. Tinkering SE 4 0.87 0.89 Design SE 4 0.90 0.94† Abbreviations: SE = self-efficacy; OE = outcome expectationsChoice Self-Efficacy and Student Major ChangesStudents’ self-reported majors at admission (Figure 1, left column), six weeks into the Fallsemester (Figure 1, center column), and the major they are most likely to pursue (Figure 1, rightcolumn) were analyzed to visualize trends in student majors. Over 71% of all students indicatedtheir major was and would be the same at each of the three time points (n = 219), but there arestill many students who indicate a change in major or a planned change in major (n = 89
consisting of creative self-efficacy questions. II. Lesson Introduction | The lesson/module began with a class discussion on the engineering design process, which focused on conceptualization and creativity, which was developed from a lesson plan inspired by Starkey et al. [19]. Embedded in the slide deck presentation that was assembled to introduce students to the entire process is a YouTube Video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuaaXMp35NI) (7:41) “developed by the researchers that introduces students to the importance of creativity in engineering design through a series of engineering examples and creativity exercises like an alternative use test [35]” [19], quoted
requests. We will explore suppressing the Techstreet direct requestoption for our patrons, or consider a standard reply that they should use the ILL request system ifthe item will not be used for a course. More frequent analysis of ILL requests and continuedoutreach to patrons about this format type and the potential utility of standards documents in thedesign process will allow subject librarians to identify standards that should be added to thecollection, either in the Techstreet aggregator system, or other multi-user licenses. We have alsoinitiated annual evaluation of the subscribed items in our Techstreet license to remove thosewithout long-term utility.We plan to investigate local cataloging practices that might increase the discoverability
economicexpansion. This escalating use of transportation infrastructure; coupled with financial constraints,has forced transportation agencies to shift more attention on the preservation and maintenance ofexisting infrastructure (i.e., pavements) rather than the construction of new highways [1]. Forexample, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) invested $91 billion in 2013for the purpose of pavement maintenance to restore the road network to a satisfactory,operational condition [2]. The main objective of any federal, state or municipal transportationagencies is to develop an efficient system of planning for the maintenance, rehabilitation, andconstruction of roadway networks; within the confines of allocated funding. Most
people skills.” ● “Having skills from a wide range of disciplines help engineers have multiple ways of approaching problems and this helps in solving problems in an efficient way.” ● “The biggest takeaways from this course are that engineering is not at all linear, and that every object you use has real world impacts.” ● “I realized how important the human aspect of the engineering process is. You are never doing something that will affect just you.” ● “Engineering isn’t just designing, it has many more parts to it. It actually consists most of communication, planning and teamwork.”A final aspect of assessment of the course relates to the student evaluations conducted at the endof each module. Total number of students who
approach and the other sectionnot receiving the pedagogy. Formative and summative assessment results of the impactedclasses (two+ in each discipline) should demonstrate the “enhanced student learning andmotivation” with course grades compared to control group or previous course administrations.Additionally, course evaluations, and measurements of cognition, engagement, and motivationwill be determined using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaires (MSLQ) [24]amended with specifically designed additional items or measures to capture the project'sintervention.During the planning phase for the project, the following criteria were developed for selectingcourses in each discipline for the pilot test implementation of ECP in Spring 2020: 1
reinforce progress, and scaffolded learning with increasing challenges. Further itemssuch as a point system and leaderboards are planned in future work. Gamification has frequentlybeen found to improve learning and engagement [11].)Prior controlled, randomized experiments have shown a 1.21σ improvement in learning onwriting nodal analysis equations and identifying elements in series and parallel in a laboratory-based experiment and a corresponding improvement of 0.91σ in student motivation [3, 4]. Aclassroom-based assessment in Fall 2014 using random assignment to compare this system tocomplete nodal and mesh analysis exercises to using the commercial WileyPLUS system found a0.41σ improvement in that homework score (p < 0.008) [7]. It was also
