achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices.” Vol. 94 Issue 5, p855-887. 33p. 13 Charts.19 Kolok, Alan. S. (2011). BioScience. Aug2011, Vol. 61 Issue 8, p626-630. 5p. “Empowering Citizen Scientists: The Strength of Many in Monitoring Biologically Active Environmental Contaminants.”20 Peckenham, J., T. Thornton, and P. Peckenham (2012) Validation of Student Generated Data for Assessment of Groundwater Quality, Jour. Sci. Educ. and Tech., 21:287-294.21 Thornton, T. and J. Leahy. 2012. Changes in social capital and networks: A study of community- based environmental management through a school-centered research program. Jour. Sci. Educ. and
; has produced award winning curriculum design and reform for secondary and post-secondary Career and Technical Education programs; and provides a variety of professional development for SETM and technology secondary and post-secondary educators focused on advanced technologies. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the University of South Florida, where her research focused on mem- brane separation science and technologies for water purification. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curricula for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school, and post secondary
in STEM” (3) there is a growing number ofsummer research programs designed to introduce students to STEM early in their academicjourney. Programs for secondary students vary from course based experiences to independentstudy similar to what is available to a college student. These early college experiences providestudents the opportunity to develop skills essential to future college and career success. The YSPprogram provides participants with a free, challenging research experience complemented andsupported by additional program elements generally not introduced until the first year of college.Guided by exemplary practices (4) to increase student retention, these complementary experiencesfall into one of the following categories:Academic
well as opportunity to engage in ongoing discussionwith other participants, impact teacher retention and satisfaction with training.6 Effective PDsupports transfer of training by immersing participants in content knowledge, allows modelingand practice of desired skills, promotes collective participation through collaboration, and lastsfor sufficient duration to handle the cognitive demands of new learning.6—13Informed by the aforementioned research-based practices of effective PD, the PD sessionsdescribed in this paper were designed within the context of situated learning14 wherein acollaborative group of researchers and educators was centered on learning situations such asbuilding a robot with specific learning standards in mind, using the
structure to allow each plan to be used in anyprofessional development participant’s classroom. Having this specific template presentedthe engineering concepts throughout the plan but specifically described the engineeringcontent in the casual explanation and rationale to give the teachers a brief explanation ofthe details. The use of this outline tied the engineering content to education practices tocreate the highest amount of internalization for students in a format that was easy to accessand understand. The poster session followed the initial portion of the workshop to expose teachers tosome of the undergraduate and graduate level research that was currently being done atManhattan College. These students were invited to come and present
the Wearable Device Challenge in local middle and high schools. I am currently a part time employee of the ASSIST Center working as an educational outreach liaison to continue the work with the Wearable Device Challenge. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching Engineering Design Through Wearable Device Design Competition (Evaluation)IntroductionThe Wearable Device Challenge (WDC) was developed at the Nanosystems EngineeringResearch Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies(ASSIST). The Challenge is rooted in the research and innovation ecosystem of the Center andits vision: to have a transformational impact on the
Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He
Paper ID #17882Ascertaining the Impact of P:12 Engineering Education Initiatives: StudentImpact through Teacher ImpactDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver
research and gender and culture in science education. Her research interests include girls’ participation in science and engineering; teacher’s engagement in action research; and science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning.James D. Lehman, Purdue University Dr. James D. Lehman is a Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and the Director of the Discovery Learning Research Center at Purdue University. He is member of the leadership teams of two current NSF-funded projects, Science Learning through Engineer- ing Design (SLED) and Professional Development for Computer Science (PD4CS). He holds a B.S. and M.S. in biology and
articles, and 126 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 17 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 100 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 60 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,500 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using an AR Drone Lab in a Secondary Education Classroom to Promote Quantitative Research1. IntroductionIn recent years, science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM
Paper ID #15755Results from a Pilot Implementation of a Biomedical Engineering Programfor Middle and High School Students (Evaluation)Dr. Amy Trauth-Nare, University of Delaware Amy Trauth-Nare, Ph.D., is the Associate Director of Science Education at the University of Delaware’s Professional Development Center for Educators. In her role, Amy works collaboratively with K-12 sci- ence and engineering teachers to develop and implement standards-based curricula and assessments. She also provides mentoring and coaching and co-teaching support to K-12 teachers across the entire tra- jectory of the profession. Her research focuses
