for expanding the role of the librarian.Literature ReviewMany librarians have incorporated standards into library resource instruction lectures and/orassignments, and more specific to this study, as a means to teach information literacy toengineering students [6-8]. While each case or study varied slightly in how standards wereincorporated into engineering curricula or library resource instruction for engineering students,all involved librarians familiar with technical literature who understood the importance ofstandards in future engineers careers. As Phillips and McPherson note, there are examples offaculty in engineering and engineering technology incorporating standards into undergraduatedesign courses, but not often in terms of
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Columbs, Ohio, 2017, vol. 2017-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2–28022.[2] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. E. Canney, “Effective ethics education: Examining differing faculty perspectives,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] V. Weil, “Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching,” in Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering: Papers from a Workshop, I. W. Wulf, Ed. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2003, pp. 79–93.[4] National Academy of Engineering (NAE), “The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century,” The
Clemson University. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant. Dr. Simmons has extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related re- search and outreach. She is a leader in research investigating the competencies professionals need to compete in and sustain the construction workforce. Dr. Simmons oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com), which is home to a dynamic, interdisciplinary mix of graduate researchers and postdoctoral researchers who work together to explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an
Swanson School of Engineering, he was with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the Department of Transportation in Washington, DC, performing technical policy analysis for vehicle fuel economy regulations.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Be- dillion’s research interests include
Engineering, LATICE 2014, 2014, pp. 74–77.[6] G. W. Hislop and H. J. C. Ellis, “Using scaffolding to improve written communication of software engineering students,” in ITNG 2009 - 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 2009, pp. 707–712.[7] T. A. Eppes, I. Milanovic, and H. F. Sweitzer, “Strengthening capstone skills in STEM programs,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Feb. 2012.[8] L. Bosman, “From Doing to Thinking: Developing the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Scaffold Assignments and Self-Regulated Learning Reflection,” Open Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 106–121, Oct. 2019.[9] T. Morgan, “Enabling Meaningful Reflection Within Project-Based-Learning in Engineering
NCSU where she began Energy Clubs, an out-of-school-time program for third, fourth and fifth graders to introduce them to renewable energy.Dr. Edward H Currie, Hofstra University Edward H. Currie holds a BSEE, Masters and Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Miami and is an Associate Professor in the Fred DeMatteis School of Engineering and Applied Science where and teaches Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and serves as a Co-Director of Hofstra’s Center for Innovation. Research interests include Additive manufacturing plastic and magnetic technology, robotic systems, color night-vision, autonomous wound closure systems, microchannel plate applications, thermal imaging, programmable systems on a
steel design, engineering mechanics: statics, building foundations and numerical analysis. Professor Ramming has recently been named Halliburton Outstanding Young Faculty and the Outstanding Teacher for the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. She has also published books for Project Lead the Way and a text on Numerical Structural Analysis. Professor Ramming enjoys spending time with the students of CEAT as the advisor of the Ar- chitectural Engineering Institute, Tau Beta Pi, Women Inspiring Successful Engineers, and CEAT Student Council. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Diversity and Culture in Structural Engineering
2005 and Bachelor’s Degree from the Hefei University of Technology in 1997, both in Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Liu’s research has historically focused on the areas of multiscale material modeling and simulation, high strain rate performance of materials, vehicle systems design and analy- sis, and hydropower and wave energy technology. His current research interests and activities center on gaining a better understanding of the process-structure-property-performance relations of structural mate- rials through advanced multiscale theoretical framework and integrated computational and experimental methods. To date, Dr. Liu has published about 200 peer reviewed publications, including more than 100 peer reviewed
