ways that the leadership of an organizationcan create a diverse cast and set the stage for creativity and innovation to occur before describingnine specific actions that leadership should take. Several of these relate to building a communitythat values, encourages, and celebrates creativity. To be clear: this is a cultural necessity thatmust be fostered by the organization’s leadership.Too often, our programs hold up one-offs as a sign of programmatic achievement, a sort of “lookwhat that kid did!”, but these achievements are singular and were often completed asindependent study or extracurricular activities rather than as part of a broad plan for all students.By building a creative community, we suggest that all student efforts are
perspective” than afforded by amore technical engineering process. Similar concepts are identified by both PA2 and PA3. PA4tells us that more experience with the concepts and process, and application of the results, isnecessary. This suggests that — in addition to inserting ethics modules in courses throughout theentire degree plan — that there could be multiple ethics checkpoints through the semester. PA5approaches ethics from the well-developed rationality of an engineer! There are always tradeoffsto be considered and with the instruction and practice provided, this student indicates that it ispossible to “engineer” a maximization of ethics while actively minimizing harms (this issomething we would hope for!) Similarly, PA6 concludes that one can
offered inthe computer science discipline. The software engineering program offers a course that includesresearch methods content, among other topics.In this paper, the course that was developed is presented. Specifically, the types of content thatwere included are discussed and an overview of each of the weekly modules is presented. Theparticular goals of each module and the instruction of research methods applicable to theadversarial cybersecurity domain are reviewed.This paper continues with a review of relevant prior work. Then, it provides context bypresenting the existing graduate programs at NDSU and the planned cybersecurity programs.The need that drove the development of the new programs is then discussed followed by adiscussion of the
primarily on disaster preparedness planning, inclusion, and capacity-building activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29629Dr. Jamie Vickery, Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events, Oklahoma State University Jamie Vickery is a research associate at the Natural Hazards Center within the Institute of Behavioral Science and a postdoctoral fellow at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. She is also an af- filiate with the Center for the Study of Disasters and Extreme Events at Oklahoma State University. Her research interests focus on hazard risk
committee to examine the feasibility of using aninternal credentialing system, rather than licensure, as the principal means of validatingfulfillment of the CEBOK [35]. In response, the task committee developed a concept forawarding specialty certification as a post-licensure credential to individual civil engineeringprofessionals who attain the undergraduate and post-graduate engineering education, mentoredexperience, and self-development outcomes specified in the CEBOK. Details of the taskcommittee’s proposal are provided in [34]. In July 2019, the ASCE Board responded favorablyto the task committee’s interim report and authorized them to finalize the proposal, including thedevelopment of business and implementation plans for the proposed
DEVICES USED BY STUDENTS TO READ ETEXTBOOK DEVICES Responses Percent Laptop 154 89.5 Desktop Computer 49 28.5 Tablet 27 15.7 Phone 22 12.8We were not surprised the majority of students used laptops and desktop computers to read theireTextbooks. Given the nature of the eTextbook format, larger screens make sense. Students didread on mobile devices, however, meaning that vendors need to be aware of and plan forresponsive design and mobile-friendly eTextbooks when making
Code of Ethics [19] requires engineers to“endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of theirprofessional services.” Without respectful listening, an engineer will not be aware of thesediverse perspectives. The quality of understanding that is achieved during communication mayvary based on who is being listened to and how one perceives the importance of the other person[20,21]. This idea is acknowledged in IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design [22]: “stakeholderengagement and deliberative processes can be effective when… more powerful actors participatewith an awareness of their own power and make a commitment to listen with humility, curiosity,and open-mindedness” (p. 84). Further, listening is the first
than moving on without addressing knowledge gaps. ● Developing and instructing additional training in active learning teaching methods for departmental teaching assistants, initially as a discrete course, and then incorporated as a mandatory training courses for student employees in Bioengineering. ● Using ‘scaffolding’, using instructional plans to lead the students from what they already know, such as using prompts, questioning, or cue cards [33], to form a deeper understanding of new material [34] with a fading level of instructor support. ● Implementing ‘exit tickets’, an end of class short task to reflect on learning, such as students noting what was most valuable, and what they are still confused
sectors to implement sustainability as part of building plan- ning, design, construction, and operations. As a LEED Accredited Professional, Annie brings the latest in green building methods, technologies, and best practices to the classroom. Her specific areas of interest include metrics of sustainability for built facilities, green building materials and systems, cost modeling to support sustainability implementation, and in situ performance of sustainable facility technologies.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida
3Table 1Participant Demographic Information Pseudonym Race/Ethnicity PhD Completion Status Degree Field Becky European American/White Completed Engineering Giselle Hispanic/LatinX Did not complete Biological Sciences Tiara Black/African American, Completed Mathematics European American/White Angela Black/African American Did not complete Engineering Erin European American/White Did not complete Physical Sciences Nadia European American/White Did not complete EngineeringAnalysis Plans A constant-comparative
