Student Identity: A Balancing Act between RolesAbstractGraduate students balance the roles of teacher, researcher, and lifelong learner at a point in theircareers when they are transitioning into professional identities. We examine the roles of studentsin engineering, education, and engineering education through a quantitative survey to betterunderstand their unique experiences.IntroductionGraduate students are often required to balance a variety of roles while completing theireducation and preparing for their careers. This transitional process is a critical part ofconstructing their professional identities. However, it is not clear how well students are able tobalance multiple roles or how well graduate programs support multiple role
problems and designing solutions)[1], [2]. However, engineering is different in manyways when compared to science, and those differences in the disciplinary practices should berecognized and emphasized [3]. A review of the literature identified sixteen practices ofengineers that were both unique to engineering and relevant to K-12 teaching [4]. Of particularinterest to our group has been persisting and improving from failure [5], assessing implication ofsolutions, and building and using models [6]. Recently, we have become particularly interestedin the ways groups of students and teachers approach balancing tradeoffs between criteria andconstraints in multi-objective problems [33].Few teachers have experience learning engineering [7], and even
from U.S. universities: 2018.,” National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Alexandria, VA, 2019. Accessed: Jun. 23, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf20301/.[21] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. United States of America: Westview Press, 1997.[22] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, 2007.[23] R. L. Kajfez and L. D. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” presented at the 2014 American Society of Engineering Education Annual
students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 253-264. DOI: 10.1080/1470329090306886214. Kajfez, R. L. and McNair, L. D. 2014. Graduate Student Identity: A Balancing Act Between Roles. In Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education. 16 pp. Indianapolis, IN. June 15-18. https://peer.asee.org/2054215. Sowell, R. 2008. Ph.D. Completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline demographic data. The NSF Workshop: A fresh look at Ph.D. education. http://www.phdcompletion.org/resources/CGSNSF2008_Sowell.pdf16. Stallone, M. 2004. Factors associated with student attrition and retention in an educational leadership doctoral program. Journal of College Teaching and
. Copeland, R. Hopson, T. Simmons, and M. J. Leibowitz, “The role of professional identity in graduate school success for under‐represented minority students,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 70–75, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1002/bmb.20673.[4] A. Wierzbicka, “A case study of emotion in culture: German Angst,” 1999, pp. 123–167. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511521256.003.[5] E. H. Erikson, Identity, youth, and crisis, [1st ed.]. New York: New York : W. W. Norton, 1968. [Online]. Available: https://unlv-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/ovttgp/01UNLV_ALMA21171117 830004081[6] M. P. Orbe, “Theorizing multidimensional identity negotiation: Reflections on the lived experiences of first-generation college students,” New
interdisciplinary understanding to balance the triadic tension I felt between myidentities as an engineer, researcher, and educator.Stevens, O’Connor, Garrison, Jocuns, and Amos3 describe identity as “a double-sided process ofpositioning ourselves and being positioned by others” (p. 357). My sense of identity refers to theway I see myself and the way others see me, in the engineering education context. Applying aninterdisciplinary understanding to position myself both within engineering and education, Iidentify myself as an educational engineer4,5,6: designing products, processes and systems tooptimize student learning. Finding my sense of identity as an educational engineer has led me tonew growth and understanding in my engineering education research and
guidelines toassist faculty members during the process of institutional transformation from a teaching-basedto a research-based university.IntroductionRegardless of whether it is primarily teaching-oriented or research-oriented, a university needsdedicated teachers, productive researchers, and effective administrators1. In engineering collegesin particular, where research productivity often outweighs teaching effectiveness, facultymembers might struggle to maintain balance among a multiplicity of roles and responsibilities.Lacking the skills to effectively balance teaching, research, and service workloads, with limitedpedagogical training at the graduate and/or post-doctoral level, novice faculty often adopt trialand error techniques2. Although
climate change effects their motivations and agency to solve complex global problems for a sustainability in their career.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering
Identities among engineering students and through their transition to work: a longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 39-52.Kajifez, R. L., & McNair, L. D. (2014) Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles. Proceedings from the 121st American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Paper#8549.Maton, K. I., Watkins-Lewis, K. M., Beason, T., & Hrabowski III, F. A. (2015). Enhancing the Number of African Americans Pursuing the PhD in Engineering. Changing the Face of Engineering: The African American Experience, 354.Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. (2010) Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative longitudinal
graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Diana Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. Additionally, her scholarship includes topics such as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College
