composites. He has worked with several federal laboratories in the area of fatigue, impact, and finite element modeling of woven composites. He has published over two hundred papers in these areas. In addition, he has edited two books in the area of Nano Engineered materials. He is a member of several professional societies including ASME, SAMPE, AIAA, ASM, and ASEE.Dr. John P. Kizito, North Carolina A&T State University John Kizito is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Director Graduate Program in Mechanical En- gineering Program at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. His research areas include Microgravity Fluids, Thermal Management and Astronautics. He is a member of SAE, ASME, and
Florida State University followed by a Master’s de- gree and PhD from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University. After completing his PhD, he spent the next few years at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory as a Postdoctoral Researcher. His research there was focused on developing new technology for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using superconducting materials. Currently he serves as a teaching faculty member in the department of elec- trical and computer engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering as the capstone design project coordinator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Exploring Antecedents of Engineering Students’Indirect and Direct Feedback-Seeking
Mingyu Lu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Virginia University Institute of Technology in 2012, and he is currently a professor. His current research inter- est
between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century.Dr. Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- principal investigator for the following
was a 1.1 kW system, consisting of four solar PVpanels that are each approximately three feet by five feet in size. Based on the portion of the roofavailable, the system could be expanded to four times its current size, which would leave a surplus ofenergy during roughly half of the year. Additionally, a wireless monitoring system allows for evaluationof the efficiency of the system against the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) model whichmade an energy estimate of the system given the system size, angle of the roof, and local weatherpatterns. The NREL modeling tool, PVWatts Calculator, is a free program that allows homeowners andinstallers to estimate the costs and monthly energy outputs of potential solar PV systems (NREL 2016
Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30936 in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries from the petroleum and natural gas industry to brewing and newspaper industries. Dr. Ayala has provided service to
study were collected during four 50-minutes discussion sections thatwere a required part of an introductory engineering course at a large Midwestern university. Thediscussion sections took place in a laboratory classroom. Each discussion section was taught byone TA and two CAs (see Table 1). The 14 consented groups, the TAs, and the three CAs wererecorded using ceiling mounted cameras and lapel, table or hanging microphones. During alldiscussion sections, students worked in small groups to solve the same ill-structured, authenticengineering task that was designed using the guidelines designed by the Authors [16]. The taskwas on 11-inch tablets, with project software installed. Each student had one tablet; tablets ofstudents in the same group
can gain state-of-the-art experiencein the laboratory before they graduate and perhaps be encouraged to pursue advanced degreesand/or research-based positions. The power electronics-based power transformer informationpresented in our paper can be used to develop advanced power electronics upper-levelundergraduate or introductory graduate level courses. To take full advantage in understandingand appreciating the content of the advanced power electronics course, a pre-requisite course inintroduction to power electronics and control system is recommended. Our literature review ondifferent SST structures presented in this paper will be the primary knowledge needed inunderstanding and design of SST model.Introduction:The power grid is mainly
Polymer Physics from the University of Abou Bekr Belka¨ıd, UABT (Tlemcen, Algeria). Dr. Hakem taught and supervised students as Professor at UABT until she joined the Department of Materials Sci- ence Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) as Visiting Professor in 2005. Before joining CMU, Dr. Hakem made several short and long-term visits as a Visiting Professor at l’Institut Charles Sadron (Strasbourg, France), Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research (Mainz, Germany) and Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, USA) where she worked on mean field theory applied to uncharged poly- mers and polyelectrolyte systems and small-angle neutron scattering of amphiphilic polymer systems in the presence of electrolytes
offered to EE students.” 1 . Topics not related to nonmajors intended area ofstudy are swiftly forgotten 1 . Often, the course contains much difficult mathematical calculationand little in the way of practical examples to motivate theoretical study 15,2,16,17 . The specificcircuit arrangements solved may be random and arbitrary, rather than genuine diagrams of realmachines 2 . These previous efforts have focused on the laboratory portion of the course toincrease student motivation, using micro-controllers, instrumentation, and interdisciplinaryprojects to add authentic context. Less research has focused on homework problems that thestudents solve, and the exam questions they complete for the majority of their grades. Circuitstextbooks such as
programmodels is described in Table 2.Table 2 Program Model Faculty-to-faculty Single faculty Department-level College-level Network broker broker Description Faculty (PI) leads A single PI runs Faculty PI serves College-level PI Existing research in research as a “broker” serves as a professional collaboration with laboratories between different “broker” between network structures international domestically and domestic multiple domestic the collaboration partners internationally departments and
