., & Leifer, L. J. A1 (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and 1613 learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison A2 433 of students and expert practitioners. Journal of engineering education, 96(4), 359-379. Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring A3 engineering design self‐efficacy. Journal of Engineering 192 Education, 99(1), 71-79
.[3] "Standards-Based Grading Overview," Active Grade, 2012.[4] S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. Lovett and M. Norman, HHow Learning Works: 7 Research Based Principles for Smart Teaching, San Franscisco: Wiley, 2010.[5] M. Townsley, "What is the Difference between Standards-Based Grading (or Reporting) and Competency-Based Education," Competency Works, 11 November 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.competencyworks.org/analysis/what-is-the-difference-between- standards-based-grading/. [Accessed 30 12 2019].[6] L. Davis, "Standards-Based Grading: What to Know in 2019," Schoology Exchange, 13 2 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.schoology.com/blog/standards-based-grading. [Accessed 15 12 2019
-profit STEM diversity organization, nation-wide chapter development, reporting, andcompliance program is presented. In the late 2000’s, the program transitioned from the End-of-Year Report (EOYR) to the National Report Program (NRP). Throughout the 2010’s, SHPEunderwent internal infrastructure changes, including an inter-organizational merger, to expand andbetter fulfill its mission to serve the Hispanic community. In turn, the NRP underwent changesfrom the EOYR to via Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats analysis. The currentiteration supplements on the former by targeting chapter growth, development, and managementthrough a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce-preparednesseducational framework. The program has
Department, and Principal Investigator of the NSF S-STEM grant at AHC. He serves as Program Chair of the Two-Year College Division of ASEE, and Vice Chair/Community Colleges for the Pacific Southwest Section of ASEE.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests
, the diodes are activated based on the currents or voltages in thecircuit operation. The inductor current iL and the capacitor voltage vC are the two variables which usually serve asthe control of diode or diode network.If there is only one time-based switch S, the converter operation comprises of two circuit modes: one when theswitch is turned on and the other when the switch is turned off. If there are two time-based switches S1 and S2, theconverter operation may comprise of four circuit modes. If one switch S1 is time based and the other S2 is based onthe circuit conditions such as the current inversion or the polarity inversion of a voltage, the converter operation mayconsist of two, three or four circuit modes.Each circuit mode is
fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497- 529Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z., (1987), 'Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education', AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), pp.3-7.Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Emblom-Callahan, M., Burgess-Palm, N., Davis, S., Decker, A., Diritto, H., Dix, S., Parker, C., & Styles, E. (2019). Accelerating student success: The case for corequisite instruction. Inquire: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 22 (1). Retrieved from: https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol22/iss1/12Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging
aspirations for growing the mechatronics curriculum. Afterreceiving student feedback from this course and improve the curriculum based on that feedback,we would like to develop a mechatronics course series that allow students to receive amechatronics minor to add concentration to their education before graduation. The course seriesmay address advanced mechatronics course topics such as embedded programming, processautomation, and wireless networks.Bibliography[1] M. K. Habib, "Mechatronics engineering the evolution, the needs and the challenges," IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 4510-4515, 2006.[2] S. M. K. a. S. A. Y. Das, "Work in progress-the outgrowth of mechatronics curriculum development efforts: an
essential for the engineering education community to be knowledgeable of the experiencesof this group in engineering. Using critical race theory and intersectionality frameworks, thisstudy utilizes quantitative and qualitative data to examine the reasons that influenced Blackwomen to leave their engineering positions. Engineering graduates of a large public Midwesternuniversity were surveyed. Ten of the 3,807 graduates identified as a woman and Black or AfricanAmerican. Participants provided information on their career trajectories, including informationon their position(s) held and the reasons that influenced them to leave. Reasons that influencedBlack Women engineers to leave their engineering positions are presented. Preliminary analysesand
., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 287–298, 2004.[8] D. H. Schunk, “Self-efficacy and academic motivation,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 26, no. 3–4, pp. 207–231, 1991.[9] L. Barnard, W. Y. Lan, Y. M. To, V. O. Paton, and S.-L. Lai, “Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2009.[10] R. S. Jansen, A. Van Leeuwen, J. Janssen, L. Kester, and M. Kalz, “Validation of the self- regulated online learning questionnaire,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2017.[11] R. Lynch and M. Dembo, “The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2, 2004.[12] L. Springer, M
Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills, vol. 57, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2016.[5] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, C. J. Finelli, and T. S. Harding, “Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences.”[6] L. C. Strauss and P. T. Terenzini, “The Effects of Students’ In- and Out-of-Class Experiences on their Analytical and Group Skills: A Study of Engineering Education,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 967–992, Dec. 2007.[7] A. L. Miller, L. M. Rocconi, and A. D. Dumford, “Focus on the finish line: does high- impact practice participation influence career plans and early job attainment?,” High. Educ., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 489–506, 2018.[8] S