students meaningful opportunities to analyze andexplore complex global challenges, collaborate respectfully with diverse others, apply learning totake responsible action in contemporary global contexts, and evaluate the goals, methods, andconsequences of that action. Global learning enhance students’ sense of identity, community,ethics, and perspective-taking. Global learning is based on the principle that the world is acollection of interdependent yet inequitable systems and that engineering education has a vitalrole in expanding knowledge of human and natural systems, privilege and stratification, andsustainability and smart development to foster individuals’ ability to advance technologyapplication, equity and justice at home and abroad.ENTC
post-secondary level. Page 26.824.5Crede, Borrego, and McNair20 suggested graduate engineers anticipating a career in academiajoin a CoP with engineering faculty in order to learn how to balance teaching, research, and life.In this study graduate engineers research with faculty and teach with secondary science teachers. Philosophical Orientation Pragmatism positions itself, appropriately, between Teachers post-positivism and interpretivism along the Mentorship
. The Integrative GraduateEducation Research and Traineeship on Magnetic and Nanostructured Materials (IGERT-MNM)is a collaboration between Purdue University, Cornell University, and Norfolk State Universityto train interdisciplinary science and engineering doctoral students for future roles as leaders inthe materials science and engineering fields. As part of this socialization into future careers,students proceed through a variety of modules. This paper specifically covers student learning ina pedagogy module, which introduces students to best practices in teaching and learning.Graduate student reflections on the development of high-school level student and teacher scienceand engineering activities were analyzed via thematic coding methods in
at least I had now set myself up in a position to continue what I came into graduate schoolwanting to do: gain deep knowledge about two-dimensional semiconductor electronics whilesimultaneously working toward social justice in engineering education research. Looking back as a PhD student halfway through their second year now, it took almost 1.5years of graduate school and countless meetings with my advisors for me to be in a positionwhere I felt secure enough in balancing my two disciplines to genuinely feel like I had a solidlaunchpad for my career interests. Much of this time was spent negotiating between my advisors,particularly my engineering advisor - they represented not only gatekeepers to the academicinstitution but also the
Paper ID #14631On Becoming an Engineer: The Essential Role of Lifelong Learning Compe-tenciesJillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Jillian Seniuk Cicek is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education in the Department of Biosystems Engi- neering at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. She is a research assistant for the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education in the Faculty of Engineering. Her research areas include outcomes-based teaching and assessment methods and tools, student-cantered instruction (SCI), the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) graduate
identity perceived their futures similarly [25].Identity-Based Motivation 1. Salient Identities as Predictors of Perceived Task Difficulty. This research paper examines the relationship between identity salience and task difficulty. Prior work found that students leverage researcher, scientist, and engineer identities when completing research tasks: this paper uses linear regression to test the salience (likelihood that identity will be leveraged in a given situation) of these identities as a predictor of task difficulty. Researcher identity salience was the strongest predictor of task difficulty, a relationship moderated by degree type (Master’s or Doctoral) [36].Graduate Student Experiences 1. Improving
. During theirparticipation in the mentoring program, undergraduates are assessed via pre- and post- surveys togauge several dimensions of their engineering identity and confidence. Additionally,undergraduates respond to biweekly reflective questions to give researchers a qualitative flavorof their experiences in the mentoring program. Graduate mentors similarly respond to severalreflective questions about their experiences during their participation in the program andcomplete pre- and post- assessments.This paper presents the qualitative data collected from graduate student mentors during the firsttwo years of program implementation. Graduate student responses have been examined in thecontext of each individual mentoring partnership to understand
scholars because of conflictingacademic structures. As a result, we pose the following research questions: 1. How do individual, microsystem, and mesosystem-level influences in a students’ academic environment affect graduate students’ abilities to develop a strong sense of interdisciplinary scholar identity, critical to self-efficacy and professional development, as they become professors in interdisciplinary spaces? 2. What are graduate students’ perceptions of the interrelationship between various layers of their academic environment (i.e., academic backgrounds and previous learning, microsystems, and mesosystems) and their interdisciplinary scholar professional identity development?Theoretical
Undergraduate Programs since 2011. Her research focuses on the intersection of science and engineering identity in post-secondary and graduate level programs.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and
Piloting a Balanced Curriculum in Electrical Engineering— Introduction to Robotics Gregory L. Plett and Michael D. Ciletti Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Colorado at Colorado SpringsAbstractRecent papers have reported that engineering students perceive and assimilate academic contentin different ways. A variety of theories have been developed to try to understand this phenome-non better so that instructional methods may be developed to reach all students. One well-knowninstrument used to assess learning styles is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) [Myers80],which can be used to classify