Bioengineering from the University of Notre Dame. Current interests include bone tissue mechanics, rehabilitation devices, engineering pedagogy, and robotic football. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Let’s get ethical: Incorporating The Office and engaging practices into an ethics module for capstone studentsIntroduction:Professional ethics is at the core of successful engineering practice, ensuring the integrity of theprofession and the safety of the general public. To promote the formation of ethically awareengineers, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires institutionsto graduate students with “an ability to recognize ethical and
Barrow, L.H., "A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Students’ Self-Efficacy by Gender, Ethnicity, Year, and Transfer Status," Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 163-172 (2009).[28] Lee, W.C., Godwin, A. and Nave, A.L.H. "Development of the Engineering Student Integration Instrument: Rethinking Measures of Integration," Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1), 30-55 (2018).[29] Fernandez, T., Godwin, A., Doyle, J., Verdin, D., Boone, H., Kirn, A., Benson, L. and Potvin, G., 2016. "More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Collection," Proceedings from ASEE 2016 Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25751Appendix A. Initial survey used for ChemE Camp
BME and a course in general engineering or computerscience.) The teaching distribution shifts substantially for required courses taken in the second year,with BME responsible for 66%, and the computer science department responsible for most of therest (26%). For junior and senior level courses, BME is responsible for almost all (92%), whichby this point are largely the simulation and modeling courses. It is uncommon for the BME department to be responsible for OOP courses, but this is thecase at seven universities (Lawrence Technological University, Marquette University, and theUniversities of Colorado at Denver, Maryland College Park, Memphis, Miami, and Texas atAustin).Examples As already seen, there is a great deal of
, and movement variability.Dr. Sara E Wilson, The University of Kansas Sara Wilson is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Academic Director of the Bioengi- neering Graduate Program at the University of Kansas. Dr. Wilson earned her PhD in Medical Engineer- ing from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She also holds a master’s degree in Mechanical Engi- neering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Dr. Wilson teaches courses in Control Systems and Biomechan- ics. Dr. Wilson also conducts research in the neuromuscular control of human motion using engineering principles from control theory and dynamics. She
across the United States and much of the world areaccredited by ABET, formerly the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. ABETgeneral criteria for these programs include Student Outcomes. The seven Student Outcomes forcivil engineering programs, are: 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize
,” Proc. IDC 2015 14th Int. Conf. Interact. Des. Child., pp. 347–350, 2015, doi: 10.1145/2771839.2771913.[7] M. Hlubinka et al., “Makerspace Playbook,” p. 78, 2013.[8] C. McKay, T. D. Banks, and S. Wallace, “Makerspace Classrooms: Where Technology Intersects With Problem, Project, and Place-Based Design in Classroom Curriculum,” Int. J. Des. Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 11–16, 2016, doi: 10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.20267.[9] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–5, 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[10] R. Beichner, “The SCALE-UP Project: A Student-Centered Active learning Environment
Paper ID #28615Work-in-Progress: Comparison of a Standards-based Assessment to aTraditional, Summative Rubric in a Biomedical Engineering LaboratoryDr. Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University Casey J. Ankeny, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Instruction at Northwestern University. Casey received her bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2006 and her doctorate degree in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University in 2012 where she studied the role of shear stress in aortic valve disease. Currently, she is investigating cyber- based student
. Baltimore, MD:Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.[2] A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, “Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education,”Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 327-338, Jul. 2008.[3] B. Newberry, “The dilemma of ethics in engineering education.” Science and EngineeringEthics. vol. 10, pp. 343-51, 2004, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[4] C.J. Finelli, M.A. Holsapple, E. Ra, R.M. Bielby, B.A. Burt, D.D. Carpenter, T.S. Harding,and J.A. Sutkus, “An Assessment of Engineering Students’ Curricular and Co-CurricularExperiences and Their Ethical Development,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no.3, pp. 469-494, Jul 2012.[5] K.A. Reyer, M.B. Cantwell, P.C. Lam, and R.M. Rafferty, “Improving Ethics Education