experience in the Invention Studio” • “Really liked the workshop assignments and felt like they offered good exposure to the machines available in the Invention Studio Felt like a good intro to the maker space for someone who was not an ME major”Scheduling • “I think this class should have blocked out the times for the Invention Studio workshops. Even if we didn't get credit for them, I think this would be very helpful in making sure that there aren't any conflicts and that students can attend each workshop to learn how to use the Invention Studio tools.” • “If class time was a little longer, there would be more time for groups to plan their next iteration. This was the biggest problem in my group, since
those who were scheduled to travel but were unable to do so. If requested by thepartner, planned on-campus meetings were shifted to a videoconference format (as were allremaining faculty interviews).B. Tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics in College of Engineering and Applied ScienceDespite multiple programmatic efforts over more than a decade, the demographics of thecollege’s faculty has remained stubbornly unrepresentative of its diversifying student body andthe diversifying pool of individuals who are earning the doctoral degrees in engineering andapplied science typically required for tenure-track faculty positions in the CEAS.1. Gender of facultyAcross all CEAS T/TT ranks, the percentage of women faculty has increased by only 5
inengineering [9]. To incorporate these benefits into this lab, students were placed into large teamsto complete the manufacturing of the Mr. Potato Heads and into smaller teams to complete agroup lab report. While not all students plan to study ISE, all engineers can benefit from theexperience of studying a problem and implementing changes to improve the solution whilemeeting given constraints.ConclusionIn the honors track for the first-year engineering program at The Ohio State University,laboratories are utilized for students to both introduce them to engineering topics from variousmajors as well as develop their technical writing skills. This Quality & Productivity lab wasdesigned to introduce first-year students to introductory ISE topics
considered it. Theproportion of female and male students who had not received encouragement from a facultymember, yet intended to attend graduate school was 26.1% and 20.5%, respectively. Whereas,38.9% and 55.9% of female and male students, respectively, who had been encouraged by one ormore faculty were planning to attend graduate school. These observations indicate a statisticallysignificant increase among male students when encouragement is received (99% confidence), buta statistically significant increase among female students can only be observed with 84%confidence. Figure 4. Graduate school intentions of LCOE students with GPA of 3.0 or above displayed by gender and whether or not faculty encouragement to attend graduate school has been
of sense of belonging. Considering that the essay question was open-ended, it is ofsignificance when students mention one of the interventions in their response. Since the interventionsthemselves are short (both the norms and mindset activities take less than an hour), the researchers weresurprised to see that so many students reflected positively on those activities. What the essay is not measuring,however, is the change in student sense of belonging over the course of the quarter. The researchers plan toconduct future research to investigate this further.Conclusion, Limitations & ChallengesThe norms and mindset interventions designed as part of this research study are of high quality and are easyto embed into an existing course. The
positive impact of socialization for ELC students occurred inInterview C. Both described how socializing can be tiring and straining for busy students,especially those who identify as introverts and need time to recover from extensive interactionwith others. This instance co-occurred with Feedback, as the student suggested havingpurposeful social time planned, such as study groups, in lieu of social time for the sake ofsocializing, such as going to a theme park. These disconfirming examples show that relationshipsare still a chief positive impact of the ELC, when tailored to the unique needs and personalitiesof engineering students [8].Theme II: Resources for Transition This theme is made up of Resources, Mentoring, and Transition to Adulthood
don’t know 11. working as a member of a large team (> 5 people) 12. working as a member of a small team (5 or fewer people) 13. working as a member of a multidisciplinary team (both engineering and non-engineering backgrounds) 14. being a leader on a team so that the job gets done while still respecting the roles of others 15. contributing to team goal setting and working with others to achieve those goals 16. evaluating team effectiveness and planning for improvements 17. identifying your own personal areas of strengths & weaknesses 18. identifying the means to develop your strengths and eliminate your weaknesses 19. working to develop broader knowledge 20. applying critical inquiry and analysis to engineering problems and doing the
