codes to mask any personal identifiable information thatcould be traced back to each participant. Steps to safeguard confidentiality in addition toassigning codes to each participant included the storage of any personal identifiable informationin a separate file (e.g., demographic information, student identification number, etc.) andsecurely discarded once the data collection had been completed. NVivo – a qualitative dataanalysis computer software
manual vs. online grading for solid models,” inProceedings of the ASEE 120th Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26,2013.[3] T. Branoff, E. Wiebe and N. Hartman, “Integrating Constraint-Based CAD into an IntroductoryEngineering Graphics Course: Activities and Grading Strategies,” in Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, USA, June 22-25, 2003.[4] I. Chester, “Teaching for CAD Expertise,” Int’l Journal of Technology Design Education, Vol.17, pp. 23-35, 2007.[5] Nicomachean Ethics, by Aristotle. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.2.ii.html,Accessed 1 February 2020.[6] D. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1).Englewood Cliffs, NJ
approaches consistentwith autoethnography, specifically Anderson [8]. Each person individually and criticallyreflected on their experiences and documented these reflections in narrative reports. In terms ofhandling the data, the research team used a protocol informed by theory in order to focus thesereflections so they could be collectively and collaboratively evaluated. We workedcollaboratively on the analysis to develop the results giving participants a chance to respond tothe analysis process and findings as they emerged. The study secured ethical clearance from theInstitutional Review Board (IRB).LimitationsA limitation of this work is that one author, Holly, has administrative responsibility for thecourse sequence within the department. While