Paper ID #9627Impact of Optional Supplemental Course to Enhance Spatial VisualizationSkills in First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University Dr. Grzybowski is a Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Depart- ment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at The Ohio State University. She received her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering and her B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State Uni- versity. Prior to becoming focused on engineering education, her research interests included regulation of intracranial pressure and transport across
), Washington, D.C., Boston, Modesto (Calif.), Hong Kong and Mel- bourne (Australia). In the fall of 2001, she was invited as the Lise Meitner Visiting Professor, department of design sciences, Lund Technical University, Lund, Sweden. Prior to teaching at WPI, she worked as a manufacturing engineer for the Norton Company in Worcester, Mass., and product development engineer for the Olin Corporation in East Alton, Ill. Professor Ault’s primary teaching responsibilities include undergraduate- and graduate-level courses in computer-aided design, mechanical design, and rehabilitation engineering. Her research interests include computer-aided mechanical design, geometric modeling, kinematics, machine design, rehabilitation engi
through a follow-up study that had been used in previous years to collect data oncurrent trends and issues related to the field. This paper will discuss the overarching issues andtrends currently in technical/engineering education and one significant area within the surveythat dealt directly with new instructional strategies for graphics education (i.e. distanceeducation). One section of the survey explored distance education in technical/engineeringgraphics education; as prior research suggested that changes had occurred in the instructionaltopics and practices of the field. Previous research also shows that instructors wondered if thesame topics were being taught and the same technology was being used by graphicsprofessionals as a part of their
AC 2007-2791: A REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE USING LINKAGES TO TEACHDESIGN, ANALYSIS, CAD AND TECHNICAL WRITINGJames Sherwood, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Dr. Sherwood joined the University in 1993. He worked for Pratt and Whitney Aircraft and BF Goodrich as a structural engineer before entering academia. He is currently Director of the Baseball Research Center and Co-Director of the Advanced Composite Materials and Textiles Laboratory. His scholarly interests include constitutive modeling, mechanical behavior of materials with emphasis on composites, finite element methods with emphasis on high speed impact, sports engineering with emphasis on baseball and innovative teaching methods in
ofManufacturers and the Manufacturing Institute, 2005) 2. These gaps indicate U.S.engineering technology graduates have a poor understanding of manufacturing processesand principles. One of the strategies used to accomplish this goal is to embed design intothe computer graphics course sequence.According to the Merriam Webster’s Online Dictionary the definition of the termembedded is to make something an integral part of the topic, which is the objective in allthree of the courses in the computer graphics sequence. The theoretical basis for usingthe embedded approach in these courses is illustrated in an article by Sutton, (2004) 5, atPurdue University involving problem-solving research outside of technology education tohelp examine the relationship
-authored over 60 research papers. He is honored with Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 and Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 from the Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech.Bryan Levy, Georgia Institute of Technology Bryan Levy is a graduate student at Georgia Institute of Technology. He obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Georgia Tech and is currently obtaining a Master’s degree from the same institute. His research primarily focuses in the impact of maker spaces on students and design problem equivalency as it pertains to assessing creativity.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Associate Professor in the George W. Woodruff
Paper ID #13265Tracking Student Engagement with a Touchscreen App for Spatial Visualiza-tion Training and Freehand SketchingProf. Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. His interests include robotics, biomedical devices, product design, and engineering education. He is co-founder of Coactive Drive Corporation, a company that provides force feedback solutions. Since 1999 he has taught engineering design and been the director of the Mechanical Engineering Design center at UC San Diego. In fall 2012, Dr. Delson introduced a
gathering data to support innovation in thedelivery of instruction. Efforts will also be made to gather control group data.References 1 Bairaktarova, Diana, Matthew Reyes, Nooshin Nassr, and Dan Thomas Carlton, “Identifying Motivational Factors and Lived Experiences that Enhance Spatial Skills in Novices and Experts in STEM Disciplines,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2015. 2 Metz, Susan Staffin, Susan Donohue, and Cherith Moore. (2012) “Spatial Skills: A Focus on Gender and Engineering” In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.), Apply Research to Practice (ARP) Resources. Retrieved January 31, 2017 from http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPResources.aspx 3 Segil, Jacob L
andexploring topics, and electronic document sharing, to name a few. The devices that can beutilized for education also are shifting. Students and instructors have access to information andinstruction not only from a desktop or laptop computer, but also digital tablets, smart phones, anddedicated readers. However, the form of delivery is not as important as the design of theinstruction. Technology does not automatically improve instruction unless the instructiondelivered through the technology is designed to be better. A number of studies havedemonstrated that the technology alone does not improve students’ learning and has nosignificant impact on student achievement. Researchers insist that these studies are asking thewrong question8. They state
licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Dawn Laux, Purdue University Dawn Laux is a Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University
Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego and the President of eGrove Education, Inc. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project- based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for di- verse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Elizabeth Rose Cowan, eGrove Education Inc. Elizabeth Cowan is a User Experience Researcher and Designer for eGrove Education, Inc., which de
Paper ID #15285Engineering Computer-Aided Drafting: A Hybrid Teaching ModelMurad Musa Mahmoud, Utah State University I am a PhD student in the Engineering Education department at Utah State University. My major advisor is Prof. Kurt Becker. I have a bachelor’s and master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. I have about five years of experience in teaching, most of which is with computer-aided drafting (CAD). My research interests include; STEM recruitment, professional development and CAD.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for
AC 2011-203: A DISTANCE LEARNING HYBRID PRODUCT LIFECY-CLE MANAGEMENT (PLM) CERTIFICATE PROGRAM IN TECHNOL-OGYNathan W. Hartman, Purdue University, Computer Graphics Technology Nathan Hartman is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University. He is also Co-Director of the Purdue University PLM Center of Excellence. His current applied research interests include the use of constraint-based CAD tools in the design process, the process and methodology for model-based definition and the model-based enterprise, geometry automation, and data interoperability and re-use. He currently teaches or has taught courses in 3D modeling, virtual
would introduce are the same that graduates of these programs would encounter on the job, on a daily basis. By exposing students to these concepts within the context of CAD instruction, they will be seeing a practical example of Lean Manufacturing at work. They will be receiving advanced preparation for the classes where they will be studying this Page 26.656.13 topic in depth, and will begin appropriating Lean Manufacturing concepts as a way of looking at the world.6.0 ConclusionBlended learning is changing the mode of instruction and learning in classrooms andlaboratories. For a subject like CAD, that is centered around the
Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Deniz Eseryel, North Carolina State University Deniz Eseryel joined North Carolina State University as a Chancellor’s Faculty Excellence Program clus- ter hire in the Digital Transformation of Education. She is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Counselor Education specializing in Digital Learning and Teaching. She is also a Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. The important but little understood question that has motivated her
received her BS from Georgia Tech in 2006, double-majoring in Psychology and Management.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluating programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evalua- tion plan designed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring
and CNC. MFGE majors also have the option to take an injection molding tooling design class offered by the department’s Plastics and Composites program as a technical elective. Figure 1 clearly demonstrates the breadth of impact of adopting a cloud- based platform on the program’s curriculum. Though faculty have the option to choose the CAx tools that best suit the learning outcomes of their courses, practicality often dictates that it is easier to work with the system that students are already familiar with from earlier CAD instruction. Adopting 3DExperience would require each of the classes illustrated to re- structure experiences using the new platform. For example, MFGE 333 and 463 utilize Model-Based Definition
, which are necessary for success in engineering design, are based on the ability to"mentally manipulate, rotate, twist, or invert pictorially presented visual stimuli."ii The creativethinking team process of brain-writing, where the primary mode of communication is freehandsketching, is a popular alternative to the verbal brainstorming technique today.iiiNothing has had more of an impact on the ability to transform visual-spatial perceptions and theevolution of graphical plans for construction of machinery and architecture than the computerand the Internet. The advent of the computer and the invention and innovation of computer-aideddesign (CAD) deeply changes how two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) graphicsare visualized and
evaluation methods [3]. By participating inthe VAST challenges, researchers are expected to gain understanding of how their system wouldbe used in dealing with real data analytic tasks. The 2013 VAST challenge presented threetypical challenges problems [4]. The mini-challenge 2 (MC2) was a design-focused problem thatasked participants to design an innovative large display to support situation awareness in a largecomputer network control center [5] . Participants of this task are expected to act not only asproblem-solvers, but also as innovative designers who can change the boring work environmentin the network control room. In the summer of 2013, we led an interdisciplinary team oftechnology and design graduate students in the Purdue University to
somethingas specific and mundane as a CAD software platform at the center of that collaboration resultedin a tremendous amount and array of specific challenges and insights derived directly fromdisciplinary assumptions about how and where design and innovation occurred.Extending from the issue of interdisciplinary collaboration is the particular tension between so-called “hard” and “soft” approaches to instruction and instructional analysis and their respectivepreferences for quantitative and qualitative research. While Nieusma and Malazita identify asqualitative researchers (despite our distinct “technical” backgrounds), and Ukleja, Krauss, andAndrews have fundamental training on both sides, we recognize that most CAD instructors doingengineering