and Their Impacts on StudentsA growing strand of scholarly dialogue in higher education explores connections betweenstudents’ emotional experiences with pressures and stress, and student achievement andretention. Relevant studies identify general academic pressures including parental expectations,grades, test taking, time pressures, and future plans [19] as well as those unique to engineeringstudents, such as family pressure to study the major [20]. Some studies specifically focus onstudent stress [21, 22] and impacts on students’ mental health [19, 23].Students often experience anxiety due to the stress of these expectations as well as fear of failureto fulfill them [24]. In the context of a study of psychological distress in college
. The time dedicatedto the Lecture Style (LS) approach during the semester was 815 minutes (43.3%), CollaborativeLearning (CL) 443 minutes (23.6%), Gamification (GA) 155 (8.3%), Problem-Based Learning(PBL) 310 (16.5%) and Social Interaction (SI) 152 (8.1%). The class times in the table werecomputed based on the number of slides presented during class, the lesson plan for each class andthe class sessions dedicated to discussing the project and solving in-class problems. LS consistedmainly of the instructor presenting the basic concepts underlying specific topics in each course.For example, a basic concept in each of the classes is as follows: SE1 - the process of performingrequirements elicitation; and FST - the approach used to generate test
into reauthoring what it means to be an engineer in thecontext of a first-year engineering design course. We begin by describing the institutionalcontext of the course.Context of First-Year Engineering Design CourseThe course that occupies the focus of the present paper is known locally as Introduction toEngineering and is offered in the fall semester at Harding—a private, non-profit, religiouslyaffiliated, teaching-focused university. It is a required course in the degree plans for fiveengineering majors that are offered at the university: biomedical, civil, computer, electrical, andmechanical. Typically, students are enrolled in the first-year engineering design course in theirfirst year of undergraduate. Almost all of the enrolled students
findingsfrom previous work with GE students, in particular a study conducted by Hutchison-Green et al.[2] Using data collected from the NSF funded project “A Mixed-Methods Study of the Effects ofFirst-Year Project Pedagogies on the Retention and Career Plans of Women in Engineering,” [5],[6] this secondary analysis of data was conducted to answer the research question, How doengineering students from a declared first-year matriculation structure develop engineering self-efficacy, through first-level and pattern coding methods [7].Perceptions of self-efficacy are formed by four sources: mastery experience, vicarious experience,social persuasions, and somatic and emotional state [8]. The most influential of these sources ismastery experience – the
profession thataffects every aspect of modern life [1]. Reinforcing this sense of responsibility throughout thecurriculum helps increase students’ awareness and judgment, which supports their ethicaldecision-making in practice [33]. One student in Fluid Mechanics noted that the intervention“show[ed] how broad of an impact the technology we might be working on in the future canhave on the country and the world sometimes.” The hydraulic fracturing activity helped thisstudent understand the potential implications of his future career and this was an importantoutcome since he planned to pursue employment in the oil industry.The narrow technical focus of individual courses in the engineering curriculum can obscureconnections between, and implications of
in the first weeks of the quarter and letting usfocus on the logic of programming and on problem solving. The online web-based simulator alsowas a pleasure to use during lectures, supporting code stepping, displaying variable updates, anddepicting flowchart views of code. The students indicated they enjoyed using the simulator aswell, and we had no reports of students having trouble accessing or using the simulator.However, we believe we got a few things wrong in the initial design of the Coral-to-C++approach. Based on the experience, we plan to make several changes in our next offering inSpring 2020 (ongoing at the time of this paper's writing): ● We taught Coral for 5 weeks, covering input/output, assignments, branches, loops
issues encountered asproblems and issues to be resolved and often lowers the frustration and dissatisfactionencountered in technical leadership roles.Servant leaders focus on the needs, development and well-being of others and share power orcontrol [20,21]. Difficulties in applying this leadership style are typically due to our trainingwhere we are taught to be independent and defend our views to avoid ‘losing’ or being provedwrong. We can often engage others readily by showing sincere interest in their point of view,ensuring that clear communication of similarities and differences in viewpoint has taken place,and by involving them in planning and implementation of new initiatives or changes in direction.This interdependence culture develops
has been official Technical Teacher at Ministry of Education in Iran from 2007 to 2018, and received many certificate in education such as Educational Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing teamwork skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of
investigates: What is therelationship, if any, between team dynamics and innovation effectiveness? Can a team achievehigh innovation effectiveness if it has low team dynamics?Literature reviewTeamwork is recognized as a critical engineering skill. ABET devotes a student outcome toteamwork skill: “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” [4]. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering suggested that“Teamwork should be embedded everywhere – as part of authentic design experiences, ifpossible – and needs to become a meta-skill for every student.” [5, p.21]. Teamwork is valued atthe workplace because it