the contrary, Charette (2013) suggested that there are more STEM workers than suitable jobsand many STEM graduates work for non-STEM related jobs. Whether one thinks there is a STEMshortage or surplus, an important factor that hinders any STEM graduate from securing a STEMjob is their inadequate level of academic preparation for college. This preparation begins in gradesK-12.STEM integration in K-12 has been on the rise since the idea was introduced almost a decade ago(Nathan & Pearson, 2014). Zuger (2015) noted the most commonly reported challenges that theK-12 schools are facing to implement STEM programs are funding (48.4%), inadequate K-8education (46.5%), insufficient teacher PD (46.4%), unclear best practices for STEM education(35.3
at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design thinking, making and design innovation project courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and mak- ing processes to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stan- ford University. Dr. Lande is the PI on the NSF-funded projectShould Makers Be the Engineers of the Future? He is a co
design efforts.” Educational Researcher 32(1): 32-34.12. Blumenfeld, P.C., 1991. “Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning.” Educational Psychologist 26(3/4): 368-398.13. Jayarao, A. 2014. “Engaging young minds to be tomorrow’s innovators.” In Einstein Fellows: Best Practices in STEM Education. T. Spuck and L. Jenkins (Eds.), New York, NY: Peter Lang: 158-181.14. Larmer, J. and Mergendoller, J.R. 2010. “Seven essentials for project-based learning.” Educational Leadership 68(1): 34-37.15. Spuck, T. 2014. “Putting the ‘authenticity’ into science learning.” In Einstein Fellows: Best Practices in STEM Education. T. Spuck and L. Jenkins (eds.), New York, NY: Peter Lang, 118-157.16
is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Dis-tinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior FacultyFellow of NYU Tandon’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have in-cluded 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 126 conferencepapers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 17 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research studentsand 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 100 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 60 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of
, rehabilitation engineering, prosthetic limb design, and STEM education.Dr. Audra N. Morse P.E., Texas Tech University Dr. Audra Morse, P.E., is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the Whitacre College of Engi- neering and a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Texas Tech Univer- sity. She leads the Engineering Opportunities Center which provides retention, placement and academic support services to WCOE students. Her professional experience is focused on water and wastewater treatment, specifically water reclamation systems, membrane filtration and the fate of personal products in treatment systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
program. Other questions not discussed: Please fill in the circle that best describes yourresponse:B I know what a 3D printer is. I know how a 3D printer operates. I understand how to usesoftware to create a 3D design. I understand how to use software to create an app. I know how to worksuccessfully in a team or group. Technology is useful for solving practical problems in life.3) Interest in STEM subjects: Please rate your interest in taking classes in the following subjects inthe future: C Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, Design. Responses were collapsed to High(very), Medium (moderate/some) and Low (little/not). Interest increased in STEM subjects,particularly in science and engineering (Figure 2), but not mathematics. The increased
and high school until they graduate. The paperincludes a summary of the activities from the first program along with best practices and lessonslearned that are supported by qualitative data from a teacher focus group and studentrespondents. Additionally, the paper also provides a description of the second program includingprogram development and plans for more formal assessment. (Note: The engineering outreachprograms are part of the GEAR UP grants. The GEAR UP grants are referred to as “grants” andthe engineering outreach programs are referred to as “programs” throughout the paper.)About GEAR UP Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) is acompetitive grant program of the United States Department of
3-5-ETS1-1 Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time or cost. 3-5-ETS1-2 Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3 Plan and carry out fair tests in which the variables are controlled and failureAdditional description and resources related to this K’Nex™ structure design activity can befound in the educational resources in NEESacademy on the NEES website[12], PacificEarthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) website[9] and in a paper[7].During the
biosensorrequire the cooperation of professors and graduate students in biology, chemistry, computerscience, electrical and computer engineering, and mathematics.To mirror the practice of this interdisciplinary research students participating in this study werechallenged to design and test “sensing” related problems of their choice. For example, teams made up of math, anatomy/physiology, and engineering and technology students designed bicycle helmets fitted with sensors to test impact absorption and collect data related to helmet materials and design