affairs from The University of Texas at Austin (BS Civil Engineering, Master of Public Affairs) and Virginia Tech (MS Industrial and Systems Engineering, PhD Engineering Education).Dr. Mark Weichold P.E., Texas A&M University Dr. Mark H. Weichold, Regents Professor and Halliburton Engineering Global Programs Professor, is an electrical engineer and has worked for General Dynamics Ft. Worth Division, Motorola in Austin, TX and the U.S. Army Electronic Technology and Devices Laboratory in Ft. Monmouth, NJ. He joined the Electrical Engineering faculty at Texas A&M University in 1982 and now holds the rank of Professor. In January 2007, he became Dean and CEO of Texas A&M University’s branch campus in Doha
duringclass and many steel design courses do not require a laboratory component. The following paperwill describe how the author uses trash bags with bolt holes to describe the concepts of yieldingand fracture, while also introducing a little bit of comedy into the classroom. Answers to themost common student questions are also provided.MotivationFor the first two or three times the author taught an introductory steel design course, he noticedthat many students were not able to clearly describe yielding in materials. From previous coursesin mechanics of materials and structural analysis, the students recognized that yielding, alongwith fracture, were both limit states to be checked, but they struggled to differentiate between thetwo failure modes and
and howthey can advance to more sophisticated scenarios. Like a computer game, students become excitedto improve their level of knowledge and go beyond a simple laboratory. They develop the datamodel, implement a base, then improve to intermediate and advanced models. Like a game, severalstudents often go beyond and develop additional scenarios of their own interest.1. IntroductionSimulation in education is a well-known and an established field. Engineering education, defensetraining, and medical exercises are a few noticeable examples. As part of the degree requirements,engineering students often learn how to use modeling and simulations for their future workplaces.Whether designing and constructing bridges, buildings, auto vehicles
$25,000 to more than $2 million annually. He introduced Polytech- nic’s first computer-based instructional laboratory. In 1983 he became Associate Provost for Computing and Information Systems. During the early stages of the PC and Workstation explosion he worked closely with Aerospace and Architectural and Engineering Design companies to lead the University’s develop- ment of Interactive Computer Graphics and Computer Aided Design (CAD) laboratories and curricula. He won a $3.2 million IBM CAD/CAM grant which enabled introduction of CAD/CAM and VLSI in- struction at Polytechnic. He served as Dean Graduate Studies 1986 - 1992, a position in which he had responsibility for recruiting graduate students and establishing
architecture, intermediate digital design, andassembly language programming4. The course requires students to model the RATmicrocontroller (MCU) using VHDL and then use it to help them learn assembly languageprogramming. The RAT MCU is an 8-bit MCU with an assembly language containing 50instructions. CPE 233 is taught as a studio course in a laboratory setting with a format thatclosely resembles a flipped classroom. The sections met for two hours, three times per week, forten weeks. Class meetings comprised of short lectures to answer questions, outline the currenttopics, and introduce experiments. Although we provided few video lectures, the lab experimentsand assigned programming problems required a significant amount of time outside of class
Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the director of the Dynamic and Smart Systems Laboratory at Tennessee Technological University. Dr. Anton received the B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan Technological University (2006), and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2008 and 2011, respectively). Following his graduate work, Dr. Anton held a two year postdoctoral position at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The central theme of his research involves characterizing the dynamic response of smart material systems for energy harvesting, structural health monitoring, sensing, and actuation. By combining expertise
thebackground to and basic knowledge about each mode of transportation. Lectures were followedby a hands-on laboratory class or a computer-based activity where students could apply the basicprinciples of transportation engineering to solve a problem related to each mode oftransportation. Finally, field trips were arranged to help students connect the theory and hands-onactivities to real-world engineering and aviation applications. A Likert scale questionnaire wasused to inquire about participants’ opinions of STEM and to assess the effectiveness of theprogram in introducing students to STEM. This paper reflects on opportunities and challenges indeveloping and implementing the curriculum and suggests improvements to it.IntroductionHigh school students
year but the same trend was observed in the previous years. Figure 2. Demographic information of participating students in 2019 programHands-on activities in Civil and Architectural Engineering:At the camp, students will learn how math and science relate to the field of engineering. Byseeing first-hand what engineers actually do, campers can better decide on a career or disciplinethey want to pursue. Whether a student is interested in clean energy, cars and motorcycles,explosives, or building bridges or towers, the camp will educate them through hands-onactivities, computer laboratory visits and practical demonstrations. The civil and architecturalengineering program is no exception to this exercise. Both programs offer a tour through
material properties of concrete.The first week of the semester in the reinforced concrete course is used to review both the materialproperties of unreinforced concrete and relevant laboratory tests, including compression, splittension, and flexure. The second week of the course is used to introduce the students to themechanical response of reinforced concrete beams, which includes a discussion of the differenttypes of failure modes and an overview of the internal couple method. During the third week ofthe course, the students learn how to calculate the flexural strength of reinforced concrete beamsthrough application of the internal couple method. The lecture titled “Is The Whole Greater Thanthe Sum of Its Parts? – Aristotle’s Insight into the