acknowledge the contributions of our USD colleagues to this workincluding Drs. Samantha Breslin, Michelle Camacho, Diana Chen, Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick,Odesma Dalrymple, Laura Gelles, Ming Huang, Gordon Hoople, Imane Khalil, Alex Mejia,Breanne Przestrzelski, and Elizabeth Reddy. We thank our Advisory Board members, Drs. AlanCheville, Donna Riley, and Linda Vanasupa, for helping us to reimagine what we can do throughthis grant. Finally, we thank the students who have engaged with these activities and providedhelpful feedback.This work is supported by the National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering andComputer Science Departments (RED) program through Award #1519453.References1 R. Olson, S. Lord, M. Camacho, M. Huang, L. Perry, B
reflections on medical metaphors, engineering educators considered the ongoing ethicalwellness of a whole engineer—or even a whole engineering profession—rather than seeking toinoculate our students against taking dangerous or irresponsible action in the future or addressless-desirable habits they have already developed, what else might student engineers andengineering educators aspire to?REFERENCES[1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs effective for the evaluationsduring the 2018-2019 accreditation cycle,” Available:http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditationcriteria/criteria-for-accreditingengineering-programs-2018-2019/ [Accessed Feb 2, 2020].[2] M. A. Holsapple, D. D. Carpenter, J. A. Sutkus, C. J. Finelli, and T. S. Harding
between district-level poverty index and collegemathematics placement, we have the opportunity to broaden participation in engineering, andconsequentially reduce wage and wealth gaps within the state.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1744497. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We alsowish to acknowledge the assistance of the Institutional Research Officers at each campus ingathering the data used in the Post-Secondary Student Census Data analysis, and of the IRBofficers and campus coordinators for their assistance in distributing the
recommendations expressed in thispaper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] M. Y. Bin Yahya, Y. Lee Hui, A. B. M. Yassin, R. Omar, R. O. anak Robin, and N. Kasim, “The Challenges of the Implementation of Construction Robotics Technologies in the Construction,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 266, p. 05012, 2019.[2] S. S. J. manyika, S. Lund, M. Chui, J. Bughin, J. Woetzel, P. Batra, R. Ko, “Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation,” 2017.[3] K. Afsari, S. Gupta, M. Afkhamiaghda, and Z. Lu, “Applications of Collaborative Industrial Robots in Building Construction,” 54th ASC Int. Conf. Proc., no. August, 2018.[4] A. Jayaraj and H. N. Divakar, “Robotics in
Paper ID #28945Promoting Materials Science and Engineering Education through 3DPrinting TechnologyDr. Tracy Zhang, MSU Michigan State University (MSU) St. Andrews, Midland, MI. Dr. Tracy Zhang is a faculty member and STEM Outreach Specialist at Michigan State University St. Andrews campus. She earned a doctoral degree in advanced materials from Central Michigan University. Her current role involves promoting STEM education to K-12 students focusing on 3D printing technology area and conducting research in the development of biosourced hyperbranched poly(ester)s for the controlled release of actives across a range of
Laboratory Facilities for Engineering Technology Programs in Malaysian Technical Universities," International Journal of Social Science Studies, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 65, 2018.[7] Z. I. A. Karim and S. M. Maat, "Employability Skills Model for Engineering Technology Students," Journal of Technical Education and Training, vol. 11, no. 2, 2019.[8] P. Appiah-Kubi and C. Brion, "Effects of Service Projects on the Perceived Skills of Engineering Technology Students," International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, 2019.[9] R. Taraban, M. Ceja, J. Suarez, D. Ernst and E. E. Anderson, "Building an Engineering Technology Workforce," Journal of Engineering Technology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 30-38, 2018.[10] J. Gallaher
security challenge. This group deeply elaborated on privacy concernsalready in their first report and used the privacy aspect as a starting point for ideatingsolutions for their challenge: “It is important to find a solution for our challenge as IoT devices are getting more common everyday and it is very likely that soon everyone is an IoT user. Because of this privacy will be an issue, since IoT is important as it guarantees equality and freedom. If IoT devices are not secured, soon everyone will have spying devices at home and the data these devices collect can be used against their users.” (group E, first report)A further four groups (L, N, R, S) increasingly raised privacy concerns. Their reports
). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.2. Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147.3. Frydenberg, J. (2007). Persistence in university continuing education online classes. The international review of research in open and distributed Learning, 8(3).4. Heyman, E. (2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs: A Delphi study. University of Phoenix.5. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of higher education, 46(23).6. Brady, L. (2001). Fault