salient events. Nature, 411, 305–309.Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2005). Exploratory Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Data. A Systematic Approach. Heidelberg: Springer.Axson, D. A. (2003). Best practices in planning and management reporting: from data to decisions. J. Wiley & Sons.Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265-289.Butler, B. E. (1980). Selective attention and stimulus localization in visual perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 119-133.Doyle, J. (1997). The Cognitive Psychology of Systems Thinking. System Dynamics Review, 13(3), 253– 265.Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the
metacognitive skills may help engineeringprograms improve instruction in this area which, in turn, could help students transition moreeffectively into professional practice. 1 D. J. Hacker, Metacognition: Definitions and empirical foundations, in D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. C. Graesser (eds), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp. 1-23, 1998. 2 A. L. Brown and J. S. DeLoache, Skills, plans, and self-regulation, in R. S. Siegel (ed), Children’s thinking: What develops? Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 3-35, 1987. 3 J. H. Flavell, Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry, American Psychologist, 34, pp
China's engineering standards and improvingthe internal system of engineering standardsInternationalizing China’s standards is important for shaping its national image, enhancing itsglobal discourse power, and enhancing China’s international prestige. Breaking the long-termmonopoly of the engineering standards market by European countries and the United Statesrequires the Chinese government to publicize China's engineering standards and engineeringculture at the national level. Although China has issued the Action Plan on Belt and RoadStandard Connectivity (2018-2020) twice, up to now the “going out” of Chinese standardshas been hampered by insufficient domestic preparation and international acclimatization.Therefore, the government needs to
theconcept maps at UE, but without the concept maps at IUPUC. In the passive-approach course,only one student preferred the course be taught without concept maps. Student plans for usingconcept maps in the future also differed across institutions. (a) (b) Figure 7: Student preference of learning with concept mapsStudents were also asked to estimate the frequency of their use of concept maps in the passive-approach course. The responses provided in Table 1 indicate that about half of the studentsreferred to the concept map weekly while the remaining students referred to the concept mapevery 4-6 weeks. Table 1: Frequency of use – passive
with professional societies in ME and outreach efforts to two year colleges.5. Continue to develop and refine a sustainability plan for continued expansion of the CW.The current paper will focus on objectives 1 and 2; to achieve these objectives, we have formed ateam from five diverse institutions: a large research public university, a small private university,a two-year college serving a large number of under-represented students, a large non-PhDgranting public university, and a bilingual research university.The Concept WarehouseThe Concept Warehouse (CW) was originally developed for use in the discipline of chemicalengineering (Koretsky et al., 2014). The CW Project has two goals: (i) to provide content thatdecreases instructional barriers
literature, the nature of responses raised someconcerns. Specifically, concerns that respondents were gaming the system to meet thequalification criteria and receive their payment led to elimination of over 20% of responses.Proposed approaches to further alleviate this concern are discussed in plans for future research.Conclusion and Direction for Future ResearchThis study represents the beginning of a multi-year effort to understand and improve EML acrossthe Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering, Jake Jabs College of Business andEntrepreneurship, and the College of Arts and Architecture at Montana State University. While itprovides interesting insight into the similarities and differences between engineering studentsand working entrepreneurs, it
to teach theseconcepts to our students.Based on this work, the authors have the following suggestions for instructors planning toimplement a similar activity in their courses: Create a reporting structure that allows students to experience and quantify risk analysis in their lab course. This process can be especially beneficial for students who have not had prior industrial experience. A sample incident reporting structure can be viewed at this link: https://neu.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0DoaoRIFrbRJcAB Include a calibration activity at the start of the semester to help students identify appropriate consequence levels for various categories of hazards. For example, broken glassware should not be
communicative validation. Ourcurrent preliminary findings include six categories along four dimensions of variation. Recently,we have received additional feedback from an advisory board with expertise in qualitativeresearch, ethics education, and phenomenographic methodology.Objective 2 Overview and ProgressIn parallel to Objective 1, our research team has been identifying critical incidents whichrepresent key experiences that lead to growth of or solidification in ways of experiencingengineering ethics. While our original plan was to utilize a content analytic approach, we slightlyrevised our Phase 2 course of action. Specifically, we applied Critical Incident Technique [46], astrategy that members of our team utilized in two recent studies [47],[48
indicate what areas of consumption they were interested in learningabout (transportation, manufacturing, residential, and commercial). The data suggests students’interest in these topics is high (>70% somewhat or very interested), though no area issubstantially more interesting than others. Students also showed a high level of interest incontemporary global challenges related to energy (>80% somewhat or very interested). Based onthese findings we plan to include substantial renewable energy content as well as informationabout global energy challenges in our new course. First-Year StudentsFigure 1. First-year student responses (n=36) to the question “What sources of energy are youinterested in