-writing, hiring and supervising staff and student workers as well as coordinating program eval- uation.Dr. Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is an Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vice-Dean of the Graduate College, and Director of the Center for the Advancement of STEM Teaching and Learning Excellence (CASTLE). He is the recipient of a NASA New Investigator Award, the Drexel Graduate Student Associ- ation Outstanding Mentor Award, the Drexel University ECE Outstanding Research Achievement Award and the International Liquid Crystal Society Multimedia Prize. In 2003, he received a NASA/ASEE Sum- mer Faculty Fellowship to research NEMS/MEMS adaptive optics in the Microdevices
their experience.Summary and “Next STEPS”The reconstruction of the STEPS program was essential to recruit underrepresented students. Thenew format was well received and shows great promise. Key lessons learned in delivering thenew curriculum and key lessons learned in extending the population participating in the informalengineering outreach program will be incorporated in successive offerings of the program. Therevamped 2015 STEPS offering follows a 2014 STEPS offering in which the content anddelivery of STEPS was significantly updated to reflect current pre-college science andengineering education research. Specifically, engineering design, engineering practices,engineering habits of mind, and best practices for engineering career exploration
Movie and Recreation Presentation 8:00 PM Game Night Center Practice 8:30 PM Throughout the week, participants attended classes taught by faculty and graduate studentsfrom the six engineering disciplines involved in this program. While the goal was partially toprovide students with a realistic college classroom experience, the classes were intended to behighly active and generally consisted of a short introductory discussion of the concepts involved,followed by an activity allowing students to explore the concepts more deeply or encouragingthem to solve a small, open-ended design
Paper ID #16327Student Self-Perceptions of Design and Creative Thinking (Fundamental)Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute. His previous middle school teaching experience informs his role as a graduate teaching assistant for TECH 120, an introductory course in design thinking. He recently completed his Master of Science in Technol- ogy Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University with a thesis investigating middle school engi- neering self-efficacy beliefs. His research interests are engineering self
) learning in community centers in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior Research Scientists program funded by After School Matters of the city of Chicago, to promote STEM for high school students and 3) a collaboration with the Center for College Access and Success – Northeastern University to promote STEM learning in their Upward Bound Math & Science program, also oriented for high school students. More information regarding the mentioned programs can be find at www.scientistsfortomorrow.org c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Scientists for Tomorrow: The evaluation and lessons learned from a self-sustained initiative to promote STEAM in out-of-school-time frameworks in
particular), and efforts in K-12 education can have a positive impact on increasing female interest and persistence in STEM at all grade levels. Fostering Teamwork o Best Practices: Identifying and employing research informed educational models developed to increase achievement for all students o Classroom Quality: The teacher ensures an effective educational environment by gauging quality indicators o Enhancing Classroom Creativity: Managing inclusive learning environments to enhance classroom creativity by inquiry activities that support unique and independent thought, problem solving, and critical thinking o Implementing
: Identifying and supporting family learning in informal settings (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).18. Bennett, D., & Monahan, P. (2013). NYSCI Design Lab: No Bored Kids!. Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators, 34.19. J. P. Gutwill, N. Hido, and L. Sindorf, “Research to Practice: Observing Learning in Tinkering Activities,” Curator Mus. J., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 151–168, 2015.20. Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning Through STEM‐Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98-120.21. Jordan, S., & Lande, M. (2014, October). Might young makers be the engineers
students’ experiences, gauge their expectations for theprogram, document what students learned within the program, and monitor the impact of theinternship experience on their careers. While only a subset of students reported that theydefinitely wanted to teach and were looking into graduate programs in education, other internsstated that they would consider teaching at some point within their careers.IntroductionSince the 1980s, educational researchers have warned of the shortage of highly qualified scienceand math teachers.1 Currently, the demand for qualified science and mathematics teachersoutpaces the supply, especially in high-need schools.2 The response to this warning has beentwo-fold: to enact strategies to retain teachers3 and to recruit
Paper ID #14678The Efficacy of Project Lead the Way: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Justin L. Hess received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education along with his Master’s of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the STEM Education Research Institute at IUPUI. Justin’s research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to improve STEM students’ ethical reasoning skills; exploring the role of empathy within design, innovation and
Paper ID #17784Work in Progress: Afterschool STEM/Literacy Program—A Description ofthe ProcessDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical