of the students for thetrip (2, 5-8).A field trip to tour a construction site tour has an inherent link to civil engineering design classcurriculum. However, planning and integration of materials by the instructor can increase thisconnection and improve learning opportunities. In order to be most effective, construction sitetours need to have a clearly defined purpose, directly relate to the curriculum and communicateinformation effectively. These goals are difficult to accomplish if the faculty member is notdirectly involved in the planning and guidance of the tour. Too often faculty members feeluncertain about the site conditions or design experience, and therefore place the responsibility ona construction manager or alumni to develop the
, the class average was 69.6 ± 15.9,with an average median of 70; in all semesters afterwards, the average was 79.1 ± 14.1 with anaverage median of 80.9. A paired two tailed t-test comparing the results from Fall 2016 to Fall2018, again distinguishing between before the project to just before the lab courses changed,indicated statistical significance in the results (p = 0.012). Given that the exam questions changedevery semester, this continued improvement strongly suggests that the course project was helpingto improve students’ understanding of the concepts.Conclusion In response to students’ requests for more learning material in their courses, curriculum-producing projects were integrated into a heat and mass transfer course, with the
was carefully designed to help first-year students achieve success in the programregardless of the specific engineering major they select in their second year. Therefore, thecourse includes themes centered on several design-and-build projects with the following programobjectives: 1. Provide students with the opportunity to experience engineering as an evolving, creative, and interdisciplinary career that impacts global society and daily life. 2. Provide students with the opportunity to develop process-driven problem-solving skills that recognize multiple alternatives and apply critical thinking to identify an effective solution. 3. Provide students with the opportunity to integrate math & science in an engineering context. 4
found to besimilar to the population at WSU based on incoming ACT math scores and preparation; however,the curriculum does not have room to add an additional required course as was done at WSU. Sincethe research to date shows that the majority of the impact of the course is on students that are notcalculus ready, the course developed at GVSU focuses on those students. Consequently, thiscourse is optional and marketed toward students who are not in calculus, enrolled in either a pre-calculus math course or trigonometry.The course was first offered in Fall of 2016. Much of the course is based on the course materialsand text developed as part of the Wright State Model; however, due to constraints, the lab portionwas limited to in-class
Results from the Implementation of Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics at University of Detroit MercyAbstractDifficulties with the Calculus sequence in the engineering curriculum leads to many studentsabandoning engineering programs. Many of these students are from underrepresented groups suchas women and students of color. This is a significant loss to the profession. The problem is notnew and engineering educators have worked on different strategies to alleviate this problem. Afairly well-known approach, first proposed by faculty from Wright State University, involvesteaching an Engineering Mathematics class to freshmen engineering students. Taught by engineers(and not mathematicians), this course typically covers
: Assessment of Student Achievement (ASA), Advanced Technology Education (ATE), Course Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI), and Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics Scholarships (CSEMS). Prior to Keene State College he taught in the Manufacturing Engineering Tech- nology department at Wentworth Institute of Technology. He has also served as an adjunct professor for the Plastics Engineering Program for the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. He has been a consultant for Ford Motor Company, Polaroid Inc., Timken Aerospace, and SMITHS Industries to name a few. As a guest scientist he consulted at the Army Materials Research for over 13 years in the Composite Devel- opment Division. He has numerous
client resources, and ethical theorySinha et al. [12] Discusses topics of construction law and Suggests situating ethics in a required course Discusses evaluation of student contracts, legal systems and maxims of law, on engineering ethics, required course with portfolios that contain samples of societal values and morality, professional engineering ethics integrated, across the student essays analyzing ethical practice, and employer obligations curriculum, or via an integrated humanities issues demonstrating student ability and social
process simulators and othercomputational tools.Today expectations for the capstone design project are much higher than they were 20 years ago.Such expectations include multiple case studies, sophisticated optimizations including processeconomics, and life-cycle and safety analyses. However, very few chemical engineeringgraduates work for design and construction companies and those employed in the processindustry will more likely work in an operating facility. The senior capstone design projectprovides students an opportunity to bring different concepts taught throughout the curriculuminto the design of a chemical process. The question is: how well does a rigorous chemicalengineering undergraduate curriculum and the associated capstone design
Annual Conference, 2018.13. Boyle, P., Houchens, B. Adaptive Water Laboratory For K 12 Outreach On SustainableWater Use. ASEE Annual Conference, 2008.14. Ganesh, T. G., Randall, L. S., Thieken, J. Designing and Testing Water Filtration Devicesusing the Engineering Design Process: A Description of an Eighth Grade Curricular Unit onBioremediation. ASEE Annual Conference, 2011.15. Goldman, S., Carroll, M., Zielezinksi, M. B., Loh, A., Ng, E. S., Bachas-Daunert, S. Dive In!An Integrated Design Thinking/STEM Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.16. Ford Versypt, A. N. Water Filtration Lesson Plan. Available from URL:http://tinyurl.com/ashleefv/waterfiltration.