Conner, Qinang Hu, Brian Norton, and Tony Ivey, ”Oklahoma State University’s ENDEAVOR: Transformation of Undergraduate Engineering Educa- tion through the Experience-based learning.” 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 21-24, 2020. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Abstract submitted on Oct 14, 2019. Abstract accepted on October 28, 2019. Draft paper submitted on Jan 31, 2020. • Lead Author: B. Smyser, Reviewer and contributor: J. Conner, ”Measurements and Analysis for Mechanical Engineers”, 2nd Edition TopHat Publishing [ISBN: 978-1-77330- 957-6] 2019 • Lee, S., Conner, J. Arena, A. ”Aspects of Autonomous Recovery System for High Altitude Payloads by Using a Parafoil” AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and
recognitionand advancement of all faculty.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1760577. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] J. Fairweather, Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996.[2] R. M. Diamond, "The tough task of reforming the faculty-rewards system," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 May 1994.[3] E. L. Boyer, Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate, Lawrenceville, NJ
. Feigh and Z. K. Chua, “Panel Discussion on: Current State of Human Factors in Systems Design,” in Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2011.[7] A. E. Coso, “Preparing Students to Incorporate Stakeholder Requirements in Aerospace Vehicle Design,” Georgia Institute of Technology, 2014.[8] G. Hinkle, “What keeps engineers from advancing in their careers?,” IEEE-USA’s Today’s Engineer, 2013.[9] C. Dym, S. D. Sheppard, and J. W. Wesner, “A Report on Mudd Design Workshop II : ‘ Designing Design Education for the 21 st Century ,’” J. Eng. Educ., no. July, pp. 291–294, 2001.[10] H. K. Ro, L. R. Lattuca, D. Merson, and P. T. Terenzini, “Measuring Engineering Students’ Contextual Competence
words “research(ing),”“database(s),” and “resource(s)” were the most prevalent words related to the consultation.Across all semesters, the word “research(ing)” appeared in data 73 times, while the word“search(es)” appeared 15 times. When describing the resources shown, students rarely mentioneda database or resource by name (see Table III). Table III Word Count Of Terms Used To Describe Resources Resource Names Fall 2017 Spring 2018 Fall 2018 Fall 2019 Total database(s) 7 19 21 20 67 resource(s) 1 12 22 9 44
ofglobal warming can help prepare students to address global warming in their careers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1635534 and 1635204. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We would also like to thank the students who participated in the research bycompleting the survey.References[1] J. Cook et al., “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 024024, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.[2] National Research Council
Norback(jnorback.isye.gatech.edu) of Kay Neeley (neeley@virginia.edu). 8 References[1] Gianniny, O. A. (1995). A century of ASEE and liberal education (or how did we get here from there, and where does it all lead? 1995 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 1995. Reproduced in D. F. Ollis, K.A. Neeley, & H.C. Luegenbiehl (Eds.), Liberal education for twenty-first century engineering: Responses to ABET/EC 200 Criteria. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 320-346.[2] Neeley, K.A. & Norback, J. S. (2016). Communication across
Paper ID #29197Designing a Streamlined Workshop for STEM-H Faculty Engaged in theScholarship of Teaching and LearningMs. Jody Zhong, University of Louisville Ms. Zhong is a fourth-year doctoral student in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville. Ms. Zhong’s interests lie in researching identity, diversity, and professional development/thriving within the academy.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD
, doi: 10.1080/15732471003588254.[4] L. F. Cabeza, L. Rincón, V. Vilariño, G. Pérez, and A. Castell, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 29, pp. 394–416, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037.[5] Z. Teshnizi, A. Pilon, S. Storey, D. Lopez, and T. M. Froese, “Lessons Learned from Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Two Residential Towers at the University of British Columbia,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 69, pp. 172–177, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.121.[6] N. Arena, “Life-cycle assessment applied to construction of Thames Tideway east tunnel, London, UK,” Eng. Sustain., vol. 172, no
Paper ID #30757Examining Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Solving anIll-Structured Problem in Civil EngineeringSecil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University Secil Akinci-Ceylan is a PhD student in Educational Technology in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Kristen Sara Cetin, Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of
effectivenessof the project in increasing the graduation rates in CS/CE of Hispanic and low-income students.We have also expanded the scope of the program to include the Electrical Engineering program.In accomplishing the project goals, the key components were designed to provide academic andmotivational support for student participants throughout their enrollment at the State Collegesand FAU.IMPLEMENTATION OF MAJOR PROJECT COMPONENTSIn this section, the status and progress related to each of the major project components arereported.a) Curricular refinement of gateway courses in mathematics and computer scienceDuring years 1 and 2, a team of gateway mathematics faculty from each State College incollaboration with faculty from the FAU ‘s Department of
Poly’s Orfalea College of Business and Penn State’s Engineering Library,Mark Bieraugel and Paul McMonigle, respectively, for their assistance refining the literaturesearching methodology for this paper.References:Ashford SJ, Tsui AS. 1991. Self‐regulation for managerial effectiveness: the role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal 34( 2): 251– 280.Atkins, L., Martinez-Moreno, J. E., Patil, L., Andrews, K. J., Wu, M. S., Dutta, D., Hug, B. & Bresler, L. (2015). Fostering innovative skills within the classroom: A qualitative analysis from interviews with 60 innovators. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.Author, 2018. Blinded for review.Bernal, A., Brackin