forsolving technical issues later or collaborating with peers. The power of the hypotheseis.is site isthat it retains the annotations, allowing one to toggle between having it on and off during siteaccess. It leaves clues about how many annotations are there as well, noting hot spots in the webdocument. In the future, the instructor plans to invite students are to submit at least fiveannotations from any computer networking technology websites, including sample screen clipsof their annotations as part of their portfolios.Learning both within the Network Switches & Routers classroom and beyond it can bestrengthened tremendously by using specific reading strategies. It can be done by showingstudents how technology professionals in the area read
Paper ID #30117Mentoring Among African American Women in the Engineering AcademyJocelyn LaChelle Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a doctoral student in engineering education research at the University of Michigan and national chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes research in entrepreneurship, organizational leadership and behavior, and strategic planning for NSBE.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State
even received national mediaattention [10]. However, the focus on plagiarism hides a host of underlying issues. In our course,we encountered gray areas where the enforcement of plagiarism rules and student learning maynot be in alignment. We also discovered that plagiarism cases were mostly among students withno prior experience, suggesting that plagiarizing could be as much a last-ditch attempt to salvagea lost situation, rather than a devious plan to break rules. This is not to suggest that we should scale back efforts to detect plagiarism or reportindividuals who commit it. However, we should also be understanding of what the underlyingissues might be. Previous research has suggested [5], [8], and we have experienced in teachingthis
virtualenvironment of a factory with a series of workstations. They were able to interact with theenvironment using the controllers on each hand (Figure 13). Inside the VR simulation, there was a large factory room with a row of workstations, asshown in Figure 14. A user wearing a VR headset was able to see the virtual environment andother users in the virtual environment. Figure 15 shows what a user saw as the other three userswere working. Every user was shown in the simulation with body and hand tracking, meaning thata user could see where the other users were and what the other users were doing with their hands.While inside the simulation every user was represented with a male virtual character in a blackbody suit, in the future we are planning
Paul andElder model of critical thinking specifically, the University of Louisville adopted it specificallyas the core of their Quality Enhancement Plan for undergraduate education, e.g. [10] As far aswe have determined, the present work is the first to apply the Paul & Elder approach to theteaching of critical reading and writing to engineering graduate students.The Course 1/Course 2 sequence was originally implemented in the University of South CarolinaCollege of Engineering and Computing (CEC) as part of the graduate curriculum in BiomedicalEngineering, which was established in 2008. Since that time, the courses have evolved into theircurrent form and have been taken by students in all CEC PhD-granting programs. The CT modelis, of
inproximity and relationship. The paper will seek to answer one main guiding research questionand two sub-questions: 1. Does the proximity and relationship with the community partner affect the manifestation of empathy in students on service-learning design projects? a. How is empathy manifesting on service-learning projects? b. What factors contribute to the manifestation of empathy in students working on service-learning design projects?ContextThe EPICS program engages students in long-term partnerships with local, regional and globalcommunity partners [6]. Undergraduate students from all engineering disciplines and othermajors across the university earn academic credit within their respective plans of study
, however, and to conduct analyses and organize results, thefollowing analyses were planned and hypotheses posed:1. Explore potential differences in ESIT and MFQ responses based on gender, age, prior workexperience, political orientation, and religious affiliation, and MFQ differences based onprevious ethics education.2. Hypothesize that students with previous ethics education would receive higher P and N2scores on the ESIT, based on results from [1].3. Hypothesize that students in this sample would receive lower P and N2 scores on the ESITthan those in [1], since the participants in this sample were non-native-English-speakingstudents.4. Hypothesize that students in this study would receive higher N2 scores after completing a one-semester-long
Paper ID #28604Evaluating the Evolution of Construction Management Students’ ConflictManagement Styles as a Result of Andragogical MethodsDr. David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University Certified Professional Constructor with twelve years professional experience in civil and construction project management encompassing over $400,000,000 worth of vertical and horizontal construction. An additional fifteen years involved in college level construction management instruction and administration including contract and project management techniques, estimating, disputes resolution practices, planning and scheduling, safety
consulting firms. Two students indicated thatsolving ill-structured problems during an internship made them feel comfortable solving ill-structured problems. Two students indicated their internship(s) helped them to pre-plan theirsolution, stated by one of the seniors: “I think that's helped me take a step back and look at it alittle more closely before I just jump right into it.” One student also stated their internship helpedthem to use outside resources as in the following example: “… and I realized how many differentsolutions and how easy it is to call a representative and especially how easy it is to call otherpeople and be like, "What have you used and what products would you recommend?" So, that'sprobably what I would have done on this.” It
a lot about what it takes to make anonline course successful. Among key lessons learned were that required synchronous onlinemeetings help keep students engaged and on track, an online chat forum (especially with a TApresent) enables a level of student engagement usually not found in in-person classes, and qualityonline interactive content is highly effective (more so than videos). Readers interested in a shortdemo video of how we run our online course can refer to [17] (full video [18]). In the pastseveral years, we have assisted several other universities to create new online courses modeledafter our course, in some cases simply cloning our entire course for an instructor to step into andteach at their school. We plan to continually
activity. In future work, we plan ondeploying our survey to institutions with a broad range of student population, departments withvarying engineering and design cultures, and professors with different approaches to the designof reflection activities. ConclusionThrough this survey development process, we have been able to identify four complications thatarise when trying to understand student reactions to reflection. Through understanding studentexperiences, we can find ways to improve reflection activities and at the same time empathizewith students as we learn how properties of reflection can cause diversity of reactions fromstudents. Understanding student reactions to reflection is a promising route
, novelty, and quality in order to evaluate thestudent’s level of design ideation expertise.BackgroundThe phases of engineering design are often taught as having a circular, iterative nature. Anengineering product or process is designed through phases of (i) defining the problem, (ii)brainstorming solutions, (iii) planning a solution, (iv) prototyping, (v) evaluating the solution, andfinally (vi) reflecting for iteration, shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Simple infographic conveying six phases of engineering design iteratively.In practice, the activities associated with each engineering design phase are highly interdependentand do not simply progress in a neat iterative circle, as implied by common infographics for theengineering design process
time frame allotted each day was a challenge, with activitiesusually taking longer than planned. As the activities are refined, the time estimates for eachactivity are becoming more accurate, and tend to fit well into the 50 minute time periods. Forlonger class sessions, multiple activities could be used together.Time always seems to be a big factor when deciding whether or not to try an intervention. Thesame amount of time was spent on each topic for classes using models vs. non-models since eachcourse went through similar activity sheets. Active learning can take a little more time than justlectures. For example, four days were spent on volumes of revolution using activity sheets (withmodels or electronic visuals), versus three days
= 7.8 ∗ 10−3 ). The increase between 2018 and 2019 may haveoccurred due to the new inclusion of freshmen in the survey. The freshmen have only beenexposed to one module in MSE 182 rather than the two in MSE 201, which had previously beenthe first course with integrated computational tools in the MSE curriculum. We conclude thatexposure to the computational modules is fulfilling students’ desire for more computation in theirMSE classes, but that more modules are still desired. We are exploring whether modules can beadded to more MSE classes and plan to expand the number of modules in MSE 182 and MSE422, which currently only have one.6 ConclusionSince the survey of employers of MSE students by Thornton et. al. 1 , our department hasintegrated
undergraduate respondents, the largest portion (26.3%)were from Environmental Engineering Program. Also, our college is unique to have AppliedSciences combined with Engineering, we had 3.5% of the respondents from Physics.7. Future WorkWe plan to continue with additional surveys, and seek responses from broader student body todetermine and rank the behaviors establishing rapport in engineering classrooms. In addition, ourgoal is to further develop the blended faculty professional development and educate our facultyon the behaviors that establish rapport. To understand the real impact on students, we willcontinue to study the instructor behavior, and student feedback correlating the impact of rapporton student resilience and retention in a longitudinal