2016-2019 at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, Germany.Prof. Musa K Jouaneh, University of Rhode Island Musa Jouaneh is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering in the Department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Systems Engineering at the University of Rhode Island where he has been working since 1990. His research interests include mechatronics, robotics, and engineering education. Dr. Jouaneh founded the Mechatronics Laboratory at the University of Rhode Island, is the author of two text books on mechatron- ics, is the developer of mechatronics-based tools for engineering education, and is the recipient of several c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
, respectively. He worked for AT&T Bell Laboratories in New Jersey as a Member of the Technical Staff and was a National Research Council (NRC) Postdoctoral Fellow at the NASA Langley Research Center. In 1994, he joined Clark Atlanta University’s Department of Engineering, and was the Director of the Mechanical Testing Labora- tories (MTL) and Associate Director of the NASA funded High Performance Polymers and Composites (HiPPAC) Center. Presently, he is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Center for Advanced Materials Research and Education (CAMRE) at the Southern Polytechnic State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Engagement in
regarding class size, teaching load, laboratory availability,service expectations or research requirements.Policies and procedure requirementsEach accrediting group features policies and procedures that regulate the release of informationto the public. Prior to an accreditation visit, programs should review the latest requirements toensure compliance, especially on websites and in printed materials. These often change andprograms are expected to be up-to-date or make efforts to become compliant. For example,ABET requires three types of information to be available to the public: the program educationalobjectives, the student outcomes as well as headcount data, including enrollment and the numberof graduates. This information should be “easy” to
working with a faculty for at least 6 weeks at theirhome campus and spending 2 weeks with a second faculty on the University Park campus.In addition to research, the two weeks at University Park were designed to expose students toopportunities and available resources through programmed activity. The first week at UniversityPark included an arrival weekend orientation with a program information session, group icebreakers, campus scavenger hunt and a half day leadership challenge workshop at a nearbyuniversity recreational facility. During the weekdays, the participants met daily for 1.5 hourswith research program staff for professional development workshops (e.g., safety training,research ethics, communication skills, etc.) and laboratory tours
, 2016.[2] N. Rutten, W. R. van Joolingen, and J. T. van der Veen, “The learning effects of computer simulations in science education,” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 136–153, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017.[3] Z. A. Syed et al., “Evaluation of Virtual Reality Based Learning Materials as a Supplement to the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Experience,” p. 11.[4] A. Akbulut, C. Catal, and B. Yıldız, “On the effectiveness of virtual reality in the education of software engineering,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 918–927, 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.21935[5] E. A.-L. Lee, K. W. Wong, and C. C. Fung, “Learning with Virtual Reality: Its
, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Dr. Nicole Ralston Dr. Nicole Ralston is an Assistant Professor and co-Director of the Multnomah County Partnership for Education Research (MCPER) in the School of Education at the University of Portland in Portland, Ore- gon. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Measurement, Statistics, and Research Design from the University of Washington. An elementary school teacher at heart, she now teaches educational research and STEM methods to undergraduate and graduate students. Her research fo- cus involves bringing active learning strategies to STEM, best practices of research-practice
Laboratory I” (EE 081) course adopted a version of “Specifications Grading”, as outlinedin Linda Nelson’s book of the same title [1], in Fall 2018. Though the main goal of this teachingand grading intervention was to raise the quality of student writing, it was anticipated that this typeof grading would bring secondary benefits. These include instilling good writing habits in generalfor follow up lab courses as well as provide more transparency and consistency in grading. Theprinciples of specifications grading are detailed in Section 2 of this paper alongside the adaptationsmade for this introductory electrical engineering lab course. The results of the intervention are laidout in Section 3, from both a student and instructor perspective. Section 4
assist teachers with student engagement, helping them to be successful throughout the STEM pipeline. A few of these key areas include enhancing student’s spatial abilities (k-12 and higher education), integrating ser- vice learning into the classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using additive manufacturing.Dr. Charles D. Eggleton, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Charles Dionisio Eggleton is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Maryland Baltimore County. He has twenty-two years of experience teaching theoretical and laboratory courses in thermo-fluids to undergraduate students and was Department Chair from 2011 - 2017
the Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Min- eral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechani- cal and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineer- ing Students. Her research
week or just 2 or 3 examinations throughout the semester, there was overwhelming support for weekly quizzesSome of the student comments were incorporated into this year’s course (until the virusshutdown forced strict on-line course presentation) while others are on the way to beingimplemented. The Civil Engineering Department has approved the laboratory component to beadded to the course and the modules for the lab are being developed. This still needs to beapproved by the University but is anticipated to start next year. The homework questions werefurther reduced by making some questions to be optional as extra credit questions. The authorsagree that the 75-minute lectures are long and try to break it up with a video or