guidingprinciples for online learning, we can ensure a viable student experience.Transformation to online learningThe Nanotechnology CourseIntroduction to Nanotechnology course was designed as an undergraduate engineering elective toexpose students to the material opportunities offered at the nanometer scale. The course contentis divided into (a) fundamentals, (b) tools for synthesis and characterization, and (c) applicationsof nanomaterials within devices and more broadly technology. Principles of Nanotechnologycourse is a graduate level course that is combined with the undergraduate course. Graduatestudents complete additional assessments that go beyond the undergraduate level assignments.The lecture content, however, is identical between the
., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., Dror, I. E. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 2009, 40(6), 1124–1134.(4) Brink, J.; Capps, E.; Sutko, A. College Student Journal, 2004, 38(2), 262+.(5) Landherr, L.J.T. “Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote Student Interest,Confidence, and Understanding”. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2019.(6) Landherr, L.J.T. “The Production of Science Comics To Improve UndergraduateEngineering.” Proc. ASEE Northeast Section Conference, 2016.(7) Vega, E.; Schnackenberg, H.L. Proceedings of the Association for EducationalCommunications and Technology, 2004.(8) Pelton, L.F.; Pelton, T.; Moore, K. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology &Teacher
: It’s Really Not Very Hard” 2018 ASEEAnnual Conference and Proceedings, ASEE, Salt Lake City, June 24-27, 2018.2 ABET, Inc. “Visiting Programs Transitioning to C3 & C5” Webinar presented by Patsy Brackin Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, EAC Criteria Committee Past Chair and Bopaya Bidanda University ofPittsburgh Chair, EAC Training Committee. April 26, 2019, located at: https://www.abet.org/events-and-workshops/assessment-planning-resources/webinars/ (28 Jan 2020).3 ABET, Inc. “FAQs for EAC C3 & C5 Criteria Changes”. Engineering Accrediting Commission. October1, 2018 https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/FAQs-for-EAC-C3-C5-4-8-2019.pdf (28 Jan2020)4 ABET Inc. “Guidance for EAC Criteria 3 and 5 Changes” Engineering
. 44, no. 2–4, pp. 334–347, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1562396.[6] E. M. Rowley and A. Ben Wagner, “Citing of industry standards in scholarly publications,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., vol. 92, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.29173/istl27.[7] J. Z. Piety and A. McCormick, “The standards collection in the Science and Technology Department of the Cleveland Public Library,” Sci. Technol. Libr., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 37– 48, May 1990, doi: 10.1300/J122v10n03_03.[8] B. S. Mathews, “The role of industry standards: An overview of the top engineering schools’ libraries,” Issues Sci. Technol. Librariansh., vol. 46, spring 2006, doi: 10.5062/F48C9T6D.[9] L. J. Pellack, “Industry standards in ARL libraries: Electronic
-019- 02434-7. [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020].[3] A.W. Eberhardt, O.L. Johnson, et al. “Team-Based Development of Medical Devices: An Engineering-Business Collaborative”. J Biomech Eng. Vol. 138, No. 7, Jul. 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org10.1115/1.4032805 [Accessed Jan. 31, 2020][4] C. Cohen., D.C. Fehder, et al. “The design of startup accelerators”, Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 1781-1791, Sep. 2019 [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003 [Accessed Feb. 3, 2020].[5] Y. Yazdi, S. Acharya. “ A New Model for Graduate Education and Innovation in Medical Technology”. Ann Biomed Eng, Vol. 41, 1822–1833 (2013). [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0869-4. [Accessed Feb. 3, 2020]
Paper ID #28588The Portia Hypothesis: Mechanical Engineering Student Perceptions ofQualificationsDr. Leigh S McCue, George Mason University Leigh McCue is an Associate Professor in George Mason University’s Department of Mechanical Engi- neering. Dr. McCue received her BSE degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2000 from Princeton University. She earned her graduate degrees from the University of Michigan in Aerospace Engineering (MSE 2001) and Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering (MSE 2002, PhD 2004). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
and Technology Case-based Instruction for Innovation Education in Engineering and Technology,” in Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[5] P. Raju and C. Sankar, “Teaching Real-World Issues through Case Studies,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, 1999.[6] C. I. Sandefur and C. Gordy, “Undergraduate Journal Club as an Intervention to Improve Student Development in Applying the Scientific Process,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 52–58, 2016.[7] A. Minerick, “Journal Club: A Forum To Encourage Graduate And Undergraduate Research Students To Critically Review The Literature,” Pap. Present. 2006 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Chicago, Illinois, 2006.[8] M
