. Discovery Press, 2019.[2] L. W. Anderson et al., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition, 1 edition. New York: Pearson, 2000.[3] D. Sayers, The Lost Tools of Learning, 1 edition. Fig, 2011.[4] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Reprint, Updated edition. New York: Ballantine Books, 2007.[5] J. Dunnicliff and D. U. Deere, Eds., Judgment in Geotechnical Engineering: The Professional Legacy of Ralph B. Peck, 1 edition. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1984.
].References[1] T. Motohiro, Handbook of sputtering technology, edited by K. Wasa, I. Kanno, and H. Kotera(Elsevier, Waltham, MA, 2012), 2nd Ed.[2] J. Vawdrey, P. Weber, Operating the Sputtering Machine, 2019.[3] R. Kamali-Sarvestani, P. Weber, A. Minaie, S. Tolman, "Integrating EnvironmentallyImproved Photolithography Technology and Virtual Reality into Advanced NanotechnologyEducation,” NSF-ATE Grant 1700695.
, Global Health Innovation Insight Series, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/centers-initiatives/csi/teaching-curriculum/global-health-innovation Session Topic(s) Introduction, Global Health Challenges 1 Spotlight Speaker (Global Health Clinician and Researcher) Identifying and Validating Needs 2 Spotlight Speaker (In-Country Engineering Partner) Design Principles 3 Spotlight Speaker (Design Firm) Understanding Market/Stakeholder Dynamics 4 Spotlight
engineering: a historical perspective," in Introduction to Biomedical Engineering, ed: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 1-29.[2] R. A. Linsenmeier, "What makes a biomedical engineer?," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 22, pp. 32-38, 2003.[3] ABET, "ABET-Accredited Program search," 2019.[4] R. A. Linsenmeier, T. R. Harris, and S. A. Olds, "The VaNTH bioengineering curriculum project," in Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society][Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002, pp. 2644-2645.[5] D. G. Williamson and K. Fridley, "A Survey of Credit Hour Requirements in BS Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering ABET Accredited
-216, February 01 2006.[6] V. Potkonjak et al., "Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review," Computers & Education, vol. 95, pp. 309-327, 2016/04/01/ 2016.[7] E. Scanlon, C. Colwell, M. Cooper, and T. Di Paolo, "Remote experiments, re-versioning and re-thinking science learning," Computers & Education, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 153-163, 2004.[8] J. Ma and J. V. Nickerson, "Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 38, no. 3, p. 7, 2006.[9] J. E. Corter, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, J. Ma, and J. V. Nickerson, "Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student
responses? Analyze and code homework assignments for connection and curiosity. Correlate participants’ homework with the five curiosity factors.We also hope in the second iteration of the course to increase the sample size of the data set.References 1. Mahadevan-Jansen, A., & Rowe, C. (2004, June), Module Based Freshman Engineering Course Development Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13180 2. KEEN, https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset-matters.aspx [accessed 1/20/2020] 3. KEEN,https://engineeringunleashed.com/searchresults.aspx?searchtype=allexemplarcard s, [accessed 1/20/2020] 4. Vernon
education: introduction tothe thematic issue,” International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, vol. 3.1, pp. 3-26,2010.[4] M. Lackeus, “Entrepreneurship in education – What, why, when, how, Entrepreneurship360Background paper”, OECD, 2015.[5] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students andentrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes”. International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 28(2), pp. 425–435, 2012[6] E. M. Eisenstein, 2010. “Engineering and entrepreneurship: Creating lasting value fromengineering”. IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skillsfor Complex Global Environments, Dublin Ireland, 2010.[7] R. M. Carey and R. D. Shonat, “Assessment of Self-Paced
beprovided questions that evaluate W.S.P. 's ability to meet the following criteria. Is it easilydeployable in the classroom? Does it allow students to meet learning outcomes? Are teachersmeeting classroom standards? Is there student engagement, and are they meeting diverse needs ofthe students. Are the classes well-structured units and lessons? Is there student motivation in acollaborative learning environment? Is there a variety of assessment methods? Is the teacherdrawing analysis and conclusions and then sharing it with the students? Figure 7: Educator InterfaceParents - Parental and guardian observation can be recorded during the study portion of Work.Study. Play!. The child’s progress can be viewed
discussion on the significance of the service activity.The completed portfolio is submitted not only to the Peer Review Committee but also to ExternalReferee(s). For contract renewal, at least one External Referee will be determined by the candidate aswell as the division chairperson. In cases of tenure, the candidate will recommend three ExternalReferees and the division chairperson will select an additional three External Referees. The yearfollowing the portfolio submission the faculty member is observed in the classroom by at least threetenured faculty from the division (any field of engineering or computer science).SupportThe small branch campus has offered a positive experience, particularly in providing a supportivedepartmental culture where