were satisfied with the presentations. The parts of the lesson they identifiedas worth repeating were the hands-on projects. Frequent mention was made of the effectivenessof the PowerPoint presentations that were a part of each lesson. The EAs identified areas in needof improvement including PowerPoints with fewer words and more graphics, speaking slowerand providing more background information on the concept, giving students more time forengaging and explaining the project, communicating more effectively with the students duringthe hands-on part of the lesson, providing and maintaining a balance between learning theconcept and having fun with the concept, and practicing the lessons before the visits to theschools.This reflective piece became
visibility spectrum, Black engineers have alsodescribed feelings of hypervisibility in which they are the center of attention, flagged orhighlighted in ways that make them stand out from the majority group. McGee et al. [15] presentan example where Black students' achievements are questioned despite being earned from theirown merits. Black engineers in leadership positions face additional trials in these scenarios ofvisibility, such as garnering respect, representing their entire race, and extra labor withoutconsideration or compensation for their roles and duties [16], [17]. Language is often used as a tool for shaping identity in STEM fields [18]. For Blackpeople, the use of language is also used as an identity-shaping device that connects
entrepreneurial mindset. Her previous research experience includes examination of implicit bias in the classroom and application of VR technologies to improve student engagement. Darby hopes to pursue a career in STEM education and educational research.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Experiential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Relationship between Transfer Students’ Social Networks and their Experience of
second case, an abuse deterrentformulation was developed to reduce the likelihood of patients crushing a tabletformulation for snorting or injecting [33]. This example was further empathized withpublic data on disparities regarding prescription pain relief overdose deaths between menand women [34]. The focus for the third case was on women and birthing people fromBlack and Latinx communities. People from Black and Latinx communities facedisparities in unplanned pregnancies compared to White and Asian counterparts despitethe availability and implementation of long-acting contraceptives [35]. After the newcontent was introduced, students were then surveyed after the HD and SDOH module andevaluated for awareness, interest, relevance, familiarity
decisions. Our results also show that despite a perceived lack of autonomy, some GTAscontinue to act autonomously when faced with decision-making in the classroom. These resultscan help inform faculty as they seek to support GTAs in the GTAs‟ teaching responsibilities.IntroductionFor many years, graduate students have served as laboratory assistants and graders forundergraduate engineering courses. Due to recent efforts to increase hands-on activities inengineering education, many institutions are now also employing graduate teaching assistants(GTAs) as course instructors and lecturers 1-3. While researchers have studied GTAs in thehumanities and physical sciences, little is known about GTA experiences in engineering. Thepurpose of this study is to
AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
at Virginia Tech. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.5 Nicklow, J. W., Marikunte, S. S., & Chevalier, L. R. (2007). Balancing pedagogical and professional practice skills in the training of graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(2), 89-94.6 Kajfez, R. L. & McNair, L. D. (2014). Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles. Paper presented at the 121th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.7 Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication
, Title VII, Title VI, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Catlin holds an M.Ed. and a JD from the University of Cincinnati. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Take this Job and Love It: Identity Conscious Self-Reflection as a Tool to Support Individualized Career Exploration for Graduating Biomedical Engineering Students IntroductionBiomedical Engineering (BME) programs train students to design and develop devices andsystems which enhance health and wellbeing. Typically, the rigorous BME curriculum focuseson mastery of subject matter and related skills, and is taught through lectures, labs, and project-based learning
and ConclusionsThe results of these two studies provide strong validity evidence for the use of these items tomeasure the role identity constructs of recognition, interest, and performance/competence forearly post-secondary engineering students. I have described the systematic development of itemsfrom prior research, literature, theory, and qualitative pilot studies. This work highlights theiterative nature of instrument development and the importance of balancing a variety ofpsychometric measures in determining which items accurately measure underlying latentconstructs of identity. The pilot study allowed me to explore the structure of the data as impliedby student responses. Once the structure was determined, a larger study provided
Education, Purdue University. In his graduate work he is exploring the systems of conceptual and social challenges associated with educa- tional change for the development of undergraduate engineering education. Before joining the doctoral program he worked for nine years in a faculty development role at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi Arabia. He received his M.S. in Civil Engineering from KFUPM and also has earned an MPBL degree from Aalborg University, Denmark.Mel Chua, Purdue UniversityDr. Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University Linda Vanasupa has been a professor of materials engineering at the California Polytechnic State Univer- sity since 1991. She also serves as co