more complex engineering activities at allstages of the life cycle of technical objects, processes and systems. The success of the project hasbeen quantitatively measured through surveys that were resented to students from the Universityof Southern Indiana. The data shows that the project overall is challenging and that they do notthink that they have the necessary knowledge and skills to develop a miniature racing car at thebeginning of the semester.References[1] Liang, J. (2012). Learning in troubleshooting of automotive braking system: A project-basedteamwork approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 331-352.[2] Peterlicean, A., & Morar, F. (2013). Project-Based Learning in Higher Education. AppliedMechanics and
beneficial for students, especially for students of opportunity on multiple levels[Carpi et al., 2017; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014]. Although UG students can gaindifferent levels of relevant skills, attitudes, and conceptual understanding in the same time ofresearch, they can get confidence in presentation skills within a relatively short time and showthe improvement in identifying patterns in data and logical argument in the experiences[Bhattacharyya et al., 2018].In recent years, not only universities but also various agencies have tried programs intended toencourage undergraduate (UG) students to involve in research. Specially, science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines have more opportunities for students to
industry for six years, and managed an otolaryngology practice for five years.Prof. Roy St Laurent PhD, Northern Arizona University Roy St. Laurent is a professor of statistics at Northern Arizona University where he has taught for 25 years. He has an undergraduate degree in mathematics from Michigan Technological University and a PhD in statistics from the University of Minnesota. His research has included publications developing new statistical methodology, as well as co-authored publications with researchers applying statistics to medical, public health, and engineering research questions. Some of his statistical interests include non- linear regression, regression diagnostics, and method comparison studies / measures of
in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Amy F. Golightly, Bucknell University Amy Golightly is an associate professor of education at Bucknell University. She earned her B. A. in psychology from the University of Saint Thomas, and her Ph.D. in school psychology from the University of Iowa. Her main research interests lie in understanding factors that facilitate or hinder learning and conceptual change in undergraduate students, and in development of assistive technology to help college students with disabilities. She is currently involved in collaborative research projects focused on these topics in chemical and electrical engineering
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Saint Louis Unviersity, Dr. Gorlewicz is currently the director of the Collaborative Haptics, Robotics, and Mechatronics (CHROME) Lab. Her research interests are in medical robotics, haptic devices, human-machine interaction, and in creating and evaluating novel learning technologies.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Dr. Sridhar Condoor is a professor, KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the editor of the Journal of En- gineering Entrepreneurship. He teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology entrepreneurship, and sustain- ability. He is spearheading technology
technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands-on learning. Luchini-Colbry is also the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S.Dr. Melissa McDaniels, Michigan State University Melissa McDaniels is Senior Advisor to the Dean for Research Mentoring at the Graduate School and Postdoc Office at Michigan State University where she has been working to support graduate students and postdocs at Michigan State as they develop their capacities as postsecondary instructors and mentors. She is also an Investigator with and part of the
):63–85, 2000. [2] D. H. Jonassen. Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. Instructional Technology and Training Series. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, 2004. [3] D. H. Jonassen. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-solving Learning Environment. Routhledge, New York, NY, 2011. [4] D. R. Woods, A. N. Hrymak, R. R. Marshall, P. E. Woods, C. M. Crowe, T. W. Hoffman, J. D. Wright, P. A. Taylor, K. A. Woodhouse, and C. G. K. Bouchard. Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2):75–91, 1997. [5] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz. Teaching Engineering. Purdue University Press, 2nd edition, 2015. [6] D. R. Woods. An evidence-based