Paper ID #30550Designing and Evaluating Co-Curricular Information Literacy Sessions forUndergraduate Engineering ResearchersShelby J Hallman, North Carolina State University Shelby Hallman is the Lead Librarian for Engineering at the North Carolina State University Libraries. She provides research support, curriculum-integrated information literacy instruction, and is a liaison for the Colleges of Engineering and Textiles and Entrepreneurship Program. Shelby is also a Co-PI on the Mellon funded grant, ”Visualizing Digital Scholarship in Libraries and Learning Spaces”, investigating large-scale visualization environments
Manufacturing Education in the UK, in: 23rd Annu. Int.Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin, Austin,USA, 2012: pp. 1–13.[5] J.H. Bøhn, Integrating rapid prototyping into the engineering curriculum ‐ a case study, RapidPrototyp. J. 3 (1997) 32–37. doi:10.1108/13552549710169264.[6] G. Celani, Digital Fabrication Laboratories: Pedagogy and Impacts on Architectural Education,Nexus Netw. J. 14 (2012) 469–482. doi:10.1007/s00004‐012‐0120‐x.[7] R.E. Stamper, D.L. Dekker, Utilizing rapid prototyping to enhance undergraduateengineering education, in: 30th Annu. Front. Educ. Conf., IEEE, Kansas City, USA, 2000:pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/FIE.2000.896570.[8] K. Stier, R. Brown, Integrating Rapid Prototyping
continued process, the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) convened a “Summit on the Future of Civil Engineering” in 2006 that lookedat articulating an “aspirational global vision for the future of civil engineering” [1]. This alsoserved as a guide to updating the ASCE Body of Knowledge document, which “offers guidancefor the education and training programs of private and public organizations that employ civilengineers; and supports changes in licensure requirements” [2]. The document providesguidelines on the learning outcomes deemed important for the profession.During the 2013-14 and 2014-15 academic years, Texas A&M University’s civil andenvironmental engineering department undertook a curriculum transformation project, basing
cover the overall field of engineering.Further, Crash Course: Engineering was effectively an extension of the project into the next fieldto cover, after having previously covered other subjects like chemistry, ecology, and literature; thebest practices utilized in producing these engineering videos were thus based on previous effortswithin Crash Course, and not based on work conducted by other researchers. The previous studies,on the other hand, will be most impactful moving forward in guiding future analyses of CrashCourse: Engineering videos in formal and informal learning environments, by means ofshowcasing how videos can best be integrated into classrooms or tutoring. Work-to-date with the Crash Course: Engineering videos has
, characterized by active, project-based learning, by introducingmathematical and scientific concepts in the context of application, and by integrating thedevelopment of teamwork, communication, and problem-solving skills in learningexperiences throughout the engineering curriculum. An engineering education based on thisvision should produce graduates better prepared to meet the needs of engineering employersand increase student motivation and interest [2].To accomplish such a shift in undergraduate engineering education, efforts towards a holisticengineering curriculum that is compatible with the complexity inherent in the technologiescurrently being developed have been encouraged (see, e. g., [3]). The key distinction drawnhere is between engineered
student’s interests and major choice, it isimportant to explore these facets with regards to specific majors and career choices. Biology isbecoming an integral part of chemical engineering education, and biological courses are evenrequired in curricula for chemical engineering programs with the terms “biochemical” or“biomolecular” in their names [5]. While chemical engineering students are therefore beingexposed to more and more biology, it is unknown whether they have positive or negativeemotions towards biology. Indeed, from the authors’ own anecdotal experiences, chemicalengineering students do not seem to be overly positive or excited about biology. The goal of thisstudy was therefore to test the hypothesis that chemical engineering students
paper discusses how students usepersonal and public spaces in their departments, the library, and what they deem as necessities tocomplete their “home away from home” on-campus experience. The photos and gps databasewill be added to the library repository collection for future researchers to use.Introduction The Texas A&M University (TAMU) Libraries are an important hub for students’studying needs. However, have we optimized or enhanced the spaces for optimal student usageand occupancy? Can we assume that technology, operating hours, location on campus, services,and furniture determine the usability of the spaces? Over the past decades, the TAMU Librarieshave renovated spaces as a reaction to safety, ADA, energy consumption, and
Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.Prof. Dawn McFadden, Pennsylvania State University Since 2015, Dawn McFadden has been an Assistant Teaching
Paper ID #29709A Study of the Effectiveness of Using Hands-On Active Learning Exercisesin a Production Operations Management CourseMajor Steven Hoak, United States Military Academy Major Steven Hoak currently serves as an instructor at the United States Military Academy in the Depart- ment of Systems Engineering, focusing on engineering management. He is a career Army Aviation and Acquisition Officer. He holds a Master degree in Nuclear Engineering (Air Force Institute of Technol- ogy), a Master of Business Management (Mississippi State University) as well as a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the United
summary, this multi-staged project forced students to rethink their designs many timesconsidering the security level of the system. It showed them the importance of building a securesystem at the design stage. IoT and computer security cannot be an afterthought, it must be thefoundation of design.Additional stages can be designed and integrated to the current project depending on the coursethe knowledge level of students in the class.Results and DiscussionTo use this Raspberry Pi kit in classes, instructors need to be aware of students’ knowledge levelon Python programming and using GPIOs in Raspberry Pi. It is noticed that CS students lack somehardware skills in general, while engineering students lack some Python programming knowledge.It is
the University of Rochester Center for Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Since 2003, Dr. Walz has taught chemistry and engineering at Madi- son Area Technical College, where he also serves as the director of the Center for Renewable Energy Advanced Technological Education (CREATE). Dr. Walz is also an adjunct professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Wiscon- sin. He has served as teacher for the UW Delta Center for Integrating Research, Teaching and Learning, and has mentored several graduate students who completed teaching internships while creating new in- structional materials for renewable energy and chemical education. Dr. Walz is also an instructor with the Wisconsin K-12 Energy
-space to another can be accomplished in infinitely many ways. These features allow asystem to be controlled. If a system needs to track an input, its output is measured and used asfeedback to construct an error function. By the application of the controller, this error is reducedas close to zero as possible. The manner, in which the error is brought to near zero, dictates theresponse of the system. Some of the methods used in control system design aim at minimizingintegral square, L2 norm, H∞ norm, etc. of the error [1]. One of the most common types ofcontrollers is a Proportional-Derivative-Integral (PID) controller. This approach of controlsystem design can be applied to any dynamic system.The teaching-learning system that is composed of a
, withthe addition of integral and derivative gains (𝐾𝐼 , 𝐾𝐷 ) in the feedback loop, along with appropriatelylocated compensator poles and zeros. The derivative component helps in improving the transientresponse of the closed loop system, while the integral component helps in reducing the steady stateerror in the system response. With all three components (Proportional + Integral + Derivative)working concurrently, it is possible to improve both the transient as well as the steady stateresponse of an aircraft’s short period dynamics. A simplified schematic of this controller isrepresented below in Figure 4. Figure 4: Architecture of a simple proportional-integral-derivative controller Given the controller types described above
their first year at CSU Chico. The bootcamp recruited matriculating students in engineering and computer science fromunderrepresented minorities and first-generation and low-income populations. The core of thebootcamp curriculum was an intensive math program designed to stimulate deeper understandingof algebra and trigonometry and practical problem-solving skills. The curriculum also includedProblem-Based Learning (PBL) modules with projects that applied concepts from computerscience and mechanical, mechatronic, computer, and electrical engineering.The first objective is particularly impactful because of the pre-requisite chains in most of ourengineering (ENGR) and computer science (CS) curricula. A one-semester delay in graduationoccurs when a