Prototyping Lecture 9 Ethics Lecture 10 Intellectual Property and Patents Lecture 11 Project Debriefthe work status. The weekly status report was also utilized to evaluate individual student’scontributions and to provide written feedback to student(s). Progress of the project wasconstantly monitored using the reporting tools presented below. ● Gantt chart: Each team was required to submit a Gantt chart for the project. The purpose of the document is to help the team lead to have an advance plan for the project execution and keep track of the work progress. ● Weekly status report: The teams are asked to submit the weekly status reports using the provided template (see
facets of ethical constructs and professional identity.References[1] W. Helmer, “Is all diversity good?” in ASEE Prism, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 10, 2013.[2] S. Scales, “Teaching civility in the age of Jerry Springer.” Teaching Ethics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1-20, 2010.[3] “Criteria for Accreditation of Engineering Technology Programs” [online], Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-technology-programs-2019-2020/#GC5[4] ”Diversity and Inclusion,” [online], https://www.abet.org/about-abet/governance/board-of- directors/policies/[5] J. Maxwell, Ethics 101: What every leader needs to know. New York: Warner Books, 2005.[6] Maples v Martin, 858 F2d 1546 (11th Cir
, Fall 2017.[9] C. E. Osgood, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum, The measurement of meaning (no. 47). University of Illinois press, 1957.[10] B. K. Sato et al., "What’s in a Prerequisite? A Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying the Impact of a Prerequisite Course," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 1, p. ar16, 2017.[11] R. Lieu, A. Gutierrez, and J. F. Shaffer, "Student Perceived Difficulties in Learning Organ Systems in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course," HAPS Educator, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 84-92, 2018.[12] J. S. Eccles, "Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors," 1983.
Practice - J PROF ISSUE ENGEDUC PRACT. 131. 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(218).[4] Steif, Paul S. and Anna Dollár, “A New Approach to Teaching and Learning Statics.” (2003).[5] Hibbeler, R C. Engineering Mechanics. New York: Macmillan, 1989. Print.[6] C. Marshall “Montessori education: a review of the evidence base,” NPJ Science of Learning,vol. 2, no. 11, 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7 [Accessed: April 10,2020]
://www.aiche.org/ccps/chemical-accidents-news 2. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016 – 2017,” Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2016. Accessed: Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/# 3. E. Biddle and S. Afanuh. “NIOSH Workplace Design Solutions: supporting Prevention through Design (PtD) using business value concepts,” U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA, Rep. 2015-198, 2015. 4. D. Crowl and J. Louvar, "Concepts to Prevent Fires
, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] V. P. Dennen and K. J. Burner, "The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice," Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, vol. 3, pp. 425-439, 2008.[2] M. Borrego, "Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp. 91-102, 2007.[3] C. J. Finelli, S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardson, "Bridging the research‐to‐practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence," Journal of Engineering
benefitthe marginalized or underserved from careers in NGOs or government agencies may result inless pay than careers in the corporate sector. A strong professionally connected socialresponsibility attitude can motivate towards action; personal willingness connects withprofessional abilities to recognize the power and opportunity s/he has to make a positive change.Figure 1: Canney and Bielefeldt’s Professional Social Responsibility Development Model[7, pg. 418]In this research, our initial hypothesis was that positive changes in students’ desires to work forcompanies or firms with good reputations for social responsibility would be at least partiallyexplained by students coming to recognize CSR as a sociotechnical activity. CSR is an
include questions from the topics covered from the textbook as well asmaterial covered for the design project(s).Table 1. Approximate Teaching ScheduleWeek No and Basic Title Sections1 Introduction, Safety tapes Lab: Projects2 Engineering Design Chp. 1.1-1.4 Safety Exam, Lab: Projects3 Engineering Design Chp. 1.5-end Lab: Projects4 Review and Catch-up Chp. 1 and Projects Exam-1 (100 min, Feb. 16)5 The Product Development Process Chp. 2.1-2.4 Lab: Projects6 The Product Development Process Chp. 2.5-end Lab: Projects7 Problem Def. and Need Identification Chp. 3.1-end Lab
University of Illinois at Chicago, a publicuniversity in an urban setting, and it is taught as a design studio which is both project- and team-based. It is a required class for Mechanical, Civil, and Industrial engineering students and it isopen to other engineering majors as an elective. There are typically forty students per classsection, and in recent years four to six sections of the class are offered in each term, taught bytwo to four faculty members. The total enrollment has been growing and is close to 400 for thecurrent academic year. Despite being offered as a first-year course, ME 250’s enrollmenttypically includes students from all years. Students are placed in teams of four to complete twoor three projects, including the final project
Paper ID #29602Design thinking concepts in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone ProjectsMr. Michael A Phelan, Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA I am a PhD student in Bioengineering at Temple University and a predoctoral fellow at the National Eye Institute supported through the Intramural Research Program of the NIH.Mr. Aratrik GuhaMr. Brandon K Harrison, Temple UniversityGeorge Moukarzel, Temple UniversityMs. Abigail A. TettehDr. Yah-el Har-el, Temple University Assistant Professor of Instruction, Department of BioengineeringDr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received her B.S