electronic parts connect with telephone jack like connectors.This makes all the electrical components for the Mindstorms a black box.Related Works Chaudhary et al. [4] evaluate the effectiveness of using the Lego Mindstorms EV3 as alearning tool and a way to get K-8 students interested in STEM. Chaudhary et al. [4] introducedthe Lego Mindstorms EV3 to a summer camp for elementary school students. The camp hadinstructors teach a hands-on curriculum centered around the device for multiple days. Along withsurveying the students about their experience, the researchers evaluated students’ “computationaland logical thinking skills” before and after the summer camp [4]. The evaluations wereperformed by having students play an online game that focused
them. Some students may already beexperienced makerspace users; others may be eager to learn, but lack the confidence or initiativeto seek out what makerspaces have to offer. For example, Florida Tech has four high qualityacademic "making" facilities and free training on how to use the equipment available to thecampus community, but only a fraction of students take advantage of them. More class projectswith EML themes early in the curriculum may encourage future makerspace usage for co-curricular activity, better senior design experiences and an overall increase in self-efficacy.The work reported here attempts to address these issues in an incremental fashion. The firstsection of the paper describes a simple team project that could be used by
Lincoln Center Summer Forum, focusing on integrating performing and visual art into elementary curriculum. In our current trying times, she is producing new plays through Zoom and co-hosting a weekly comedy show on Socially Distant Improv (Instagram Live). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31067Jimena Bermejo Jimena is a as a movement artist who has moved away from the classical ”rehearse-to-perform” paradigm of her dance training to include imperfections, to break the separation between audience and performer. She uses movement, text, and performance actions to experiment
Character Education? A Literature Review of Four Prominent Virtues in Engineering EducationAbstractThe complexity of problems that engineers address requires knowledge, skills, and abilities thatextend beyond technical engineering expertise, including teamwork and collaboration, problem-solving, curiosity and lifelong learning, cultural awareness, and ethical decision-making. How dowe prepare engineering students to develop these essential capacities? One promising approachis to integrate character education into the undergraduate curriculum. Using an established andcommonly used taxonomy advanced by the Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues at theUniversity of Birmingham, this paper explores the extent to which virtues are
seen from Table 5, the students agreed that this design course helped them toachieve 7 out of the 11 ABET outcomes (with an overall score above 4 out of 5). Compared withthe results collected in Fall 2017, it can be found that the Fall 2018 class has made progress indeveloping 9 out of the 11 ABET student outcomes (a, c, e, f, g, h, i, j, and k). From the rightmostcolumn in Table 6 we can find that the three ABET mostly impacted by the presented activitiesare outcomes h, i, and a. The effects of the new course materials, including the newly designedviscous damping system projects and the integration of other vibration and control systems builtby previous students, in enhancing the teaching effectiveness and student learning experience inthis
withinscientific literature, as evidenced by an increased discussion of citizen science in peer reviewedarticles [6]. Despite its growth, relatively few citizen science projects have focused onengineering disciplines [6, 7]. Prior citizen science efforts have developed curricula for low-cost,air-quality sensors in schools [8] and a recent study enabled citizen scientists to monitor andreport unlawful air quality emissions from local industry [9]. One challenge integrating airquality measurement with citizen science initiatives is over sensors’ perceived “black box”operation, with citizen scientists having little understanding of how these sensors function [10].While prior outreach has helped expose the inner workings of sensor hardware
particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Susan Bobbitt Nolen is Professor Emerita of Learning Sciences & Human Development at the University of Washington. She earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at Pudue University. Her current research interests focus on student engagement in engineering practices and social interaction during learning activ- ity, and their relationship to