(eCURe) funded by the National Science Foundation Advanced TechnologicalEducation award number 1601813. M.H., E.B. and I.B. were supported by BUILD PODER,funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Healthunder the award number RL5GM118975. M.G. gratefully acknowledges the support receivedfrom the National Science Foundation through grant number CMMI-1538861 and United StatesFood and Drug Administration through grant U01FD005535.References[1] M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A.G. Campbell, P.B. Campbell, W.F. Denetclaw, C.G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G.H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee: Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol 3, pp 15, 2016.[2] E. E
includes a prediction of an even greater shortage: To grow our nation’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) capacity and ensure that Americans nationwide can participate in a science and engineering (S& E) intensive economy, the United States must foster its Skilled Technical Workforce (STW) – individuals who use S & E skills in their jobs but do not have a bachelor’s degree. Rapid changes in the nature of work, education, technology, workforce demographics, and international competition have led to the National Science Board (NSB, Board) to conclude that our competiveness, security, and research enterprise require this critical, but often overlooked segment of our STEM-capable workforce. Adding to
data that could be of use wouldbe to test the various implementations with a different course instructor, and look for similarperformance differences. In conclusion, when some of principle problems associated withteaching and learning programming are analyzed, modified lecture with SI seems to offer somepositive initial results.References[1] D. Sleeman, “The challenges of teaching computer programming,” Communications of theACM, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1986.[2] S. Sentance and A. Csizmadia, “Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies froma teacher’s perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol. 22, pp.469-495, 2017.[3] M. Ben-Ari, “Constructivism in computer science education,” Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on
also technology transfer and universityresearch administrators.References[1] H.A. Howard, D. Zwicky, M. Phillips, “Academic Libraries Support Cross-Disciplinary Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research, Paper 206, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/206 [Accessed February 15 ,2019].[2] J.P. Shipman and B.A. Ulmer, ed. Information and Innovation. A Natural Combination for Health Sciences Libraries. Lanham, Boulder, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.[3] C. Elliott, J. Dewland, J.R. Martin, S. Kramer, and J.J. Jackson Sr., “Collaborate and Innovate: The impact of academic librarians on the commercialization of university
classrooms,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–698, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/095006999290516.[2] S. L. Westbrook and E. A. Marek, “A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 649–660, 1991, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280803.[3] E. A. Marek, C. C. Cowan, and A. M. L. Cavallo, “Students’ Misconceptions about Diffusion: How Can They Be Eliminated?,” The American Biology Teacher, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 1994, doi: 10.2307/4449757.[4] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick, “Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar
] Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok — Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theorycomfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012[2] “Minority Serving Institutions: Americas’ Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce,” The NationalAcademies Press, Washington DC (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/25257[3] Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race ethnicityand education, 8(1), 69-91.[4] Smith, J. M., & Lucena, J. C. (2016). Invisible innovators: how low-income, first-generation students use their funds ofknowledge to belong in
on pedagogicalmethods, or seeing methods used by other instructors. SEEFs shared common motivations ofjoining a career involving instruction motivated by experiences during student teaching roles,and a desire to improve teaching practices. In addition, the SEEF community referred to Barkleyet al.’s handbook [29] on collaborative learning techniques provided a wealth of teachingmethods, along with Godsell’s sourcebook [30] which provided perspective on differentmethods, their implementation and evaluation, among many other sources. However common toall the SEEFs was interpreting the application of these methods to fit their discipline. Forexample, in Computer Science the jigsaw method was used to explore the ethics of human-computer
external evaluator collects evaluation data on each cohort and each component of thetraineeship according to our logic model-based evaluation plan. At the time of paper submissionwe do not yet have results of the first year’s evaluation.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DGE-1828942.[1] E. Golde and G. Walker, Eds., Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006.[2] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Talley, S. E. Branch, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, "A strategic blueprint for the alignment of doctoral competencies with disciplinary expectations," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32